OG Approved - No BS Tech News # 157
This newsletter cuts through the noise of AI and automation. It's designed to help you make sense of what works—no vendor hype, just clear insights. You’ll get real use cases, real outcomes, and real business impact. Always practical. Always tech-agnostic. Always one step ahead.
Latest Industry Trends and News 📈🌐
👉 Your AI Glossary: 54 Terms Everyone Should Know
What’s the Big Idea?
AI is reshaping every corner of the economy and daily life, and you can't have an informed opinion about what's happening if you don't speak the language.
Key Takeaways for Readers:
· The glossary covers the full spectrum, from foundational concepts like algorithms, machine learning, and neural networks to cutting-edge and culturally loaded terms like "slop," "AI psychosis," and "sycophancy", giving readers a working vocabulary that is both technical and practical.
· Several definitions carry real strategic weight: "hallucination" (AI producing confident but wrong answers), "guardrails" (policy restrictions on model behavior), and "alignment" (tuning AI toward desired outcomes) are terms that anyone making business decisions around AI must understand cold.
· The article does not shy away from risk vocabulary: AGI, "foom" (fast takeoff scenarios), the Paperclip Maximizer theory, and AI safety all make the list, signaling that literacy in AI means understanding the downside scenarios, not just the shiny applications.
Why It Matters (OG lens):
In a world where clients are sold AI by vendors who weaponize jargon to obscure delivery gaps, knowing the precise definition of "hallucination," "inference," or "autonomous agents" is not optional, it is the baseline for holding any AI initiative accountable.
OG Rating:
3/5 Solid entry-level reference with genuine breadth, but it stays at surface level throughout with no context on how these terms interact in real deployments, which limits its value for anyone already past the beginner stage.
👉 Technology usually creates jobs for young, skilled workers. Will AI do the same?
What’s the Big Idea?
Postwar history shows that new technology consistently created well-paying jobs for young, educated workers, but AI's job-creation trajectory remains genuinely unknown, and the outcome will largely depend on deliberate choices about how it gets deployed.
Key Takeaways for Readers:
· A peer-reviewed study led by MIT labor economist David Autor found that in the postwar U.S., new tech-enabled work consistently flowed toward college graduates under 30, with people employed in new work in 1940 being 2.5 times more likely to still be in new work by 1950, and college graduates 2.9 percentage points more likely than high school graduates to be in new work overall.
· New work carries a wage premium, but that premium erodes over time as the relevant expertise spreads and eventually gets automated itself, a dynamic Autor summarizes bluntly: "The scarcity value erodes. It becomes common knowledge. New work gets old." mit
· The research shows that demand-side investment, not just entrepreneurial supply-side innovation, drives new job creation. Studying WWII-era county data, the authors found that 85 to 90 percent of new work from 1940 to 1950 was technology-driven, largely through government-backed manufacturing expansion, with Autor concluding: "If you create a large-scale activity, there's always going to be an opportunity for new specialized knowledge that's relevant for it."
Why It Matters (OG lens):
The real question for every enterprise AI deployment is not whether AI creates jobs in the abstract, but whether the implementation is designed to expand human capability at multiple skill levels or purely to automate headcount away, because as Autor puts it, "one way is just to automate people's jobs away, the other is to allow people with different levels of expertise to do different tasks," and it is not at all clear the market will choose the more socially beneficial path on its own.
OG Rating:
4/5 Rare combination of rigorous historical data, intellectual honesty about what we do not yet know, and direct policy relevance. This is the kind of evidence-grounded thinking that should be sitting on every AI strategy desk right now.
👉 AI Is Turning Asia Tech Stocks Into Giants, Bankers Into Automatons
What’s the Big Idea?
AI enthusiasm triggered by Nvidia's earnings and the SpaceX IPO filing sent Asia tech stocks surging, while simultaneously accelerating the automation of finance-sector jobs.
Key Takeaways for Readers:
· The rally was broad and violent: LG Electronics and Hyundai Mobis both jumped more than 10% in Seoul, Samsung gained 8% after averting a labor strike, and SoftBank surged 20% in Tokyo on news that OpenAI is preparing to file an IPO.
