close
Wayback Machine
27 captures
17 Aug 2021 - 10 Jan 2026
Dec JAN Feb
20
2021 2022 2023
success
fail
About this capture
COLLECTED BY
Collection: Save Page Now
TIMESTAMPS
loading
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20220120004407/https://www.pnas.org/content/118/34/e2100995118
Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Publication Charges
  • Submit
  • Submit
  • About
    • Editorial Board
    • PNAS Staff
    • FAQ
    • Accessibility Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • Site Map
  • Contact
  • Journal Club
  • Subscribe
    • Subscription Rates
    • Subscriptions FAQ
    • Open Access
    • Recommend PNAS to Your Librarian

User menu

  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Home
Home
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current
    • Special Feature Articles - Most Recent
    • Special Features
    • Colloquia
    • Collected Articles
    • PNAS Classics
    • List of Issues
    • PNAS Nexus
  • Front Matter
    • Front Matter Portal
    • Journal Club
  • News
    • For the Press
    • This Week In PNAS
    • PNAS in the News
  • Podcasts
  • Authors
    • Information for Authors
    • Editorial and Journal Policies
    • Submission Procedures
    • Publication Charges
  • Submit
BERJAYA
Research Article

The strength of the Earth’s magnetic field from Pre-Pottery to Pottery Neolithic, Jordan

View ORCID ProfileAnita Di Chiara, View ORCID ProfileLisa Tauxe, View ORCID ProfileThomas E. Levy, Mohammad Najjar, View ORCID ProfileFabio Florindo, and View ORCID ProfileErez Ben-Yosef
  1. aIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 00143 Roma, Italy;
  2. bScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0220;
  3. cLevantine Archaeology and Cyber-Archaeology Laboratory, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093;
  4. dCouncil for British Research in the Levant (CBRL), Tla’ Al-Ali, Amman 11181, Jordan;
  5. eDepartment of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel

See allHide authors and affiliations

PNAS August 24, 2021 118 (34) e2100995118; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100995118
Anita Di Chiara
aIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 00143 Roma, Italy;
bScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0220;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anita Di Chiara
Lisa Tauxe
bScripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0220;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Lisa Tauxe
  • For correspondence: [email protected]
Thomas E. Levy
cLevantine Archaeology and Cyber-Archaeology Laboratory, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Thomas E. Levy
Mohammad Najjar
dCouncil for British Research in the Levant (CBRL), Tla’ Al-Ali, Amman 11181, Jordan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fabio Florindo
aIstituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, 00143 Roma, Italy;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Fabio Florindo
Erez Ben-Yosef
eDepartment of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Erez Ben-Yosef
  1. Contributed by Lisa Tauxe, June 28, 2021 (sent for review January 17, 2021; reviewed by Maxwell Brown and Monika Korte)

  • Article
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Significance

The Earth’s magnetic field has changed significantly in the past with implications for related phenomena, such as deep-Earth processes and evolution of life. Accurate datasets of its past behavior also provide a dating tool. We present data from Neolithic ceramics and flint from Jordan. Our results are among the oldest in the Levant, covering a period of major changes in human history. The data help in refining the resolution of the archaeomagnetic curve, in turn enhancing its use as a dating tool and for understanding past field behavior. Moreover, we demonstrate the potential for the use of flint material, the most common raw material for the manufacturing of tools in the entire Paleolithic and younger periods, for archaeointensity investigations.

Abstract

Constraining secular variation of the Earth’s magnetic field strength in the past is fundamental to understanding short-term processes of the geodynamo. Such records also constitute a powerful and independent dating tool for archaeological sites and geological formations. In this study, we present 11 robust archaeointensity results from Pre-Pottery to Pottery Neolithic Jordan that are based on both clay and flint (chert) artifacts. Two of these results constitute the oldest archaeointensity data for the entire Levant, ancient Egypt, Turkey, and Mesopotamia, extending the archaeomagnetic reference curve for the Holocene. Virtual Axial Dipole Moments (VADMs) show that the Earth’s magnetic field in the Southern Levant was weak (about two-thirds the present field) at around 7600 BCE, recovering its strength to greater than the present field around 7000 BCE, and gradually weakening again around 5200 BCE. In addition, successful results obtained from burnt flint demonstrate the potential of this very common, and yet rarely used, material in archaeomagnetic research, in particular for prehistoric periods from the first use of fire to the invention of pottery.

