close
Jump to content

Federation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Federal state)

BERJAYA
  Federal states
BERJAYA
The spectrum of regional integration or separation

A federation (also called a federal state) is a union of partially self-governing provinces, states, or other regions under a federal government (federalism). In a federation, the self-governing status of the component units and the division of power between them and the central government are constitutionally entrenched and may not be altered unilaterally by either the central or constituent-unit authorities without following the constitutional amendment process.[1]:3–5

Sovereign power is formally divided between a central authority and a number of constituent regions so that each region retains some degree of control over its internal affairs.[2]

Some federal constitutions give the central authority exceptional powers that depart from the ordinary division of powers. In India, the Constitution requires the Union to protect states against internal disturbance and permits President's Rule when a state government cannot be carried on in accordance with the Constitution; it also authorizes Parliament to legislate for implementing treaties notwithstanding the ordinary federal allocation of legislative power.[3] In Canada, section 91 of the Constitution Act, 1867 gives Parliament authority to make laws for the "Peace, Order, and good Government of Canada" in matters not assigned exclusively to the provinces.[4] The Supreme Court of Canada has described the national-concern branch of this power as a rarely applied and strictly limited doctrine whose use must maintain provincial autonomy and the federal balance.[5]

The governmental or constitutional structure found in a federation is described as federalist, or as an example of federalism, and is commonly contrasted with the unitary state. France and Japan, for example, have been unitary for many centuries. The Austrian Empire was a unitary state with crown lands; after the transformation into the Austria-Hungary monarchy, the remaining crown lands of Cisleithania became federated as Länder of the Republic of Austria through the implementation of its constitution. Germany, with its 16 states, or Länder, and Nigeria, with its 36 states and federal capital territory, are examples of federations. Federations are often multi-ethnic and cover a large area of territory (such as Russia, the United States, Canada, India, Brazil, Pakistan or Australia), but neither is necessarily the case (such as Saint Kitts and Nevis or the Federated States of Micronesia).[1]:1–2 Roughly 40 per cent of the world's population lives in countries described as federal.[6]

History

[edit]

Several ancient chiefdoms and kingdoms, such as the 4th-century-BCE League of Corinth, Noricum in Central Europe, and the Iroquois Confederacy in pre-Columbian North America, could be described as federations or confederations. The Old Swiss Confederacy is often regarded as a historical example of a confederation composed of largely autonomous cantons.[7][8]

Several colonies and dominions in the New World consisted of autonomous provinces, transformed into federal states upon independence such as the United States, and various countries in Latin America (see Spanish American wars of independence). Some of the New World federations failed; the Federal Republic of Central America broke up into independent states less than 20 years after its founding. Others, such as Argentina, have shifted between federal, confederal, and unitary systems, before settling into federalism. Brazil became a federation only after the fall of the monarchy, and Venezuela became a federation after the Federal War.

Australia and Canada are also federations. They became federations while still part of the British Empire, and gradually evolved towards full independence.[9][10]

Germany is another nation-state that has switched between confederal, federal and highly centralized forms. The North German Confederation, the succeeding German Empire and the Weimar Republic were federations.[1]:8–10

Founded in 1922, the Soviet Union was formally a federation of Soviet republics, autonomous republics and other federal subjects, though in practice highly centralized under the government of the Soviet Union. The Russian Federation has inherited a similar system.[1]:9–10

India, Pakistan, Nigeria and Malaysia (then Federation of Malaya) became federations on or shortly before becoming independent from the British Empire.[1]:9–10

In some recent cases, federations have been instituted as a measure to handle ethnic conflict within a state, such as Bosnia and Herzegovina, and Iraq since 2005 as well as Somalia since 2012.[1]:77–79[11]

With the United States Constitution having become effective on 4 March 1789, the United States is the oldest surviving federation, while the newest federation is Nepal, after its constitution went into effect on 20 September 2015.[12]

