close
Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:

Animal communication

Tree-hole frogs exploit resonance effects

These anurans know a trick or two when it comes to the romantic powers of song.

Abstract

Animal mating calls that exert a comparatively high sound pressure propagate over greater distances and generally have greater attractive power1,2. Here we show that calling male Bornean tree-hole frogs (Metaphrynella sundana) actively exploit the acoustic properties of cavities in tree trunks that are partially filled with water and which are primarily used as egg-deposition sites. By tuning their vocalizations to the resonant frequency of the hole, which varies with the amount of water that it contains, these frogs enhance their chances of attracting females.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

USD 39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Resonance effect and associated temporal call and pitch alterations of a tree-hole frog calling from inside a tube as the air-column depth increases.
BERJAYA
Figure 2
BERJAYA

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerhardt, H. C., Dyson, M. L. & Tanner, S. D. Behav. Ecol. 7, 7–18 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerhardt, H. C., Tanner, S. D., Corrigan, C. M. & Walton, H. C. Behav. Ecol. 11, 663–669 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wells, K. D. in Anuran Communication (ed. Ryan, M. J.) 45–60 (Smithsonian Inst. Press, Washington DC, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Welch, A. M., Semlitsch, R. D. & Gerhardt, H. C. Science 280, 1928–1930 (1998).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Klump, G. M. & Gerhardt, H. C. Nature 326, 286–288 (1987).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gerhardt, H. C. & Huber, F. Acoustic Communication in Insects and Anurans (Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bennet-Clark, H. C. J. Exp. Biol. 128, 383–409 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bailey, W. J., Bennet-Clark, H. C. & Fletcher, N. H. J. Exp. Biol. 204, 2827–2841 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prozesky-Schulze, L., Prozesky, O. P. M., Anderson, F. & van der Merwe, G. J. J. Nature 255, 142–143 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bailey, W. J. & Roberts, J. D. J. Nat. Hist. 15, 693–702 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Penna, M. & Solis, R. Anim. Behav. 51, 255–263 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Daws, A. G., Bennet-Clark, H. C. & Fletcher, N. H. Bioacoustics 7, 81–117 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Björn Lardner.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lardner, B., bin Lakim, M. Tree-hole frogs exploit resonance effects. Nature 420, 475 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/420475a

Download citation

  • Issue date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/420475a

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing