close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;19(3):125-31.
doi: 10.7874/jao.2015.19.3.125. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

Relation between Phonological Processing, Auditory Processing and Speech Perception among Bilingual Poor Readers

Affiliations

Relation between Phonological Processing, Auditory Processing and Speech Perception among Bilingual Poor Readers

Mohan Kumar Kalaiah. J Audiol Otol. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Background and objectives: A deficit in phonological processing abilities has been hypothesized as a cause of reading deficits among poor readers, but the precise etiology of this deficit is still unknown. Many studies have investigated the relation of auditory processing and speech perception with phonological processing, while the relation between these are not well understood. Thus, the present study was carried out to investigate the relation between these abilities among poor readers.

Subjects and methods: A total of 20 children between 7-12 years of age participated in the study. Among these 10 were typically developing children and 10 were poor readers. Auditory processing, speech perception in noise and phonological processing skills were assessed in both the groups.

Results: Auditory processing was not significantly different between children in both the groups. In contrast, phonological awareness, verbal short-term memory and rapid automatized naming, which reflect phonological processing, and speech perception in noise were found to be significantly affected in poor readers. In addition, the results showed a significant correlation between phonological processing and speech perception in noise.

Conclusions: The present study found a significant relationship between speech perception in noise and phonological processing, while there was no relationship between auditory processing and phonological processing. This finding suggests that poor speech perception among poor readers may be one of the contributing factors for phonological processing deficits, which in turn leads to reading difficulties.

Keywords: Auditory processing; Phonological processing; Poor readers; Reading impairment; Speech perception.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Mean threshold and standard deviation (in parenthesis) for frequency modulation detection (left) and gap detection tasks (right) across the groups of participants.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Mean scores and standard deviation (in parenthesis) for various tasks measuring phonological awareness.*significant difference between the groups at p<0.05.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Mean identification scores and standard deviation (in parenthesis) for non-word recognition task across groups.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Mean duration and standard deviation (in parenthesis) required for poor readers and typically developing children to complete the tasks measuring rapid automatized naming. *significant difference between the groups at p<0.05.
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Mean speech identification scores in noise and standard deviation (in parenthesis) across two groups of children. *significant difference between the groups at p<0.05. SNR: signal-to-noise ratio.

References

    1. Wagner RK, Torgesen JK, Laughon P, Simmons K, Rashotte CA. Development of young readers' phonological processing abilities. J Educ Psychol. 1993;85:83–103.
    1. Sprugevica I, Høien T. Relations between enabling skills and reading comprehension: a follow-up study of Latvian students from first to second grade. Scand J Psychol. 2004;45:115–122. - PubMed
    1. Nelson JM, Lindstrom JH, Lindstrom W, Denis D. The Structure of Phonological Processing and Its Relationship to Basic Reading. Exceptionality. 2012;20:179–196.
    1. Snowling MJ. Dyslexia. 2nd ed. Oxford: Wiley; 2000.
    1. Ramus F. Developmental dyslexia: specific phonological deficit or general sensorimotor dysfunction? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003;13:212–218. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources