User talk:Bermensterflora

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia americana (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ChrysGalley was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

I think we will need a bit more than just one source. Also have a look at W:REFB to see how to cite a source better, but that's not the reason for the decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schwenckia americana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ChrysGalley (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Bermensterflora! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ChrysGalley (talk) 09:20, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia alvaroana has been accepted

Schwenckia alvaroana, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 03:57, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Early McIntosh (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by QEnigma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Require WP:RS and WP:IS sources for verifiability. Please refer to WP:YFA and WP:BETTER for guidance on drafting an article and to WP:REFB for instructions on formatting references correctly.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Early McIntosh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QEnigma 论 08:19, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Early McIntosh (March 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:REFBEG. Largely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Early McIntosh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 11:28, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Schwenckia Americana has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Schwenckia Americana. Thanks! Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 05:47, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia Americana (March 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Schwenckia americana instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schwenckia Americana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:35, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Was this a bug or it was rejected and it was accepted at the same time.Is everything correct? Bermensterflora (talk) 10:09, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

In Wikipedia, article titles are case-sensitive. In other words, Schwenckia Americana and Schwenckia americana are different. Schwenckia americana (with the species lower-case) is the correct usage. Plants of the World Online at https://powo.science.kew.org/ is a good source of information about individual plant species and can be cited as a reference. ~2026-14528-60 (talk) 13:15, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

in the editing history shows my account created the official article Bermensterflora (talk) 19:11, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Bermensterflora! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Article development
• Help desk

If you have questions, ; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Cicada1010 (talk) 18:09, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

Thank you so much maybe tomorrow i will make like 4 articles Bermensterflora (talk) 19:10, 7 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Schwenckia curviflora has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Schwenckia curviflora. Thanks! Valorrr ^{(lets chat)} 04:22, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia curviflora has been accepted

Schwenckia curviflora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

QEnigma 论 07:46, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia glabrata (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Thilio were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

also please See WP:bare URLs.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schwenckia glabrata and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 14:45, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

hi can you please say what is wrong like what things should i remake. thank you Bermensterflora (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia filiformis (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilio was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schwenckia filiformis and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 14:52, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

hi what things should i remake. please say what should i remake Bermensterflora (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia elegans (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilio was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schwenckia elegans and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 15:26, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

so what is the problem in this article Bermensterflora (talk) 15:42, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@Bermensterflora can you please see WP:REFBEG?. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 15:53, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

so you want to add the refrence from the senteces i took from? Bermensterflora (talk) 15:58, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

I don't understand what you are saying but I want you to compare Schwenckia curviflora and Draft:Schwenckia elegans and tell me what you notice in their sentences (Citations). CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 16:12, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

so i remade something but there is this bug whre when i delet that random taxobox at the refrence with some wierd refrences and upload it it is still there Bermensterflora (talk) 17:15, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@Bermensterflora, please keep the "submission declined" tag at the top of the draft. This helps reviwers see what issues it has had before, and what they need to check for.~2026-14601-69 (talk) 17:44, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

yeah sorry i was trying to edit to make everything good so the article be accepted so people find something interesting. i want to say a wish. if this is declined can one of you maybe remake it and make it better because something happened in the process of making these articles Bermensterflora (talk) 17:48, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

@Bermensterflora I have fixed the errors for you Here. Please read Referencing for beginners I strongly recommend it as it will help you learn how to citing sources. Also please read A primer for newcomers. If you have any questions please don't hesitate to ping me or leave message on my Talk Page. cheers. CONFUSED SPIRIT(Thilio).Talk 18:04, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

thank you so much Bermensterflora (talk) 18:17, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

hi so i want to make another article about this plant but different species. but the problem all of the source is in a photo. and i translated it and if i cite should i just site every sentence with that photo or... Bermensterflora (talk) 06:32, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

also by rejecting these articles even tho it has info and refrences. is it because of WP:REFBEG or something else. i just new to wikipedia articles came to make articles about plants fruits etc that people dont want to Bermensterflora (talk) 17:51, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia elegans has been accepted

