Talk:Fire Emblem Warriors: Three Hopes/GA1

GA review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Pokelego999 (talk · contribs) 01:16, 5 August 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: OpalYosutebito (talk · contribs) 19:49, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

I'm excited to review another Fire Emblem-related article! :D - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 19:49, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

For the Sales section, do you have any details regarding sales in the United States? - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 20:12, 8 August 2026 (UTC)

@OpalYosutebito Looking briefly I don't see anything particularly about US sales data. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:09, 10 August 2026 (UTC)

I just performed a series of copyedits. I'll let you know if I spot any complex errors - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 18:51, 9 August 2026 (UTC)

Please change game-mechanics to game mechanics - OpalYosutebito 『talk』 『articles I want to eat』 00:28, 13 August 2026 (UTC)

Checklist

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Spotcheck per section

• Gameplay
• Synopsis
  • Setting and characters
  • Plot
• Development and release
• Reception
  • Pre-release
  • Critical response
  • Sales