| The News Most Recent Threads | The Blogs Most Recent Threads | The Boards Most Recent Threads |
About | Contact | Advertise | Shop | Donate
Far be it from me to accuse Gandhi of missing a note, but in the case of the 'Occupy Wall Street' protests, the Mahatma's famous quote appears to be lacking a few essential words. "First they ignore you," he said, "then they ridicule you, then they fight you, then you win."
That's not quite correct.
Certainly, the OWS protests began with a great whistling silence from the "mainstream" news media. It is only because of the resources available to the average person in this marvelous technological age we live in that word of the protest ever reached beyond its original location.
Thanks to cell phones, video cameras, digital recorders, and of course, the internet - all wielded by patriot citizens - reports, images and video of the protest began to dribble out via Twitter, Facebook and a variety of blogs and alternative news media sites like Truthout. But from the "mainstream" news, there was nothing, and nothing, and nothing.
Eventually, however, the OWS protest broke through the "mainstream" news blackout, thanks in no small part to commentators like Lawrence O'Donnell, Rachel Maddow and Keith Olbermann. Once the "mainstream" news outlets finally deigned to lower themselves to report on the rabble down on Wall Street, their tone and tenor fairly oozed contempt. The New York Times, bastion of the status quo, published an article describing each and every participant of the OWS protest as a moonbeam-riding fuzzbrain, someone reeking of patchouli who couldn't string a coherent thought together if their life depended on it...which was followed up immediately by a barrage of reports defending cops who hosed down defenseless women penned in behind nylon barriers with pepper spray, because those cops were doing exactly, precisely the right thing. Or something.
This, as usual, from the same "mainstream" news media that didn't have any problem with the gun-toting "patriots" of the Tea Party and their catastrophically-spelled signs. Well, then again, the Tea Party has corporate sponsorship, while the OWS protesters are doing this on their own. It pays - literally - to have friends in high places.
Similar disdain was heaped upon the OWS protest from every corner of the "mainstream" news realm, most especially from Fox News and the long reach of conservative talk radio. These protesters are bums, hippies, losers, anarchists, idiots, communists and fools, a drumbeat which has continued to this very day.
So.
First they ignore you: check.
Then they ridicule you: check.
According to Gandhi, the next step comes when they fight you, but here is the spot where his marvelous wisdom could use a bit of enhancement.
First they ignore you, then they ridicule you...
Then they get scared.
And they are scared, now. You can smell it. The criticism being leveled at the OWS movement has gotten far harsher in the last several days. Presidential candidate Mitt Romney recently deployed the old chestnut about "class warfare" to describe the protest. Rep. Eric Cantor doubled down on Romney's rhetoric with some of his own: "If you read the newspapers today, I for one am increasingly concerned about the growing mobs occupying Wall Street and the other cities across the country. Believe it or not, some in this town have actually condoned the pitting of Americans against Americans."
That's pretty rich right there, don't you think? Fellows like Cantor have made turning American against American their bread and butter for the last ten years..."You're with us or against us"...but I digress.
Fact: OWS has bloomed in more than a dozen major cities all across the country. It stopped being a protest a while ago. It's a movement now.
And they're scared.
Know how I know? I know because a friend in San Francisco took the time to transcribe a document he was given by the major bank he works for. The document, titled "Protest Safety Handbook," explains what a bank employee should do when confronted with the horror and terror of an OWS protest.
I am leaving the name of the bank out of this to protect my friend. Some tidbits:
The movement in New York has begun to publish a four page news paper titled "The Occupied Wall Street Journal." The current edition of the published document loosely outlines the group's manifesto and intentions. The group has indicated that they have been inspired by the results from similar groups involved in the "Arab Spring" in the Middle East. The group's publication cites an intention to first to protest and then to march, escalating to civil disobedience when necessary.
These types of groups are reaching out to the disengaged and disenfranchised population of the United States for members, often encouraging the unemployed and homeless to join the movement. Often these marches and protests are unplanned and result from instant notification on "Social Networks" that produce "Flash Protest Mobs" in a matter of minutes. While this group has not yet resorted to violence the possibility exists that they can.