Schwenckia elegans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 01:48, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia angustifolia has been accepted

Schwenckia angustifolia, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 02:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia glabrata has been accepted

Schwenckia glabrata, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 09:12, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia filiformis has been accepted

Schwenckia filiformis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dan arndt (talk) 09:31, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

hi is Schwenckia grandiflora actually a real article? so when i clikced when it was red it didnt say to make a draft it just put me at the editing and it didnt show the refrence so i had to make my refrence. is there a problem or i just have something going on? Bermensterflora (talk) 10:26, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia grandiflora

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia grandiflora, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:35, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Schwenckia grandiflora moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Schwenckia grandiflora, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

i mean there are only 2 parts where i could put citation where it is wich is by powo and who discovered and published it is in every article Bermensterflora (talk) 10:50, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

but how to do the taxobox like in nearly all my articles. someone just comes and edits and puts it there Bermensterflora (talk) 10:58, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

what about schwenckia breviseta? Bermensterflora (talk) 15:17, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

i made another Schwenckia species but because there wasnt many informations about it i found i made it based on 2 articles from th enet and an article from wikipeida that says the full name of the botanist who described the species Bermensterflora (talk) 16:43, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia heterantha

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia heterantha, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:57, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Schwenckia heterantha article

Hello Bermensterflora, Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I refer to the Schwenckia heterantha article you created today. The article was incomplete and required intervention to make it consistent with other articles on similar topics. I would appreciate it if you could study existing articles on plant species, etc., and create entries that do not require extensive intervention from other editors and reviewers to bring them to the expected standard. Please refer to WP:YFA and WP:BETTER for guidance on drafting an article and to WP:REFB for instructions on formatting references correctly. Regards. QEnigma 论 17:37, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

i just like creating articles to plant that would have never existed. even tho people made taxonomy box for my articles it seems like people dont want to loose their time for a plant hwo was described so little. and yes it could be incomplete the article but this is all i found. for 3 pages straight it showed just Schwenckia americana. plus powo was th only website that showed where it is and where was described. Bermensterflora (talk) 18:25, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

If your article is not properly structured and provided with appropriate sources, it will not be maintained in the mainspace. Please understand that accuracy is more important than simply producing articles which are lacking in context. Regards. QEnigma 论 20:38, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia grandiflora has been accepted

Schwenckia grandiflora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

QEnigma 论 18:04, 9 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia breviseta (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Schwenckia breviseta and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:01, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

hi this is off topic but the next schwenckia species has a website that actually shows the page of the botanist study but it is in another language. is it still suitable for english translation. then again i will translate parts of it Bermensterflora (talk) 06:21, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Schwenckia breviseta has been accepted

Schwenckia breviseta, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

QEnigma 论 07:36, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia huberi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia huberi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:47, 10 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Schwenckia lateriflora. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments belong on the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and may respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Joyous! Noise! 19:35, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

Basically, that message is saying that if you want to comment to someone about the article, do it on the talk page, not within the article itself. If you need help setting up a discussion there, let me know by replying here (hit the "reply" button), and I'll get a message alert. Joyous! Noise! 19:38, 11 March 2026 (UTC)

why did the editor remove the description and uses there is a resource at the references wich shows the website i took it from. and still the websites gatekeep nearly all of the original books the botanist describe the plant. from nearly all schwenckia species only huberi i could find Bermensterflora (talk) 09:04, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia longiseta

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia longiseta, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:52, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia micrantha

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia micrantha, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 10:50, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia mollissima

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia mollissima, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:34, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bermensterflora. Thank you for your work on Schwenckia mollissima. Another editor, Hurricane Wind and Fire, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Could you add an infobox please?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hurricane Wind and Fire}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 13:55, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricane Wind and Fire: i ive added atleast a taxobox at every species i didnt add it. and is there other problems in the articles i just need 4 species and im done with schwenckia. And as a heads up say other plants who has misisng species. i will only do plants. Bermensterflora (talk) 15:35, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

