close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20130921181020/http://www.pandagon.net/
LeftRight

10 DAYS IN A MADHOUSE is a feature motion picture thriller set in the post Civil War era as “The Greatest Reporter in America,” Nellie Bly goes undercover in a notorious woman’s insane asylum to expose atrocities, abuse, rape and murder.

The feature length movie thriller 10 DAYS IN A MADHOUSE chronicles the real life experiences of Nellie Bly, who was born during the Civil War and in a world run by men was called “the greatest reporter in America,” “fearless,” and, “daredevil reporter.” The creators of Superman based his counterpart, reporter Lois Lane, on Nellie Bly. Bly circled the globe in 72 days, worked as an elephant trainer and risked her life time and again going undercover in crime and slavery rings to bring horrors against the helpless to light. At 23 she feigned mental illness to go undercover in the notorious Blackwell’s Island Woman’s Insane Asylum to expose atrocities, abuse rape and murder.

The film makers are looking for additional funding to start filming 10 Days in a Mad House. If you’d like to support this project please visit: http://www.indiegogo.com/projects/10-days-in-a-madhouse-suspense-thriller-dramatic-feature-film

 


‘Mini-Miss’ pageant organisers face fines and prison sentences as parliament addresses ‘hypersexualisation’ of under-16s.

Najat Vallaud-Belkacem

The French parliament has moved to ban children’s beauty contests in an attempt to halt what one former minister called the hyper-sexualisation of young girls.

France’s upper house of parliament, the senate, adopted the proposal as part of a wider law on gender equality after former sports minister Chantal Jouanno called for the ban on beauty pageants for children under 16. It must now be passed by the national assembly before becoming law.

“Let us not make our girls believe from an early age that their only value is their appearance,” Jouanno told the senate. “Let us not allow commercial interests to outweigh social interests. Lawmakers are not moralisers, but we have a duty to defend the superior interest of the child.”

The ban on what the French call Mini-Miss beauty pageants was opposed by the Socialist senator Virginie Klès, who sponsored the gender equality bill, as well as the government’s spokeswoman and women’s rights minister, Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, both of whom judged the penalties too harsh.

Under the proposed law, anyone who flouts the minimum age limit for beauty pageants will face up to two years in prison and a €30,000 (£25,000) fine.

Vallaud-Belkacem tabled an amendment that would force pageant organisers to apply for official permission to stage them, but this was ruled out after Jouanno’s amendment was approved.

Afterwards, Vallaud-Belkacem suggested she might call for an amendment to control rather than ban the child beauty pageants when the bill is discussed in the lower house in the next few weeks.

In a parliamentary report drawn up in March 2012, Jouanno expressed concern about the hyper-sexualisation of young girls, including “the sexualisation of their expressions, postures or clothes that are too precocious”. Jouanno said at the time: “The phenomenon is more and more present.”

Her report, Against Hyper-Sexualisation: A New Fight for Equality, expressed concern that young girls were being disguised as “sexual candy” in a competition over appearance, beauty and seduction, which she said was “contrary to the dignity of the human being”.

The report also recommended further measures that were not included in the bill including outlawing adult clothing in child sizes, for example padded bras and high-heeled shoes, and banning the casting of models under 16 in advertising campaigns.

Jouanno’s report was prompted by international outrage over a fashion photo-shoot in French Vogue that showed 10-year-old Thylane Loubry Blondeau and two other girls posing in heavy makeup, jewellery, high-heeled shoes and tight clothes, and pouting provocatively.

The magazine feature initially failed to rouse anger in France, but sparked widespread criticism in America where the pictures were deemed inappropriate, prompting the French government to announce its inquiry.

After the senate vote, Michel Le Parmentier, who organises the Mini-Miss pageant, said his company would look at moving the contests to other European countries if France imposed a ban.

“Maybe in Belgium, very close to the border,” Le Parmentier said.

He insisted his pageants involved “no make-up, no swimsuits, no artifice” and that the girls simply paraded in princess dresses.

The bill now passes to the national assembly where it needs approval before entering the statute books.