Safety Tips:
- Avoid poorly lit areas and isolated locations that may make you vulnerable to an attack.
- Keep the cars doors locked while driving in the area of a mob or protest march.
- Project an image of confidence and strength. Walk with a purpose and avoid hesitation, keep your head up, shoulders back and make eye contact with people you pass.
- Avoid confrontation and unnecessary contact with protesters.
- Avoid walking or driving alone. There is safety in numbers.
- Carry purses close to the body.
- Wallets and cash are best kept in a front pocket.
- Avoid wearing Bank ID or logo items outside the bank if possible.
- Keep your cell phone charged and close at hand.
- Have emergency contact information pre-programmed into your phone.
- Have your keys out and ready before you need them.
- If you feel that you're in danger or if you observe suspicious or illegal activities, call the police or dial 911.
- If confronted or attacked, try to remain calm and cooperate by following the attacker's instructions.
- Do not attempt to reason or argue with the protesters.
- Cooperate and do not risk your personal safety.
- Be a good witness and try to remember as many details of what occurred as you can.
(Emphasis added)
Makes it sound like you're walking through a war zone, right? Not a peaceful protest, but some actively dangerous Thunderdome where instant and horrible death might reach out at any time to cut you down.
The financial powers-that-be are desperate to paint this peaceful, meaningful movement as some kind of civilization-annihilating upheaval, populated by rogues, pickpockets, mobs and murderers. They need the OWS protest to be seen this way by the general public, so they can discredit it and destroy it. Fear-mongering is an old, old tactic, and they are deploying it once again.
Note well: the bank that distributed this hyper-paranoid ball of gibberish is an entire continent away from the nexus of the OWS movement in New York City.
I guess San Francisco's OWS chapter has been making some noise. Same with Boston, and DC, and a dozen other cities.
First they ignore you.
Then they ridicule you.
Then they get scared.
Then they fight you.
Then you win.
I don't think the Mahatma would mind this small addition to his statement. It fits.
And it's true. They are scared.
You can smell it.
_______
Quote: Two words for you
Two words for you Cantor
One can only hope that the first one is "get" or the second one is "you"
Well done, WRP
Well done, sir.
Cantor looks like a mafia hit man. I'd like to meet that
mf'er in a dark alley and wipe that fucking smirk off his face.
Good article.
"Cantor looks like a mafia
"Cantor looks like a mafia hit man."
I think the jerk looks more like a weasally spoiled rich kid that wouldn't know one end of a shovel from the other. I'll bet he abuses small puppies as well for his own sick enjoyment.
About that dark alley...I'll be at the other end in case he makes a run for it.
_______"The Object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." - Marcus Aurelius

Thank you, my friend. I'm
Thank you, my friend. I'm always glad for the backup.
I also appreciate you not arguing with me about who gets first wack at that scumbag.
According to WRP, the last item on Ghandi's list was that
we win. I'll see you on the other side and I'll buy you a beer.
"I'll see you on the other
"I'll see you on the other side and I'll buy you a beer."
Yer on mi amigo! Just don't forget to do the job right and leave the footprint of a workboot (preferrably Vibram) on his cutsy mug.
And I've got the second round:-)
_______"The Object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." - Marcus Aurelius

Cantor's perfect self projection
"Believe it or not, some in this town have actually condoned the pitting of Americans against Americans."
Wedge issues, crafted to pit Americans against each other whilst their pockets are picked and their civil rights stripped, have been the dark art of the Republicans for years.
_______Have you torqued a wingnut today?
![]()
Corporations aren't people - they're Republicans
- Al Sharpton
Cantor is nuthen but a
Cantor is nuthen but a spoiled trust fund baby....would love to see some old school union longshoremen bitch slap him around on a lonely peer in some remote dock of New york or Chicago.
"Tell this to your boss Boner...SMACK...."
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
-albert einstein
The Movement Is Picking Up Steam And I'm Liking This
The obscenely rich SHOULD be a bit concerned.
There is real discontent in this country. The filthy rich need to know that a good many of these protesters are people that struggled hard to attain a decent quality of Life and they aren't simply parasites.
THAT is the point that major news organizations seem to be missing.