Not sure if this helps because it's so empty, but may be a good place to start if you wish to add more taxoboxes. Not all will be plants but some will. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 21:19, 12 March 2026 (UTC)

@Hurricane Wind and Fire: there is little to no info about these species only 3 species i found info on huberi and another that got deleted because they thought the description was ai Bermensterflora (talk) 09:58, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, the category didn't link correctly, the missing taxobox category is here. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 13:25, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bermensterflora. Thank you for your work on Schwenckia micrantha. Another editor, Orange sticker, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for adding! Please have a look at WP:CITE for help on formatting references.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Orange sticker}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Orange sticker (talk) 09:41, 13 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia paniculata

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia paniculata, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:58, 14 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia trujilloi

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia trujilloi, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:51, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Help

I NEED PEOPLE TO HELP ME TO FIND PLANTS WHO HAS MANY SPECIES UNWRITTEN. I'VE JUST WRITTEN THE LAST SCHWENCKIA SPECIES AND LOOKING FOR OTHER PLANTS Bermensterflora (talk) 17:33, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Nice work with Schwenckia. You could try checking Wikispecies and red-linked species lists in large plant genera, and also ask at WikiProject Plants for suggestions on groups with missing articles. Kqol • talk 00:23, 22 March 2026 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Early McIntosh has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Early McIntosh. Thanks! Greenman (talk) 10:31, 25 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Rosa alabukensis

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rosa alabukensis, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Rosa × alpestris

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rosa × alpestris, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:08, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

LLM Source

Hello, I'm MtBotany, I noticed you used Selina Wamucii as a source when creating Schwenckia juncoides. It is an unreliable source due to being generated by a Large Language Model. Other websites to avoid include botanicalrealm.com, plantiary.com, and Botanikks. If you are looking for reliable sources about plants I recommend searching the books available at archive.org.

Additionally, one sentence describing the species was copped from Plants of the World Online. Never copy text from other websites. If you have any questions WP:PING me here or ask on my talk page. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 21:47, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Rosa altidaghestanica

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Rosa altidaghestanica, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:09, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia americana var. angustifolia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia americana var. angustifolia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:54, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sipoteni, a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2014 census was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:30, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia breviseta

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia breviseta, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:58, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: International Festival of Fashion Photography has been accepted

International Festival of Fashion Photography, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been accepted!

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is common for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

• See the quality assessment scheme to find out how to improve the article.

Future articles

• Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without submitting a draft for review. However, you may continue submitting drafts to Articles for creation if you prefer.

• Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Next steps

• Find other Wikipedia articles related to your topic and add links pointing to the new article. This helps readers find it.
• Group the article with similar subjects by adding relevant categories.
• You may consider nominating a fact from the article within the next 7 days to appear on the Main Page's Did you know section.
• Wikipedia is a work in progress. You can continue to expand and improve the new article.
• The new article will become eligible to be indexed on search engines once patrolled or after 90 days; search engines may take time to reflect this.
• For friendly peer support regarding editing, sourcing, or policies, visit the Teahouse, a question and answer hub for new editors.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

NeoGaze (talk) 15:58, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

May 2026

Hello, I'm UtherSRG. An edit that you recently made to Schwenckia breviseta seemed to be generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is not allowed on Wikipedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or ask your questions at the Teahouse, a friendly place for new users. Your recent edits to this article and another seem to be 100% AI-generated. This is not acceptable. UtherSRG (talk) 00:21, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

hi i used ai to translate it from a old book iwch described many plants from the 1800s everything there is translated not usaed it and asked for references since chatgpt is actually doesnt work in my country for some reason Bermensterflora (talk) 17:06, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Please don't do that. AI translations are still LLM programs which are prone to hallucinations. Please see WP:TRANSLATE for a guide to how to translate works from one langue to English for use in Wikipedia. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:46, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Thanks! Bermensterflora (talk) 04:14, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Take a look at all of the changes I made to Schwenckia breviseta, using the history of the article to see the specifics of the changes that I made. Let this be a guide for how to write further articles and please also go back and fix the other articles you've worked on in a similar manner. Feel free to ping me on questions on specifics. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:34, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

why would you remove the citation for the website wich describes the plant Bermensterflora (talk) 15:07, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