Rallying for immigration reform in Washington, D.C. on Thursday landed more than 100 women in handcuffs. U.S. Capitol Police arrested protesters, among whom were “20 undocumented women from 20 different states,” according to immigration reform advocate Vivian Lavitan. The protesters linked arms and blocked an intersection while calling for the House of Representatives to pass a Fair Immigration Reform bill for women and children. In addition to the protests, children donned “Don’t Deport My Mom” T-shirts and distributed heart-shaped cookies to Congressional representatives. The House has yet to pass an immigration measure like the one the Senate passed in June.

Read it at NBC Washington


This week’s feel-good story of the homeless man in Boston who found a backpack containing $42,000 in cash and travelers checks and then turned it into authorities is developing into an even better tale.

An online fundraiser to collect money for that Good Samaritan, who we now know is named Glen James, had raised nearly $64,000 as of 9:20 a.m. ET Wednesday.

The “Boston Homeless Man Reward” campaign was launched by Ethan Whittington of Midlothian, Va., who hasn’t met James, but felt compelled to see if other Good Samaritans would “help this man change his life.”

James was honored this week by the Boston Police Commissioner Edward Davis “for his extraordinary show of character and honesty.”

According to The Boston Globe:

“James, a slight, bespectacled man in his mid-50s who says he has been homeless for five years, said the thought of keeping the money never crossed his mind.

” ‘Even if I were desperate for money, I would not have kept even a penny of the money found,’ he said Monday in a handwritten statement. ‘God has always very well looked after me.’ ”

The Globe adds that “in his statement, James wrote about how he found the money and a bit about himself. He had worked at a courthouse for 13 years as a file clerk, he said, before being fired. On Monday, the courts could not immediately confirm his employment. James could have gotten another job, he said, but he suffers from an inner-ear disorder that causes prolonged vertigo spells.”

The money he found last weekend belonged to a student from China who was visiting Boston. It was returned to the student.


The decisions of all mothers are often harshly judged, says Katrina Alcorn in this excerpt from “Maxed Out: American Moms on the Brink.” But the finger pointing needs to stop, and instead we have to push for economic policies and social institutions that support caregiving.

Every mother I know has felt judged, at one time or another, about her choice to work or not work, most often by other women. Stay-at-home moms are overcoddling and wasting their education. Full-time “career” moms are coldhearted, reptilian women who care more about money and status than about their own children.

Oh, but the judgment doesn’t stop there. Mothers who stop at one kid are depriving their child of siblings. The ones who have more than two kids are accelerating global warming. Mothers who don’t breastfeed long enough are going to give their children asthma. Mothers who breastfeed too long are weird. Helicopter moms are overscheduling their children, turning them into type A, anorexic basket cases, while the rest of us are depriving our children of important enrichment activities. Health-nut mothers judge others for putting Fritos and unnaturally flavored juice in the lunch box. Meanwhile, everyone pities the children of health-nut mothers, who have to eat that gritty whole grain bread and the brown spotted bananas.

BERJAYA

These are the kinds of judgments that get passed around casually in our personal lives. Then there’s the public arena. There was the furor over tiger moms with the publication in 2011 of Amy Chua’s “Battle Hymn of the Tiger Mother.” Should women push their children harder to be “successful” in school, music and other pursuits? Next we were outraged over the May 2012 Time magazine cover, which showed a mom looking defiantly into the camera while breastfeeding her toddler next to the headline “Are You Mom Enough?” Are women breastfeeding too long or not long enough?

Marissa Mayer Criticized

This happened around the same time everyone had to weigh in on the pregnancy of the new Yahoo! CEO, Marissa Mayer, and her decision to take only a couple of weeks of maternity leave. What’s wrong with her, anyway? We had barely settled back in our seats when we had to rise again to join the kerfuffle over Anne-Marie Slaughter’s essay in The Atlantic, “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All,” which quickly became one of the most widely read articles in the history of the magazine. But instead of a dialogue about the structural issues that Slaughter said are holding us back, much of the reaction to her piece came back to personal choices. Should women change their definition of “having it all”? Should we learn to be content with what we have?

