close
Academia.eduAcademia.edu

Outline

Soil chronosequences, soil development, and soil evolution: a critical review

1998, Catena

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0341-8162(98)00053-8

Abstract

Soils chronosequences are valuable tools for investigating rates and directions of soil and landscape evolution. Post-incisive chronosequences are the most common type of chronosequence. They are found in many landscapes, including sand dunes, glacial moraines, landslide scars, old pasture, burnt landscape patches, old mining areas, lava flows, alluvial fans, floodplains, river terraces, and marine terraces. They register pedogenic change over time-scales ranging from years to millions of years. Soil chronosequences help in testing rival theories of pedogenesis. Traditional soil formation theory sees a soil developing progressively under the influence of the environmental state factors until it is in equilibrium with prevailing environmental conditions. This developmental view of pedogenesis is supported by the classic soil chronosequence studies. A new evolutionary view of pedogenesis, which was prompted by the omnipresent inconstancy of environmental conditions and the notions of multidirectional changes and multiple steady states Ž . as predicted by non-linear dynamics , proposes that environmental inconstancy and non-linear behaviour in soil-landscapes lead to soil evolution, rather than to soil development. Soils 'evolve' through continual creation and destruction at all scales, and may progress, stay the same, or retrogress, depending on the environmental circumstances. Some recent soil and vegetation chronosequence investigations support an evolutionary view of pedogenesis. It is concluded that soil chronosequences are still potent instruments for pedological investigations and that they have a starring role to play in the testing of pedological theories. q

Key takeaways
sparkles

AI

  1. Soil chronosequences are crucial for understanding rates and directions of soil evolution over millions of years.
  2. Post-incisive chronosequences are the most common and provide insights into pedogenic change.
  3. The text evaluates two theories of pedogenesis: the developmental and the evolutionary views.
  4. Recent studies indicate multidirectional soil evolution, challenging traditional unidirectional models.
  5. Soil chronosequences support empirical testing of pedological theories and contribute to landscape evolution research.

References (90)

  1. Amit, R., Gerson, R., Yaalon, D.H., 1993. Stages and rate of the gravel shattering process by salts in desert reg soils. Geoderma 57, 295-324.
  2. Ampe, C., Langohr, R., 1993. Distribution and dynamics of shrub roots in recent coastal dune valley ecosystems of Belgium. Geoderma 56, 37-55.
  3. Aniku, J.R.F., Singer, M.J., 1990. Pedogenic iron oxide trends in a marine terrace chronosequence. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 147-152.
  4. Arlinghaus, S.L., Nystuen, J.D., Woldenberg, M.J., 1992. An application of graphical analysis to semidesert soils. Geogr. Rev. 82, 244-252.
  5. Bain, D.C., Mellor, A., Robertson-Rintout, M.S.E., Buckland, S.T., 1993. Variations in weathering processes and rates with time in a chronosequence of soils from Glen Fleshie, Scotland. Geoderma 57, 275-293.
  6. Birkeland, P.W., 1990. Soil-geomorphic research-a selective overview. Geomorphology 3, 207-224.
  7. Birkeland, P.W., 1992. Quaternary soil chronosequences in various environments-extremely arid to humid Ž . Ž tropical. In: Martini, I.P., Chesworth, W. Eds. , Weathering, Soils and Paleosols Developments in Earth . Surface Processes, 2 . Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 261-281.
  8. Bockheim, J.G., 1980. Solution and use of chronofunctions in studying soil development. Geoderma 24, 71-85.
  9. Bormann, B.T., Sidle, R.C., 1990. Changes in productivity and distribution of nutrients in a chronosequence at Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska. J. Ecol. 78, 561-578.
  10. Bowman, G.M., 1989. Podzol development in a Holocene chronosequence: I. Moruya Heads, New South Wales. Aust. J. Soil Res. 27, 607-628.
  11. Brooks, S.M., Richards, K.S., 1993. Establishing the role of pedogenesis in changing soil hydraulic properties. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms 18, 573-578.
  12. Burges, A., 1960. Time and size as factors in ecology. J. Ecol. 48, 273-285.
  13. Carreira, J.A., Niell, F.X., Lajtha, K., 1994. Soil nitrogen availability and nitrification in Mediterranean shrublands of varying fire history and successional stage. Biogeochemistry 26, 189-209.
  14. Clements, F.E., 1916. Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Publication No. 242. Carnegie Institute of Washington, Washington, DC.
  15. Cowles, H.C., 1899. The ecological relations of the vegetation on the sand dunes of northeastern Minnesota. Botanical Gazette 27, 95-117, 167-202, 281-308, 361-391.
  16. Crews, T.E., Kitayama, K., Fownes, J.H., Riley, R.H., Herbert, D.A., Mueller-Dombois, D., Vitousek, P.M., 1995. Changes in soil phosphorus fractions and ecosystem dynamics across a long chronosequence in Hawaii. Ecology 76, 1407-1424.
  17. Crocker, R.L., Major, J., 1955. Soil development in relation to vegetation and surface age at Glacier Bay, Alaska. J. Ecol. 43, 427-448.
  18. Davis, W.M., 1909. Geographical Essays. Ginn, Boston, MA.
  19. Dawson, B.S.W., Fergusson, J.E., Campbell, A.S., Cutler, E.J.B., 1991. Depletion of first-row transition metals in a chronosequence of soils in the Reefton area of New Zealand. Geoderma 48, 271-296.
  20. Dethier, D.P., 1988. The soil chronosequence along the Cowlitz River, Washington. US Geological Survey Bulletin 1590-F, 47 pp.
  21. Dorronsoro, C., 1994. Micromorphological index for the evaluation of soil evolution in central Spain. Geoderma 61, 237-250.
  22. R.J. Huggettr Catena 32 1998 155-172
  23. Dorronsoro, C., Alonso, P., 1994. Chronosequence in Almar River fluvial-terrace soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 910-925.
  24. Drury, W.H., Nisbet, I.C.T., 1973. Succession. J. Arnold Arboretum 54, 331-368.
  25. Fastie, C.L., 1995. Causes and ecosystem consequences of multiple pathways of primary succession at Glacier Bay, Alaska. Ecology 76, 1899-1916.
  26. Ferran, A., Vallejo, V.R., 1992. Litter dynamics in post-fire successional forests of Quercus ilex. Vegetation 99-100, 239-246.
  27. Fine, P., Singer, M.J., Verosub, K.L., 1992. Use of magnetic-susceptibility measurements in assessing soil uniformity in chronosequence studies. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 1195-1199.
  28. Frazer, D.W., McColl, J.G., Powers, R.F., 1990. Soil nitrogen mineralization in a clearcutting chronosequence in a northern California conifer forest. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 1145-1152.
  29. Gerrard, A.J., 1992. Soil Geomorphology: An Integration of Pedology and Geomorphology. Chapman & Hall, London, 260 pp.
  30. Gleason, H.A., 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 53, 7-26.
  31. Harden, J.W., 1982. A quantitative index of soil development from field descriptions: examples from a chronosequence in central California. Geoderma 28, 1-28.
  32. Harden, J.W., Taylor, E.M., Hill, C., Mark, R.K., McFadden, E.D., Reheis, M.C., Sowers, J.M., Wells, S.G., 1991. Rates of soil development from four soil chronosequences in the southern Great Basin. Quaternary Res. 35, 383-399.
