close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Nov;38(11):997-1000.
doi: 10.1037/hea0000779. Epub 2019 Jul 1.

"Stealthing": Factors associated with young men's nonconsensual condom removal

Affiliations

"Stealthing": Factors associated with young men's nonconsensual condom removal

Kelly Cue Davis. Health Psychol. 2019 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the rates, predictors, and associated sexual risk indices of young men's nonconsensual condom removal (also known as stealthing).

Methods: Participants were 626 male inconsistent condom users aged 21-30 years recruited from an urban area in the Pacific Northwest. Participants completed survey measures assessing sexual aggression history, sexual aggression-related attitudes, sexually transmitted infection history, unplanned pregnancies, and nonconsensual condom removal experiences.

Results: Almost 10% of the participants (n = 61) reported engaging in nonconsensual condom removal since the age of 14 years, with an average of 3.62 times (SD = 3.87) and range of 1-21 times (maximum possible). After controlling for condom use self-efficacy, men with greater hostility toward women (odds ratio = 1.47) and more severe sexual aggression history (odds ratio = 1.06) had significantly higher odds of engaging in nonconsensual condom removal behavior. χ2 analyses demonstrated that men who had a history of nonconsensual condom removal were significantly more likely to have had a sexually transmitted infection diagnosis (29.5% vs. 15.1%) or have had a partner who experienced an unplanned pregnancy (46.7% vs. 25.8%).

Conclusions: Nonconsensual condom removal, which involves elements of both sexual risk and sexual aggression, confers multiple sexual risks to its recipients, thus meriting increased clinical and research attention. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abbey A, Parkhill MR, & Koss MP (2005). The effects of frame of reference on responses to questions about sexual assault victimization and perpetration. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 364–373. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Assembly Democrats. (2018) Greenwald and Mosquera Two-Bill Package to Strengthen Protections for Victims of Sexual Assault Approved by Panel. 2018. Retrieved from: http://www.assemblydems.com/Article.asp?ArticleID=14319. Accessed August 26, 2018.
    1. Black DS, Sun P, Rohrbach LA, & Sussman S (2011). Decision-making style and gender moderation of the self-efficacy-condom use link among adolescents and young adults: Informing targeted STI/HIV prevention programs. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, 165, 320–325. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brafford LJ & Beck KH (1991). Development and validation of a condom self-efficacy scale for college students. Journal of American College Health, 39, 219–225. - PubMed
    1. Brodsky A (2017). Rape-adjacent: Imagining legal responses to nonconsensual condom removal. Columbia Journal of Gender & Law, 32, 183– 210.