Federations and other forms of state

[edit]
BERJAYA
A map of the Russian Federation, showing its eighty-three federal subjects before the annexation of Crimea in 2014
BERJAYA
A map of the Federative Republic of Brazil, showing its twenty-six constituent states and the Federal District
BERJAYA
A map of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, showing its regions
BERJAYA
A map of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, showing its 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory
BERJAYA
A map of the United Mexican States, showing its thirty-one constituent states and Mexico City
BERJAYA
A map of the United States of America showing its fifty constituent states and the District of Columbia
BERJAYA
A map of Canada showing its ten provinces and three territories
BERJAYA
A map of the Commonwealth of Australia showing its six states and ten territories
BERJAYA
A map of the Federal Republic of Germany showing its sixteen constituent states (Länder) including three city-states
BERJAYA
A map of the Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal showing its seven constituent provinces
BERJAYA
A map of Malaysia showing its thirteen states and three federal territories

Federations

[edit]

The component states are in some sense sovereign, insofar as certain powers are reserved to them that may not be exercised by the central government. However, a federation is more than a mere loose alliance of independent states. The component states of a federation usually possess no powers in relation to foreign policy and so enjoy no independent status under international law. However, German Länder have that power,[1]:21–29[13] which is beginning to be exercised on a European level.

Some federations are called asymmetric because some states have more autonomy than others. An example of such a federation is Malaysia, in which Sarawak and Sabah agreed to form the federation on different terms and conditions from the states of Peninsular Malaysia.[14]

A federation often emerges from an initial agreement between several separate states. The purpose can be the will to solve mutual problems and to provide for mutual defense or to create a nation-state for an ethnicity spread over several states. The former was the case with the United States and Switzerland. However, as the histories of countries and nations vary, the federalist system of a state can be quite different from these models. Australia, for instance, is unique in that it came into existence as a nation by the democratic vote of the citizens of each state, who voted "yes" in referendums to adopt the Australian Constitution. Brazil, on the other hand, has experienced both the federal and the unitary state during its history. Some present-day states of the Brazilian federation retain borders set during the Portuguese colonization (before the very existence of the Brazilian state), whereas the latest state, Tocantins, was created by the 1988 Constitution for chiefly administrative reasons.

Federalism is especially common among very large democracies, but federations vary greatly in area and population; territorial size alone does not determine constitutional form.[1]:1–2

Unitary states

[edit]

A unitary state may include self-governing regions, but their powers are legally delegated by the central constitutional order and can in principle be altered or withdrawn unilaterally. In a federation, by contrast, the existence and powers of the constituent units are constitutionally entrenched. Political constraints may nevertheless make withdrawal of devolved autonomy difficult even where it remains legally possible.[1]:4–6

Confederation

[edit]
BERJAYA
The Swiss Confederation and its 26 cantons

A confederation, in modern political terms, is usually limited to a permanent union of sovereign states for common action in relation to other states.[15] The closest entity in the world to a confederation at this time is the European Union. While the word confederation was officially used when the Canadian federal system was established in 1867, the term refers only to the process and not the resulting state since Canadian provinces are not sovereign and do not claim to be. Switzerland retains the official name Swiss Confederation but has been a federal state since 1848.[8]

Belgium evolved from a unitary state into a federal state through constitutional reforms beginning in 1970; Article 1 now defines it as a federal state composed of communities and regions.[16] Proposals described as confederalism remain part of Belgian political and scholarly debate.[17]

Compared with a federation, confederal institutions are subordinate to the member states, tend to exercise fewer powers directly over individuals, and commonly depend on member-state implementation or heightened consent for major decisions.[1]:5–6

Over time these terms acquired distinct connotations leading to the present difference in definition. An example of this is the United States under the Articles of Confederation. The Articles established a national government under what today would be defined as a federal system (albeit with a comparatively weaker federal government).[18] However, Canadians, whose government was designed with a stronger central government than the US in the wake of the US Civil War, use the term "Confederation" to refer to the formation or joining, not the structure, of Canada. Legal reforms, court rulings, and political compromises have decentralized Canada in practice since its formation in 1867.