  • archaeointensity
  • Jordan
  • Pre-Pottery Neolithic
  • Neolithic

Footnotes

  • ↵1To whom correspondence may be addressed. Email: ltauxe{at}ucsd.edu.
  • Author contributions: L.T. and E.B.-Y. designed research; A.D.C., T.E.L., and M.N. performed research; A.D.C. and L.T. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; A.D.C., L.T., and E.B.-Y. analyzed data; A.D.C., L.T., T.E.L., and E.B.-Y. wrote the paper with contributions from F.F.; M.N. provided archaeological context; and F.F. provided support for the first author.

  • Reviewers: M.B., University of Minnesota; and M.K., Helmholtz Centre Potsdam-GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences.

  • The authors declare no competing interest.

Data Availability

Rock and paleomagnetic data have been deposited in the Magnetics Information Consortium database (https://earthref.org/MagIC/17126).

Published under the PNAS license.

View Full Text

References

  1. ↵
    1. E. Thellier,
    2. O. Thellier
    , Sur l’intensité du champ magnétique terrestre dans le passé historique et géologique. Ann. Geophys. 15, 285–378 (1959).
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. M. J. Aitken
    , Dating by archaeomagnetic and thermoluminescent methods. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 269, 77–88 (1970).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. R. Thér et al
    ., How was Neolithic pottery fired? An exploration of the effects of firing dynamics on ceramic products. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 26, 1143–1175 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. A. N. Goring-Morris,
    2. E. Hovers,
    3. A. Belfer-Cohen
    , The Dynamics of Pleistocene and Early Holocene Settlement Patterns and Human Adaptations in the Levant: An Overview (Oxbow Books, Oxford, UK, 2009).
  5. ↵
    1. A. Carrancho,
    2. J. Morales,
    3. A. Goguitchaichvili,
    4. R. Alonso,
    5. M. Terradillos
    , Thermomagnetic monitoring of lithic clasts burned under controlled temperature and field conditions. Implications for archaeomagnetism. Geofis. Int. 53, 473–490 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. K. Kapper,
    2. F. Donadini,
    3. A. M. Hirt
    , Holocene archeointensities from mid European ceramics, slags, burned sediments and cherts. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 241, 21–36 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. K. Kapper,
    2. F. Donadini,
    3. M. Mauvilly,
    4. S. Panovska,
    5. A. M. Hirt
    , New directional archeomagnetic data of burned cave sediments from Switzerland and geomagnetic field variations in Central Europe. Geophys. J. Int. 198, 1208–1221 (2014).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  8. ↵
    1. C. Zeigen,
    2. R. Shaar,
    3. Y. Ebert,
    4. E. Hovers
    , Archaeomagnetism of burnt cherts and hearths from Middle Palaeolithic Amud Cave, Israel: Tools for reconstructing site formations processes and occupation history. J. Archaeol. Sci. 107, 71–86 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. G. J. Borradaile,
    2. S. A. Kissin,
    3. J. D. Stewart,
    4. W. A. Ross,
    5. T. Werner
    , Magnetic and optical methods for detecting the heat treatment of chert. J. Archaeol. Sci. 20, 57–66 (1993).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. B. A. Purdy,
    2. H. K. Brooks
    , Thermal alteration of silica minerals: An archeological approach. Science 173, 322–325 (1971).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. S. Weiner,
    2. V. Brumfeld,
    3. O. Marder,
    4. O. Barzilai
    , Heating of flint debitage from Upper Palaeolithic contexts at Manot Cave, Israel: Changes in atomic organization due to heating using infrared spectroscopy. J. Archaeol. Sci. 54, 45–53 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. D. Atkinson,
    2. J. A. King
    , “Fine particle magnetic mineralogy of archaeological ceramics” in J. Physics: Conference Series (IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK, 2005), vol. 17, p. 145.
  13. ↵
    1. A. Genevey,
    2. Y. Gallet,
    3. J.-C. Margueron
    , Eight thousand years of geomagnetic field intensity variations in the eastern Mediterranean. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 108, 2228 (2003).
  14. ↵
    1. E. Ben-Yosef et al
    ., Application of copper slag in geomagnetic archaeointensity research. J. Geophys. Res. 113, B08101 (2008).
  15. ↵
    1. E. Ben-Yosef et al
    ., Geomagnetic intensity spike recorded in high resolution slag deposit in Southern Jordan. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 287, 529–539 (2009).
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. R. Shaar et al
    ., Geomagnetic field intensity: How high can it get? How fast can it change? Constraints from Iron Age copper slag. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 301, 297–306 (2011).