  33. Harrison, J.B.J., McFadden, L.D., Weldon, R.J. III, 1990. Spatial soil variability in the Cajon Pass chronosequence: implications for the use of soils as a geochronological tool. Geomorphology 3, 399-416.
  34. Hole, F.D., 1961. A classification of pedoturbation and some other processes and factors of soil formation in relation to isotropism and anisotropism. Soil Sci. 91, 375-377.
  35. Howard, J.L., Amos, D.F., Daniels, W.L., 1993. Alluvial soil chronosequence in the inner Coastal Plain, central Virginia. Quaternary Res. 39, 201-213.
  36. Huggett, R.J., 1995. Geoecology: An Evolutionary Approach. Routledge, London, 320 pp.
  37. Huggett, R.J., 1997. Environmental Change: The Evolving Ecosphere. Routledge, London, pp. 378 pp.
  38. Jenny, H., 1941. Factors of Soil Formation: A System of Quantitative Pedology. McGraw-Hill, New York, 281 pp. Jenny, H., 1980. The Soil Resource: Origin and Behaviour. Ecological Studies, Vol. 37. Springer, New York.
  39. Johnson, D.L., Hole, F.D., 1994. Soil formation theory: a summary of its principal impacts on geography, Ž . geomorphology, soil-geomorphology, Quaternary geology and paleopedology. In: Amundson, R. Ed. , Factors of Soil Formation: A Fiftieth Anniversary Retrospective. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication 33. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, pp. 111-126.
  40. Johnson, D.L., Watson-Stegner, D., 1987. Evolution model of pedogenesis. Soil Sci. 143, 349-366.
  41. Johnson, D.L., Keller, E.A., Rockwell, T.K., 1990. Dynamic pedogenesis: new views on some key concepts, and a model for interpreting Quaternary soils. Quaternary Res. 33, 306-319.
  42. Karlstrom, E.T., Osborn, G., 1992. Genesis of buried paleosols and soils in Holocene and late Pleistocene tills, Bugaboo Glacier area, British Columbia, Canada. Arctic Alpine Res. 24, 108-123.
  43. Kieft, T.L., 1994. Grazing and plant canopy effects on semiarid soil microbial biomass and respiration. Biology and Fertility of Soils 18, 155-162.
  44. Kitayama, K., Mueller-Dombois, D., Vitousek, P.M., 1995. Primary succession of Hawaiian montane rain forest on a chronosequence of eight lava flows. J. Vegetation Sci. 6, 211-222.
  45. Kohls, S.J., van Kessel, C., Baker, D.D., Grigal, D.S., Lawrence, D.B., 1994. Assessment of N fixation and 2 N cycling by dryas along a chronosequence within the forelands of the Athabasca Glacier, Canada. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 26, 623-632.
  46. Kroonenberg, S.B., Hoorn, M.C., Moura, M.L., Veldkamp, A., 1990. Variability in bulk geochemistry of fluvial terrace sands: consequences for the study of weathering chronosequences. Pedologie 40, 19-31.
  47. Ĺeigh, D.S., 1996. Soil chronosequence of Brasstown Creek, Blue Ridge Mountains, USA. Catena 26, 99-114. Ž .
  48. Manner, H.I., Morrison, R.J., 1991. A temporal sequence chronosequence of soil carbon and nitrogen development after phosphate mining on Nauru Island. Pacific Sci. 45, 400-404.
  49. Matthews, J.A., 1992. The Ecology of Recently-Deglaciated Terrain: A Geoecological Approach to Glacier Forelands and Primary Succession. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 386 pp.
  50. R.J. Huggettr Catena 32 1998 155-172 171
  51. McCarroll, D., 1991. Relative-age dating of inorganic deposits: the need for a more critical approach. Holocene 1, 174-180.
  52. Mellor, A., 1987. A pedogenic investigation of some soil chronosequences on neoglacial moraine ridges, southern Norway: examination of soil chemical data using principal components analysis. Catena 14, 369-381.
  53. Merritts, D.J., Chadwick, O.A., Hendricks, D.M., Brimhall, G.H., Lewis, C.J., 1992. The mass balance of soil evolution on late Quaternary marine terraces, northern California. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 104, 1456-1470.
  54. Messer, A.C., 1989. An alternative approach to the study of pedogenic chronosequences. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 43, 221-229.
  55. Mohindra, R., Parkash, B., 1990. Clay mineralogy of the Gandak megafan and adjoining Middle Gangetic Plains, India. Bull. Sci. Geol. 43, 203-212.
  56. Ńiewenhuyse, A., Jongmans, A.G., Van Breeman, N., 1994. Mineralogy of a Holocene chronosequence on andesitic beach sediments in Costa Rica. Soil Science Society of America Journal 58, 485-494.
  57. Olff, H., Berendse, F., De Visser, W., 1994. Changes in nitrogen mineralization, tissue nutrient concentrations and biomass compartmentation after cessation of fertilizer application to mown grassland. J. Ecol. 82, 611-620.
  58. Olson, J.S., 1958. Rates of succession and soil changes on Southern Lake, Michigan, sand dunes. Bot. Gazette 119, 125-170.
  59. Phillips, J.D., 1995a. Time lags and emergent stability in morphogenicrpedogenic system models. Ecol. Modelling 78, 267-276.
