close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20110822073018/http://mmmsmiscellaneousmiscellanea.blogspot.com/

Saturday

Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream has introduced a new flavor

In honor of the 44th President of the United States, 
Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream has introduced a new flavor:

BERJAYA
“ Barocky Road .”
 
Barocky Road is a blend of half vanilla, half chocolate, and surrounded by nuts and flakes. The vanilla portion of the mix is not openly advertised and usually denied as an ingredient. The nuts and flakes are all very bitter and hard to swallow.
The cost is $82.84 per scoop...so out of a hundred dollar bill you are at least promised some CHANGE..!

When purchased it will be presented to you in a large beautiful cone, but after you pay for it, the ice cream is taken away and given to the person in line behind you at no charge.  You are left with an empty wallet, staring at an empty cone and wondering what just happened.


Redistribution of wealth!

Friday

A Catholic Archbishop's thoughts on immigration... something to think about...

BERJAYA

The Past and the Future of the United States of America

by  Fr. Roger Landry August 26, 2011
Archbishop Jose Gomez of Los Angeles is quickly becoming one of the most persistently prophetic voices in the Church of the United States. He is as cheerful, amiable and accessible as any bishop in the country, but at the same time he is earning a reputation as a truth-telling boat-rocker, unafraid to call to mind inconvenient truths that many outside the Church and some inside would prefer to ignore. On no issue has he been more candid and challenging than that of immigration.
In a remarkable July 28 address entitled "Immigration and the 'Next America': Perspectives from our History" to Catholics in Napa, California, he described his frustration over the immigration debate. "It seems like most people have made up their minds already on this issue" and that "we are just talking round the edges of the real issues." The real issues are more than just border security, green cards, and what to do with immigrants in our country illegally. It concerns what America is, has been and will become. "Both sides of the argument," he recognized, "are inspired by a beautiful, patriotric idea of America's history and values," but lately he's been "starting to wonder: What America are we really talking about?" If there's a great divergence about what America's true history and values are, not even "patriotism" will unite any longer.
"America is changing," he noted forthrightly, "and it has been changing for a long time. The forces of globalization are changing our economy and forcing us to rethink the scope and purpose of our government. Threats from outside enemies are changing our sense of national sovereignty. America is changing on the inside, too. Our culture is changing. We have a legal structure that allows, and even pays for, the killing of babies in the womb. Our courts and legislatures are redefining the natural institutions of marriage and the family. We have an elite culture — in government, the media and academia — that is openly hostile to religious faith. America is becoming a fundamentally different country. It is time for all of us to recognize this — no matter what our position is on the political issue of immigration."
Because of this vast disparity of opinion among Americans on the dignity owed every human person, the value of marriage and family, and whether religious faith is good or evil, there is an enormous division over what to do with immigrants here illegally. Do we view illegal immigrants as dehumanized "criminaliens" or as fellow human beings, even brothers and sisters, whom no caring sibling would ever push to have deported to a situation of deprivation? Do we seek to keep families together in a time of confusion or do we do as the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency did in the 2007 Bianco raid in New Bedford, flying parents to holding cells in Texas while their soon-to-be-traumatized-and-practically-orphaned kids remained in school in New Bedford? Do we value the deep Christian faith and piety of the vast majority of immigrants or do we view it with hostility? "We have to bring a Catholic faith perspective to this debate about immigration," Archbishop Gomez declared. "We cannot just think about this issue as Democrats or Republicans or as liberals or conservatives. That means we have to listen to the teachings of our Church on this issue."
He also said that we have to acquire a deeper Catholic perspective on "America's history and purposes" with regard to immigration. When we do, he said, we will recognize not only that "immigration is not a problem for America" but is the "key to our American renewal."
"One of the problems we have today," he said in the most provocative part of his talk, "is that we have lost the sense of America's national 'story.' If our people know our history at all, what they know is incomplete. And when we don't know the whole story, we end up with the wrong assumptions about American identity and culture. The American story that most of us know is set in New England. It's the story of the pilgrims and the Mayflower, the first Thanksgiving, and John Winthrop's sermon about a 'city upon a hill.' It's the story of great men like Washington, Jefferson and Madison. It's the story of great documents like the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. It's a beautiful story. It's also true. Every American should know these characters and the ideals and principles they fought for. From this story we learn that our American identity and culture are rooted in essentially Christian beliefs about the dignity of the human person."
"But," he continued, "the story of the founding fathers and the truths they held to be self-evident is not the whole story about America. The rest of the story starts more than a century before the pilgrims. It starts in the 1520s in Florida and in the 1540s here in California. It is the story not of colonial settlement and political and economic opportunity. It's the story of exploration and evangelization. This story is not Anglo-Protestant but Hispanic-Catholic. It is centered not in New England but in Nueva España — New Spain — at opposite corners of the continent. From this story we learn that before this land had a name its inhabitants were being baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. The people of this land were called Christians before they were called Americans. And they were called this name in the Spanish, French and English tongues. From this history, we learn that long before the Boston Tea Party, Catholic missionaries were celebrating the holy Mass on the soil of this continent. Catholics founded America's oldest settlement, in St. Augustine, Florida, in 1565. Immigrant missionaries were naming this continent's rivers and mountains and territories for saints, sacraments and articles of the faith.… This is the missing piece of American history. And today more than ever, we need to know this heritage of holiness and service — especially as American Catholics."
Archbishop Gomez was not trying to argue that Blessed Junipero Serra, Venerable Antonio Margil, Father Jacques Marquette and Mother Joseph should supplant Washington, Madison, Jefferson and Franklin in American history books, but rather he wanted to acknowledge — and get all Americans to acknowledge — that what the former did and established is crucial to understand not only how the nation we are today was formed but one of the factors that led it to become great. The genesis of the United States today was not constructed exclusively on the foundations of the thirteen colonies.
America was founded not on ethnicity or common territory but on a creed, a deeply Christian belief that all men and women are created equal, with God-given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, the Los Angeles prelate stressed. Our country has always been a "nation of nationalities," made one out of many (e pluribus unum). When this American creed is taken for granted — as happened with the native Americans at the birth of the nation, with the Know-Nothings in the mid-1800s, and with the Japanese-American internments during World War II — and we begin to believe that the "'real Americans' are exclusively of some particular race, class, religion or ethnic background," we damage our country. "That's why it is essential that today we remember the missionary history of America — and rededicate ourselves to the vision of America's founding 'creed.'"
American Catholics, he said, have a "special duty today to be guardians of the truth about the American spirit and our national identity" as well as to be "witnesses to a new king of American patriotism," one that challenges those who "would diminish or 'downsize' America's true identity." That American patriotic identity is expressed perhaps most forcefully and beautifully by Emma Lazarus' unforgettable words chiseled at the base of the Statue of Liberty: "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to be free. The wretched refuse of your teeming shore. Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me. I lift my lamp beside the golden door!"
The torch that Lady Liberty lifts high must continue to burn brightly for our country to be true to itself and to be renewed. Archbishop Gomez is prophetically calling on all Catholic Americans to join him in carrying that torch aloft.