Yes indeed. Be VERY AFRAID you rich fucks because we the peasants are righteously pissed off.
I didn't hear him [Cantor]
I didn't hear him [Cantor] say anything when the Tea Party was out demonstrating, actually spitting on members of Congress right here in the Capitol. And he and his colleagues were putting signs in the windows encouraging them. But let's not get down to that.---Nancy Pelosi
No, Nancy, since being above the fray has pretty much destroyed the Dems, let's do get down to that: Eric Cantor is the kind of vicious, lying, two-faced sociopath who makes your standard-issue hypocrite look like an icon of unsullied integrity. What else would you expect from a cynical little hustler who spends all his waking hours chowing down on Grover Norquist's ass? He's a natural-born hitman for the Teatard mafia. Somewhere there's a pic of him flashing his well-capped choppers that would make Dracula retract his fangs in fear.
But as WRP says, now he---and his co-conspirators---are scared. And to paraphrase Colonel Kilgore, "I love the smell of Repug fear in the morning." Or any time...
_______P Kibble
Cantor is Despicable
When I heard Cantor say that about pitting American against American, I surely laughed right out loud. These guys never disappoint in the hypocrisy department, do they? The over-the-top Tea Party thugs have been terrorizing Americans for awhile now and I'm proud to say that the Wall Street protesters are much better spellers to boot. I'm SO sick of the politicians--at this point in the game, this is our only hope. It'll be interesting to see how Obama reacts when he finally realizes that the protest is about him too. Perhaps he doesn't get it either but you can bet the Democrats will try to lay claim to this (which they do not deserve with just a few exceptions). I say Elizabeth Warren for President! The funniest thing I read today is that "Joe the Plumber" has filed his paperwork to run for Congress in Ohio (oh, holy hell! say what?!). Things just keep getting crazier (and I thought it wasn't possible after either years of Dubya). Thanks, Mr. Pitt, for another sensible essay.
_______Rene'--Cackling is the best medicine.
They're scared shitless a penny might be taken away from them
"The financial powers-that-be are desperate to paint this peaceful, meaningful movement as some kind of civilization-annihilating upheaval..."
Ah, but it is, its intention is the annihilation of THEIR ill-gotten civilization and they know it. They're NOT going to go gentle into that good night.
I noticed that in order to support their biased point of view of what's happening, Faux News kept showing the same short clip of one of the protesters who was being arrested resisting the arrest. ONE PERSON that wasn't just being passive about being arrested unlike almost all the rest who were being co-operative with the police, run that one clip over and over again to give their audience the impression that a veritable rioting mob scene is what's happening, something akin to Chicago 1968.
_______I've got values but I don't know how or why.
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes at least one of them.
hardly "scared" if Thugs hold the House
and manage to take the Senate, if not the presidency in a year. Violent protests spurred by the police could just as likely take us rightward as towards more equal division of wealth or jobs or social supports. I'd love Pitt to be right but "smelling fear" is not exactly data-based, and not the same as confirming it. Certainly, citing a little hysteria from a bank guide to avoid conflict is not exactly proving the point this bank is shaking in its boots, let alone others.
Krugman, too, today talks about "panic among the plutocrats" but I disagree, as yet, and I remember the 1960's or the labor wars of the 1890's, and the result -- well, the '60's ended up getting W. elected for he was the cultural culmination of the anti-war, anti-corporate protests. And look at those numbers of challengers to the status quo compared to today's handfuls.
Likewise, the plutocrats survived the '30's -- and they hold nearly total political sway. Do you think, in this time of high unemployment, the 1% will have any trouble hiring all the security people they need to keep order?
I hope the protests grow and I hope street action makes the oligarchs sweat, but modest evidence doesn't yet convince me, certainly not because of what rightwing propagandists like Cantor spout, or Orrin Hatch. They go to extremes with no evidence at all -- talking up class warfare and mobs to incite fear, not to make owners tremble (perhaps the opposite). I question how peaceful campers in the low thousands scare the richest among us -- esp. when there are few if any serious confrontations. True, big protests start with small steps but it will take a lot more than blarney from extremists to convince me top dogs are wetting their pants.
_______Robert S. Becker
Robert, I salute the non-violent attitude thus far...
