close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Oct;60(4):1136-1153.
doi: 10.1111/bjso.12458. Epub 2021 May 12.

Implicit racism, colour blindness, and narrow definitions of discrimination: Why some White people prefer 'All Lives Matter' to 'Black Lives Matter'

Keon West  1 , Katy Greenland  2 , Colette van Laar  3
Affiliations

Implicit racism, colour blindness, and narrow definitions of discrimination: Why some White people prefer 'All Lives Matter' to 'Black Lives Matter'

Keon West et al. Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct.

Abstract

The Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement has been called the 'civil rights issue of our time' (Holt & Sweitzer, 2020, Self and Identity, 19(, p. 16) but the All Lives Matter (ALM) movement swiftly emerged as an oppositional response to BLM. Prior research has investigated some predictors of support for ALM over BLM, but these predictors have thus far not included levels of racial bias or potentially relevant constructions of racism. This pre-registered, cross-sectional study (N = 287) tested the degree to which White participants' support for ALM could be predicted using measures of racism (implicit and explicit) and ideological stances around the construction of 'racism' (that discourage the recognition of contemporary inequalities and discrimination). Using multiple regression analyses, we found that implicit racism, colour-blind ideology, and narrow definitional boundaries of discrimination positively predicted support for ALM over BLM. Explicit racism, collective narcissism, and right-wing political orientation did not predict ALM support, nor did any (2-way) interaction of these predictors. Implications for our understanding of the All Lives Matter movement are discussed.

Keywords: All Lives Matter; black lives matter; colour blindness; implicit bias; inequality; police; racism.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Adams, G., Edkins, V. A., Lacka, D., Pickett, K. M., & Cheryan, S. (2008). Teaching about racism: Pernicious implications of the standard portrayal. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30, 349-361. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973530802502309
    1. Andreouli, E., Greenland, K., & Howarth, C. (2016). ‘I don’t think racism is that bad any more’: Exploring the ‘end of racism’ discourse among students in English schools. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 171-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2143
    1. Atkins, A. (2019). Black lives matter or all lives matter? Color-blindness and epistemic injustice*. Social Epistemology, 33(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2018.1483879
    1. Greenland, K., van Laar, C., & West, K. (under review). Definitional boundaries of discrimination: The cultural tools for deciding what constitutes discrimination (and what doesn’t).
    1. Awad, G. H., Cokley, K., & Ravitch, J. (2005). Attitudes toward affirmative action: A comparison of color-blind versus modern racist attitudes. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1384-1399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02175.x

LinkOut - more resources