close
Jump to content

Contraband

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contraband (from Medieval French contrebande "smuggling")[1] is any item that, relating to its nature, is illegal to be possessed or sold. It comprises goods that by their nature are considered too dangerous or offensive in the eyes of the legislator—termed contraband in se—and forbidden.[2][3][4]

Derivative contraband consists of goods that may normally be owned, but are liable to be seized because they were used in committing an unlawful act and hence begot illegally, e.g. smuggling goods; stolen goods – knowingly participating in their trade is an offense in itself, called fencing.[5]

The modern term “contraband” refers to any kind of goods that are either prohibited or restricted and are being illegally brought into and out of different countries in breach of national legislation and international treaties.[6] These may include narcotic drugs, fake products, firearms, animals and animal parts that are subject to protection under the law, hazardous substances, and many others whose transfer is regulated by legislation.[7] Smuggling organisations tend to adjust their techniques to avoid detection, and this poses an ongoing problem for customs and border control agencies.[8]

International bodies such as the World Customs Organisation (WCO) encourage coordinated customs compliance via the SAFE Framework of Standards, which binds the involved nations to a standardised approach to risk management and encourages the use of non-invasive inspection systems, like large X-ray and gamma-ray scanners, to inspect high-risk cargo.[9] The WCO also operates systems such as the Cargo Targeting System, which uses risk management factors to evaluate the manifest information of the cargo such that the customs administrations are able to allocate their inspection efforts to high-risk cargo.[10] Similarly, the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Trade Facilitation Agreement has acknowledged risk management as a method to focus customs control on high-risk shipments while speeding up the clearance of low-risk shipments.[11]

In many ways, customs and border control services have begun to incorporate intelligence collection into their risk management process by combining information about threat factors such as organised crime and trafficking and the analysis and dissemination of that information for detecting and stopping contraband before reaching the point of inspection.[12] It has also become increasingly typical for modern contraband enforcement to include cooperation between customs agencies and other law enforcement agencies. Joint work carried out by WCO and INTERPOL resulted in the seizure of a large number of endangered wildlife and timber that had been trafficked in contravention of the CITES Convention.[13]

Law of armed conflict

[edit]
BERJAYA
Contraband weapons seized by an Afghan and coalition security force during an offensive security operation in Nangarhar

In international law, contraband means goods that are ultimately destined for territory under the control of the enemy and may be susceptible to use in armed conflict.[14] Traditionally, contraband is classified into two categories, absolute contraband and conditional contraband. The former category includes arms, munitions, and various materials, such as chemicals and certain types of machinery that may be used directly to wage war or be converted into instruments of war.

Conditional contraband, formerly known as occasional contraband, consists of such materials as provisions and livestock feed. Cargo of that kind, presumably innocent in character, is subject to seizure if in the opinion of the belligerent nation that seizes them, the supplies are destined for the armed forces of the enemy rather than for civilian use and consumption. In former agreements among nations, certain other commodities, including soap, paper, clocks, agricultural machinery and jewelry, have been classified as non-contraband, but the distinctions have proved meaningless in practice.

Under the conditions of modern warfare, in which armed conflict has largely become a struggle involving the total populations of the contending powers, virtually all commodities are classified by belligerents as absolute contraband.

American Civil War

[edit]

During the American Civil War, Confederate-owned slaves who sought refuge in Union military camps or who lived in territories that fell under Union control were declared "contraband of war". The policy was first articulated by General Benjamin F. Butler in 1861, in what came to be known as the "Fort Monroe Doctrine," established in Hampton, Virginia. By war's end, the Union had set up 100 contraband camps in the South, and the Roanoke Island Freedmen's Colony (1863–1867) was developed to be a self-sustaining colony.[15] Many adult freedmen worked for wages for the Army at such camps, teachers were recruited from the North for their schools by the American Missionary Association, and thousands of freedmen enlisted from such camps in the United States Colored Troops to fight with the Union against the Confederacy.[16]

Treaties

[edit]

Numerous treaties defining contraband have been concluded among nations. In time of war, the nations involved have invariably violated the agreements, formulating their own definitions as the fortunes of war indicated. The Declaration of London, drafted at the London Naval Conference of 1908–1909 and made partly effective by most of the European maritime nations at the outbreak of World War I, established comprehensive classifications of absolute and conditional contraband. As the war developed, the lists of articles in each category were constantly revised by the various belligerents despite protests by neutral powers engaged in the carrying trade. By 1916, the list of conditional contraband included practically all waterborne cargo. Thereafter, for the duration of World War I, nearly all cargo in transit to an enemy nation was treated as contraband of war by the intercepting belligerent, regardless of the nature of the cargo. A similar policy was inaugurated by the belligerent powers early in World War II.

Neutral nations

[edit]

Under international law, the citizens of neutral nations are entitled to trade, at their own risk, with any or all powers engaged in war. No duty to restrain contraband trade is imposed on the neutral governments, but no neutral government has the right to interfere on behalf of citizens whose property is seized by one belligerent if it is in transit to another. The penalty traditionally imposed by belligerents on neutral carriers engaged in commercial traffic with the enemy consists of confiscation of cargo. By the Declaration of London, it was extended to include condemnation of the carrying vessel if more than half the cargo was contraband. The right of warring nations to sink neutral ships transporting contraband is not recognized in international law, but the practice was initiated by Germany in World War I and was often resorted to by the Axis powers in World War II.[citation needed]

References

[edit]
  1. "Definition of CONTRABAND". Merriam-Webster. October 3, 2023. Retrieved October 15, 2023.
  2. MacAlpine, Ian (December 1, 2022). "Contraband found at Joyceville Institution". The Kingston Whig Standard. Archived from the original on December 3, 2022.
  3. Offenhartz, Jake (November 28, 2022). "'I brought in contraband': Ex-Rikers guard describes how he smuggled drugs into troubled NYC jail". Gothamist. Archived from the original on April 10, 2024.
  4. "Contraband drugs worth more than Rs 3cr seized in Assam". ThePrint. November 29, 2022. Archived from the original on December 20, 2022.
  5. "Puerto Rican attorney found guilty in costly contraband case". AP NEWS. November 21, 2022. Archived from the original on December 1, 2022.
  6. "United Nations Convention against Transnational Organized Crime". United Nations : Office on Drugs and Crime. Retrieved August 1, 2026.
  7. United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC)./Annual evaluation report / United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Vienna, Austria : United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). 2008.
  8. Basu, Gautam (September 30, 2014). "Combating Illicit Trade and Transnational Smuggling: Key Challenges for Customs and Border Control Agencies". World Customs Journal. 8: 15–26. doi:10.55596/001c.93062.
  9. "2018 Edition of the SAFE Framework of Standards". World Customs Journal. 12 (1). March 31, 2018. doi:10.55596/001c.115716. ISSN 1834-6715.
  10. "World Customs Organization". www.wcoomd.org. Retrieved August 6, 2026.
  11. "World Trade Organisation Agreement on Trade Facilitation, 7 December 2013". World Customs Journal. 8 (1). March 30, 2014. doi:10.55596/001c.93053. ISSN 1834-6715.
  12. Ylönen, Marja; Aven, Terje (April 3, 2023). "A new perspective for the integration of intelligence and risk management in a customs and border control context". Journal of Risk Research. 26 (4): 433–449. doi:10.1080/13669877.2023.2176912. ISSN 1366-9877.
  13. "2,114 seizures of endangered animals and timber in major international law enforcement operation". www.interpol.int. Retrieved August 8, 2026.
  14. International Committee of the Red Cross (October 1995). San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 148. ISBN 9780521558648.
  15. "The Roanoke Island Freedmen's Colony" Archived September 29, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, provided by National Park Service, at North Carolina Digital History: LEARN NC, accessed 11 November 2010
  16. For further information on the use of the term "contraband" in the Civil War, see "Northern Visions of Race and Reform" Deprecated link archived 2010-02-13 at archive.today.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Caruana, Joseph (2007). "The British Contraband Control Service in the Mediterranean". Warship International. XLIV (4): 367–375. ISSN 0043-0374.

Sources

[edit]