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. E. Ben-Yosef,
    2. M. Millman,
    3. R. Shaar,
    4. L. Tauxe,
    5. O. Lipschits
    , Six centuries of geomagnetic intensity variations recorded by royal Judean stamped jar handles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 2160–2165 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. R. Shaar et al
    ., Large geomagnetic field anomalies revealed in Bronze to Iron Age archeomagnetic data from Tel Megiddo and Tel Hazor, Israel. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 442, 173–185 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. S. Cai et al
    ., Geomagnetic intensity variations for the past 8 kyr: New archaeointensity results from Eastern China. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 392, 217–229 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. R. Shaar,
    2. L. Tauxe,
    3. A. Goguitchaichvili,
    4. M. Devidze,
    5. V. Licheli
    , Further evidence of the Levantine Iron Age geomagnetic anomaly from Georgian pottery. Geophys. Res. Lett. 44, 2229–2236 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. P. W. Livermore,
    2. A. Fournier,
    3. Y. Gallet
    , Core-flow constraints on extreme archeomagnetic intensity changes. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 387, 145–156 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Y. Gallet,
    2. A. Genevey,
    3. M. Le Goff,
    4. F. Fluteau,
    5. S. A. Eshraghi
    , Possible impact of the Earth’s magnetic field on the history of ancient civilizations. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 246, 17–26 (2006).
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. P. Ertepinar et al
    ., Extreme geomagnetic field variability indicated by Eastern Mediterranean full-vector archaeomagnetic records. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 531, 115979 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. S. Cai et al
    ., Archaeointensity results spanning the past 6 kiloyears from eastern China and implications for extreme behaviors of the geomagnetic field. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114, 39–44 (2017).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. M. Korte,
    2. C. G. Constable
    , Archeomagnetic intensity spikes: Global or regional geomagnetic field features? Front. Earth Sci. 6, 1–15 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. M. L. Osete et al
    ., Two archaeomagnetic intensity maxima and rapid directional variation rates during the Early Iron Age observed at Iberian coordinates. Implications on the evolution of the Levantine Iron Age Anomaly. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 533, 116047 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. G. M. Turner,
    2. R. Kinger,
    3. B. McFadgen,
    4. M. Gevers
    , The first archaeointensity records from New Zealand: Evidence for a fifteenth century AD archaeomagnetic ‘spike’ in the SW Pacific Region? Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 497, 47–72 (2020).
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. I. Peters,
    2. L. Tauxe,
    3. E. Ben-Yosef
    , Archaeomagnetic dating of pyrotechnological contexts: A case study for copper smelting sites in the Central Timna Valley, Israel. Archaeometry 60, 544–570 (2018).
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. M. Gómez-Paccard et al
    ., Archaeomagnetic and rock magnetic study of six kilns from North Africa (Tunisia and Morocco). Geophys. J. Int. 189, 169–186 (2012).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  30. ↵
    1. M. D. Stillinger,
    2. J. W. Hardin,
    3. J. M. Feinberg,
    4. J. A. Blakely
    , Archaeomagnetism as a complementary dating technique to address the Iron Age chronology debate in the Levant. Near East. Archaeol. 79, 90–106, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. E. Ben Yosef,
    2. L. Tauxe,
    3. T. E. Levy
    , Archaeomagnetic dating of copper smelting site F2 in the Timna Valley (Israel) and its implications for the modelling of ancient technological developments. Archaeometry 52, 110–1121 (2010).
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. D. Hnatyshin,
    2. V. A. Kravchinsky
    , Paleomagnetic dating: Methods, MATLAB software, example. Tectonophysics 630, 103–112 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  33. ↵
    1. F. J. Pavón-Carrasco,
    2. J. Rodríguez-González,
    3. M. L. Osete,
    4. J. M. Torta
    , A Matlab tool for archaeomagnetic dating. J. Archaeol. Sci. 38, 408–419 (2011).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. M. C. Brown et al
    ., GEOMAGIA50. v3: 1. General structure and modifications to the archeological and volcanic database. Earth Planets Space 67, 83 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. C. Constable,
