2018
The bilingual language network: Differential involvement of anterior cingulate, basal ganglia and prefrontal cortex in preparation, monitoring, and execution
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
45
12
9
2
Citation Types
9
55
0
0
Year Published
2018
2026
Publication Types
Select...
48
6
2
2
Relationship
4
54
Authors
Journals
Cited by 56 publications
(64 citation statements)
References 84 publications
9
55
0
0
“…As a minor difference between the groups, we found more frequent activation of secondary language areas in bilinguals. This result aligns with previous studies that demonstrated that the left Caudate and Angular Gyrus are relatively more involved with bilingualism 41 , 42 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As a minor difference between the groups, we found more frequent activation of secondary language areas in bilinguals. This result aligns with previous studies that demonstrated that the left Caudate and Angular Gyrus are relatively more involved with bilingualism 41 , 42 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Consistent with our previous research, a main effect of task phase was observed in left lateral frontal ROIs including DLPFC, lateral orbitofrontal cortex (BA 47), and IFG (BA 44), in the right precentral gyrus, and in the medial Pre-SMA (see Figure 2). Follow-up analyses revealed that each of these areas had greater activation during execution than encoding, consistent with the Execution Network described in our previous work [20].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The current experiment replicates and extends our previous research on the role of the left lateral frontal regions in bilingual language control [20]. Both the current and previous research demonstrates that left lateral frontal regions show increased activation from global language preparation phases, to local rule selection phases, with the highest activation during task execution.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This result aligns with prior findings of disrupted connectivity between the SN and DMN in MDD (Balaev et al, 2018;Fettes et al, 2018;Gong et al, 2019). The SN plays a crucial role in detecting and processing emotionally salient stimuli (Etkin et al, 2011;Seo et al, 2018), while the DMN is implicated in self-referential thinking and rumination (Scheibner et al, 2017). A reduced causal influence from the SN to the DMN might indicate an impaired ability to regulate internal emotional states and a propensity for excessive rumination in MDD patients (Gandelman et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%

