Earlier while I was shaving in the gym (clothed only in a towel wrapped around my waist), a total stranger suddenly came up right behind me and exclaimed, “I bet you never lived in California!”
Taken somewhat aback, I replied, “As a matter of fact, I lived in California for 26 years.” (Actually, that’s a conservative estimate, but whatever.)
He then replied in a very annoyed and annoying manner, “Well, I can’t believe you run water while shaving!” and continued towards the door, barely giving me time to call out lamely, “I didn’t know it was your business!”
Let me confess right here that at the time of the gratuitous scolding by this total stranger (who thinks it is his business to monitor the water usage of other strangers) that yes, the water was running. Not that I waste water deliberately. I don’t like waste, and I’m one of those people who takes one minute showers and lets urine mellow a few times before finally flushing. I don’t like to allow the toilet to get too stinky, though, because that requires scrubbing with detergent, which is not only a pain in the ass but for all I know is probably worse for the environment than regular flushing.
And of course I am very familiar with California water shortages and related conservation measures. Not that I am endorsing waste of anything (especially things in short supply), but I think Michigan’s situation is a bit different:
As the ice sheet retreated into Canada, it temporarily made Lakes Superior, Michigan and Huron into one huge body of water called Lake Nipissing, which had the unusual quality of having three outlets — via the Ottawa-St. Lawrence rivers, Detroit-St. Clair rivers and Illinois-Mississippi rivers.
Lake Huron continued to drain eastward out the Ottawa-St. Lawrence rivers until about 5,000-6,000 years ago. Lake Michigan continued to drain out the Illinois River where Chicago now stands until about only 3,000 years ago, when the Great Lakes finally assumed their present shapes.
The Great Lakes today hold an estimated six quadrillion gallons of water — a fifth, or 20 percent, of all the drinkable water on the surface of Earth.
If all the water in the Great Lakes were spread evenly over the continental U.S., the 48 states would be flooded under more than nine feet of water.
The surfaces of the lakes total more than 94,000 square miles — covering an area about the size of the entire state of Oregon.
Etc.
Again, I do not advocate waste. However, I am not sure that applying California water conservation techniques is needed here in Michigan. I also think it is a bit rude to butt into the life of a total stranger and scold him. I have a heavy beard, and after a workout I shave. Unlike the sink in my house, the gym sink has no stopper, and as I have a heavy beard, I cannot swish my razor around in the sink to get the hair stubble out. My Gillette Mach II has the triple blades that get mucked up by stubble and it is necessary to rinse it out repeatedly while I shave. And sure, maybe I could have been turning the water on and off more, but I shave pretty quickly, and unless we are sentenced to live in a communitarian world, I don’t see how my shaving habits are the business of a total stranger. It just isn’t a big deal.
Had he not been in such a hurry to leave without listening to my reply, I’d have liked to ask him whether he sits outside shower stalls with a stopwatch. He was a big overweight man, so I suspect he eats a lot more than I do… and what if his showers are longer than mine? What if his “carbon footprint” is bigger than mine? He was clean-shaven, like me, but is shaving necessary, or is it “bad for the environment”? How are these things to be fairly determined?
I wrote this post not merely because it was irritating, but because I think this man’s attitude is indicative of a mindset that regards environmentalism not as politics (which it is) but as a form of morality. Clearly, the guy thought this touched on the issue of right and wrong, and he believed (or at least wanted to believe) that I was in the wrong and that he was the upholder of righteousness.
Environmentalism is becoming one of those things considered beyond debate. Is that healthy for democracy?
Or is the democratic process trumped by “sacred” things?