But if a republikkkan does happen to win the 2012 election (and I wouldn't be at all surprised if they did) and said new president tries to crack down on the thus far peaceful protests, I think that he/she will find they have bitten off more than they can chew.
Don't forget, these people come from *ALL^ walks of life except the 1%. Yes, they are, IMHO quite admirably, trying thier damnest to be peaceful in spite of what the 1% has done to them. And yes, they include the military personell who have been screwed just like the rest of us.
If a republikkkan president were to do as Ru$h Limbaugh or other rightwing pundits suggest and "go Kent State" on them, they really will have an insurrection on their hands and they will lose, badly.
Frankly, at this point, the ball is in their court. They can choose to listen as reasonable leaders or face another storming of the Bastille with all of the consequences related to such an upheaval..
_______"The Object of life is not to be on the side of the majority, but to escape finding oneself in the ranks of the insane." - Marcus Aurelius

yes, all hell could break lose
but the results would not be as easy to predict as you imply with "they really will have an insurrection on their hands and they will lose, badly." The '60's were certainly insurrectionary, our last big one, and there were always enough "pigs" (at least in UC Berkeley where I was) and security-control types to keep things "in order." Chicago was a police riot, and I wouldn't say Mayor Daley's forces "lost," badly or any other way.
When one side has all organized police/armies, and all the guns, plus high tech surveillance unknown 40 years ago, well, I wouldn't want to predict the ending. Yes, people can sabotage the system and technology but then everyone pays -- and the rich go on vacation.
There are hundreds of American Bastilles and I don't think the ball is in their court, even if they begrudgingly give up a few per cent of the spoils. But my position is, I don't yet see elitist fears on a big scale (in political terms, like the '30's where they will learn to share better) and I am not confident I can predict tomorrow, let alone what could happen in two years. Right now, we have a good start and it may grow wildly and then we will see who has the ball in which court. Now, it's too early for this skeptic (and '60's veteran) to predict.
RB
_______Robert S. Becker
The Unfunny part of this,is
The Unfunny part of this,is that the US Government fully supported these same type of uprisings in places like Egypt and Libya,now we are going to use our own jack booted thugs to put down a class uprising?
Ohh Ya,I forget that they are MAKING MONEY off those other uprisings by selling arms to the rebels,and signing petro contracts....
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
-albert einstein
not "fully" supported of true freedom fights
This Pentagon and White House doesn't willynilly rush into freedom fights, picking its favorites and protecting those (as in Egypt) way beyond their ability to maintain popular support. I see the US as often a day late and a dollar short. And when they get into warfare, they are very, very slow to withdraw when they fear reversals. In rhetoric Obama for example sounds supportive; in politics and with unconditional money, much less so.
_______Robert S. Becker
Oh, Becker, you buzzkill.
Oh, Becker, you buzzkill. But your reservations are understandable, alas.
Right now the primary emotion---or tropism?---most of the scum de la scum one-percenters are experiencing is probably not fear so much as a cross between amused indifference and mild-to-moderate annoyance. News coverage of our oh-those-crazy-kids shenanigans are at least as entertaining as a rerun of Desperate Housewives. And, true, there are always enough ex-Black Ops or off-their-meds psycho cops for hire out there, should the more intractable elements of the rabble start asking for their lives back. Besides which, Washington knows who oh-so-generously butters both sides of its bread.
The more pragmatic issue is the continued viability of this kind of social movement. After the initial high fades, there is the morning after, and then the morning after that.... Who knows how long the OWS movement can sustain itself before becoming just another living relic of the Left, whose intentions are often more honored than its sporadic accomplishments. (Re those accomplishments: the plutocrats did survive the 30's---but so did we, with Social Security. FDR's devil's pact with capitalism wasn't a total win-win for Big Biz.)
Organizers are in this for the long haul, but the rank and file? Hard to tell this early on. (Right now I'm visiting Portland, where it's---surprise---cold and wet. And if it starts to snow in a few months?...)