Empire

[edit]

An empire traditionally denotes a territorial realm governed under an imperial sovereign, but empires have varied greatly in the degree to which authority was centralized.[19] Imperial and federal categories are not mutually exclusive: the Constitution of the German Empire (1871–1918), for example, established an enduring federation of member states and combined federal, monarchical and representative institutions.[20]

Comparison with other systems of autonomy

[edit]

Federacy

[edit]

A federacy[21] is a unitary state that incorporates one or more self-governing autonomous areas. It is distinguished from a federation in that the constitutional structure of the state is still unitary, but incorporates federalist principles. Some federacies, notably Åland, were established through international treaty. Other examples sometimes classified as federacies include South Tyrol (the Autonomous Province of Bolzano/Bozen) in Italy, whose extensive and constitutionally protected autonomy has been compared with that of Åland.[22][23]

Devolution

[edit]

A federation differs from a devolved state, such as Indonesia and the United Kingdom, because, in a devolved state, the central government can alter the powers and autonomy of the subunits without changing the constitution. In the United Kingdom, these include the Scottish Parliament, the Welsh Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly. Although the UK Parliament retains parliamentary sovereignty and therefore ultimate legislative authority, the status of the devolved institutions is subject to important constitutional and political constraints. For example, the Scotland Act 2016 declares the Scottish Parliament and Scottish Government permanent parts of the United Kingdom's constitutional arrangements and provides that they are not to be abolished except following a referendum in Scotland.[24] In some cases, such as the autonomous communities of Spain, devolution has led to federation in all but name, or "federation without federalism".[25]

Crown dependencies

[edit]

The relation between the Crown Dependencies of the Isle of Man and the bailiwicks of Guernsey and Jersey in the Channel Islands and the United Kingdom is very similar to a federate relation: the islands enjoy extensive internal self-government, and the United Kingdom, via the Crown, takes care of their foreign relations and defense – although the UK Parliament does have overall power to legislate for the dependencies. However, the islands are neither an incorporated part of the United Kingdom nor are they considered to be independent or associated states. The islands do not have a monarch, per se; rather in the Isle of Man the British Monarch is, ex officio, Lord of Mann, and in the Bailiwicks of Guernsey and Jersey, the British Monarch rules as the Duke of Normandy.[26]

Dependent territories

[edit]

The British overseas territories have differing degrees of internal self-government. The United Kingdom retains constitutional responsibilities, including security and obligations under international law, while territorial governments exercise powers allocated by their respective constitutions.[27]

De facto federations

[edit]

The distinction between a federation and a unitary state is often quite ambiguous. A unitary state may closely resemble a federation in structure and, while a central government may possess the theoretical right to revoke the autonomy of a self-governing region, it may be politically difficult for it to do so in practice. The self-governing regions of some unitary states also often enjoy greater autonomy than those of some federations. For these reasons, it is sometimes argued that some modern unitary states are de facto federations.[28]

De facto federations, or quasi-federations, are often termed "regional states".

Spain

[edit]
BERJAYA
The Autonomous communities of Spain

Spain is suggested as one possible de facto federation[29] as it grants more self-government to its autonomous communities[30][31] than are retained by the constituent entities of most federations.[32] For the Spanish parliament to revoke the autonomy of regions such as Galicia, Catalonia or the Basque Country would be a political near-impossibility, though nothing bars it legally. The Spanish parliament has, however, suspended the autonomy of Catalonia in response to the Catalan declaration of independence, in the lead-up to the 2017 Catalan election.[33] Additionally, some autonomies such as Navarre or the Basque Country have full control over taxation and spending, transferring a payment to the central government for the common services (military, foreign relations, macroeconomic policy). For example, scholar Enrique Guillén López discusses the "federal nature of Spain's government (a trend that almost no one denies)."[34] Each autonomous community is governed by a Statute of Autonomy (Estatuto de Autonomía) under the Spanish Constitution of 1978.

