The aim of the present study was to investigate the binding sites interactions and the selectivity of sarpogrelate to human 5-HT(2) receptor family (5-HT(2A), 5-HT(2B) and 5-HT(2C) receptor subtypes) using molecular modeling. Rhodopsin (RH) crystal structures were used as template to build structural models of the human serotonin-2A and -2C receptors (5-HT(2A)R, 5-HT(2C)R), whereas for 5-HT(2B)R, we used our previously published three-dimensional (3D) models based on bacteriorhodopsin (BR). Sarpogrelate, a novel 5-HT(2)R antagonist, was docked to the receptors. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations produced the strongest interaction for 5-HT(2A)R/sarpogrelate complex. Upon binding, sarpogrelate constraints aromatic residues network (Trp(3.28), Phe(5.47), Trp(6.48), Phe(6.51), Phe(6.52) in 5-HT(2A)R; Phe(3.35), Phe(6.51), Trp(7.40) in 5-HT(2B)R; Trp(3.28), Phe(3.35), Phe(5.47), Trp(6.48), Phe(6.51), Phe(6.52) in 5-HT(2C)R) in a stacked configuration, preventing activation of the receptor. The models suggest that the structural origin of the selectivity of sarpogrelate to 5-HT(2A)R vs both 5-HT(2B)R and 5-HT(2C)R comes from the following results: (1) The tight interaction between the antagonist and the transmembrane domain (TMD) 3. Asp(3.32) neutralizes the cationic head and interacts simultaneously with carboxylic group hydrogen of the antagonist molecule. (2) Due to steric hindrance, Ser(5.46) (vs Ala(5.46) in 5HT(2B) and 5HT(2C)) prevents sarpogrelate to enter deeply inside the hydrophobic core of the helix bundle and to interact with Pro(5.50). (3) The side chain of Ile(4.56) (vs Ile(4.56) in 5HT(2B)R and Val(4.56) in 5HT(2C)R) constraints sarpogrelate to adjust its position by translating toward the strongly attractive Asp(3.32). These results are in good agreement with binding affinities (pKi) of sarpogrelate for 5-HT(2) receptor family expressed in transfected cell.