Indo-European between Uralic and Caucasian

Frederik Kortlandt

Indo-European between Uralic and Caucasian

Frederik Kortlandt

visibility

849

views

Abstract

Indo-European is an Indo-Uralic language that borrowed directly from North-East Caucasian, but not from North-West Caucasian or Kartvelian, and indirectly from Semitic.

Key takeaways

AI generated

Indo-European is an Indo-Uralic language influenced by North-East Caucasian, not North-West Caucasian.
Ten Proto-Indo-European (PIE) borrowings from North-East Caucasian are identified, primarily as loanwords.
The Khvalynsk culture around 5000 BC likely represents the Indo-Uralic dialect of Proto-Indo-European.
David Anthony's research reveals two phases of Caucasian language influence on Indo-European.
Semitic elements likely reached Indo-European through Caucasian intermediaries or the Balkan peninsula.

FAQ's

AI generated

What explains the absence of borrowings from North-West Caucasian?add

The paper reveals that all Proto-Indo-European borrowings are from North-East Caucasian, possibly due to earlier structural similarities stemming from a common substratum rather than direct contact.

When did the major interactions between Caucasian languages and Proto-Indo-European occur?add

It proposes that the first phase of interaction occurred around 5000 BC, coinciding with the Khvalynsk culture, while a second phase during the Maikop period saw reduced influence.

How does Indo-European relate to Uralic languages?add

The study finds that Indo-European is derived from an Indo-Uralic language, suggesting a close relationship with Finno-Ugric and Samoyedic languages.

What specific terms indicate North-East Caucasian influence on Proto-Indo-European?add

Key identified terms include *dig-'goat', *ǵh erd-'pear', and *ulH2neH2-'wool', indicating possible loan origins from North-East Caucasian languages.

What methodology was used to analyze the etymological relationships among these languages?add

The research utilizes genetic analysis alongside linguistic comparisons to trace borrowings and influence timelines, as indicated by David Anthony's work on Yamnaya ancestry.

Last updatedOctober 09, 2025

1 of 4

Download research papers for free!

References (15)

Adams, Douglas Q. 2013. A dictionary of Tocharian B, revised and greatly enlarged [Leiden Studies in Indo-European 10] (Amsterdam: Rodopi).

Anthony, David W. 2019. Archaeology, genetics, and language in the steppes: a comment on Bomhard. Journal of Indo-European Studies 47, 175-198.

Beekes, Robert S.P. 1987. On Indo-European 'wine'. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft 48, 21-26.

Bjørn, Rasmus G. 2017. Foreign elements in the Proto-Indo-European vocabulary: a comparative loanword study (Master's thesis, University of Copenhagen).

Bomhard, Allan R. 2019a. The origins of Proto-Indo-European: the Caucasian substrate hypothesis. Journal of Indo-European Studies 47, 9-124.

Bomhard, Allan R. 2019b. Response to the comments. Journal of Indo-European Studies 47, 199-212.

Colarusso, John. 1997. Proto-Pontic: Phyletic links between Proto-Indo-European and Proto-Northwest Caucasian. Journal of Indo-European Studies 25, 119-151.

Fortescue, Michael. 1998. Language relations across Bering Strait (London: Cassell).

Janhunen, Juha. 2009. Proto-Uralic: what, where, and when? The quasquicentennial of the Finno-Ugric Society (Helsinki: Suomalais-ugrilaisen seura), 57-78.

Kortlandt, Frederik. 2010. Studies in Germanic, Indo-European and Indo-Uralic [Leiden Studies in Indo-European 17] (Amsterdam: Rodopi).

Kortlandt, Frederik. 2019. On the reconstruction of Proto-Uralic. Petri Kallio rocks (Helsinki: Kallion etymologiseura), 11-14.

Matasović, Ranko. 2012. Areal typology of Proto-Indo-European: the case for Caucasian connections. Transactions of the Philological Society 110/2, 283-310.

Sammallahti, Pekka. 1988. Historical phonology of the Uralic languages. The Uralic languages (Leiden: Brill), 478-554.

Starostin, Sergej A. 2007. Indoevropejsko-severnokavkazskie izoglossy. Trudy po jazykoznaniju (Moskva: Jazyki slavjanskix kul'tur), 312-358.

Tuite, Kevin. 2019b. Comments on "The Origins of Proto-Indo-European: The Caucasian substrate hypothesis". Journal of Indo-European Studies 47, 157-165.