South Africa

[edit]
BERJAYA
Provinces of South Africa

The 1996 Constitution of South Africa establishes national, provincial and local spheres of government that are "distinctive, interdependent and interrelated" and gives provincial legislatures constitutionally defined powers.[35] On the other hand, if federation is defined as the constitutional entrenchment of the powers of subcentral units (provinces, etc.) that is not unilaterally changeable or revocable by the central authority, South Africa does qualify, formally, as a federal state.[36] Scholars nevertheless use varying descriptions, including federal and multi-sphere governance, and emphasize the comparatively strong role of national institutions.[11][37]

European Union

[edit]

The European Union (EU) is a sui generis supranational union of sovereign member states. Its constitutional character has no universally accepted classification. Scholars have variously analysed the EU using theories of federalism, characterised it as a federation or federal union of states, or argued that its legal order remains fundamentally international rather than federal.[38][39][40] It is therefore commonly described as a sui generis political and legal union.

Under the principle of conferral, the EU may act only within the limits of the competences conferred on it by its member states through the EU treaties. Competences not conferred on the Union remain with the member states, while the exercise of non-exclusive EU competences is governed by the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.[41] The Union has its own legal personality.[42] According to the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, provisions of EU law may have direct effect, and EU law has primacy over conflicting national law within its field of application.[43]

The Treaty of Lisbon, which entered into force on 1 December 2009, ended the former three-pillar structure. The treaties instead distinguish between exclusive, shared and supporting competences, alongside arrangements for coordinating national economic and employment policies and special provisions governing the Common Foreign and Security Policy.[44][45] The EU consequently exercises substantial authority in areas including the customs union, common commercial policy, the internal market, agriculture, environmental policy and the area of freedom, security and justice, although the extent and form of its authority vary between policy fields.

The Council of the European Union uses qualified majority voting for approximately 80 per cent of its legislative work, generally where legislation is adopted jointly with the European Parliament under the ordinary legislative procedure. Unanimity remains required in a number of sensitive areas, including most decisions under the Common Foreign and Security Policy, EU enlargement, the Union's own resources, the harmonisation of indirect taxation and certain measures concerning justice and home affairs or social protection.[46] The EU therefore combines supranational decision-making, under which common institutions may adopt binding legal acts without the unanimous approval of every member state, with intergovernmental procedures in which national governments retain a veto.

These characteristics give the EU powers not normally associated with a traditional confederation, particularly because its legal acts can bind member states and, in some circumstances, individuals directly. The EU nevertheless differs from a sovereign federal state. Its competences derive from treaties concluded by the member states, and amendments made through the ordinary treaty-revision procedure enter into force only after ratification by every member state in accordance with its constitutional requirements.[47] Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union also permits any member state to decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements.[48]

In its 2009 judgment concerning the Treaty of Lisbon, the German Federal Constitutional Court described the EU as a Staatenverbund, translated by the court as an “association of sovereign states”: a permanent organisation of states that exercises public authority on the basis of treaties while its underlying constitutional order remains dependent on the member states.[49] In German constitutional terminology, this classification is distinct from both a Staatenbund—a confederation of states—and a Bundesstaat, or federal state. Terms such as “federal-like system”, “quasi-federation”, “federal union” and “federation sui generis” are therefore used in the scholarly literature depending on the definition of federalism being applied.

People's Republic of China

[edit]

Constitutionally, the power vested in the special administrative regions of the People's Republic is granted from the Central People's Government, through a decision by the National People's Congress. However, there have been certain largely informal grants of power to the provinces, to handle economic affairs and implement national policies, resulting in a system some have termed "federalism with Chinese characteristics".[50]

Wallis and Futuna

[edit]

Wallis and Futuna has an unusual territorial structure in which three administrative districts correspond to the traditional kingdoms of Uvea, Alo and Sigave; each district has legal personality and a council chaired by its customary king.[51] French law also preserves personal customary status and guarantees respect for local customs insofar as they are compatible with general principles of law.[52]

Internal controversy and conflict

[edit]
BERJAYA
The United Provinces of Central America was a short-lived federal republic.

