Saturday, October 08, 2011
It's what the fashionable revolutionaries are doing
In this pre-meeting facilitators decided that the human microphone method should be used. In New York City amplifiers are banned in public parks. The human microphone method is a practical way of amplifying sound without electricity. The speaker says three to four words at a time, and then those who can hear the speaker repeat the words. It’s easy to see how this can be beneficial with larger crowds, but there were only two hundred people present, and the facilitators had a loudspeaker.
Labels: douchebaggery, New Orleans, Occupy Nola
Friday, October 07, 2011
We Are Not Ready For Some Football or #Occupy Belgium Superdome
Anyway we've got mixed feelings about the sudden and unceremonious demise of Hank Williams Jr.'s career as America's Football Preparedness Herald. Of course we hate that song. We've always hated that song, and we've long dreamed of the day when the long stinging pain of that song would be gone from our lives forever. Why just a week prior to this mess we had played a little game with ourselves where we tried to guess the exact right time to change the channel to Monday Night Football so that we'd come in just after the song but before kickoff. We waited 10 whole minutes past the scheduled air time of MNF, flipped the channel and then, dammit, there was Hank screaming and mocking us again. This wasn't actually the first time we'd played that game and lost but now that we know it will be the last we're wondering if we won't miss it a little.
Plus if you're gonna dump Hank, don't do it because of his idiotic political opinions. For one thing, it isn't like anyone is surprised by them. For another, nobody cares. More importantly, though, because he wasn't fired specifically because the song is stupid, that just leaves the door open for any possibly worse, even completely unnecessary to football broadcasting musical number to replace it. WIST's Sports Hangover has been throwing the name Rebecca Black around just to give you an idea. But we're pretty sure there are even worse possibilities out there and ESPN has the resources to find them. Also, too, as well, what's wrong with just this, anyway? Either way we're not too worried about Bocephus. He's a country boy. He'll survive.
But just to add a bit of perspective here Williams was let go because during one brief and pointless FOX News segment he shared with us a whiskey-soaked fantasy of his about a hypothetical golf game between Bibi Netanyahu and Adolf Hitler. Meanwhile, this week, Tom Benson was allowed to pin the name of Mercedes Benz onto the state-owned building where his football team sometimes plays. The Daimler-Benz company may not know much about imaginary golf, but it does have a history of its own with Adolf Hitler.
''Leading managers of Daimler-Benz lent valuable assistance to the National Socialists before Hitler became Chancellor in 1933,'' Mr. Bellon writes. ''The corporation even claimed that it was responsible for 'helping to motorize the movement.' '' One way the company aided Hitler's party was to take out large advertisements as early as 1931 in the Nazi newspaper, the Volkischer Beobachter, known for its virulent propaganda and anti-Semitic ti-rades.The author believes that the ads may have been part of a quid pro quo arrangement under which Daimler-Benz cars were given or lent to Hitler and his party's officials.
Benz went on to produce war materiale for the Nazis including trucks, parts, tanks, and aircraft engines much of which was built through forced labor by Jews in concentration camps.
Now we're not saying that Daimler-Benz's history as a Nazi-owned company who forced slaves to build instruments of war which Hitler used to kill American soldiers maybe is still so relevant that it means 60 years after the fact the modern iteration of that company can't now be associated in a small and irrelevant way with the presentation of an American sporting event. We're just wondering if maybe Hank Williams' war crimes merit the more severe rebuke they've drawn.
Saints vs Jaguars: (Jaguar being a luxury car of British origins who we don't think ever collaborated with the Nazis but admittedly haven't checked)
- How this game was won: Blaine Gabbert is just plain not good. The Saints got off to a good start in this one but then let Jacksonville hang around and kind of edge back into the game almost by accident. It isn't difficult to imagine the Jaguars managing to steal the game except for the fact that their quarterback Blaine Gabbert played so horribly in the second half.
Saints players and coaches expressed their surprise afterwards that Gabbert figured as prominently in the Jags' game plan as he did. The Saints had expected to see more of Maurice Jones-Drew early on but instead Gabbert came out throwing.
