Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

Shortcuts

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Shortcut

WP:BEFOREWP:BEFORE

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
- It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
- You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
- It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
- A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
- As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2026/(name of page to be deleted)}}
Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "~~Delete~~ keep".
If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Antisemitic violence in Bielsk County, Poland (1941)

Antisemitic violence in Bielsk County, Poland (1941) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Piotrus has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-neutral original research by a user who got globally blocked for problematic edits; no interwiki. Piotrus (talk) 09:40, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Comment: yes, the respective user had some issues with often having pro-israel views. The German magazine der Spiegel had a report on these events, see their article.Yes, their article is in German and I found it after perhaps 10 minutes search. So the question really is: do we want to clean up the article, as Events seen to have happened.--Eptalon (talk) 19:32, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I'm okay with the en:WP:TNT approach here, but there is also an argument that some salvageable content might be buried within. I should note that this user has created 237 non-deleted pages here, and almost all of them are related to Israel or anti-Semitism. It might be worth taking a closer look at those too. Garsh (talk) 04:56, 18 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 09:40, 23 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Omneky

Omneky (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: See en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omneky (2nd nomination). Not notable. Barras talk 18:44, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:44, 22 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Sushi Hero Toro

Sushi Hero Toro (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG. Barras talk 14:50, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:50, 22 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shaxxy

Shaxxy (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability isn't established through reliable sources. The sources here suffer from en:WP:NEWSORGNIGERIA concerns. The articles use so much promotional and potentially AI generated language. At least five articles use the word "wave" to describe her being part of the "new wave of young creators."

There is no claim to notability here; simply having a lot of followers and views is not a claim. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:48, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:48, 22 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pawan Patodia

Pawan Patodia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources are promotional, person seems otherwise non-notable Garsh (talk) 04:46, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 04:46, 22 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Harshada Pathare

Harshada Pathare (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable person. Fails the GNG and has already been deleted at AfD on enwiki Garsh (talk) 16:17, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

I DO see some sources that are not reliable (no editorial oversight) but some do appear to be reliable so I'd lean to keep unless the sources are all found to be not-reliable.

Wekeepwhatwekill 00:19, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this article, this is my first article and when we search her name on Google. We found, she is notable writer & author. Please help me to improve it. that's why I chooses simple English Wikipedia Platform. I will do more improve in future give me a month time. Factmasterforge (talk) 07:07, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:17, 21 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Seong-Bin Jung

Seong-Bin Jung (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not clearly notable; no sources provided that show notability or verify anything here. CountryANDWestern (talk) 15:18, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:18, 21 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DELETE there are absolutely no sources nor any indication that he's notable.

Wekeepwhatwekill 00:21, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

PG Works

PG Works (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of this company's notability, couldn't find any sources that fit the WP:GNG Garsh (talk) 23:33, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:33, 19 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DELETE no references to this company at all, nor any indication that it's notable. Wekeepwhatwekill 00:23, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Jeremiah Gutierrez

Jeremiah Gutierrez (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to be a non-notable person, no evidence of notability Garsh (talk) 23:32, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced your RfD with a corresponidng quick deletion infobox. KCanadianJ316 (talk) 03:59, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I saw a claim of notability, but that works too. This can be closed. Garsh (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:32, 19 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Cosmic Princess Kaguya!

Cosmic Princess Kaguya! (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Michael21107 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no references, and apart from the infobox and a short lead only contains a section with the movie's plot. The plot section is, paradoxically, c. one thousand words longer than that in the "full" English Wikipedia's article. Michael21107 (talk) 06:21, 12 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

KEEP The English version definitely has references - the references need to be here as well. This demonstrates notability.

Wekeepwhatwekill 00:25, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The references mention was more about the fact that this appears to be (maybe it isn't) an AI made summery of the plot with some basic info. The first edit, not by the author, earned, rightfully, in my opinion, the tags {{complex}}, {{copyedit}}, {{no sources}}, and {{plot}}. Michael21107 (talk) 09:51, 17 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 06:21, 19 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Enciclopedia Colchagüina

Enciclopedia Colchagüina (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable. Barras talk 19:44, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

KEEP It's being discussed in reliable news sources in it's own country which demonstrates notability. Wekeepwhatwekill 00:29, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 19:44, 18 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Firman of Mir Muhammad

Firman of Mir Muhammad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Second nomination -- Based on an English Wikipedia investigation, two of the four voters in the previous RFD were socks of one another, another of the four is a sock of someone else, and the fourth only has made one edit ever - their vote.

As such, renominating it for a fresh discussion: Notability/verifiability of this article is not well established. The phrase "Firman of Mir Muhammad" appears nowhere but Wikipedia results related to this article. The phrase "The Firmān of Mīr-i-Kura" only appears in the title of a journal article that is cited elsewhere. Overall, this appears to be another Wikipedia entry that takes events that are covered in a sentence or two and conflates them or utilizes synthesis to create a grander event. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:38, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

DELETE Yes, a Firman is a decree, but I also see no place where this event is called this anywhere. Wekeepwhatwekill 00:35, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 16:38, 18 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Trump Unyielding

Trump Unyielding (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Second nomination -- the first in 2024 closed as keep with only one "vote" from the creator of the article. Like the article that was deleted at the English Wikipedia, the article is based on questionable sources. The sources are promotional pieces with desk editors or AI generated slop. The article, as well, seems AI aided with phrases like "The book was discussed by..." and "Reports and reviews talked about..." Nothing has been shown here that demonstrates it meets our GNG or specific standards for books. CountryANDWestern (talk) 12:36, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep: I do not think the article should be deleted. The book has been written about by different news websites and newspapers, in different regions. I see some are reviews, but they still talk about the book in detail and not just in passing. The article is also short and simple enough for an encyclopedia entry. Jansedits (talk) 12:14, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Note to closing admin, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Izaaqnewton. This user has only had a Wikipedia account for two hours prior to this vote. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:19, 16 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 12:36, 18 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Education Perfect