And what influence will this "prophetic minority" (to borrow Jack Newfield's term for the 60's Left) have on their fellow United Statesers? Yes, as you note, the fulfilled prophecy of that minority turned out to be largely a legacy of betrayal and defeat, but didn't the New Left also help raise lasting questions about minority rights, women's rights, etc.---questions that too many Americans had hitherto been unwilling to discuss? And didn't those questions have an impact on public policy---an impact which conserrvatards are now trying to reverse? Even partial victories are seldom final.
I do have serious doubts about the long-term efficacy of civil disobedience as a tool for social change, even if it were to spread from a minority of protesters to the general populace. WRP cited Gandhi, so I'll do the same:
I believe that no government can exist for a single moment without the cooperation of the people, willing or forced, and if people suddenly withdraw their cooperation in every detail, the government will come to a standstill.
The necessary and sufficient cause for such an upheaval would involve what Gandhi called a "change of heart"---not in flat-affect criminals like Cantor or the Bros Koch but in the mass of ordinary citizens. To thereafter achieve a "standstill" would entail massive noncooperation (tax refusals, boycotts, strikes, etc.). The alternative would be massive violence, and although Jim Morrison said, "They've got the guns/But we've got the numbers," no one wants to be the first (or last) to step into some mercenary's crosshairs. Then again, would the violence come from the Left or the Right (or both, in an end game of mutual annihilation)?
Right now, the likelihood of either scenario playing out seems slight. But who knows? I thought the 60's would usher in a just society and I thought Dubya would be a one-term disaster. So I'm probably wrong again.
_______P Kibble
many benefits of protest
PK
I am sure you are right about something, re last sentence, just because neither of us happens to know what it is. Chance favors that millionth monkey. Goes for anything I might predict. The subject wasn't whether the insurrections of the '30's or '60's did not produce lots of benefits, direct and indirect, but they also produced unhappy trends, as I said, ridden by dinosaurs like W. I think they were vital periods of growth without which we'd never had liberal presidents.
Even at Berkeley, I was skeptical that a mature capitalist system that has in fact spread the wealth from the 1940s through the 1970 was ripe for revolution. Certainly not the blue collar kind my socialist friends were trying to foment. And I am no longer sure we aren't too big to have a national revolt -- too big to rail? too big to assail? too big to unravel?
The point, if I may be so bold as to return to this essay, is whether the elite, with whom I have passing knowledge (once a business player) are panicky, scared or quaking in their Italian leather boots. NOT by a long shot, as you say, not even worried they will lose tax benefits or dividends -- look at the stock market today, up hundreds of points and unrelated totally to whatever scruffy types yell outside their halls.
I think civil disobedience works but eventually only if it links to some real-world (democratic) political action -- as the '60's did. Congress eventually shut down funding for the Vietnam War -- Ford wanted to go on and on, just like Nixon, in modified terms. Few presidents meet wars they don't like. And what I will welcome is some shift from this no hierarchy, no spokesperson mantra -- and some clear policy statements, some assertion of marketable values, for that is what politicians understand, especially when linked to majority votes.
I know of no American protest that had any positive good without some political linkage -- now that will scare politicians. But frankly, unless we double income tax on the rich, they ain't yet worried. But it could, possibly come to be -- and there's some chance, however small, Pitt is right. Just not yet. Not from my perch. But, don't tell the nitwits here, but I could be wrong, too.
_______Robert S. Becker
I WANT The Filthy Rich To Be Afraid
Absolutely
How did you gain your wealth ? Was it honorable ? Was it legal ? Did people die from your personal gain ? Did you crush hard working americans to get to the top ?
And so, if people have died because of your greed, it only stands that you should die, too.
Those are questions for the fourth estate
Those are questions for the fourth estate to answer. There is a current muckraker deficiency.
An interesting note: The most notorious American muckraker was Jack Anderson (WP)... a Mormon.
_______Lived in the US end of Nixon thru end of Clinton.
You can learn something everyday here!
I didn't know JA was a Mormon. Thanks Contra.
_______Have you torqued a wingnut today?
![]()
Corporations aren't people - they're Republicans
- Al Sharpton
"Then they will fight you." You can count on it.
We can almost hear the cogs in the minds of those think tank lackeys turning as the protests against their rich bosses continue, and the greedy bosses order them to come up with some sort of plan to stop the truth tellers and protesters who expose these folks for just what they are, the super selfish on steroids.
