Debate in California about the funding cuts for higher education has become quite perplexing, partly because some of the parties are not thinking very clearly about it, partly because the question is fairly complicated, partly because the politics of California budgeting have become so pathological. In response to relentless nagging from David Schutz (well, he [...]
Archive for the ‘California Politics’ Category
Does Arnold Schwarzenegger care more about Tea Partiers or the planet?
Tonight was the big Cal teach-in before tomorrow’s day of walkout/protest/demonstration scheduled for all University of California campuses….Back in the day, a teach-in was teaching: faculty who knew something about an issue tried to explain it, sometimes just propagandizing but preferably illuminating complications and subtleties of the state of affairs (Vietnam War, racial injustice, etc.) triggering the state of protest. Tonight, not so much; the six speakers were earnest and lively, but the critical thinking of which we’re supposed to be a veritable factory had mostly left the building.
On Wednesday evening I attended a “teach-in” sponsored by the local chapter of student “government” at Berkeley, the Senate of Associated Students of the University of California. A half-dozen faculty (not me) offered ten-minute perspectives on current events, which are heading to a university-wide walkout on Sept. 24; Friday the Senate voted unanimously to support [...]
Pay cuts are better than layoffs.
In the situation faced by UC faculty, calling them “furloughs” is better than calling them pay cuts.
So I don’t see any moral imperative to act out the idea of a furlough by teaching less.
Schwarzenegger cuts programs for abused and neglected kids in order to protect Hummer drivers. Ladies and gentlemen: compassionate conservatism.
Since Viriginia Postrel was kind enough to point people to this space for ideas about how California might deal with the hole our insanely expensive correctional system puts in the state budget, I suppose it’s time for a post on that topic. (Though this is the first time I’ve heard about a link drawing [...]
How could the California Supreme Court have overturned Prop 8 yet allowed the voters to ban same-sex marriage through a ballot measure — and done so in a principled way? Here’s how.
Yes on 1A (extending tax increases).
Maybe on 1B (restoring school funding).
No on 1C (borrowing against future lottery revenues).
Yes on 1D and 1E (cancelling guaranteed funding streams for children’s programs and mental health).
No on 1F (a meaningless insult directed at the legislature.)
The face is the face of a sportswear model, but the mind is the mind of a wonk.