    2. M. Korte,
    3. S. Panovska
    , Persistent high paleosecular variation activity in Southern Hemisphere for at least 10 000 years. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 453, 78–86 (2016).
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. F. J. Pavón-Carrasco,
    2. M. L. Osete,
    3. J. M. Torta,
    4. A. De Santis
    , A geomagnetic field model for the Holocene based on archaeomagnetic and lava flow data. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 388, 98–109 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. S. A. Campuzano,
    2. M. Gómez-Paccard,
    3. F. J. Pavón-Carrasco,
    4. M. L. Osete
    , Emergence and evolution of the South Atlantic Anomaly revealed by the new paleomagnetic reconstruction SHAWQ2k. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 512, 17–26 (2019).
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    1. I. Kuijt,
    2. A. N. Goring-Morris
    , Foraging, farming, and social complexity in the Pre-Pottery Neolithic of the Southern Levant: A review and synthesis. J. World Prehist. 16, 361–440 (2002).
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. B. Finlayson et al
    ., Architecture, sedentism, and social complexity at Pre-Pottery Neolithic A WF16, Southern Jordan. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 8183–8188 (2011).
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Y. Gallet et al
    ., New Late Neolithic (c. 7000–5000 BC) archeointensity data from Syria. reconstructing 9000 years of archeomagnetic field intensity variations in the Middle East. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 238, 89–103 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. E. B. Banning
    , “It’s a Small World: Work, Family Life, and Community in the Late Neolithic” in The Social Archaeology of the Levant: From Prehistory to the Present, A. Yasur-Landau, E. H. Cline, Y. Rowan, Eds. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2018), pp. 98–121.
  42. ↵
    1. O. Gary
    , “Rollefson. The Neolithic Period” in Jordan: An Archaeological Reader, R. B. Adams, Ed. (Equinox, London, UK, 2008), pp. 71–108.
  43. ↵
    1. O. Bar-Yosef
    , “The “Pre-Pottery Neolithic” period in the Southern Levant” in Préhistoire du Levant, J. Chauvin, P. Sanlaville, Eds. (CNRS, Paris, France, 1981), pp. 551–570.
  44. ↵
    1. K. V. Flannery
    , The origins of the village revisited: From nuclear to extended households. Am. Antiq. 67, 417–433 (2002).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  45. ↵
    1. Y. Yu,
    2. L. Tauxe,
    3. A. Genevey
    , Toward an optimal geomagnetic field intensity determination technique. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 5, Q02H07 (2004).
    OpenUrl
  46. ↵
    1. L. Tauxe,
    2. H. Staudigel
    , Strength of the geomagnetic field in the Cretaceous Normal Superchron: New data from submarine basaltic glass of the Troodos Ophiolite. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 5, Q02H06 (2004).
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. G. Cromwell,
    2. L. Tauxe,
    3. H. Staudigel,
    4. H. Ron
    , Paleointensity estimates from historic and modern Hawaiian lava flows using basaltic volcanic glass as a primary source material. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 241, 44–56 (2015).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  48. ↵
    1. G. A. Paterson,
    2. L. Tauxe,
    3. A. J. Biggin,
    4. R. Shaar,
    5. L. C. Jonestrask
    , On improving the selection of Thellier-type paleointensity data. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 15, 1180–1192 (2014).
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. G. A. Paterson
    , A simple test for the presence of multidomain behavior during paleointensity experiments. J. Geophys. Res. 116, B10104 (2011).
  50. ↵
    1. T. Nagata,
    2. Y. Arai,
    3. K. Momose
    , Secular variation of the geomagnetic total force during the last 5000 years. J. Geophys. Res. 68, 5277–5282 (1963).
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. R. Shaar,
    2. L. Tauxe
    , Thellier GUI: An integrated tool for analyzing paleointensity data from Thellier-type experiments. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 14, 677–692 (2013).
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. M. Domanski,
    2. J. A. Webb
    , Effect of heat treatment on siliceous rocks used in prehistoric lithic technology. J. Archaeol. Sci. 19, 601–614 (1992).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  53. ↵
    1. J. C. Larrasoaña et al
    ., Magnetic properties of cherts from the Basque-Cantabrian Basin and surrounding regions: Archeological implications. Front. Earth Sci., 10.3389/feart.2016.00035 (2016).
  54. ↵
    1. M. Moník,
    2. Z. Nerudová,
    3. P. Schnabl