  60. Phillips, J.D., 1995b. Self-organization and landscape evolution. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 19, 309-321.
  61. Phillips, J.D., 1997. Simplicity and the reinvention of equifinality. Geogr. Anal. 29, 1-15.
  62. Phillips, J.D., in press. On the relation between complex systems and the factorial model of soil formation. Geoderma.
  63. Piccolo, M.C., Neill, C., Cerri, C.C., 1994. Natural abundance of 15 N in soils along forest-to-pasture chronosequences in the western Brazilian Amazon Basin. Oecologia 99, 112-117.
  64. Prosser, I.P., Roseby, S.J., 1995. A chronosequence of rapid leaching of mixed Podzol soil materials following sand mining. Geoderma 64, 297-308.
  65. Quantin, P., Balesdent, J., Bouleau, A., Delaune, M., Feller, C., 1991. Premiers stades d'alteration de ponces Ž . volcaniques en climat tropical humide Montagne Pelee Martinique . Geoderma 50, 125-148.
  66. Ŕeheis, M.C., 1990. Influence of climate and eolian dust on the major-element chemistry and clay mineralogy of soils in the northern Bighorn basin, USA. Catena 17, 219-248.
  67. Retallack, G.J., 1990. Soils of the Past: An Introduction to Paleopedology. Unwin Hyman, Boston. Ž .
  68. Retallack, G.J., 1992. Paleozoic paleosols. In: Martini, I.P., Chesworth, W. Eds. , Weathering, Soils and Paleosols, Developments in Earth Surface Processes 2. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 543-564.
  69. Rode, A.A., 1961. The soil forming process and soil evolution. Israel Program for Scientific Translations, Jerusalem.
  70. Ryzhova, I.M., 1996. Analysis of the feedback effects of ecosystems produced by changes in carbon-cycling parameters using mathematical models. Eurasian Soil Sci. 28, 42-52.
  71. Salisbury, E.J., 1925. Note on the edaphic succession in some dune soils with special reference to the time factor. J. Ecol. 13, 322-328.
  72. Schaetzl, R.J., Barrett, L.R., Winkler, J.A., 1994. Choosing models for soil chronofunctions and fitting them to data. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 45, 219-232.
  73. Simonson, R.W., 1959. Outline of a generalized theory of soil genesis. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 23, 152-156.
  74. Simonson, R.W., 1978. A multiple-process model of soil genesis. In: Mahaney, W.C. Ed. , Quaternary Soils. Geo Abstracts, Norwich, pp. 1-25.
  75. Singer, M.J., Fine, P., Verosub, K.L., Chadwick, O.A., 1992. Time dependence of magnetic susceptibility of soil chronosequences on the California coast. Quaternary Res. 37, 323-332.
  76. Skjemstad, J.O., Fitzpatrick, R.W., Zarcinas, B.A., Thompson, C.H., 1992. Genesis of podzols on coastal dunes in Southern Queensland. II. Geochemistry and forms of element as deduced from various soil extraction procedures. Australian Journal of Soil Research 30, 615-644.
  77. Stevens, P.R., Walker, T.W., 1970. The chronosequence concept and soil formation. Q. Rev. Biol. 45, 333-350.
  78. R.J. Huggettr Catena 32 1998 155-172 172
  79. Thompson, C.H., 1992. Genesis of podzols on coastal dunes in Southern Queensland. I. Field relationships and profile morphology. Australian Journal of Soil Research 30, 593-613.
  80. VandenBygaart, A.J., Protz, R., 1995. Soil genesis on a chronosequence, Pinery Provincial Park, Ontario. Can. J. Soil Sci. 75, 63-72.
  81. Vincent, K.R., Bull, W.B., Chadwick, O.A., 1994. Construction of a soil chronosequence using the thickness of pedogenic carbonate coatings. J. Geol. Educ. 42, 316-324.
  82. Vreeken, W.J., 1975. Principal kinds of chronosequences and their significance in soil history. J. Soil Sci. 26, 378-394.
  83. Walker, T.W., 1966. The factor time in soil formation. New Zealand Soil News 6, 153-167.
  84. Walker, T.W., Syers, J.K., 1976. The fate of phosphorus during pedogenesis. Geoderma 15, 1-19.
  85. Yaalon, D.H., 1971. Soil-forming processes in time and space. In: Yaalon, D.H. Ed. , Paleopedology-Origin, Nature and Dating of Paleosols. International Society of Soil Science and Israel Universities Press, Jerusalem, Israel, pp. 29-39.
  86. Yaalon, D.H., 1975. Conceptual models in pedogenesis: can soil forming factors be solved?. Geoderma 14, 189-205. Ž .
  87. Yaalon, D.H., 1983. Climate, time and soil development. In: Wilding, L.P., Smeck, N.E., Hall, G.F. Eds. , Pedogenesis and Soil Taxonomy: I. Concepts and Interactions. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 223-251.
  88. Zamotayev, I.V., Targulian, V.O., 1994. Development of ferralitization in a chronosequence of Andosols. Ž Ž . .
  89. Eurasian Soil Sci. 26, 1-8, Translated from Pochvovedeniye, 5 1994 : 25-29 .
  90. Zarin, D.J., Johnson, A.H., 1995. Base saturation, nutrient cation, and organic matter increases during early pedogenesis on landslide scars in the Luquillo Experimental Forest, Puerto Rico. Geoderma 65, 317-330.