Disputes over the boundary between central and constituent-unit powers are common in federations. Federal constitutions typically designate a court or another institution to arbitrate jurisdictional disputes, while intergovernmental bodies and procedures manage responsibilities that overlap in practice.[1]:56–57,64–69

Federal systems also vary in whether constituent units are socially congruent with the country as a whole or instead coincide with distinct linguistic, ethnic, religious or regional communities; the latter arrangement is commonly described as incongruent federalism.[53]

The ability of a federal government to create national institutions that can mediate differences that arise because of linguistic, ethnic, religious, or other regional differences is an important challenge. The inability to meet this challenge may lead to the secession of parts of a federation or to civil war, as occurred in the United States (southern states sought to protect the institution of slavery while northern states opposed it, with a catalysis occurring in the then–Kansas Territory), in Nigeria and in Switzerland. In the case of Malaysia, Singapore was expelled from the federation because of rising racial tension. In some cases, internal conflict may lead a federation to collapse entirely, as occurred the Federation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland, the Gran Colombia, the United Provinces of Central America, and the West Indies Federation.

Federalism can help accommodate territorial diversity, but it does not eliminate secessionist conflict or guarantee political stability. Comparative studies identify both durable federal accommodation and failed or contested federal arrangements, as well as the use of federalism in post-conflict reconstruction.[1]:77–79[11]

Federal governments

[edit]

A federal government is the common government for the federation as a whole. Federal systems ordinarily contain at least two constitutionally recognized orders of government, each acting directly on citizens within its assigned fields.[1]:3–5,21–29

Powers commonly assigned to the federal level include defence, foreign affairs, currency and interregional or international commerce, although the precise allocation varies among federations.[1]:21–29

Federal institutions may include an executive, legislature, ministries, administrative agencies and courts. Many federations also provide constituent units with representation in an upper chamber or another central body.[1]:42–54

Contemporary

[edit]

There are 27 federations in the world, with 6 each in Africa, Asia and Europe, 4 in North America, 3 in South America and 2 in Oceania.

Current federations
Year est. Country Type
[t 1]
Structure Top-level subdivisions (federated and other) Major federated units Minor units[t 2] (federated or other)
1853 BERJAYA Argentine Republic R Presidential Provinces of Argentina 23 provinces 1 autonomous city
1901 BERJAYA Commonwealth of Australia M Parliamentary States and territories of Australia 6 states 3 internal territories (two of which are self-governing) and 7 external territories
1920 BERJAYA Republic of Austria R Parliamentary[t 3] States of Austria 9 states (Länder or Bundesländer) incl. the city-state of Vienna
1993 BERJAYA Kingdom of Belgium M Parliamentary Divisions of Belgium 3 communities, 3 regions 3 communitarian commissions
1995 BERJAYA Bosnia and Herzegovina R Parliamentary Divisions of Bosnia and Herzegovina 2 entities, one of which is itself a federation of 10 cantons 1 district[t 4]
1889 BERJAYA Federative Republic of Brazil R Presidential Federative units of Brazil 27 federative units (one is a federal district and the others are states)[t 5] 5,569 municipalities[54][55]
1867 BERJAYA Canada M Parliamentary Provinces and territories of Canada 10 provinces 3 territories
1992 BERJAYA Union of the Comoros R Presidential Autonomous islands of the Comoros 3 autonomous islands