We can probably, as William noted as already happening, that the MSM will barrage us with a shit storm of lies and bullshit propaganda that tries to paint protesters and jobless and homeless as a small group of lazy, hippie bums who are too sorry to go out and find work and who want to live off of the government till...and that the government cannot afford them anymore.
(But we can afford 5 trillion dollar wars and we can afford to print 16.5 trillion dollars and hand out loans to our bankers and the Western world bankers at 1% interest, and we can afford to hand them 800 billion free money, and we can afford to allow Congress and government to borrow 2.5 trillion dollars from Americans who paid into the SS trust fund, and this money has not been paid back).
Yes, these guys are nervous, but I don't think they are scared yet.
Yes, the think tank lackeys read history too, but their sick minds put a conservative "spin" on what they read. They have to do this in order to please their bosses who demand that they "believe" in the cause of selfish greed and self interest (of the bosses of course).
For example, if a conservative think tank lackey were reading Russian history, he or she would try to figure out what the Czar did wrong in controlling his serfs and how he might have won the day by duping them and oppressing them in different ways from what he did.
For this reason, we can expect that the current oppressors of the US population will devise some innovative schemes to stem the protests and discredit the protesters.
Technology allows the easy identification of protest leaders, and they can expect all sorts of devices to be used to distract and intimidate them. Most of these devices have been used in the past, even including murder of some. That, however, just ups the ante when it occurs and if enough people are angered by violence against protesters and jobless, it can create a much larger shit storm against the rich and famous.
Lackeys have the pressure on them too, including think tank employees and politicians and police.
Think tank lackeys might send agents provocateurs into protest movements to lead them off track. Protesters need to be aware of new people who try to lead the protests off track.
Bought politicians and officials will often pass laws and regulations that make life difficult for dissenters and protesters.
Police bullies will do what they love to do best, bully anyone who challenges the establishment status-quo. These guys will beat and pepper spray people. The see force as the means of making people comply with directions. Fear equals respect in their eyes.
Expect increased secrecy from government and from media and from establishment in many areas except the propaganda area. In the minds of these think tanks, duping and fooling and mind-fucking the citizenry is what their game is all about. Move thinking this way. Move it that way. Throw some fog and some smoke and some mirrors up so that it keeps the masses confused.
Now, at some point, if the big guys feel overconfident and unafraid or are just plain crazy for power, they will turn loose violence upon the American people and public. This is what Gandhi counted on and it served his purposes extremely well.
This is like the wrestler or karate expert parrying and forcing his opponent to use his own strength and own weight to defeat himself.
When General Dyer ordered over 1000 peaceful Indian protesters shot down, this drove the final nails in the coffin for the British Empire. It was finished.
Stalin tried to hide this stuff from the Soviet citizenry, but do it anyway. His "black maria" sedans rolled up at night and people were disappeared forever to the gulags or were simply exterminated and buried without a trace. But this stuff cannot be hidden from the public.
You can create a climate of fear and terror, but when people have nothing to lose, they get really serious about resistance, and resistance become deadly. We see this in Iraq and in Afghanistan. We can stay there for a hundred years, but we will never subdue the peoples there, and as long as we are there, we can expect some of our occupation forces to die there.
So, it's all a question of degrees and innovation on the part of the rulers and their lackeys.
One thing about this bunch, especially the far right ultra-conservative end of it, is that they are crooked, mean and stubborn, and they seem to believe their own simplistic agenda of beating down fellow American citizens. In fact, they appear to hate people who have less than themselves.
The neo-liberal end of the spectrum is somewhat different. I think some of these guys are simply overwhelmed with their own arrogance and a belief that they are superior to the people they try to control. They see the citzenry as a bunch of unwashed rabble that needs controlling and directing and if a few hundred thousand slip into poverty so they can progress their global agendas, then tough shit, so be it. This ruling class accross the spectrum is arrogant beyond belief.