What do you mean? I cleaned up how the citations are displayed. I didn't remove any. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

ohh sorry it was just under the 6th one plus there is a video on youtube showing some new species 3 and he said that the genus schwenckia doesnt share common ancestors and is it good as a citation? Bermensterflora (talk) 18:37, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Generally, those kinds of YouTube videos are not acceptable. But see WP:RSYOUTUBE. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:54, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

ok fine with me. Bermensterflora (talk) 18:56, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Schwenckia curviflora. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Again, please use complete sentences; that means using a subject and a verb. Please do not use catalogue style formatting. UtherSRG (talk) 14:37, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

hi so i taken the description from the original book and maybe it is old and used wrong verbs if ypu can take a look i can send you a image or the url Bermensterflora (talk) 17:12, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/9669#page/174/mode/1up Bermensterflora (talk) 17:14, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

and its all full of only description without verbs so thats why Bermensterflora (talk) 17:15, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

but the description was alright? since you deleted because it wasnt a complete sentence Bermensterflora (talk) 17:19, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

You must write in your own words. Do not use the computer to translate for you. Use complete sentences. If you can not manage this, you don't have the skills required to edit. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:01, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

now i actually made with my own words plus added the taxonomy and described a variety Bermensterflora (talk) 12:51, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Could you please explain which parts of the description are problematic and suggest specific improvements? I based the text on the botanical source and would like to improve it rather than repeatedly reverting each other. Bermensterflora (talk) 14:07, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Your writing. All of it. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:08, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

i actually wrote it Bermensterflora (talk) 14:09, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

from the original book where it was described Bermensterflora (talk) 14:10, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

You may be better off writing first on https://ro.wikipedia.org, which is in your native tongue, and then work on translating articles from there to English later, when you have gained more experience with writing articles. Trying to learn how to write an article while doing so not in your native tongue is much more difficult. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:45, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

so hi since S. alvaroana has a journal wich isnt in the BHL but there is on Powo a image of it dried so when i will make the description should i say when its dried... or just without it Bermensterflora (talk) 06:43, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

wait no S. elegans i meant Bermensterflora (talk) 06:47, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

S. elegans i meant Bermensterflora (talk) 06:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

alright so 3 species are stubs the others were described by my if i could find the original book i took it from the dried or in the case fo s. elegans both dried and when its grown Bermensterflora (talk) 08:12, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

No, you can't write your own description based on an image; that is original research. - UtherSRG (talk) 14:18, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia breviseta

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia breviseta, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:06, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Plopi, Cantemir

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Plopi, Cantemir, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:31, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia breviseta

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia breviseta, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:40, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Schwenckia hyssopifolia

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Schwenckia hyssopifolia, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:33, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bermensterflora. Thank you for your work on Rosa × andegavensis. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bermensterflora. Thank you for your work on Rosa amblyophylla. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources. Thanks and have a good day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 11:25, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

@Mariamnei: Thanks i will try my best Bermensterflora (talk) 11:41, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosa amblyophylla

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rosa amblyophylla requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/731554-1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UtherSRG (talk) 14:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rosa × andegavensis

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rosa × andegavensis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://powo.science.kew.org/taxon/urn:lsid:ipni.org:names:731577-1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UtherSRG (talk) 14:33, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