The ploy kind of worked for a time. But in football, the fact that something is mildly surprising, does not mean it's actually a winning strategy. Of Gabbert's 196 yards passing, 165 of them came during the first half. As the game went on, and the Saints realized Jacksonville was serious about wanting to beat them with Gabbert, things went less well. During one second half stretch, Gabbert threw 10 consecutive incomplete passes and was picked off by Patrick Robinson.
When Jacksonville went for a 4th and 2 late in the 3rd quarter and decided to put the ball in Gabbert's hands instead of Jones-Drew's, we knew the game was pretty much over then and there.
Also, this year's popular Twitter theory shared by @saintsnola, @nolarr, and others among us holds that an NFL quarterback's probability of success is inversely proportional to his resemblance to a stereotypical date rapist. Gabbert is a near perfect example.
NFL QB? or scene from The Karate Kid? - It's been fun index:

Darren Sproles vs Jacksonville: 7 carries 75 yards, 5 receptions 56 yards, 1 punt return 8 yards, 2 kickoff returns 48 yards
TOTAL 188 all purpose yards
Reggie Bush vs San Diego: 13 carries 50 yards, 2 receptions 15 yards
TOTAL 65 all-purpose yards
On the season now that's an NFL-leading 716 all-purpose yards and 3 touchdowns for "Tank" Sproles and 228 all-purpose yards and 2 fumbles for Bush. Keeping track of this is starting to get a little boring, right? Well not quite yet.
For one thing, we always wanted a player with the nickname "Tank." (No not a Benz tank. Then we'd have to call him "Panzer") It gives us an excuse to embed more Bob in the game re-caps. - Diners, Drive-ins, and Diving to the Ground Index:
Last week, Panthers' tight end Jeremey Shockey caught 2 passes for 41 yards. Once again he scored zero touchdowns which keeps him at zero on the season tied with whatever back-up Saints tackle might happen to catch a pass in the endzone at any point this season.
Meanwhile, we keep saying this statistic isn't about Jimmy Graham but let's look at his numbers anyway.
Graham's 10 receptions 132 yards 1 TD was the second best receiving day for a Saints tight end... ever.It's been a long time since a Saints tight end had as prolific a day. His career-high catch and yardage totals ranked among the best efforts in club history. In fact, only one Saints tight end has ever had a more productive day, and that came 31 years ago when Henry Childs had 144 yards in a 38-35 loss to the 49ers on Dec. 7, 1980.
After four games Graham is on pace for 96 receptions which would best Shockey's career high of 74. Sproles and Graham are what the Saints thought Bush and Shockey would be when they were acquired. Their success where their predecessors' disappointed has been the story of the first quarter of the 2011 season.
One more fun fact: This season so far, Saints fullback Jed Collins has more touchdowns than Bush and Shockey combined. - Uh oh the kicker sucks: One of the reasons the Saints had trouble putting the Jaguars away was the trouble they had in the "red zone" caused them to settle for more field goal attempts than we're accustomed to watching. Another reason is when the Saints were in long-ish field goal range, John Kasay blew it twice. We may have to re-open our file on cursed jersey #2.

Starting to worry about this again - Other uniform-related facts: The Saints have won 9 consecutive games in black jersies and gold pants. Through the first four games, they've put up a 3-1 record including a not-all-that-discouraging loss to the defending Superbowl champion. They've also yet to break out the awful black pants this year. Let's keep that going.
- Difficult to see trend: Despite some deceptive numbers, the Saints' defense has had difficulty these past few games getting off the field in big 3rd and long situations. Jacksonville only actually converted 4 out of 15 3rd downs last week but the ones they did turn over were particularly embarrassing and had a significant impact on the game.
For example let's look at the Jaguars' first scoring drive in the second quarter. The situation is this. The Saints have just taken a 14-0 lead by finishing a 96 yard drive with a touchdown pass to Jimmy Graham. If the Jags sputter on this next opportunity, the game could get out of hand. They move the ball almost to midfield before a Roman Harper sack sets up a 3rd and 20. This is obviously the biggest play of the game to this point. And the Saints' defense screws it up big time allowing a completed pass plus a facemask penalty setting Jacksonville up First and 10 on the Saints' 30. A few plays (including another 3rd and long conversion) later, Jacksonville scores and suddenly it's a game again.