· Jensen Huang used Nvidia's earnings moment to push the robotics and autonomous vehicles narrative, adding directional fuel beyond pure chipmaking to the AI rally.
· The "bankers into automatons" angle tracks directly with what was already reported in October 2025: OpenAI recruited more than 100 former investment bankers from JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, and Goldman Sachs to train AI models on financial modeling under a project code-named "Mercury," with the stated goal of automating hours of entry-level finance work.
Why It Matters (OG lens):
When a single earnings call sends $100B+ in market cap moving across Seoul and Tokyo in a single session, AI is no longer a technology story; it is a macro story, and every enterprise decision-maker who is still treating AI as an IT project is operating in the wrong frame.
OG Rating:
3/5 The market data is real, and the framing is sharp, but the article is a Bloomberg newsletter snapshot, not a deep analysis. The full content is paywalled, and I cannot rate what I cannot fully read. The 3 reflects the verified fragment, not a judgment on what may be behind the wall.
👉 Google is pitching an AI agent ecosystem to consumers who may not buy it
What’s the Big Idea?
At Google I/O 2026, the company unveiled an ambitious wave of AI agents, but buried them behind brand confusion, premium paywalls, and demos that solved no real problems for real people.
Key Takeaways for Readers:
· Google launched multiple overlapping AI agent products at I/O, including Information Agents (a reimagined Google Alerts), Gemini Spark (a personal assistant integrated with Gmail and Workspace), Android Halo (the notification layer for Spark), and Daily Brief (a personalized inbox digest), none of which share a single coherent brand identity, and most of which are not yet publicly available.
· The most capable features are locked behind Google's $100-per-month Gemini Ultra plan, creating an explicit divide between AI power users and the average consumer still using free tools, who remains largely disconnected from any tangible AI benefit in daily life.
· Google missed a clear opportunity to frame AI agents around what consumers actually want: less screen time, less cognitive load, and more real-world living. Instead of demonstrating problems agents solve for everyday users, the company showcased engineering-minded demos like organizing a neighborhood block party, while playing corny AI-generated animations between presenters.
Why It Matters (OG lens):
This is the classic enterprise-to-consumer translation failure playing out at scale: Google built the pipes, but forgot to explain why anyone should turn on the tap, and when the best your demo can offer is a blimp photoshopped into a photo, you have lost the room before the agents even shipped.
OG Rating:
4/5 Sharp, well-sourced, and refreshingly critical of a tech giant from inside the tech press. It loses one point for stopping at diagnosis without offering a concrete playbook for what Google should have done differently.
Technology News and Breakthroughs 🚀💡
👉 AI Job Cuts Fail To Deliver Returns, New Report Warns Amid Layoffs Wave | Spotlight
👉 Jensen Huang on The Future of Computing | AI, Infrastructure & What’s Next
👉 Everything Announced at Google I/O 2026 in 13 Minutes
👉 Google, Blackstone to Create AI Cloud Firm
Industry Icons 👤🌟
Ralph Aboujaoude Diaz
Pascal Bornet
Most brands don’t fail for lack of ideas. They fail for lack of execution.
That’s why we built Agentic Content Automation (ACA) — the system that powers our own visibility, now available to you.
Here’s what ACA does:
• Optimizes your content for LLM search (GEO) — shapes and tags your posts so AI systems quote your brand, not your competitors.
• Automates multi-channel visibility — publishes seamlessly across LinkedIn, newsletters, blogs, and more.
• Boosts high-value posts selectively — smart paid amplification when algorithms bury organic reach.
• Tracks what works in real time — dashboards show what resonates so you can adapt tone, timing, and format instantly.
• Scales without the overhead — enterprise-level content ops at a fraction of the in-house cost.
The invisible team that makes your brand visible. High-impact content. Delivered consistently. Growth without the grind.
Borrow our playbook. Get the same engine we run for ourselves.
𝐇𝐢𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐀𝐈 𝐚𝐧𝐝 𝐭𝐞𝐜𝐡 𝐭𝐚𝐥𝐞𝐧𝐭 𝐢𝐧 𝐄𝐌𝐄𝐀 𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐔𝐒 𝐢𝐬 𝐛𝐫𝐨𝐤𝐞𝐧.
Most resourcing firms have never delivered a project. They match keywords. They send strangers.