Monday

Explaning tax incentives and the daily debt...

BERJAYA
 BERJAYA
BERJAYA
 BERJAYA

The tax cuts for all Americans account for about 28 minutes of the $4.7 billion in new daily debt accrued by the
United States each day.  BUSH TAX CUTS = 28 Minutes


•Take the wars in the Iraq, Afghanistan, and Libya:  •Tax incentives for oil companies:
•And the tax cuts for all Americans :  When combined only account for about 3 hours of the $4.7 billion in new daily debt accrued by the United States each day. Wars and tax cuts =3 hours



The tax incentives provided to oil companies amount to about 2.2 minutes of the $4.7 billion in new daily debt accrued daily by the United States.

Sunday

Congressman Westmoreland: Spending is the problem

Here's a great article on it:  
U.S. Rep. Lynn Westmoreland speaks to an audience Thursday at the Carroll County Chamber of Commerce.
The problem with the U.S. government, a Congressman said Thursday, is not revenue, but spending.

With the complicated budget issues facing the nation’s government, U.S. Rep. Lynn Westmoreland is using the summer break from Congress to answer questions throughout his region.

Westmoreland, R-Newnan, was in Carroll County Thursday to try to explain the numbers being discussed.

“When you start talking about discretionary spending, non-discretionary spending, cuts to taxes, reduces in tax breaks, revenue and spending, it gets confusing,” he said.

In an effort to make the figures align better, Westmoreland and his aides created charts to better explain to his audience at the Carroll County Chamber of Commerce the possible outcomes of the different cuts, increases and the national debt.

If the oil companies incentive, tax breaks on corporate jets and Bush era tax cuts and the war money spent in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya were not spent, the daily equivalent would equal what the U.S. spends in three hours.

In comparison, the U.S. budget has had to borrow about 33 percent of the budget from other countries and U.S. citizens for years, Westmoreland said.

“This proves we have a spending problem, not a revenue problem,” he said. “There’s never been anyone come in my office and not want more money. Eventually, we have to say we don’t have any more money.”

When asked if he thinks the 12-person financial committee selected by President Barack Obama would be effective, Westmoreland said he did not think it would. Some of the primary money drains, like Social Security, are exempt from potential cuts, but those programs are among the ones that most need reform.

“When 10,000 people are added to the lists (to receive Social Security, Medicare, food stamps or other programs) every day ... there is fraud,” he said.

People who are physically able to work receive disability while people unable to work are denied. Westmoreland said similar claims are made throughout the overworked agencies. The agencies need to have a smaller focus to catch errors and save the funds.

One of the biggest areas the committee of 12 is allowed to cut is the military. With the current global climate, Westmoreland thinks it would be unwise to make deep cuts in the military and defense budget.

A bill introduced by Westmoreland and passed in the House would review how bank failures are determined.

Almost 70 community banks in Georgia have failed in the past several years. Five banks that were either based in Carroll County or had branches here have failed since 2007. Georgia has had about 20 more banks close than any other state.

Westmoreland said the problem started when banks started foreclosing on properties and selling them at large discounts just to move the properties. It caused property values in the neighborhood to drop, making mortgages worth less. The drop in value did not just affect home owners, it affected the banks that held the mortgages.

When the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp and other government organizations step in, the bank is required to either collect the difference in property value compared to the mortgage from the home owner or pay the difference. When the small community banks cannot pay the difference, the FDIC steps in to sell the bank to another company, usually larger. The bigger banks get loss-share agreements and financial incentive to balance the assets of the purchased banks.

“It has a snowball effect. Those big banks fire-sell properties and more community banks can’t afford to stay in business,” Westmoreland said.

His bill, currently being reviewed by the Senate, would require a review of the FDIC, Office of Comptroller General and other involved organizations to review the accounting practices.

If the bill passes in the Senate, the study will begin.

At the same time, Westmoreland will be working on legislation that would allow the community banks to spread the financial difference over a space of five years rather than requiring immediate repayment.

“That would stabilize a lot of these community banks,” he said. “We’re continuing to work on it.”

The move is not just for the banks. Many people invest in community banks and, when the FDIC takes over, they lose all the money they invested.

Daniel Jackson, CEO and president of Carroll County Chamber Commerce and Carroll Tomorrow, said he was pleased with the turnout for Westmoreland.

“It proves that people are interested and concerned. (Congress) knows people are frustrated,” Jackson said.

The chamber and Carroll Tomorrow tend to avoid politics but when the issues of national concern have direct impact on the area businesses, Jackson began to feel the need to make sure everyone had the details of the national finances available to them.

“Things are not improving at the speed we’d like,” he said.

Locally, however, businesses are growing slowly. Several local companies have added workers and are out of room to expand in current facilities but are not confident enough in the economy to try expand and add more employees.

“Once things are more stable and consumer confidence improves, I think there’s a possibility of quick growth in our community,” he said. “It’s not all bad news, but when that’s the only thing front and center, it weighs heavy on the mind.”

Jackson said the people he spoke with after the meeting felt they were getting accurate numbers and a straight story.

“We can’t depend on the U.S. Congress to fix the problems,” Jackson said. While it is tempting to step away from the situation and withdrawal, he said, everyone needs to be involved.
© times-georgian.com 2011




Friday

Jack Welch for Secretary of the Treasury...


Need I say more?



We've had enough of reckless borrowing.. and spending...


Imagine if your government were as focused on saving money as it is on spending money.
Flash back to March 2, 1995. On that day, the U.S. Senate failed — by one vote — to send a balanced budget amendment to the states for ratification. The amendment had previously passed the House by the required two-thirds majorit, and the Senate vote was the last legislative hurdle before ratification by the states.
If that amendment had passed, then we would not be facing the fiscal crisis we now face. If that amendment had passed, then balancing the budget would have been the rule rather than the exception, and we wouldn't be facing the annual deficits and skyrocketing debt that we must address today.
Once again we are standing at a crossroads. The decisions we make today will determine the direction of our country for years to come. We can take action now to ensure that our children will face a much brighter fiscal future. We must not allow ourselves to miss this opportunity.
We all know that Washington has a spending problem. In recent years, federal spending has increased at an unsustainable pace, allowing our national debt to spiral out of control. The annual deficits and the resulting debt continue to grow due to political pressures and dependence on government programs.
Just as any family or business has to do, Washington needs to learn to live within its means so that we can continue to focus on growing the economy, creating jobs and getting people back to work.
Short-term spending cuts are necessary to begin to get our fiscal house in order but will not be enough without long-term changes. That's why a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution is the only way to ensure that Congress curtails its spending on an annual basis regardless of which party is in control.
BERJAYA
This week, the House of Representatives will vote on a three-part balanced budget amendment that would amend the Constitution to (1) require that total spending for any fiscal year not exceed total receipts; (2) require that bills to raise revenues pass each House of Congress by a two-thirds majority; and (3) establish an annual spending cap such that total federal spending could not exceed 18 percent of the economic output of the United States.                                                       
On the other side of the Capitol, 47 Republican senators have co-sponsored a similar balanced budget amendment, which is a strong sign that the Senate is ready to engage on this important piece of legislation.
Further, with 49 out of 50 state governments, including Virginia, required to balance their state budgets, we believe that the federal government should be required to do the same.
The fact that Congress is once again debating raising the nation's debt limit demonstrates that we need to cut spending now and put in place enforcement mechanisms to ensure that we spend responsibly down the road.
Together we must make the tough choices necessary to control spending, pave the way for a return to surpluses and ultimately pay down the national debt. A balanced budget amendment would force Congress to do this, make reckless borrowing a thing of the past and secure a much better future for our children and grandchildren.
The choice is ours. The stakes are high. Failure is not an option.


Change the culture of spending...

Tuesday

What a surprise... American patriotism... thanks to the Flash mob!