    , Experimental heating of Moravian cherts and its implication for paleolithic chipped stone assemblages. Archaemetry 59, 1190–1206 (2017).
    OpenUrl
  55. ↵
    1. I. E. Nachasova,
    2. K. S. Burakov
    , Geomagnetic variations in the VI-V millennia BC. Geomagn. Aeron. 38, 502–505 (1998).
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. K. Kitazawa
    , Intensity of the geomagnetic field in Japan for the past 10,000 years. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 7403–7411 (1970).
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. K. S. Burakov,
    2. I. E. Nachasova,
    3. G. N. Petrova
    , The geomagnetic field intensity in the Baikal region during the last millennia. Geomagn. Aeron. 40, 219–223 (2000).
    OpenUrl
  58. ↵
    1. I. E. Nachasova,
    2. K. S. Burakov,
    3. O. V. Pilipenko
    , Variations in the intensity of the geomagnetic field in Siberia during the last 13000 years. Izvestiya Physics of the Solid Earth 51, 44–50 (2015).
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. I. E. Nachasova,
    2. K. S. Burakov
    , Archaeointensity of the geomagnetic field in the fifth millennium BC in northern Mesopotamia. Geomagn. Aeron. 35, 398–402 (1995).
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. A. H. Simmons,
    2. M. Najjar
    , Ghwair I: A small, complex Neolithic community in Southern Jordan. J. Field Archaeol. 31, 77–95 (2006).
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. G. O. Rollefson
    , The aceramic Neolithic. Bar Int. Ser. 705, 102–126 (1998).
    OpenUrl
  62. ↵
    1. P. J. Reimer et al
    ., The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 cal kBP). Radiocarbon 62, 725–757 (2020).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. ↵
    1. H.A. Simmons
    , The Neolithic Revolution in the Near East: Transforming the Human Landscape (University of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ, 2011).
  64. ↵
    1. M. Burton,
    2. T. E. Levy
    , The Chalcolithic radiocarbon record and its use in southern Levantine archaeology. Radiocarbon 43, 1223–1246 (2001).
    OpenUrl
  65. ↵
    1. E. Schnepp
    , Geomagnetic paleointensities derived from volcanic rocks of the Quaternary East Eifel volcanic field, Germany. Phys. Earth Planet. Inter. 94, 23–41 (1996).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  66. ↵
    1. M. J. Aitken,
    2. A. L. Allsop,
    3. G. D. Bussell,
    4. M. B. Winter
    , Determination of the intensity of the Earth’s magnetic field during archeological times: Reliability of the Thellier technique. Rev. Geophys. 26, 3–12 (1988).
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. R. S. Coe
    , The determination of paleo-intensities of the Earth’s magnetic field with emphasis on mechanisms which could cause non-ideal behavior in Thellier’s method. J. Geomag. Geoelectr. 19, 157–178 (1967).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  68. ↵
    1. R. S. Coe,
    2. S. Grommé,
    3. E. A. Mankinen
    , Geomagnetic paleointensities from radiocarbon-dated lava flows on Hawaii and the question of the Pacific nondipole low. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 1740–1756 (1978).
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. M. J. Aitken,
    2. P. A. Alcock,
    3. G. D. Bussell,
    4. C. J. Shaw
    , Archaeomagnetic determination of the past geomagnetic intensity using ancient ceramics: Allowance for anisotropy. Archaeometry 23, 53–64 (1981).
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. J. Rogers,
    2. J. M. W. Fox,
    3. M. J. Aitken
    , Magnetic anisotropy in ancient pottery. Nature 277, 644–646 (1979).
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  71. ↵
    1. R. J. Veitch
    , An investigation of the intensity of the geomagnetic field during Roman times using magnetically anisotropic bricks and tiles. Arch. Sci. Geneve. 37, 359–373 (1984).
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. A. R. Biedermann,
    2. D. Bilardello,
    3. M. Jackson,
    4. L. Tauxe,
    5. J. M. Feinberg
    , Grain-size-dependent remanence anisotropy and its implications for paleodirections and paleointensities—Proposing a new approach to anisotropy corrections. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 512, 111–123 (2019).
    OpenUrl
    1. T. E. Levy et al
    ., Early metallurgy, interaction, and social change: The Jabal Hamrat Fidan (Jordan) research design and 1998 archaeological survey. Preliminary report. Hawliyyat Dairat al-Atar al-Ammat 45, 159–187 (2001).
    OpenUrl
    1. A. Hauptmann
    , The Archaeometallurgy of Copper: Evidence from Faynan, Jordan (Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany, 2007).
    1. M. M. Burton et al
    ., Ceramic technology at Wadi Fidan 61, an early Pottery Neolithic site (ca. 6500 B.C.E.) in the Faynan region of southern Jordan. J. Archaeol. Sci. Rep. 38, 103029 (2021).
    OpenUrl

