close
Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr 18:9:563.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00563. eCollection 2018.

Leaders' Expressed Humility and Followers' Feedback Seeking: The Mediating Effects of Perceived Image Cost and Moderating Effects of Power Distance Orientation

Affiliations

Leaders' Expressed Humility and Followers' Feedback Seeking: The Mediating Effects of Perceived Image Cost and Moderating Effects of Power Distance Orientation

Jing Qian et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

We developed and tested a model to identify the role of leaders' expressed humility on employees' feedback-seeking processes. The data used in our study was from a sample of 248 employees and 57 of their immediate supervisors. The results revealed that: (1) leader's expressed humility positively related to employees' feedback seeking mediated by employees' perceived image cost; and (2) power distance orientation moderated the relationship between leader's expressed humility and employees' perceived image costs, such that the relationship was stronger when the power distance orientation was lower rather than higher. The results offer new insight into potential managerial practices that aim at stimulating feedback seeking. We conclude with a discussion for future research.

Keywords: feedback seeking; humility; perceived image cost; power distance orientation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Theoretical model.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
The moderating effect of power distance orientation.

References

    1. Aiken L. S., West S. G. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    1. Anseel F., Beatty A. S., Shen W., Lievens F., Sackett P. R. (2015). How are we doing after 30 years? A meta- analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. J. Manage. 41 318–348. 10.1177/0149206313484521 - DOI
    1. Argandona A. (2015). Humility in management. J. Bus. Ethics 132 63–71. 10.1007/s10551-014-2311-8 - DOI
    1. Ashford S., Blatt R., Vandewalle D. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: a review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. J. Manage. 29 773–799. 10.1016/S0149-2063(03)00079-5 - DOI
    1. Ashford S. J. (1986). Feedback-seeking in individual adaptation: a resources perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 29 465–487. 10.2307/256219 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources