close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Nov 29;113(48):13678-13683.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.1605043113. Epub 2016 Nov 15.

Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education

Affiliations

Universal screening increases the representation of low-income and minority students in gifted education

David Card et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

Low-income and minority students are substantially underrepresented in gifted education programs. The disparities persist despite efforts by many states and school districts to broaden participation through changes in their eligibility criteria. One explanation for the persistent gap is that standard processes for identifying gifted students, which are based largely on the referrals of parents and teachers, tend to miss qualified students from underrepresented groups. We study this hypothesis using the experiences of a large urban school district following the introduction of a universal screening program for second graders. Without any changes in the standards for gifted eligibility, the screening program led to large increases in the fractions of economically disadvantaged and minority students placed in gifted programs. Comparisons of the newly identified gifted students with those who would have been placed in the absence of screening show that Blacks and Hispanics, free/reduced price lunch participants, English language learners, and girls were all systematically "underreferred" in the traditional parent/teacher referral system. Our findings suggest that parents and teachers often fail to recognize the potential of poor and minority students and those with limited English proficiency.

Keywords: gifted identification; underrepresentation; universal screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Fraction gifted by end of third grade, District schools vs. matched comparison schools. (See SI Materials and Methods for details.)
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Cumulative distribution of changes in the fraction of gifted third-grade students between 2004–2005 and 2006–2007. Districts are in the same state, with 20+ elementary schools. Lines represent 95% confidence interval.
Fig. S1.
Fig. S1.
Frequency distribution of IQ scores, pre and post universal screening.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
District trends in fraction gifted by end of third grade.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
IQ distributions of always takers and students identified by screening.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 5.
Distributions of gifted students across schools.

References

    1. Ford DY. The underrepresentation of minority students in gifted education: Problems and promises in recruitment and retention. J Spec Educ. 1998;32(1):4–14.
    1. Donovan MS, Cross CT. Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education. Natl Acad; Washington, DC: 2002.
    1. Woods SB, Achey VH. Successful identification of gifted racial/ethnic group students without changing classification requirements. Roeper Rev. 1990;13(1):1–26.
    1. Figlio D. 2005. Names, Expectations, and the Black-White Test Score Gap (Natl Bur Econ Res, Cambridge, MA), Work Pap 11195.
    1. Elhoweris H, Mutua K, Alsheikh N, Holloway P. Effects of children’s ethnicity on teachers’ referral and recommendation decisions in gifted and talented education. Remedial Spec Educ. 2005;26(1):25–31.

Publication types