June 2026

Hello, Bermensterflora, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Deelirish (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections before editing further. Thank you. Staraction (talk · contribs) 20:10, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Rosa caudata, you may be blocked from editing. You can not use translations without providing a source. You can not assert bloom data without providing a source that supports it. - UtherSRG (talk) 18:08, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Rosa beauvaisii moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Rosa beauvaisii. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and incubate it in the draft space. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Instant History (talk) 18:41, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Please be careful

Hi Bermensterflora, I'm Thryduulf. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! Thryduulf (talk) 08:40, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

Articles on species belonging to genus Rosa

Hello Bermensterflora, Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I refer to your series of articles on species belonging to the genus Rosa, the most recent being Rosa brotherorum, Rosa × bishopii, Rosa × biturigensis and Rosa × bolanderi. You have consistently omitted infobox/speciesbox details, categories, proper italicisation of scientific names, and a Taxonbar, while also duplicating references and not providing a talk page. This results in another editor or reviewer needing to make the necessary corrections at a later time, which is both time-consuming and unproductive. I would be grateful if you could complete your articles to the accepted standard for this subject on this platform. Regards. QEnigma 论 08:41, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello Bermensterflora, I refer to the recently created articles Rosa buschiana, Rosa calantha, Rosa calcarea and Rosa calyptopoda. You have again failed to properly complete these articles, leaving considerable work for others. I implore you to study similar articles on the subject, including those you have previously created that were subsequently corrected by others, and to publish complete articles that require minimal intervention. QEnigma 论 17:17, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

its just the first time using these templates Bermensterflora (talk) 17:51, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

sorry for many errors Bermensterflora (talk) 17:51, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

When I nominated several of your articles for deletion for copyright violations, that was an indication to stop and look at what you are doing and how to improve. When Instant History moved Rosa beauvaisii to draft space, that was an indication to stop and look at what you are doing and how to improve. When QEnigma called out four articles earlier today, that was an indication to stop and look at what you are doing and how to improve. QE has again pointed out multiple instances where you have failed to learn from your past mistakes. Please stop creating new articles for a time, and start learning on what is expected for new articles in the botanical realm. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:49, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Early McIntosh (June 20)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, ArthurTheGardener, left the following feedback:

This draft lacks inline citations. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources. We require inline citations (footnotes) to show which source supports which specific statement.

You must place an inline citation directly after:

• quotations;
• any material whose verifiability is likely to be challenged or is contentious;
• any material about living people.

Please edit your draft to support your statements with inline citations. Learn how to create inline citations in the:

• Source Editor: Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup.
• VisualEditor: Introduction to referencing with VisualEditor.

Please don't resubmit this article until you have fixed your citations.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Early McIntosh to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

ArthurTheGardener (talk) 10:53, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on 31 August 1989 Street

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 31 August 1989 Street, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help). Below are the references causing this error:
  • wikimapia.org https://wikimapia.org/street/133664/ro/Str-31-August-1989. Retrieved 2026-06-28. {{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:54, 28 June 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vasile Alecsandri Street

The article Vasile Alecsandri Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. UtherSRG (talk) 02:53, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 31 August 1989 Street

The article 31 August 1989 Street has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. UtherSRG (talk) 02:54, 29 June 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Early McIntosh (August 1)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Ethmostigmus, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Early McIntosh to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Ethmostigmus 🌿 (talk | contribs) 10:39, 1 August 2026 (UTC)

August 2026

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Kislokan when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before savingan edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! You can also contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:14, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Agronomovca, Ungheni, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. wikipedia is not a reliable source to cite on wikipedia Jackjd0 (talk) 06:24, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

you deleted the article? Bermensterflora (talk) 06:24, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

there is already an article, at Agronomovca, you are creating a duplicate page, and citing mostly sources that should Never be cited on wikipedia- ie: wikipedia Jackjd0 (talk) 06:29, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

thats the commune i make the village the seat of the commune Bermensterflora (talk) 06:32, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

in this case, please use reliable sources. and consider just adding it to the existing page as a subsection, as the existing page is very short and your proposed page is quite short as well. Jackjd0 (talk) 06:34, 2 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Zăzulenii Noi, Ungheni when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before savingan edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! You can also contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:34, 4 August 2026 (UTC)

Hello, just a reminder that on English Wikipedia, per consensus we don’t have separate articles on Moldovan villages, but rather include all quotable information on them within the parent commune article. Especially given that there isn’t much citable information available on them (no, moldovenii.md isn’t a reliable source), that shouldn’t be much of a problem.