FAQs

sparkles

AI

What explains the effectiveness of soil chronosequences in pedogenesis research?add

Soil chronosequences reveal the rate and direction of pedogenic change, exemplified by studies showing an exponential relationship between soil properties and time, providing compelling data for testing theories of soil formation.

How do different environments contribute to soil chronosequence development?add

Chronosequences have been identified in diverse environments such as glacial moraines and coastal sand dunes, with varying soil evolution periods from 220 years in Glacier Bay, Alaska, to millions of years in other locations.

What methods are most reliable in constructing geographical soil chronosequences?add

Utilizing soils that have formed on surfaces of known age or buried under sedimentary cover, like alluvial fans and terraces, is considered a more secure method for chronosequence construction.

When did significant challenges to traditional soil formation theories arise?add

Recent empirical investigations over the last two decades have prompted a shift from traditional developmental theories of pedogenesis to an evolutionary perspective, encouraging exploration of multidirectional evolution patterns.

What are the implications of variable soil properties across chronosequences?add

Studies show that properties in chronosequences, such as in Alaska, often continue to evolve without reaching steady states, suggesting that soil development is influenced by complex environmental factors and historical events.

About the author
BERJAYA
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Undergraduate
Papers
12
Followers
125
View all papers from Gabriela Ulloa Contadorarrow_forward