Why are we so obsessed with women’s personal choices? Why are we so quick to judge mothers? Maybe we judge because we feel conflicted about the choices we’ve made. We’re afraid of screwing up what we’re constantly reminded is the most important job we’ll ever have: raising our children. We point the finger at others as a way of feeling better about ourselves. We wrestle with our feelings about how our own mothers raised us.

The Real Conflict

Whatever its cause, all this judgment is, of course, a distraction. The real conflict, which we all feel either directly or indirectly, is between all parents and the economic policies and social institutions that don’t value the act of caregiving, that make it so damnably difficult to raise our children, stay economically viable and keep ourselves and our relationships intact. Politicians of all stripes (mostly men) extol family values, but do we really value families when we don’t offer parents paid time off after the birth of a baby? When affordable, quality child care is out of reach for so many families? When so few women have the support they need from employers to breastfeed, and half of us lack paid sick time?

As one author pointed out in a May 2012 New York Times opinion piece, “If ‘the conflict’ continues to be framed as one between women . . . it will continue to distract us from what we should really be doing: working together–women and men together — to change the cultural, social and economic conditions within which these crucial choices are made.”

Excerpted from “” by Katrina Alcorn. Available from Seal Press, a member of the Perseus Books Group. Copyright 2013.

Katrina Alcorn is the author of “Maxed Out: American Moms on the Brink” (Seal Press / $16.00 / September 2013). She writes for The Huffington Post, as well as about the perils of working and raising kids on . She lives in Oakland, Calif., with her husband and three children.

For More Information:

Buy the Book, “Maxed Out: American Moms on the Brink”:


If you saw an unconscious, tied-up woman in the back of a pickup truck, wouldn’t you be extremely alarmed and alert authorities immediately? One Waco, Texas, advertising company is actually selling a very realistic-looking decal portraying exactly that. Hornet Signs created the tailgate decal, and owner Brad Kolb says he “wasn’t expecting” the barrage of negative reactions. The company also creates car wraps depicting an Army soldier aiming a barrel of a gun toward a trailing car, and a zombie creeping out of a pickup. Kolb says orders have actually gone up following the controversy. The bound woman is an employee who volunteered for the photo, Kolb says, and the wrap was placed onto another employee’s truck. “Is it a sick joke or good business marketing?” asks the anchor of TV news station KTEM. Can we agree that a tied-up woman should not be considered either a joke or marketing strategy at all?


For women struggling to make inroads in the male-dominated tech industry, a few stunning situations this week have provided some extreme examples of what they’re up against.

Sexist attitudes in startup culture got a major showcase on stage at TechCrunch Disrupt, one of the industry’s leading conferences. In a separate incident online, the hateful, bigoted musings of a media company’s chief tech officer got public attention that forced his firing — but he’d been tweeting sexist content for years. They are the latest flare-ups for a community struggling to get more women in its ranks.

On Sunday, after an all-night hackathon at TechCrunch Disrupt, Australian programmers presented Titstare. “Titstare is an app where you take photos of yourself staring at tits,” Jethro Batts explained. He went on to say, “I think this is the breast hack ever.”

The app was dreamed up during an overnight hackathon and presented to an audience of 500. The creators later said it was a parody.

“It’s not. It’s not a funny thing. It’s not appropriate,” says Richard Jordan, whose daughter participated in the hackathon and was in the audience. He says that presentation was actually just one of two disgusting displays.

“A guy got up and presented his hack, which was some game where you shake the phone and compete with your friends to shake the phone. And he simulated masturbation. Complete with noises and sounds in front of the audience. It was a thoroughly embarrassing situation to be in,” Jordan says.

Especially for Jordan, who was seated next to his daughter Alexandra, a programmer who took part in the hackathon. She is 9 years old.

“She’s, you know, she’s a very mature young lady and she sort of shrugs this kind of stuff off. But she shouldn’t have to,” Jordan says. “A lot of people have mentioned, ‘Oh, it’s not OK because there were kids in the audience.’ The bigger point is, that stuff shouldn’t be OK anyway.”

TechCrunch issued an apology Sunday for the “two misogynistic presentations,” acknowledging that “sexism is a major problem in the tech industry” and that the events represented “a failure to properly screen our hackathons for inappropriate content ahead of time and establish clear guidelines for these submissions.”

Alexia Tsotsis, the co-editor of TechCrunch, says, “I personally am sorry. I also was offended.” She says creators of the controversial app didn’t list its name on the presentation list, which is how it avoided raising red flags beforehand.

“It’s sort of symptomatic of a larger problem,” Tsotsis says. “Which is, tech has been a guy, dude-bro area for a while now. Now as it becomes more mainstream, more women join the workforce and are exposed to these locker-room-type attitudes.”

Women are so outnumbered in tech that in 2010, the Silicon Valley Index found that just 3 percent of venture-backed companies were all-female teams, compared with 89 percent all-male teams. It spills into a fratty culture getting a lot more attention lately, as these incidents happen so publicly.

A firestorm forced out Pax Dickinson, Business Insider’s chief technology officer, on Tuesday after his racist, sexist Twitter feed got wide notice. Some sample musings: “Men have made the world such a safe and comfortable place that women now have the time to bitch about not being considered our equals.” Or, “This election will be decided by single women. It’s an epic battle between ‘Jungle Fever’ and ‘Daddy Issues.’ ”

He’d been tweeting such things for years, but it was only this week that it got enough attention to cost him his job.

Programmer Adria Richards says these situations are happening too often.

“It was really distressing and I was upset and I couldn’t believe that this was happening,” she says of the Disrupt incident. “I think a lot of fields have this problem where people just aren’t aware of how their actions or words can affect people in a negative way.”

She knows about negative reactions. A few months ago, Richards tweeted a photo of two men making sexual jokes at a coder conference. One of those men got fired. Richards was then the target of rape and death threats, computer hacks and racial slurs before she got fired, too. Today, she’s speaking out for women in the industry.

“There’s so much tech, geeky things I love. But when things like this happen. I just want to shrink away. I feel like a little kid again. In a bad way though. Like a little kid who feels unsafe.”

Making the tech industry a place where women feel safe and welcome will take more work. But for starters, TechCrunch’s editor says that from now on at the company’s conferences, sexism will no longer get a stage.

Women Can't Actually Have It All

Angela Ahrendts, CEO of Burberry


Angela Ahrendts, one of Britain’s most successful businesswomen, has admitted that women “can’t do it all”, adding fresh fuel to the debate about whether women can combine harmony in the home with business success.

Mother of three teenagers, Ms Ahrendts is credited with reviving the fortunes of Burberry, the fashion brand where she is chief executive, and establishing herself as one of the most astute in the sparse ranks of female bosses.

Does she achieve a balance that suits the family as well as shareholders? She thinks so but works hard at it.

burberry ceo

Her working day starts at 4.35am, but she rations out-of-hours work to one evening a week and insists on arriving home on Friday after travelling.

She has turned down invites to the Oscars because: “It’s not more important than my husband. It’s not more important than my kids. It’s not more important than Burberry”.

She said in an interview with The Sunday Times: “I don’t want to be a great executive without being a great mum and a great wife. I don’t want to look back and say I wish I had done things differently. Balance is a really big word for me.

“It’s one of the most important parts of my job, showing that you can’t do it all.”

Ms Ahrendts’ comments are the latest in a debate led by Facebook chief operating officer Sheryl Sandberg. Ms Sandberg has called for working women to “lean in” to their careers and demand husbands bear a greater share of the domestic burden.

While both are American, they appear to have different takes on the issue.

Sandberg believes women are penalised at work because of gender stereotypes, one of the themes in her book ‘Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead.”

She has said: “Give us a world where half our homes are run by men and half our institutions are run by women. I’m pretty sure that would be a better world. Our culture needs to find a robust image of female success that is first, not male and second, not a white woman on the phone, holding a crying baby.”