1995 BERJAYA Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia R Parliamentary Regions and chartered cities of Ethiopia 12 regions[56] 2 chartered cities
1949 BERJAYA Federal Republic of Germany R Parliamentary States of Germany 16 states (Länder or Bundesländer) incl. the city-states of Berlin, Hamburg, and Bremen
1947[t 6] BERJAYA Republic of India R Parliamentary States and union territories of India 28 states 8 union territories, including a national capital territory
2005 BERJAYA Republic of Iraq R Parliamentary Governorates of Iraq 19 provinces (governorates)
1963 BERJAYA Malaysia M Parliamentary States of Malaysia 13 states 3 federal territories
1824 BERJAYA United Mexican States R Presidential States of Mexico 31 states and Mexico City
1979 BERJAYA Federated States of Micronesia R Presidential Administrative divisions of Micronesia 4 states
2015 BERJAYA   Federal Democratic Republic of Nepal R Parliamentary Provinces of Nepal 7 provinces
1960[t 7] BERJAYA Federal Republic of Nigeria R Presidential Subdivisions of Nigeria 36 states 1 federal capital territory
1947[t 8] BERJAYA Islamic Republic of Pakistan R Parliamentary Provinces and territories of Pakistan 4 provinces 2 autonomous territories and 1 federal capital territory
1992[t 9] BERJAYA Russian Federation R Semi-presidential Federal subjects of Russia Russia claims 89 federal subjects; 83 are within Russia's internationally recognized borders.[57][58][59]
1983 BERJAYA Federation of Saint Christopher and Nevis M Parliamentary The islands Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 federal unit (the island of Nevis) The island of Saint Kitts (directly administered by the federal government)
2012 BERJAYA Federal Republic of Somalia R Parliamentary Federal Member States of Somalia 7 states[60]
2011 BERJAYA Republic of South Sudan R Presidential States of South Sudan 10 states 3 administrative areas (one of which has a special administrative status)
1956 BERJAYA Republic of the Sudan R Military junta States of Sudan 18 states
1848 BERJAYA  Swiss Confederation R Directorial Cantons of Switzerland 26 cantons[t 10]
1971 BERJAYA United Arab Emirates M Semi-constitutional monarchy Emirates of the UAE 7 emirates
1776[t 11] BERJAYA United States of America R Presidential US states and territories 50 states 1 federal district; 16 territories[t 12]
1864 BERJAYA Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela R Presidential States of Venezuela 23 states 1 federal district, 1 federal dependency
  1. R = Federal republic; M = Monarchy
  2. That is, first-level subdivisions possessing less autonomy than the major federated units.
  3. De facto; de jure a semi-presidential republic.
  4. Brčko District is de jure part of both entities, and de facto administered separately from either.
  5. 20 provinces during the Empire of Brazil 1822–89
  6. As an independent Dominion; republic declared in 1950
  7. As the Federation of Nigeria; republic declared in 1963
  8. As an independent Dominion; republic declared in 1956
  9. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union, a new Treaty of Federation was signed in 1992, which did not include all of the same components as the Soviet Union.
  10. Three pairs of cantons have less power at federal level than the other 20 cantons, but the same degree of internal autonomy.
  11. The United States Constitution, which replaced the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union, was drafted in 1787 and was ratified in 1788. The first Congress and President did not take office until March 1789.
  12. Of the 5 territories that are permanently inhabited, all are unincorporated, two are commonwealths and a third is formally unorganized. Of the other 11, one is incorporated and all are unorganized; together they form the United States Minor Outlying Islands. The term insular area includes both territories and places with a Compact of Free Association.