There was a similar pattern during the Texans game as well. The percentages might not show it but, for some reason, big game changing plays seem to come against the Saints' defense on 3rd and long. Just something to keep an eye on. - Off and running? If you're a bit of an X and O geek you may enjoy Ben Muth's columns at Football Outsiders breaking down the Saints' offensive line play this season. This week Muth was impressed with the running game which shouldn't be too much of a surprise. But he also pointed out some noteworthy flaws in the pass protection which he pins on Brian De La Puente and Charles Brown. It's worth a read but our two cents is this.
Yes, the Saints racked up good rushing numbers this week. But so much of that is sneaking Darren Sproles through on surprise tosses or draws that it's not exactly the sort of thing you can read as dominant line play. In fact the whole Saints' running game is based so much on stretch and draw type plays that the line spends more time stepping back and catching defenders than it does firing off the ball and hitting people even when the Saints aren't throwing the ball. That can make for some really bad football against an opponent who knows how to read your tricks. We liked to see Mark "Did Dug" Ingram burrow his way through for a first down in a late game short yardage situation but he got next to no help from his linemen on that play.
We're telling you he looks like Dig Dug This nickname will stick even if it kills us
Otherwise Muth is right. The pass protection has been bad so far. The sack Charles Brown allowed to stall the opening drive of the second half last week was particularly bad. - This week's Jordan Jefferson Try Not to Kick Anybody In the Face Award: Speaking of hits on the quarterback, Drew Brees was pounded into the turf by Jacksonville's Terrance Knighton well after the end of a play during the second half touching off a momentary scuffle on the field. Knighton was not flagged for the late hit and, we admit we haven't been paying much attention this week but we're not sure he's been fined after the fact. For all the whining Michael Vick did last week about being singled out by officials, Brees has a case of his own to make after the past two games.
Reiterating our apology from above, but that's all we got this week. One of these weeks we'll get this done right and it will be... well.. it will be a thing that happened. You'll see. Anyway we don't have any time to proofread this either so if you feel like picking out our typos, grammatical errors, and such in the comments go right ahead. Just don't be a big Nazi about it.
Thursday, October 06, 2011
Fooled again
Also it doesn't help that this opening scene from last night's South Park premiere captures my general state of motivation lately. More so than usual, I mean.
Ass Burgers
Get More: SOUTH
PARKmore...
So that's that.
Meanwhile, reports from today's #Occupy event suggest that it was moderately well attended but also pretty uneventful, or even, in the words of one eyewitness "boring, Sidney, boring!"
Still I've found it diverting enough to look through some of the photos.

Photo by Flickr user Artbymags
I think this is probably my favorite because it combines the grammatically and contextually confounding phrase "Who Dat? We Dat" with a store bought Guy Fawkes masks which has the double benefit of being both a tired cliche and a modest profit center for mega-corporation Time-Warner who has trademarked the image. The improvised fleur-de-lis on the forehead isn't actually necessary to make the image any more lame or predictable but I do appreciate the extra effort there.
Labels: Occupy Nola, television
Welcome to the occupation
A group of protesters calling themselves "Occupy New Orleans" will march across the city today before setting up an "encampment" at Duncan Plaza across from City Hall where some say they plan to live for months. Inspired by the "Occupy Wall Street" protests, which began in New York City three weeks ago and have since spread to at least 80 other cities, the group is demonstrating against what it sees as the disproportionate power wielded by corporations and the rich.
Mainly what this means is that if NOPD wants to misbehave they'll have to cite the noise ordinance instead. Or they could treat it like a St. Joseph's Day parade and just move in without any pretext whatsoever.
And if none of that goes as badly as we know it can, we understand Jackie Clarkson is prepared to drop buckets of water on Duncan Plaza from a helicopter.
Labels: douchebaggery, New Orleans, Occupy Nola, Occupy Wall Street
The single most ridiculous thing I have ever read in my entire life

What a shameless fucking fraud that man is. But then, who isn't these days?
