close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20110930160523/http://theparagraph.com/

Like WPA Before, Recovery Act to Leave Lasting Public Good

September 14th, 2011

BERJAYA
Moynihan Station (Moynihan Station Dev. Corp.)
From the start, people have likened the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, also known as “the stimulus”, to the New Deal’s famous public works program, the Works Progress Administration (WPA) started in 1935.1 2 3 Over its eight years, the WPA hired eight million people to work on 1.4 million projects, many of which built roads, bridges, sewers, airports, parks, reservoirs and electric transmission — infrastructure that has lasted decades, some to this day. While the Recovery Act did not hire workers directly, its funding, loans and loan guarantees saved or created jobs for three million people.4 Many of those people worked and are still working on the 45,000 projects that the Recovery Act classifies as infrastructure, transportation or energy/environment.5
BERJAYA
Ivanpah Mojave Desert Solar Plant Unit 1 tower
(BrightSource Energy, Inc.)
One of the bigger of those projects, the Ivanpah Mojave Desert solar plant, will stand among the world’s largest, putting out 400 megawatts of electricity. Another big power project, the Caithness Shepherds Flat Wind Farm in Oregon, will stand as the world’s largest wind farm, putting out 845 megawatts. Some of the bigger transportation building projects are the Moynihan Station Amtrak train hall in New York City, the Innerbelt Bridge in Cleveland and the Caldecott Tunnel in Oakland. And one of the biggest of the Recovery Act’s electric vehicle battery projects, the new Johnson Controls advanced battery plant in Holland, Michigan, makes complete lithium-ion battery systems for hybrid and electric vehicles.
BERJAYA
WPA Plaque on bridge in Springfield, Ohio
(Ohio Federal Writers’ Project)
Since its start in February 2009, the Recovery Act has completed about 21,000 of the 45,000 infrastructure-type projects, while the rest will continue to course through the domestic economy for another few years. While the Recovery Acts’s running time won’t last as long, the public good from the infrastructure it builds may well last as long as that of the WPA.
BERJAYA
Cleveland Shoreway in 1939 – built by the WPA (Ohio Federal Writers’ Project)

BERJAYA
Cleveland Innerbelt Bridge – to be built with Recovery Act funding
(Old bridge to be replaced is ghosted-out in foreground.) (ODOT)

Sources

Read the rest of this entry »

Print this article. Print this article.

Where are all the bad teachers?

August 11th, 2011

Teachers called to stand and be fired.
Teachers called to stand and be fired.
Providence Journal / Connie Grosh
Political winds seem to be blowing against U.S. teachers. Republican state governments accuse teachers of having lavish benefits, and pass laws to tear-up their contracts and destroy their unions.1 A public school district superintendent refuses to bargain, fires the entire teaching staff, and the Obama Administration applauds.2 3 4 These same policy-makers take standardized testing of students, now used, with questionable reliability, to rate schools, and push it to rate — and fire — teachers.5 6 7 8 All of these actions seem to come from a notion that there are a great many bad teachers that should be fired and lazy teachers that could be threatened into working harder. But who has seen many of these bad and lazy teachers? Among my 50 or so public school teachers from kindergarten through twelfth grade, all but one did a passable job or better. The one who didn’t was just old and too unaware to rein in her wild ninth-graders, and soon retired. Nevertheless, let’s count her as failing, giving us one-in-fifty, 2% of teachers that could not do the job. That hardly makes a great many. Now think back on all of your teachers, K through 12. Leaving aside whether you liked a teacher, what percent really did not do a passable job?

What percent of your teachers K-12 did NOT do a passable job?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Sources

Read the rest of this entry »

Print this article. Print this article.

Almost Cut My Grass

July 9th, 2011

Ajuga
Almost cut my grass.
It happened just the other day.
It’s getting kind of long.
I could’ve said it was in my way.

But I didn’t, and I wonder why …

Well, I did eventually cut my grass, but not till latter May. And it’s no wonder why — I’m slow to mow to start with, and the very rainy spring in the land south of Lake Erie this year often left the yard too soggy to mow.1 But the lack of mowing had a benefit — a nice showing of wildflowers, with honeybees working them. And it saved some time and gasoline. So, I imagine I’ll let that yard grow again next year — especially since I found some advice on meadow care that suits me: “Mow once a year in early spring before new growth begins.”2 That’s it. So that’s the plan.

Here are some pictures of the yard in bloom, 14 May 2011:

Golden Ragwort
Golden Ragwort

Wild Blue Phlox
Wild Blue Phlox

Ajuga, in Two Shades
Ajuga, in Two Shades

Honeybee
Honeybee

white flower
What is the white flower among the grass?

Sources

Read the rest of this entry »
Print this article. Print this article.

1.3 Million Signers, 6000 Marchers and a Semi-Truck Bring Referendum on Ohio SB5

July 3rd, 2011

Bagpipe corps leads Million Signature March -- ProgressOhio.org
On the last day of March, Ohio governor John Kasich signed the Republicans’ anti-democratic law, Senate Bill 5 (SB5). Soon after, a citizens alliance began using the state’s democratic public referendum law to repeal it.1 9 With 40-some clauses that weaken workers and their unions, SB5 practically cancels the public worker’s right to collective bargaining, which is a form of workplace democracy. 6 2 7 SB5 has two clauses that seriously weaken workers’ bargaining leverage.8 One clause, SB5’s first, totally bans strikes. The other bans arbitration in case of no agreement, and lets the public employer choose its own last offer. SB5 also has clauses that weaken the contract. Two ban bargaining for the major benefits of health insurance and retirement. Another allows a public employer to break the employment contract, if the state auditor declares a fiscal watch. Other SB5 clauses weaken the union. For instance, one bans fair share payment by non-union workers to the union for costs of bargaining and upholding their contract. Another classifies more workers as “supervisors”, ineligible for union membership. Yet another bans any bargaining to limit privatization, or compensate the worker for it. But Ohio’s public referendum law empowers citizens to repeal a new law — though it isn’t easy.3 First, a citizens committee gets its ballot language approved by the secretary of state, after which the new law goes on hold until the referendum process plays out. Then the committee has 90 days from the time the newly-passed law was filed to gather the valid signatures of 6% of the electorate that voted in the last governor’s race, with at least 3% in each of half of the state’s counties. For the referendum on SB5, that meant 231,149 valid signatures, and about 450,000 signatures total to ensure enough valid ones.4 But the committee got thousands of volunteers to circulate petitions, and ended up with 1,298,301 signatures — nearly three times the goal — from all 88 counties.5 Last Wednesday, one day before the deadline, a parade of 6,000 people and a semi-truck marched through Columbus to deliver the petitions in 1,502 boxes to the secretary of state. Next, the petitions will go to the county boards of elections for validation. And in November Ohio will, with hardly a doubt, hold a public referendum on SB5.


‘Videos: The People’s Parade to Repeal SB5’ – ProgressOhio.org


Video: Unloading the petitions from the semi-truck.

Sources

Read the rest of this entry »
Print this article. Print this article.

Human Rights for Non-Human Entities: Nature and the Corporation

June 21st, 2011

Pacha Mama
Pacha Mama
Some countries in the Western Hemisphere have given constitutional rights to non-human entities — with opposite effects on their democracies. While Ecuador and Bolivia stand to strengthen their democracies by declaring human-like rights for Pacha Mama, that is, Nature, the United States, has weakened its democracy by giving human rights to the business Corporation. Ecuador and Bolivia take from their indigenous Andean people a tradition of reverence for Nature as a living being, which encompasses human and all other life.1 In 2008, Ecuador held a national referendum and resoundingly approved a new constitution, in which “Nature, or Pacha Mama, where life is reproduced and occurs, has the right to integral respect for its existence and for the maintenance and regeneration of its life cycles, structure, functions and evolutionary processes.”2 And last year Bolivia, following adoption of a new constitution, wrote similar rights for Nature into its laws. Now persons and communities in those countries, where oil and gas drilling, and mineral mining have ruined much land, and farming has cleared much rainforest, can petition the government on behalf of Nature to stop such damage.3 In contrast, the United States takes from its founders a tradition of respect for the “unalienable Rights” of the individual.4 Its 223-year-old constitution has stood to protect those rights, and makes no mention of the Corporation.5 But in 1886, the Supreme Court reporter led his summary of a run-of-the-mill Supreme Court case with a claim that the court had never ruled on — “The defendant Corporations are persons within the intent of the clause in section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which forbids a State to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”6 Later court rulings mistakenly used that claim as precedent, and wrongly gave the Corporation equal protection rights.7 Since then, the courts have stretched that errant precedent to give other human rights, such as free speech and privacy, to the Corporation, which has used them to overturn health, safety and environmental laws made by elected legislatures.8 9 But last year’s Supreme Court ruling using the right of free speech to allow the Corporation to pump unlimited money into elections has fueled a movement to amend the U.S. Constitution to state what the average child could tell you: that the Corporation is not a real person, and does not have human rights.10 13 11 12 When backed by a constitution that bans human rights for the Corporation and recognizes human-like rights for Nature, a nation’s elected governments — local, regional and national — may better uphold the people’s will for health, safety and a natural environment.

Sources

Read the rest of this entry »
Print this article. Print this article.