Defunct

[edit]

Some of the proclaimed Arab federations were confederations de facto.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Anderson, George (2008). Federalism: An Introduction (PDF). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-542904-6. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  2. "Federalism and Federation". The Princeton Encyclopedia of Self-Determination. Princeton University. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  3. "The Constitution of India" (PDF). Legislative Department, Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India. 1 May 2026. arts. 253, 355–356. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  4. "Constitution Act, 1867, section 91". Department of Justice Canada. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  5. "References re Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act, 2021 SCC 11". Supreme Court of Canada. 25 March 2021. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  6. "Countries". Forum of Federations. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  7. Church, Clive; Dardanelli, Paolo (2005). "The dynamics of confederalism and federalism: Comparing Switzerland and the EU". Regional & Federal Studies. 15 (2): 163–185. doi:10.1080/13597560500115444 via ResearchGate.
  8. 1 2 "The Swiss state and its citizens after 1848". Swiss Federal Archives. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  9. "Federalism in Canada". Government of Canada. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  10. "Federation". Parliamentary Education Office, Parliament of Australia. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  11. 1 2 3 Yimenu, Bizuneh (2024). "Federalism and State Restructuring in Africa: A Comparative Analysis of Origins, Rationales, and Challenges". Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 54 (1): 6–33. doi:10.1093/publius/pjad015.
  12. "Nepal". Forum of Federations. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  13. Leonardy, Uwe (1992). "Federation and Länder in German foreign relations: Power-sharing in treaty-making and European affairs". German Politics. 1 (3): 119–135. doi:10.1080/09644009208404305.
  14. Harding, Andrew (25 January 2021). "Asymmetric Federalism and Protection of Indigenous Peoples: The Case of Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysian Federalism". 50 Shades of Federalism. Retrieved 24 January 2024.
  15. "confederation". Oxford English Dictionary (online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  16. "Belgium, a federal state". Belgian Federal Government. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  17. Popelier, Patricia (2020). "How dynamic federalism sheds new light on the Belgian federalism-confederalism debate". Fédéralisme Régionalisme. 20. Université de Liège. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  18. "Articles of Confederation (1777)". U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  19. Jones, Charles (2018). "Empire". A Concise Oxford Dictionary of Politics and International Relations (4th ed.). Oxford University Press. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  20. 1 2 "Constitution of the German Empire (16 April 1871)". German History in Documents and Images, German Historical Institute. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  21. Some dictionaries, such as the Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language (1989 ed.), state that federacy is synonymous with confederacy ("by aphesis"). In French, the English words federacy, confederacy, and confederation are all translated by "confédération".
  22. Stepan, Alfred; Linz, Juan José; Yadav, Yogendra (31 March 2011). Crafting State-Nations: India and Other Multinational Democracies. JHU Press. ISBN 978-0-8018-9723-8.
  23. Dosch, Jörn; Lakatos, Malvina (2020). "South Tyrol and Åland: Collective Identity in the Interplay of Old and New Minorities". Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism. 20 (2): 188–207. doi:10.1111/sena.12323. ISSN 1754-9469.
  24. "Scotland Act 2016, section 1". The National Archives. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  25. The Federal Option and Constitutional Management of Diversity in Spain Xavier Arbós Marín, page 375; included in 'The Ways of Federalism in Western Countries and the Horizons of Territorial Autonomy in Spain' (volume 2), edited by Alberto López-Eguren and Leire Escajedo San Epifanio; edited by Springer ISBN 978-3-642-27716-0, ISBN 978-3-642-27717-7(eBook)
  26. "Crown Dependencies: Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man". Ministry of Justice. 12 April 2013. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  27. "The UK is committed to supporting its Overseas Territories to deliver their priorities: UK Statement at the UN Fourth Committee". Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office. 16 October 2025. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  28. Sahadzic, Maja. "Federal Theory on Constitutional Asymmetries: revisited" (PDF). Queen Mary Law Journal: 135–147. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 February 2019. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
  29. "Is Spain a federation?". Eupedia.com. 8–25 May 2010.
  30. Mallet, Victor (18 August 2010). "Flimsier footings". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 10 December 2022. Retrieved 25 August 2010.(registration required)
  31. "A survey of Spain: How much is enough?". The Economist. 6 November 2008. Retrieved 25 August 2010.(subscription required)
  32. Moreno, Luis. "Federalization in multinational Spain" (PDF). Unidad de Políticas Comparadas (CSIC). Working Paper 07-04. Archived from the original (PDF) on 22 September 2021. Retrieved 26 February 2019.
  33. "Rajoy cesa al Govern, disuelve el Parlament y convoca elecciones para el 21 de diciembre". eldiario.es. 27 October 2017. Retrieved 10 August 2018.
  34. Enrique Guillén López Archived 11 October 2009 at the Wayback Machine, JUDICIAL REVIEW IN SPAIN: THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT, 41 Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 541, 544 (2008).