Labels: Buddy Roemer, douchebaggery, Occupy Wall Street
Wednesday, October 05, 2011
Some 99% are more 99% than others
What's happening now is the technocracy is organizing itself to fight back. MoveOn, the Obama campaign, blogland—that's the technocracy in action. But the only way they'll win is by allying themselves to the 80% of Americans who have essentially no power. And technocrats can almost never bring themselves to identify downward. (I didn't get a PhD in mechanical engineering so I'd have to join no union!) Meanwhile, the 80% can smell the fact the technocrats do have contempt for them and have no intention of sharing real power—making the 80% vulnerable to rhetorical attacks on the technocratic elite.
Yesterday in a widely circulated blog post Ezra Klein highlighted what, to him, makes the protests "worth covering." Unlike a lot of these elite presspersons I personally have always thought the sit-ins were "coverage-worthy" even if I don't particularly care for the participants, but I digress. Here's Klein.
It was a Tumblr called, “We Are The 99 Percent,” and all it’s doing is posting grainy pictures of people holding handwritten signs telling their stories, one after the other.
“I am 20K in debt and am paying out of pocket for my current tuition while I start paying back loans with two part time jobs.”
These are not rants against the system. They’re not anarchist manifestos. They’re not calls for a revolution. They’re small stories of people who played by the rules, did what they were told, and now have nothing to show for it. Or, worse, they have tens of thousands in debt to show for it.
Yeah yeah "small stories of people who played by the rules" sounds appealing to a certain aesthetic like Klein's. But what that really refers to is Schwarz's "technocratic elite" in this case at least appearing to "identify downward" for once. Except not really. Mostly what we're seeing is a lot of Yuppies suddenly disappointed that their decision to buy into a corrupt system hasn't affirmed their claim to superior personhood through material reward. Particularly telling is that so many of the messages include citations of advanced degrees. We're hearing from people who think they're entitled to something they've "earned."
These are people who did what they were supposed to do. They signed up to pay the right banks for the appropriately expensive educations and mortgages. They read the right books, watched the right TV, bought the right gadgets. They voted for consensus elite governments and assented to policies that redistributed wealth upward while leaving the rest of us, those of us who hadn't fixated so intensely on proving ourselves worthy by their standards, behind. And now they're shocked to learn that they're as expendable and unnecessary as the next human? I thought these were smart people. They certainly like to proclaim themselves so anyway.
One would have at least hoped the local chapter would have applied for a city permit to march tomorrow given the hyper-serious attitude of our current administration and police force to such matters.
But alas,
As of Tuesday afternoon, the NOPD said that Occupy NOLA has not applied for a permit to march. If the march does happen, the NOPD says officers will be on the scene.
The OccupyNOLA position on this is that their "legal team" advises them a permit is not actually necessary for a political protest even though marching without one in New Orleans is technically illegal. I'm not sure I would take my chances given NOPD's behavioral tendencies but good luck anyway.
Labels: douchebaggery, New Orleans, Occupy Wall Street, police, politics
Monday, October 03, 2011
#Occupy Cannizzaro!
UPDATE I just realized I posted the wrong video here and left it like that all week. Here's what you should have seen.
Labels: crime, Leon Cannizzaro, New Orleans
Michael Bloomberg rock opera
Meanwhile, it's good to see the Paultards show up to plan this week's "Occupy NOLA" event. Between them and the "anarchists" (last seen in action here) what could possibly go wrong?
The actual Occupy New Orleans protest will begin on Thursday, Oct. 6 (the national Occupy Together movement's "Day of Solidarity") at noon in front of Orleans Parish Prison at Tulane and Broad.
Note: That location was determined by a series of votes after protracted and sometimes heated discussion. My read on it was that it could very well change, more than once, by Thursday, so check the Web sites listed above. Other, rejected-as-of-now sites included Lafayette Square, Lee Circle and City Hall.
Protesters will march from there to Lafayette Square to protest at the New Orleans branch of the Federal Reserve. They plan to set up a long-term occupation "base camp" in Duncan Plaza at New Orleans City Hall.
You know there are actually quite a few examples of inappropriate corporate usurpation of our public sphere in New Orleans worthy of "occupation." If the marchers go to John White's office, for example, they might draw more attention to the importance of these upcoming BESE elections as they relate to the privatization of our public schools. But then again, Ron Paul supporters don't even believe in public education in the first place so I guess that's out.
I also wouldn't mind seeing them take on any of the ongoing film productions around town which, funded through Louisiana tax incentives, appropriate city streets and public locations for the benefit of a particularly insulting kind of corporate profit taking not to mention create a major inconvenience for anyone who either lives near or travels through any of the city's more photogenic areas. But then I'm pretty sure there's enough overlap between the assembled protesters and people who like to pass around their head shots to keep that from happening.
Last week, I sort of tongue-in-cheekishly suggested the Superdome although some of that was "kidding on the square" as Buddy D used to say. It's at least more within the context than frowning at a statue somebody put up in Tivoli Circle a hundred years ago.
So, in the tried and true American spirit of incoherent compromise, the group has settled on starting at Tulane and Broad because.. you know police and stuff.. and then moving on to the Fed branch because.. GOLD STANDARD, BITCHES.. before settling down in Duncan Plaza which is where, you may remember, Ray Nagin once managed to ignore a whole encampment of homeless people for months. So the good news there is nobody should ask them to move or pay any attention them at all for quite a while. That is unless they take it into their minds to do any "aggressive panhandling" in which case the law requires Stacy Head to shoot them on sight.
Labels: douchebaggery, Michael Bloomberg, Occupy Wall Street, Ron Paul
Friday, September 30, 2011
Things I don't get to go watch because of the early LSU kickoff
Update: See Gambit coverage of the event here.
Labels: avondale, labor, New Orleans
Serpas Signal
License, registration, proof of insurance -- have them at the ready tonight and early Saturday morning if you drive in the Downtown area of New Orleans. A DWI checkpoint will be operating there from about 9 p.m. until 5 a.m.
I've been saying for some time that more traffic checkpoints were going to be Serpas' answer to the recent upswing in violent crime and home invasions around town. You may have thought I was kidding about that. Not so much. The sad truth is, the police don't have much power to do anything other than harass people. They're about to start arguing that they should be allowed to harass more aggressively. Of course it won't solve anyone's problem but it's what they know how to do.
Labels: New Orleans, police, Ronal Serpas
Occupy Poydras Street or Pawed And Herded And Other Mistreatments Of Superdome Patrons
Unless you've been living under a rock, or doing whatever it is people do to attain Jackie Clarksonian levels of obliviousness these days, you're no doubt conscious of the ongoing "Occupy Wall Street" sit-ins in New York right now. Patrick did some thinking out loud about this scene the other day and despite what sounds a little like a scolding comment from us below that post, we're basically in agreement with his ambivalence. Sure, we're as upset as the next somewhat left of center American about the concentration of wealth and power in the hands of financial and political elites, but as we've seen numerous times, we aren't too keen on the efficacy of gathering large groups of self-important hipppies in the streets for the purposes of combating any of this.
Recently when we attended the disastrous ALEC protest in New Orleans, we concluded
I saw them make a few more rounds chanting the usual worn out protesty mantras about "The people united" and whatnot. As they came by shouting "This is what Democracy looks like" it occurred to me that they were probably right about that. Elites and lawmakers quietly dividing up the wealth of the nation in a hotel suite while clueless douchebags and idiot kids prattle on to no affect in the street is pretty much exactly what American democracy looks like in 2011.
And this is still our impression of what's going on in New York right now. The only improvement being that at least some of the snotty little kids are being pepper sprayed as karmic payment for their quest for celebrity.
Yes, of course, some actual celebrities are showing up now too. (Kudos to Radiohead for saying no, by the way.) And before it's over we're sure someone will write some messages on their hands, or someone will make an awareness calendar or something. But at the end of the day, all of these people will have to go home and realize that they have no alternative but to vote for Obama again and the finance elites will continue to run everything. But hey, it was a great time "doing important things" and all. I'm sure a lot of people got laid. Or failing that, came away with some great networking leads for that next social media marketing thing they're doing next month. Great work, kids.
The one slight advantage the New York protesters have over their copycat me-too marches planned all over the country is at least the Wall Street event is arguably maybe about something. Yglesias, who is like us somewhat sympathetic to the complaint, sounds similarly frustrated with the tactics.