Education Perfect (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Had a good look for sources online and none help the subject meet the WP:GNG, and the article's sources are primary. This subject is not notable. Garsh (talk) 05:21, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:21, 18 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Andrea Holmes Thompkins

Andrea Holmes Thompkins (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources do not support notability Garsh (talk) 05:20, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 05:20, 18 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Harry Weinberger

Harry Weinberger (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of notability for this person Garsh (talk) 03:07, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

I found another person with this name on the English Wikipedia who is in fact an artist should we convert this article on this figure skater into an article on that artist --Amapenguin (talk) 03:54, 8 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not notable. -Barras talk 15:30, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 03:07, 15 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Yang Cuixi

Yang Cuixi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not clear that this individual is notable based on the sources. The sources provided (several of which are repeats of another source such as the 6th and 7th source), seem unreliable or speculative in nature. They seem to be based on "rumor" rather than fact. CountryANDWestern (talk) 10:13, 4 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I'm truly sorry. Yang Cuixi was a real historical figure, a female artist from the late Qing Dynasty and the Republic of China period. The content was not AI-generated; a complete translation from Chinese to English would be awkward, so the sentences may not be entirely coherent. Because I'm not very good at adding references, there are some duplicates. I apologize, and I hope this entry will not be deleted. Icefire12345 (talk) 11:23, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:13, 11 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Harold Schweizer

Harold Schweizer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established through reliable and independent sources. All of the sources here seem to be things he’s published or his profiles at his institutions and such. CountryANDWestern (talk) 22:29, 1 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there!

Thank you for adding this discussion.

I am currently working on improving the article by adding new sources to establish the subjects notability. Please allow me time to find the sources to improve the article. I do agree with your comment that the main sources I added were primary but they were only to improve the topic.

However, I do welcome any further suggestions that may help the article further. ~~~~ PublicRecordWriter (talk) 20:17, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 22:29, 8 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2016 Assyrian protest

2016 Assyrian protest (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Barras has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Same as en:2016 Assyrian protest. Has been deleted there. Looks pretty much like the same here. Barras talk 14:56, 30 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Thank you for the nomination.

I understand that the article was deleted on English Wikipedia. However, I would like to ask whether the topic could still be improved here by adding stronger reliable sources and clearer neutral wording.

If the standalone article is not appropriate I would also be open to merging the content into a broader article for example, about Assyrian protests or minority protests rather than losing the information entirely

I am willing to improve sourcing and structure if given the opportunity

Thank you for your consideration. Masare012 (talk) 16:12, 30 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:56, 7 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rachel Morford

Rachel Morford (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability not established through independent sources. The provided sources include her alumni newsletter, the organization she is president of, and the newsletter for the company she worked for. Can't find anything independent that gives notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:31, 29 April 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep -- Understanding completely Wikipedia's media-coverage-based definition of notability, from being a member of Women in Red for the past six years, as well as part of a weekly edit-a-thon that spends a lot of time building our understanding of coverage of different topics and individuals, this is the type of topic/individual that would more likely have coverage that was acceptable if not for the overall lower interest in publishing stories about women. Particularly given her involvement in SWE, and the rank she has achieved there (indicating, I would argue, that the 50,000+ members around the world appreciate her impact on that organization and through her career (Source: Society of Women Engineers, "FY25 Membership Statistics.")), I believe she would and should qualify as notable if it were not for societal norms about who to value. SWE exists specifically because of the lack of interest in female engineers. It is something of a catch 22. ~2026-26800-88 (talk) 14:07, 2 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really know if "there SHOULD be coverage of her" is a good reason to keep an article. I certainly understand the bias and such and the concerns with coverage of women in STEM, but we still have our overarching policies and guidelines regarding sourcing and notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:52, 4 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 14:31, 6 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. Ternera (talk) 14:13, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Republican voter

Republican voter (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nothing more than a dictionary definition of little use. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:39, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

As is, this is a dicef. I see little room for an encyclopedic article. So,this is a delete -Eptalon (talk) 10:42, 11 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This request is due to close on 13:39, 12 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:12, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Resham Jhapi

Resham Jhapi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to fail verifiability and WP:GNG. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:41, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:41, 12 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:12, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Rhapsody in Blue (short movie)

Rhapsody in Blue (short movie) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nothing apparently notable about this short film / segment of the Fantasia 2000 movie. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:49, 5 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 13:49, 12 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE Ternera (talk) 14:12, 15 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

2026 White House security incident

2026 White House security incident (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

CountryANDWestern has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Similar reasons to those spelled out at the currently open en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2026 White House security incident: This is a WP:NOTNEWS situation. Brief event with no evidence of lasting notability. CountryANDWestern (talk) 18:21, 7 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:21, 14 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. WP:SOFTDELETE CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Joe Delaney (bagpiper)

Joe Delaney (bagpiper) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable person. Being a former member of Dropkick Murpheys is probably a claim of notability (no A4), but this person nevertheless is not notable. I could find no sources that pass the WP:GNG. Garsh (talk) 01:59, 6 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 01:59, 13 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to Delete. G2 - copy and paste of T. V. R. Shenoy which was then "hijacked." CountryANDWestern (talk) 17:08, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ShinoyRajendraprssad

ShinoyRajendraprssad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request · open RfD subpage

Garsh2 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable person, fails the WP:GNG Garsh (talk) 16:23, 14 May 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:23, 21 May 2026 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.