close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100203041950/http://www.samefacts.com:80/

February 2nd, 2010

The Republican Party is essentially a regional party dominated by white southern elites, a group observed keenly by Henry Adams:

The Southern secessionists were certainly unbalanced in mind—fit for medical treatment, like other victims of hallucination,—haunted by suspicion, by idées fixes, by violent morbid excitement; but this was not all. They were stupendously ignorant of the world. As a class, the cotton-planters were mentally one-sided, ill-balanced, and provincial to a degree rarely known. They were a close society on whom the new fountains of power had poured a stream of wealth and slaves that acted like oil on flame. They showed a young student his first object-lesson of the way in which excess of power worked when held by inadequate hands.

The Education of Henry Adams, chap. 7.

This is eerily like contemporary Congressional Republicans, and a warning if they should ever return to power.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
February 2nd, 2010

Just to make sure that Congressional Democrats don’t possibly get their act together, Senate Republicans have vowed to obstruct even more than they have been doing so far:

The GOP Senate leadership has privately settled on a strategy to derail health reform if Dems try to pass the Senate bill with a fix through reconciliation, aides say: Unleash an endless stream of amendments designed to stall for time and to force Dems to take untenable votes.

The aide described the planned GOP strategy as a “free for all of amendments,” vowing Dems would face “a mountain of amendments so politically toxic they’ll make the first health debate look like a post office naming.”

Can they do this?  Well, yes, unless the Democrats grow a pair and bring in the Vice President to rule out these potential amendments as non-germane and dilatory.  Is that hardball?  Yes.  Is it anything more extreme than what the Republicans are proposing?  Do I have to answer that?

Now, I realize that reconciliation doves like Ezra Klein and Mark Schmitt will come up with yet another series of reasons why the Democrats just have to capitulate again, but there is simply no basis for this.  And I have that on good authority.  Here’s an interview with former Senate parliamentarian Robert Dove:

Lester Feder: The decision about what can stay in under the rules is solely up to the parliamentarian?

Robert Dove: Theoretically, no—Vice President Biden is the ultimate decider. But no vice president has tried to play that role in reconciliation. We haven’t had vice presidents that have tried to play important procedural roles for a very long time. The last one was Nelson Rockefeller, in 1975, and before him Hubert Humphrey, in the 1960’s. But no vice president has ever tried to play a role in reconciliation. Basically, since Walter Mondale was vice president, they have kind of been co-opted by the president and given an office down in the West Wing. Their interest in playing Senate politics has become attenuated. That has left the Senate parliamentarian in an extremely powerful position.

Lester Feder: So as the rules of reconciliation are written, the Vice President is the technically the one who should make the procedural call, but he defers to the parliamentarian?

Robert Dove: He doesn’t usually even show up. If you expect to see the Vice President on the Senate floor, you’re going to be disappointed. He’s almost never there, so he’s usually not even there to do that.

If he were to show up, and he wants to make these decisions, yes. He has the authority to do that. He is the president of the Senate.

Emphasis mine.  I have been arguing this for months now, and no one has yet to give me a good answer to it, so I will continue to say it: the Vice President, not the Parliamentarian, has the right to rule on what stays and what goes into a reconciliation bill.  And if the Republicans decide to throw up millions of amendments, the President of the Senate has the right to say as a blanket matter that none are germane.

The goal of Congressional Republicans since 1994 has been nothing less than the destruction of the informal institutions of government — the shared understandings about some things that are “just not done.”  You don’t use the subpoena power to harass your political opponents — but they did.  You don’t use impeachment in order to bring down a President for trivialities — but they did.  You don’t use the filibuster as a matter of course — but they did.  You don’t change Senate blue slips rules not once, not twice, but three times in order to effect their preferences — but they did.  You don’t use the Office of Legal Counsel to authorize illegal behavior and give your people a Get Out of Jail Free card — but they did.  Now, it’s understood that you don’t bring up a million amendments to undermine reconciliation — but they will.  The Democrats must respond or they simply do not deserve the support of Americans.

Barack Obama is from Chicago, as Republicans love to comment.  In The Untouchables, Sean Connery tells Kevin Costner, “He sends one of your guys to the hospital, you send one of his to the morgue.  That’s the Chicago way.”

It’s coming.  It should.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
February 1st, 2010

Apparently the leadership on both sides of the Capitol has figured out that the only thing to do now is Pass. The. Damned. Bill. with an agreed-on set of fixes to some of the problems with the Senate version.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
February 1st, 2010

Now that you’ve heard all the whining from the left and gloating from the right about Obama’s failure to build the Heavenly City in twelve whole months as President, listen to Norman Ornstein on Obama’s first year of legislation:

This Democratic Congress is on a path to become one of the most productive since the Great Society 89th Congress in 1965-66, and Obama already has the most legislative success of any modern president — and that includes Ronald Reagan and Lyndon Johnson. The deep dysfunction of our politics may have produced public disdain, but it has also delivered record accomplishment.