But when the lodestar of your movement is to say, “The one thing we all have in common is that We Are The 99% that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%,” it’s difficult for me to get excited. You have to have a dream scenario in mind. What if the protests are super-popular, the crowds are enormous, and the inconvenience to the high and mighty becomes intolerable? What if the bad guys decide it’s time to consider a surrender? You want them to come out, address the crowd, and do what?Our point is a bit harsher than his in that we don't think any of the people you see on TV actually care about making anything specific happen beyond calling attention to themselves. But, on the off chance that we can salvage something worthwhile from our own local "occupation" event let us offer up a suggested target. Why not Occupy Poydras Street?
Let's make make the Occupy New Orleans event a real assertion of the people's rights in the face of neo-feudal elite usurpers by marching on and "occupying" the site of that elite's most egregious presumption of ownership. Let's demand that Tom and Rita Benson acknowledge that the Louisiana Superdome belongs not to them, not to the National Football Cartel they hold membership in, but to the citizens of the State of Louisiana who paid to construct and maintain that facility out of their tax revenues. Let's remind the Bensons that it is our good name and iconography on which the lucrative brand "New Orleans Saints" that the Bensons derive such wealth from is built.
You want specific demands? Fine, here they are. We demand that the Bensons immediately cease efforts to cheapen our building, our "Sacredome" by appending the name of some base commercial sponsor to its title. We've been more than reasonable with the Bensons and the NFL. We've allowed them to profit handsomely while using our building and enjoying our subsidies and trademarking our name and symbols. At least spare us the indignity of having a corporate partner of theirs pretend to some ownership of our property as well.
Other sports owners are oblivious to the bounty they've been granted by the people at large. Tell the Bensons not to be like them. Tell them that NFL bylaws are not necessarily the law of the land. Were we to one day muster the political will, we could still follow a successful alternate model that more accurately reflects the public's entitlement via-a-vis its investment in its sports franchises.
It may be exorbitantly expensive to run a team, but people don’t buy N.F.L. teams as a civic service. Being an N.F.L. owner is like having a license to print money. Television contracts alone run in the billions, with the 2006-2011 contracts valued at approximately $3 billion annually, $800 million more than the previous contracts. In addition, N.F.L. teams have received $6 billion in public funds to build the current crop of stadiums. In other words, the public is already shouldering a great deal of the cost and debt for N.F.L. franchises. But these public dollars, through some sort of magic alchemy, morph into private profits that often flow away from the communities that ponied up the dough. In the United States, we socialize the debt of sports and privatize the profits. Green Bay stands as a living, breathing, and, for the owners, frightening example, that pro sports can aid our cities in tough economic times, not drain them of scarce public resources.
But we're not marching to overturn the Bensons' stolen applecart. We could do that but we're reasonable people. We just want to be treated with respect when we show up at our building to watch our football team play. Part of that means not selling off our name but it also means keeping your damn dirty hands off of us.
Instead of the torso-only pat-downs and bag checks that have been in place for several years, ticket holders will be patted down from the ankle up before Sunday's duel between the Saints and the Chicago Bears.
The National Football League demanded the expanded screenings in the wake of an incident last week at a game in New Jersey between the New York Jets and Dallas Cowboys, where a spectator sneaked in a stun gun.
The more skeptical among us aren't so sure this is about safety. More likely it's about maximizing owners' concession profits.
The new searches may unintentionally disrupt a longtime tradition for some Saints fans, including Joseph, who totes a small flask to every game to avoid paying $9 for a single drink and $14 for a double, he said.
Freeman conceded that guards might "catch a few more things." And, as always, he said, anyone nabbed with a flask, or any other beverages, will be asked to consume it or pour it out before entering the Dome.
Those $9.00 beer profits, by the way, go directly to Benson. The taxpayers don't even realize any benefit from sticking it to themselves on drink prices. Ourselves, we have been flask carriers ever since 2006 when we thought $9.00 was an outrageous amount to pay for the Dome double Bloody Marys. Surely we're not ready to back down in the face of near 50% inflation over 5 years.
