close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Apr 11:14:11.
doi: 10.1186/s12995-019-0231-3. eCollection 2019.

Maritime welfare facilities - utilization and relevance for the compensation of shipboard stress

Affiliations

Maritime welfare facilities - utilization and relevance for the compensation of shipboard stress

Marcus Oldenburg et al. J Occup Med Toxicol. .

Abstract

Background: Maritime welfare institutions enable crew members of ships to use different recreation facilities ashore during their work assignments aboard. This study analyses the shipcrew members' need and their usage behavior of maritime welfare facilities that can be visited free of charge while their ship is in port.

Methods: A medically trained scientist interviewed 316 seafarers during 22 ship voyages. In addition, interviews were performed in 8 stations of the German Seamen's Missions.

Results: Port stay of the vessels accounted for 43.6% of the entire voyage duration. 279 seafarers (88.3%) stated having had opportunities for shore leave in order to visit maritime welfare facilities. Officers less often stated possibilities for shore leave than ratings (OR 0.40; 95%CI 0.24-0.67). The main reasons for shore leave were to contact family and friends and distraction from the everyday work on board. Short stays in port, a high workload and limited opportunities for reaching the welfare facilities were main obstacles to shore leave. Furthermore, several seafarers complained about poor information on board about the facilities. Among the various welfare institutions, a "very high importance" was attributed to Seamen's Missions and religious facilities (40% of the non-European seafarers - especially from Asia - and approx. 10% of the Europeans).

Conclusion: This study reveals sufficient time periods for seafarers to leave the vessel in port, mainly depending on the number of terminals to be called at. During the vessels' port stay, a reduced workload for the shipping crew can be achieved by transferring several routine tasks to shoreside personnel. Furthermore, more attention should be paid to the accessibility of the welfare facilities and to better information about their offers. Measures should be taken to facilitate visits to maritime welfare facilities as an important refuge for seafarers.

Keywords: Compensation; Maritime; Seafarer; Welfare facilities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Taking part in this study was voluntarily. All participants gave their informed consent before taking part in this study. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Hamburg Medical Association (no PV4395).Not applicable.The authors declare that they have no competing interests.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Shore leave opportunities for seafarers
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Shore leave frequencies for seafarers depending on ranks
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Shore leave reasons for European and Southeast Asian seafarers
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Obstacles to shore leave for European and Southeast Asian seafarers

References

    1. Carotenuto A, Molino I, Fasanaro AM, Amenta F. Psychological stress in seafarers: a review. Int Marit Health. 2012;63(4):188–194. - PubMed
    1. Tedesco LMR, Ferrara P, Stromillo L, Arnese A, Albano L. Seafarers’ perceptions of job demand: a cross-sectional study. Arch Environ Occup Health. 2018;73(5):278–283. doi: 10.1080/19338244.2017.1342590. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jensen OC, Sorensen JF, Thomas M, Canals ML, Nikolic N, Hu Y. Working conditions in international seafaring. Occup Med (Lond) 2006;56(6):393–397. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kql038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Luthwaite B. Feeders going from strength to strength. Scontainer Shipping & Trade. 2017.
    1. Barnard B. Feeder shipping on a roll as intra-regional traffic grows. IHS Faiplay Cointainer. 2018.

LinkOut - more resources