This arrogance comes, I think, from the spoiled and somewhat, by world standards, lavish lifestyles they were raised in. American parents, working day and night, for their own material success, lavished the kids with things and stuff and a life where reality was a television, a computer games, fast food and sex with after school friends. The only real value or meaning this crowed learned while growing up was to push yourself to the limit to impose yourself upon the world around you and to take all you can from others when the opportunity arises, and television and movie entertainment taught them that violence is an acceptable way of doing this, especially if you are powerful enough to get away with it... and nowadays, they play a real life version of Dungeons and Dragons.
So, protesters can expect the traditional rules of history to apply, but they can certainly expect some very innovative resistance strategies from these arrogant think tank lackeys that the rich and powerful have employed in their service.
On cardinal rule of history in these things that always applies to rulers and also the oppressed, however, and everyone needs to remember this, is that however much the level of oppression and violence escalates, at some point, the pendulum will swing in the opposite direction to balance things out. It might take one month, one year or one hundred years, but this always happens.
I have some doubts about this bunch being very scared yet. I think they are too stupid and arrogant to be scared yet.
I Would Also Opine That These Rich Bastards Not
Provoke the masses. I don't think these arrogant assholes actually have a sense of how much rage is out there.
These taunts of we are the 1% 's is pretty provacative. It's an In -Your-Face-Insult.
It will be amusing to you rich people until someone actually does you harm because of your arrogance.
Be very careful. You are in more danger than you realize. The anger on the street is very, very real.
Let me put it this way: I would bring harm to you if I could, and I'm a gentle soul.
So stop and think. DO NOT BE COCKY OR ARROGANT.
"We Have Seen The Enemy..."
Thank you, William Rivers Pitt for this column and 'thank you as well to "all" who have weighed in on this issue.
_______"Advertising may be described as the science of arresting the human intelligence long enough to get money from it."
Stephen Leacock (1869-1944)
- God still undecided on election
by aardvark
5 posts, 92 views - Music thread: What are you listening to right now?
by Blood Red Sun
697 posts, 29400 views - Quote Of The Day
by JMadison
60 posts, 773 views - KIB goes completely insane, buys a Harley
by aussidawg
213 posts, 29301 views - diaspora * alpha
by BlueTigress
2 posts, 42 views - Bill O'Reilly 'Killing Lincoln' Errors: Book Contains Plethora Of Factual Inaccuracies, banned from Ford's Theater book store
by MissMarple
1 posts, 134 views - NY Foreclosure Law Firm Threw Party Where Participants Dress Up As Homeless, Foreclosed Americans
by aardvark
7 posts, 284 views
- Penn State And The Culture Of Rape
by Cliff Schecter
1 comments - Vast Amounts of Time
by Mason
0 comments - Why You Cannot Divide By Zero: Frog Gravy 56
by CraneStation
1 comments - Deja vu all over again: 1968 and 2011 on Sproul Plaza
by Jane Stillwater
0 comments - Will The RATS Court Exact Revenge On Barack Obama?
by richard729
3 comments - Wandering back through the archives
by cewillir
7 comments - Save the Internet
by artlj56
1 comments - The Embers of Their Own Demise
by Daveparts
1 comments - "Regulatory Uncertainty", The Right's New Talking Point
by yellow
1 comments - The Men in the Jungle
by Iguazulu
0 comments - Becoming Blasé About War Crimes
by artlj56
18 comments - That Dark Horizon
by Daveparts
4 comments - Missing the Point of Ohio's Referendum
by Michael Kwiatkowski
33 comments - God is a Concept
by Daveparts
1 comments - What This Country Needs…
by Daveparts
3 comments - Good Luck to the Dude from AK!
by river walker
21 comments - Americans across the country are on the march!
by forman
0 comments - Ohio Voters Reject Senate Bill 5, Obamacare; Mississippi Defeats Anti-Abortion Amendment
by Michael Kwiatkowski
6 comments - If this doesn't convince the majority to revolt...
by macgp44
0 comments - Jobless and Clueless
by Joel S. Hirschhorn
3 comments - Being Woody Guthrie
by Daveparts
0 comments - And the Country Went to Hell
by Daveparts
2 comments - Black Bloc -- or Black Water?