The productivity began with the stimulus package, which was far more than an injection of $787 billion in government spending to jump-start the ailing economy. More than one-third of it — $288 billion — came in the form of tax cuts, making it one of the largest tax cuts in history, with sizable credits for energy conservation and renewable-energy production as well as home-buying and college tuition … Education Secretary Arne Duncan has leveraged some of the stimulus money to encourage wide-ranging reform in school districts across the country. There were also massive investments in green technologies, clean water and a smart grid for electricity, while the $70 billion or more in energy and environmental programs was perhaps the most ambitious advancement in these areas in modern times. As a bonus, more than $7 billion was allotted to expand broadband and wireless Internet access, a step toward the goal of universal access. Any Congress that passed all these items separately would be considered enormously productive. Instead, this Congress did it in one bill. Lawmakers then added to their record by expanding children’s health insurance and providing stiff oversight of the TARP funds allocated by the previous Congress. Other accomplishments included a law to allow the FDA to regulate tobacco, the largest land conservation law in nearly two decades, a credit card holders’ bill of rights and defense procurement reform.

John Judis weighs in on the administrative record:

Obama’s three Republican predecessors were all committed to weakening or even destroying the country’s regulatory apparatus: the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and the other agencies that are supposed to protect workers and consumers by regulating business practices. Now Obama is seeking to rebuild these battered institutions. In doing so, he isn’t simply improving the effectiveness of various government offices or making scattered progress on a few issues; he is resuscitating an entire philosophy of government with roots in the Progressive era of the early twentieth century. Taken as a whole, Obama’s revival of these agencies is arguably the most significant accomplishment of his first year in office.

So let’s take a few deep breaths, stop playing Chicken Little, and get back to work.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
February 1st, 2010

When I suggested – amid the furore about the Obama “budget freeze” – that we might see cuts in NASA, I was engaging in wish-fulfillment fantasy rather than prediction. But today comes word that they’re killing the “back-to-the-Moon” program entirely, as part of an overall NASA budget that isn’t keeping up with inflation.

I still think it’s crazy to spend more than three times the NSF budget on the space program, but most of the unmanned stuff has real scientific merit. It’s the manned program that’s a boondoggle, and that’s what’s taking the hit.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
January 31st, 2010

Mark suggests that in order to develop compassion it might be good to start with “venomous invertebrates.”

That’s probably right, but brutal.  Mark, you want me to feel compassion for these guys?BERJAYABERJAYABERJAYA

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
January 31st, 2010

… not all children are “above average.” A requirement that all students to be “proficient” by 2014 could only be met by redefining “proficient.” It’s not clear what the Obama Administration is going to propose – and there’s no hint that it plans to replace outmoded Taylorite defect-finding with statistical quality assurance – but they are going to insist on performance and they are not going to insist on the impossible. That’s progress.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
January 31st, 2010

One of the two most devastating things I ever heard one politician say about another was Ed Koch’s remark after beating Bella Abzug in an incumbent v. incumbent Congressional primary.  Not only had Koch carried the district handily, he’d carried Abzug’s home Election District (New Yorkese for “precinct”) by 2:1.  A reporter asked Koch how he’d managed to beat Abzug on her home turf, and Koch replied, “They know her.”

The Political Action Committee of Hewlett-Packard, where Carly Fiorina used to be the CEO, has donated the maximum in her Senate race: to her opponent.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
January 30th, 2010

Your problem, Grasshopper, is that you do not love your enemies. Until you can truly feel their pain, your enmity and your contempt for them will continue to eat away at your spirit.

Even a Republican Congressman is, deep down, a fellow suffering human being. You need to learn to feel sorry for him.

This exercise should help. If you have even a gill of the milk of human kindness left in you, watching the entire House Republican Conference get taken to school by a guy they’ve convinced themselves is just an empty suit with a TelePrompter should make you feel sorry for them. “Plenty of Republicans asked good and probing questions,” reports Marc Ambinder, “but Mike Pence, among others, found their arguments simply demolished by the president.”

Here’s the transcript. And here’s an excerpt from early on:

If you’re calling for just across-the-board tax cuts, and then on the other hand saying that we’re somehow going to balance our budget, I’m going to want to take a look at your math and see how that works.

And here’s another:

If you say, “We can offer coverage for all Americans, and it won’t cost a penny,” that’s just not true. You can’t structure a bill where suddenly 30 million people have coverage, and it costs nothing.

You’re laughing, Grasshopper? That isn’t very compassionate of you. Maybe House Republicans are a bridge too far; let’s start with venomous insects invertebrates first.

BERJAYA

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
January 30th, 2010

Steve Benen:

Republican obstructionism has reached the level at which they oppose ideas they support.

Share this post:
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Digg
  • Reddit
  • Facebook