Ms Ahrendts says it is impossible to have it all. “I’m here to run Burberry and I’m here to be a really great wife to my husband. And we have three amazing teens so that’s three really big jobs,” she said.

She tries to lead by example. “We have a lot of women working here and I always tell them they are mothers first. Those children are their legacy and they have partners and that’s a big obligation.”


Almost a quarter of men surveyed in a UN report looking at violence against women in parts of Asia have admitted to committing at least one rape.

Rape was particularly common within relationships. However, one in 10 men admitted raping a woman who was not their partner.

Ten thousand men from six countries took part in the survey.

It is the first multi-country study to examine how widespread violence against women is and the reasons behind it.

Of those who admitted rape, just under half said they had done so more than once.

The prevalence of rape varied between countries.

In Papua New Guinea, more than six out of 10 men surveyed admitted forcing a woman to have sex.

It was least common in urban areas of Bangladesh, where it was just under one in 10 and Sri Lanka where it was just over one in 10.

In Cambodia, China and Indonesia it ranged from one in five to almost half of
all men surveyed.

Part of the research has been published in The Lancet Global Health.

The authors said that the findings do not represent the whole Asia and Pacific region – but the survey respondents do provide a good demographic match for the countries studied.

Men were asked questions like:

  • Have you ever had sex with your partner when you knew she didn’t want to but you thought she should agree because she’s your wife/ partner?
  • Have you ever had sex with a woman or girl when she was too drunk or drugged to say whether she wanted it or not?

They recorded their answers on hand-held computers while the interviewer left the room.

‘Sexual entitlement’

Nearly three quarters of those who committed rape said they did so for reasons of “sexual entitlement”.

Report author Dr Emma Fulu said: “They believed they had the right to have sex with the woman regardless of consent.

“The second most common motivation reported was to rape as a form of entertainment, so for fun or because they were bored.”

That was followed by using rape as a form of punishment or because the man was angry.

“Perhaps surprisingly, the least common motivation was alcohol.” said Dr Fulu.

Men who had themselves suffered violence as children, especially childhood sexual abuse were more likely to have committed rape.

“These data justifiably create global outrage, accentuated by horrific recent high-profile cases, including the brutal gang rape of a student in New Delhi,” said Dr Michele Decker from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore

“More than half of non-partner rape perpetrators first did so as adolescents, which affirms that young people are a crucial target population for prevention of rape.

“The challenge now is to turn evidence into action, to create a safer future for the next generation of women and girls.”

Professor Rachel Jewkes, who led the research in Papua New Guinea, said the area they surveyed – Bougainville – had a particularly turbulent history, with an extraordinarily destructive civil conflict extending from the late 1980s to beyond 2005.

“It’s an area where the conflict hasn’t been absolutely resolved,” she said.

“When we looked at mental health we saw particularly high prevalence of post traumatic stress disorder including uncontrollable aggression, the disruption of normal social relations and relations in the family.”

Percentage of men admitting rape

  • Papua New Guinea Bougainville Island – 62%
  • Indonesia Papua Province – 48.6%
  • Indonesia urban – 26.2%
  • China urban/rural – 22.2%
  • Cambodia – 20.4%
  • Indonesia rural – 19.5%
  • Sri Lanka – 14.5%
  • Bangladesh rural – 14.1%
  • Bangladesh urban – 9.5%
  • Source: United Nations

So how exactly did Michele Bachmann’s 2012 presidential campaign go from winning in Ames to crashing in the Iowa caucuses—and embroiled in ethics investigations? Ex-aide Peter Waldron says he has the answers.

Why is the 2012 presidential campaign of Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) under investigation? In a new e-book, Bachmannistan, Peter Waldron, a longtime evangelical activist who worked on Bachmann’s campaign as a national field coordinator, details the campaign’s implosion and how he says it broke trust with those across the country who volunteered for, donated to, and supported the four-term congresswoman.