  35. "Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996" (PDF). Department of Justice and Constitutional Development. ss. 40, 104. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  36. van Staden, Martin (Fall 2021). "The Potential for Constitutional Devolution in South Africa". Cato Journal.
  37. Simeon, Richard; Murray, Christina (2001). "Multi-Sphere Governance in South Africa: An Interim Assessment". Publius: The Journal of Federalism. 31 (4): 65–92. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a004921.
  38. Kelemen, R. Daniel (2019). "Federalism and European Integration". In Wiener, Antje; Börzel, Tanja A.; Risse, Thomas (eds.). European Integration Theory (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. pp. 27–42. doi:10.1093/hepl/9780198737315.003.0002. ISBN 978-0-19-873731-5.
  39. Larsen, Signe Rehling (2021). The Constitutional Theory of the Federation and the European Union. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oso/9780198859260.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-885926-0.
  40. Eleftheriadis, Pavlos (2020). A Union of Peoples: Europe as a Community of Principle. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-885417-3.
  41. "Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, Article 5". EUR-Lex. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 12 August 2026.
  42. "Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, Article 47". EUR-Lex. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 12 August 2026.
  43. "Fundamental cases at the Court of Justice". CURIA. Court of Justice of the European Union. Retrieved 12 August 2026.
  44. "The Treaty of Lisbon". EUR-Lex. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 12 August 2026.
  45. "Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, Article 2". EUR-Lex. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 12 August 2026.
  46. "How does the Council vote?". Council of the European Union. Retrieved 12 August 2026.
  47. "Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, Article 48". EUR-Lex. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 12 August 2026.
  48. "Consolidated version of the Treaty on European Union, Article 50". EUR-Lex. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved 12 August 2026.
  49. "Judgment of 30 June 2009—Treaty of Lisbon". Federal Constitutional Court of Germany. 30 June 2009. Retrieved 12 August 2026.
  50. Gregory H. Fuller (2008). "Economic Warlords: How De Facto Federalism Inhibits China's Compliance with International Trade Law and Jeopardizes Global Environmental Initiatives". Tennessee Law Review. 75: 545. SSRN 1151187.
  51. "Organisation institutionnelle" (in French). Administration supérieure des îles Wallis-et-Futuna. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  52. "Loi no 61-814 du 29 juillet 1961 conférant aux îles Wallis et Futuna le statut de territoire d'outre-mer" (in French). Légifrance. arts. 3, 17–18. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  53. Lijphart, Arend (2012). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press. pp. 183–184. ISBN 978-0-300-17202-7.
  54. [clarification needed]"IBGE atualiza Estruturas Territoriais do país" (in Brazilian Portuguese). Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 29 April 2025. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  55. "Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988" (in Brazilian Portuguese). Presidência da República. arts. 1 and 18. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  56. 2024–25 Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey: Summary Report (PDF) (Report). Ethiopian Statistical Service. 2026. p. 2. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  57. "Constitution of the Russian Federation, Article 65" (in Russian). President of Russia. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  58. "Territorial integrity of Ukraine". United Nations General Assembly. 27 March 2014. A/RES/68/262. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  59. "Territorial integrity of Ukraine: defending the principles of the Charter of the United Nations". United Nations General Assembly. 12 October 2022. A/RES/ES-11/4. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  60. "Federal Member States". Ministry of Planning, Investment and Economic Development, Federal Republic of Somalia. Retrieved 18 August 2026.
  61. Whaley, Joachim (2002). "2: Federal Habits: the Holy Roman Empire and the continuity of German Federalism". In Umbach, Maiken (ed.). German Federalism: Past, Present and Future. New Perspectives in German Political Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 15. ISBN 9780230505797. Retrieved 19 November 2017. Few would query the proposition that German federalism has deep historical roots. Indeed discussion of its contemporary manestation in the Federal Republic routinely refer to the federal traditions of the Holy Roman Empire -...].
  62. David Keanu Sai. "THE AMERICAN OCCUPATION OF THE HAWAIIAN KINGDOM: BEGINNING THE TRANSITION FROM OCCUPIED TO RESTORED STATE" (PDF). University of Hawaii. Three additional laws prohibiting the selling of rum, prostitution, and gambling were later added to the code, and proclaimed together as the first penal laws of the kingdom on December 8th 1827. The enforcement of these penal laws, however, resided within the multi-tiered feudal structure of various mesne lords who ruled over the people. The "rule of law" had not yet been laid as the cornerstone of constitutional governance and enforcement of the law was not sufficient across the realm, but it was the beginning of modernity and the move from a federal to a unitary form of governance.
  63. The federal structure was abolished in 1934, when French Equatorial Africa was reorganized as a unitary administrative entity, and was restored at the end of 1937.
  64. Gained independence in 1957, joined with Sabah, Sarawak, and Singapore to form Malaysia in 1963.
  65. Became Czech and Slovak Federative Republic through a constitutional change in 1990.
[edit]