by Jane Stillwater
0 comments - Unfailed States of the Horn of Africa
by Iguazulu
0 comments - Move Your Money
by jdp55
0 comments
The highest-rated threads (minimum ten votes):
- This Is What Waterboarding Looks Like
by David Corn
56 comments
22358 reads - Barking Mad
by Mike Whitney
28 comments
14194 reads - Police Spying in the Birthplace of the First Amendment
by Dave Lindorff
11 comments
7333 reads - Shame on Us All
by Robert Parry
44 comments
7532 reads - So long, it's been good to know ya'
by Ed Naha
53 comments
14054 reads - David Kuo's Book "Tempting Faith": The Author's Agenda, the Authoritarian Behavior He Reports, And the White House's Response
by John W. Dean
34 comments
11612 reads - Olbermann Special Commentary Nov. 1
by Barry Ragin
28 comments
9032 reads - Housing Bubble Smack-down
by Mike Whitney
30 comments
18880 reads - At Least We Aren't Nazis!
by Pamela Troy
10 comments
6749 reads - An Important Story You Didn't See
by Stephen Pizzo
34 comments
17616 reads - Why I Love Santa
by Cenk Uygur
9 comments
5661 reads - Delusions of victory
by Sidney Blumenthal
20 comments
6707 reads - The Public Housing Struggle in New Orleans: A Tale of Two Sisters
by Bill Quigley
3 comments
5275 reads - Saddam is Dead
by punkmonksf
34 comments
23590 reads - The 2006 WTF? Awards!
by Ed Naha
8 comments
6718 reads
Blogs
Alan Bisbort
Alicublog
Americablog
Andrew Bard Schmookler
Atrios
Bad Attitudes
Barry Lando
Barry Yourgrau
Barbara O'Brien
Bartcop
Blog Report
Bob Geiger
Booman Tribune
BTC News
Chris Floyd
Cliff Schecter
Crooks and Liars
Culture Kitchen
Daily Kos
Dave Lindorff
David Corn
David Sirota
David Swanson
Demosthenes
Digby
Ed Naha
Ed Tant
Firedoglake
Greg Palast
Hal O'Boyle
James Wolcott
Jayne Lyn Stahl
Jesus' General
Joe Bageant
Josh Marshall
Len Hart
Liberal Oasis
Making Light
Media Is A Plural
My Left Wing
Pierre Tristam
PM Carpenter
Political Junkies
RJ Eskow
Riverbend
Roger Ailes
Rude Pundit
Russ Baker
Sadly, No
Scholars & Rouges
Scott Shuster
Seeing The Forest
Skippy
Stephen Elliott
Stephen Pizzo
Steve Gilliard
Susie Madrak
Ted Rall
Timothy Gatto
William Fisher
Worldwide Sawdust
Advocacy
Mesothelioma Treatment
News & Commentary
AlterNet
Antiwar.com
Black Agenda Report
Black Commentator
Buffalo Beast
BuzzFlash
Consortium News
Common Dreams
CounterPunch
Crisis Papers
Democratic Underground
Democrats.com
Dissident Voice
Drudge Retort
In These Times
The Huffington Post
MediaChannel
The Nation
The Progressive
The Washington Monthly
Scoop
TomPaine.com
Truthdig
Truthout
Virtual Citizens
Working For Change
Radio & TV
The Young Turks
Thom Hartmann
There are currently 7 users and 96 guests online.
| 100 Most Recent Threads | Topics & Issues | Events | Polls | Chimp 1.0 Home | Top | About | Contact | Advertise | Shop | Donate
Privacy Policy | Terms of Use © 2011 Smirking Chimp Media bot trap |























"Believe it or not, some in
"Believe it or not, some in this town have actually condoned the pitting of Americans against Americans."
-OK,That right there is enough to make me puke,these ruthless sack sucken motha's have been pitting the haves against the havenots ...and winning in every case for a long time.Esp this smarmy little corporate smiley whore Cantor,they have been stabbing the little people in the back,denying UI benefit extensions,calling Obama the 'food stamp' President and now actively going after our little ole Social Security checks,which the would just love to throw on the roulette table on wall street.Two words for you Cantor,and I'm in too nice of a mood this morning to say them...
_______"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe."
-albert einstein