This archive was compiled in conjunction with John Guillory’s book On Close Reading, in which my print bibliography documents some key moments in the still-unfolding history of close reading—from its tentative origins to the recent flood of scholarship on the subject.

In aggregate, this archive corroborates that the phrase “close reading” has remained in contentious circulation for nearly a century. Constructed on the principle of quotation rather than narration, the archive recovers a tacit discourse that is happening in, below, and through all sorts of other arguments.

As you explore the archive, you might find yourself surprised by the sheer volume of writing on this topic, which has steadily increased since the 1970s, apparently unaffected by shifting disciplinary tides. Patterns begin to emerge: early comments about close reading tend to stem from outside the university, while contemporary scholars increasingly attempt to establish the genealogy of the practice.

Searching permits you to gather your own harvest—whether of one critic’s discussions of “close reading,” an anthology of poems, or even a painting. Perhaps those who survey the archive will assemble their own alternative accounts—so much the better. As Edward Said held: “single phrases” can “contain a whole library of meanings.”

Scott Newstok