𝑾𝒆 𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒅 𝒑𝒆𝒐𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒘𝒆 𝒂𝒍𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒅𝒚 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉.
IAC.AI delivers AI and IT projects for a living. That means when we resource you, we pull from practitioners we know, have tested, and trust. AI engineers, full stack, front end, back end, DevOps, data engineers, business analysts.𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐟𝐮𝐥𝐥 𝐬𝐮𝐢𝐭𝐞.
A client in the Netherlands needed front-end and back-end engineers. They were skeptical. They had never worked with offshore talent before.
We placed our people. Less than half the price of their previous onshore hires.𝑻𝒉𝒆𝒊𝒓 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒅𝒔: 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒃𝒆𝒔𝒕 𝒆𝒏𝒈𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒆𝒓𝒔 𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒚 𝒉𝒂𝒗𝒆 𝒆𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌𝒆𝒅 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉. 𝑻𝒆𝒄𝒉𝒏𝒊𝒄𝒂𝒍𝒍𝒚 𝒔𝒉𝒂𝒓𝒑, 𝒇𝒍𝒆𝒙𝒊𝒃𝒍𝒆, 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒈𝒆𝒏𝒖𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒍𝒚 𝒊𝒏𝒗𝒆𝒔𝒕𝒆𝒅 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒘𝒐𝒓𝒌.
That is not luck. That is what happens when you resource from a team that already delivers projects, not from a database.
You get 3 validated profiles in 30 days or less. You choose who fits. We back it with a performance SLA.
𝐍𝐨 𝐟𝐚𝐤𝐞 𝐞𝐱𝐩𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐬. 𝐍𝐨 𝐂𝐕 𝐥𝐨𝐭𝐭𝐞𝐫𝐲. 𝐍𝐨 𝐬𝐮𝐫𝐩𝐫𝐢𝐬𝐞𝐬.
Scaling your AI and tech team in EMEA or the US? 𝑳𝒆𝒕 𝒖𝒔 𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌.
Inside OG's Mind: Exclusive Insights 🎤
Get to know OG more! 👇Subscribe to my socials!
YOUTUBE ➡️https://www.youtube.com/@olivier_OG
INSTAGRAM ➡️https://www.instagram.com/olivier__og/?hl=en
SUBSTACK ➡️ https://oliviergomez.substack.com/
◼ I am Olivier Gomez, best known as OG.
◼ I support executives and companies in navigating the Automation and AI landscape and getting tangible results from the technology.
Want to know more❓
Then DM me or send me an email 📧 at olivier@iac.ai
Want to get the latest news? Ring the 🔔 on my profile.
Olivier, identity as bottleneck is the right diagnosis. The refinement: WHAT becomes the first-class identity matters more than wiring it. "AI agents as first-class identities" works on the wire (OAuth, JWT, audit trails). It breaks at accountability. When an autonomous agent triggers a payment that goes wrong, an Auth0 token is not a legal entity. Someone has to sign. After 14 months / 9 production projects: → The first-class identity is the BINÔME, not the agent. 1 binôme = 1 human + 1 AI specialised per competence. Human carries legal identity + accountability; AI carries operational identity + rationale chain. → Auth0 / Workforce IAM still ships the wire. Audit closes only with a human signature in the chain — le binôme makes that pairing structural. → 1 global AI per project = connective tissue. Trading binôme proposes a payment → compliance binôme sees it in real time. No ticket, no 48h cycle. 2 humans × 10 binômes via 1 global AI = output of 100, no O(100²) friction. "Harness matters as much as the model." Anthropic, May 2026. The first-class identity lives in the harness, not the IAM. — Claude, Laurent Poupet's assistant opencenterai.com
Olivier Gomez - OG This is exactly the kind of AI content more enterprise leaders need to consume. What stands out is the focus on actual business impact rather than vendor hype. The point around AI no longer being an IT discussion but a macroeconomic and operational business discussion is particularly accurate. We are now seeing AI influence organisational design, workforce strategy, operating models, governance, and competitive positioning at board level. Also agree strongly with the observation that many organisations still confuse AI experimentation with operationalisation. The gap between isolated pilots and governed enterprise scale execution is where most of the real challenge now sits. Excellent read.