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
If your organization uses OpenAthens, you can log in using your OpenAthens username and password. To check if your institution is supported, please see this list. Contact your library for more details.

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

Subscribers, for more details, please visit our Subscriptions FAQ.

Please click here to log into the PNAS submission website.

PreviousNext
Back to top
Article Alerts
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on PNAS.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The strength of the Earth’s magnetic field from Pre-Pottery to Pottery Neolithic, Jordan
(Your Name) has sent you a message from PNAS
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the PNAS web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The strength of the Earth’s magnetic field from Pre-Pottery to Pottery Neolithic, Jordan
Anita Di Chiara, Lisa Tauxe, Thomas E. Levy, Mohammad Najjar, Fabio Florindo, Erez Ben-Yosef
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2021, 118 (34) e2100995118; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2100995118

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Request Permissions
Share
The strength of the Earth’s magnetic field from Pre-Pottery to Pottery Neolithic, Jordan
Anita Di Chiara, Lisa Tauxe, Thomas E. Levy, Mohammad Najjar, Fabio Florindo, Erez Ben-Yosef
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Aug 2021, 118 (34) e2100995118; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2100995118
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Article Classifications

  • Physical Sciences
  • Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences
  • Social Sciences
  • Anthropology
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences: 118 (34)
Table of Contents

Submit

Sign up for Article Alerts

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Materials and Methods
    • Data Availability
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & SI
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

You May Also be Interested in

Permafrost.
Permafrost methane and heat waves
Atmospheric methane levels increased over geological formations in Northern Siberia following a heat wave in 2020, suggesting that permafrost thaw releases methane from reservoirs.
Image credit: Wikimedia Commons.
Wadi Fidan 01 archaeological site in Arabah Valley, Jordan.
Earth’s magnetic field strength in Neolithic Jordan
Pottery, burnt clay, and burnt flint from Jordan dated from 7752 BCE to 5069 BCE yielded a record of variations in Earth’s magnetic field strength during the Neolithic period.
Image credit: Thomas E. Levy.
Granular forces (black lines) at the same location in the soil before (left) and after (right) ant tunneling.
3D modeling of ant tunnels
Mechanics of ant tunneling could inspire the development of improved robotic mining techniques.
Image credit: Jose E. Andrade and David R. Miller (California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA).
Image from Hubble Telescope of white dwarf start Sirius A and its smaller companion Sirius B.
Inner Workings: Astronomers uncover new way to measure the speed of stars
New observations now allow the seemingly impossible: measuring the speeds of some stars along the line of sight without ascertaining their Doppler shifts.
Image credit: NASA, H.E. Bond, and E. Nelan (Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore, MD); M. Barstow and M. Burleigh (University of Leicester, UK); and J.B. Holberg (University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ).
Field of dandelions under a blue sky.
Journal Club: Gene isolated that triggers asexual births in dandelions
Researchers found a gene that could pave the way toward modifying crops so that they produce stable hybrid seed lines with desirable traits.
Image credit: Aleksandr Ozerov.

Similar Articles

Site Logo
Powered by HighWire
  • Submit Manuscript
  • Twitter
  • Youtube
  • Facebook
  • RSS Feeds
  • Email Alerts

Articles

  • Current Issue
  • Special Feature Articles – Most Recent
  • List of Issues

PNAS Portals

  • Anthropology
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Front Matter
  • Physics
  • Sustainability Science
  • Teaching Resources

Information

  • Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • Reviewers
  • Subscribers
  • Librarians
  • Press
  • Cozzarelli Prize
  • Site Map
  • PNAS Updates
  • FAQs
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Rights & Permissions
  • About
  • Contact

BERJAYA

Feedback    Privacy/Legal

Copyright © 2022 National Academy of Sciences. Online ISSN 1091-6490. PNAS is a partner of CHORUS, CLOCKSS, COPE, CrossRef, ORCID, and Research4Life.