In a phone interview with The Daily Beast, Waldron said Bachmann sought to quash the publication of his book, which was published online Monday. That effort, he said, included having her attorney, Bill McGinley of the K Street law firm Patton Boggs, discourage Waldron from publishing. Waldron also said he acquiesced to requests from James Pollack, a top Bachmann aide, not to publish the book before Bachmann’s reelection to Congress in 2012, lest a potential loss deprive Capitol Hill of a voice for “Christians and patriots.” Once Bachmann won and her presidential campaign staff received the back pay they had been owed since 2011, Waldron said, he uploaded his e-book.

In Bachmannistan, Waldron attempts to trace how Bachmann’s campaign went off the rails after she won the Ames Straw Poll in August 2011 and became the frontrunner in the Iowa caucuses. The campaign was defined by poor judgment, he said. Every time Bachmann had “the opportunity to make the right decision, the campaign made the wrong decision,” he told The Daily Beast. But he said those decisions weren’t the result just of strategic errors but of deliberate malevolence.

Waldron pointed a finger at Keith Nahigian, who eventually became Bachmann’s campaign manager. Nahigian won an internal fight within the campaign, Waldron said, over whether the Minnesota congresswoman should emulate Rick Santorum’s approach and focus on Iowa or visit Florida, South Carolina, and New Hampshire in an attempt to “look presidential.” According to Waldron, Nahigian, who was doing advance for the campaign, benefited directly from the latter course of action: “He had a vested interest in more travel, more buses, more hotels.” Nahigian could arrange these trips, bill them to the campaign, and then “sign and approve his own invoices,” Waldron said.

Bachmann’s first campaign manager, Ed Rollins, quit over the strategic decision to abandon Iowa, marking the beginning of the decline of Bachmann’s political fortunes. “Santorum put on a pair of blue jeans, sweater vest and drove his pickup truck to every county and small town in Iowa, and he’s from Pennsylvania. [Bachmann] is from Waterloo, Iowa, and she chose the other road,” Waldron said mournfully.

Yet those apparent miscues paled in comparison with the hiring of Iowa state Sen. Kent Sorenson as the campaign’s state chairman, said Waldron, despite state ethics rules against presidential campaigns hiring members of the state legislature.

In a statement, James Pollack dismissed Waldron as a “former staffer with an ax to grind.”

Sorenson said he could offer, according to Waldron, “an extensive grassroots network with a substantial number of leaders [that could] … provide momentum through the straw poll and into the caucus,” but that proved to be an exaggeration, he said. Meanwhile, the campaign was paying Sorenson more than $100,000 for his endorsement, Waldron said. While Sorenson seemed like a natural fit for Bachmann at the time, Waldron described him as the “darling of Iowa conservatives, feared by the left and not trusted by RINOs.” The negotiations over Sorenson’s endorsement, Waldron said, focused on how to pay him without having to report to the Federal Election Commission. “A wise campaign would have walked away,” Waldron said. Three days before the caucuses, Sorenson jumped ship and endorsed Ron Paul. Bachmann finished sixth and dropped out of the race the next day.

Sorenson also allegedly landed the Bachmann campaign in hot water by obtaining the email list of an organization of conservative parents who homeschooled their children. An Iowa campaign staffer alleged in lawsuit against the Bachmann campaign that Sorenson stole the list from her personal computer. The suit was settled out of court in late June.

In a statement, James Pollack dismissed Waldron as a “former staffer with an ax to grind.” For his part, Waldron said Bachmannistan isn’t much of a tell-all, as he was repeating what he told law-enforcement agencies investigating Bachmann’s presidential bid over the past year and a half. Waldron said he wanted to share those statements with other Americans who had supported Bachmann. The book is for “the millions of people that donated $15 to $25 to her campaign and want to know what happened to their Michele,” he said. Bachmann announced in late May that she will not seek reelection to Congress.

“I hope they remain in the process, get involved and registered,” he said. “I’m very concerned that her sudden, abrupt retirement will leave a vacuum. We need to find good people who are ethical and lead with integrity. I believe that candidate is there. I am just concerned that the Michele Bachmann experience will alienate them.”

by