This stuff was extensively discussed a few months ago (for instance here), with huge amounts of stress, time and energy wasted, so let’s not go through that again, thank you very much. But if we must discuss this, let’s pick an appropriate place, i.e. Talk:Agronomovca.

Also please mind WP:OWN and WP:3RR. — Biruitorul ^Talk 04:01, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

You are a romanian right? so that means romanian's thousands of small villages being in communes wich have 5 villages. if it is i will do it there too since...it has wierd names (never was in romania) like only village i cna think of in my home town is Gura Cainarului. Anyway if it works in romania the same i will do it there too Bermensterflora (talk) 04:17, 6 August 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Små-Hakksteinan when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Specifying |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= needs to be defined in the template in order to work. You can look at the documentation for the template being used, but it is also helpful to use the preview button before saving an edit; this helps find any errors that have been made and ensures that the values added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is highly recommended that editors use this before saving. Note I have likely fixed the error by now so check the history of the page to see how it was fixed. If you have any questions of if I can help explain further, please let me know! You can also contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:44, 15 August 2026 (UTC)

Your edits are becoming disruptive. You have been warned multiple times about the need to use preview to check your edits, yet you continue to introduce unknown parameters into articles. You did this again at Chips Way when you modified the page. Please understand that while you may not find these edits a problem, they do cause issues for those attempting to clean up pages and prevent vandalism. Please respond to this message and acknowledge that you better monitor your edits moving forward. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:37, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Ok. I will try to check if uknown parameters were added. Sorry if I did not change the articles which had uknown parameters. 👍 Bermensterflora (talk) 03:58, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

You have been warned about this multiple times. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:59, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Wait another article with uknown parameters? Bermensterflora (talk) 04:08, 19 August 2026 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Schwenckia Americana

Hello, Bermensterflora. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Schwenckia Americana, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:07, 7 August 2026 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Bermensterflora. Thank you for your work on Claveliimonas bilis. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start. Please try to expand this. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei ✦ ^{reach out 🕊️} 07:49, 17 August 2026 (UTC)

Chips Way moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Chips Way. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no indication of notability of the subject. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 00:39, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

So I added (I think) Secondary Citations from about how the company invested 20 million euros into the factory. it has 10 citations(if those 6 I added are not going to be deleted. Bermensterflora (talk) 04:24, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Zackmann I have recreated Chips Way infobox I didnt use parameters like owner or geographic location just the basic Bermensterflora (talk) 06:44, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Disability and Neurodiversity Pride Flags (August 18)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Sulfurboy, left the following feedback:

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

• Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
• Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Multiple unreliable sources used such as tumblr and dailymotion. Please see WP:RS for what we consider to be reliable sourcing.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Disability and Neurodiversity Pride Flags to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:24, 18 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nimu Spacecat (August 20)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, PacificDepths, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

User:Bermensterflora this draft has not improved since it was last declined.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Nimu Spacecat to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

🌊PacificDepths (talk) 04:29, 20 August 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marc Buyse (August 20)

Draft declined

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Your draft submission to Articles for creation has been reviewed but not accepted at this time.

Feedback

The reviewer, Thilsebatti, left the following feedback:

This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

• provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
• are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
• are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

Next steps

• Edit Draft:Marc Buyse to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
• When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.

Need help?

• For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
• You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Scam warning

• If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.

Thilsebatti (talk) 11:17, 20 August 2026 (UTC)