Adding 'clone to satisfy the borrow checker' anti-pattern#110
Conversation
64b6a2e to
68f1793
Compare
|
That said, I have seen quite a few blog posts discussing "it is okay to write inefficient code". Those posts even mentioned that |
I think it's fine to consider it an anti-pattern, as it's not trying to state that |
|
What I personally still miss here is the influence on performance of |
|
My two cents - along the lines of what @pickfire mentioned: we should be very wary of demonizing |
Do you have any recommendations? |
c32561b to
eaa9e0a
Compare
Co-authored-by: Marco Ieni <11428655+MarcoIeni@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Marco Ieni <11428655+MarcoIeni@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Hello ! |
|
@pickfire @marcoieni Worked in your proposals, want to read over it again? ;) |
|
That's great, thanks! |

Due to inactivity of the author and maintainers not being able to edit the PR I'll move #23 to a new branch in this repository.
Future fixes to the PR will be made on this branch.