Anyway we're happy to report that we made it past the Stasi with little difficulty these first two weeks. Also we had one of these with us which certainly looks threatening in and of itself but caused little distress with security.

It turns out that a small metal flask is still a pretty decent piece of spy technology. It's curved so it hugs the hip in a nearly undetectable fashion. Nearly undetectable.
The National Football League is pushing for enhanced security, and starting with Sunday's game at Lambeau, all fans will be subject to a hand-held, metal-detecting wand test before being admitted.
The procedure would be similar to wand inspections at the airport, but this process would be less invasive than the full-body exam, said Doug Collins, Packers director of security.
See even in Green Bay they're getting ridiculous with this stuff. Worse, in Cleveland last weekend, fans were ejected from their taxpayer subsidized stadium for standing. For fucking standing!
At least if they're going to poke and prod and otherwise insult us the way they do, they could try to do it more quickly. When the Saints kicked off against Houston, our section of the Dome was still a good 2/3 empty due to the long lines at the gate. We're not sure we reached full capacity until a few minutes into the second half. Maltreatment of citizens by private lords presuming to reign over the public space has gone too far. Please join us Sunday as we tell these Occupy NOLA people they need to do something about... oh okay we'll probably just be watching the Saints and Jaguars Sunday afternoon but you get the idea.
Anywhoo... this is a football re-cap, right?
Two Weeks of Saints Football:
- This week's RTA complaint: Ever since we became a one bicycle household, we've found ourselves relying on the streetcar service to get us
tonear the Dome on game days. Our results have been fair at best in the past and recently have only gotten worse. Streetcar service on Sundays has always been iffy but if there's an event like a football game going on it's just deplorable. If you're not at a stop by 10:45 at the latest, odds are you're not going to be in your seats in time for kickoff. Often even that is no good as we have quite a few times found ourselves giving up and walking all or most of the way downtown. Last week we stood at the stop and watched 5 streetcars roll by headed the wrong direction one right after the other as if they were a parade or perhaps a slightly interrupted train. Luckily this one time we happened to be rescued by passing Good Samaritans offering a ride. Otherwise, given the security lines we faced once we arrived, we might never have made it inside that day. - Just get Drew's contract done already.
It's pretty obvious that Drew Brees is as responsible for what happens with the Saints' offense as Sean Payton is. The Houston game couldn't have illustrated his value more clearly.Trailing 26-17 early in the fourth quarter, Payton made a brilliant strategic move. He abandoned the regular offense and went almost exclusively to a hurry-up offense that relied on Brees to call the plays at the line of scrimmage based on pre-snap reads.
Conjuring up his Purdue University days, Brees operated out of the shotgun and spread formation. The Saints' used the same five skill-position players in their Posse personnel group: receivers Devery Henderson, Robert Meachem and Lance Moore; tight end Jimmy Graham; and running back Darren Sproles, who was aligned as a slot receiver more often than not.
When we saw the Saints go to this offense after having been frustrated for much of the day, we said they looked like they were "out of ideas." We've changed our mind a little bit about that and we'll try to explain here.
It had been a long day of, yet again, not understanding why the Saints refused to stick with a running game that appeared to be producing results. We've also been watching a lot of LSU football this year which (at least while Jordan Jefferson has been out) has demonstrated the value of just lining up and beating people by doing what works. In an era where every college defense is built to defend the spread, LSU runs the ball right at people and just keeps doing it. Basically they've confused the competition by taking football back to 1983 and are killing people with that. Maybe someone will figure it out eventually but the key thing to remember there is, until someone does, don't stop doing it.
Several times during the Texans game, the Saints followed up consecutive positive running plays by suddenly jumping back into their spread formation on first and 10. We know Payton wants to show off all of the nifty toys in the Saints' offense but we get frustrated whenever football coaches abandon something that's working because they want to show us something neat.
When the Saints turned the keys over to Drew in the fourth quarter, we saw them line up in the shotgun and thought they might be just giving up. But looking back at how Drew ran the offense we've come to feel differently about this. See this week's JJ award section below for more on this but what Drew did here was find a play that works and stick with that until the Texans either stopped it or were crushed by it. That's winning football. It just got done through the air instead of on the ground this time.
It's almost enough to make us hope the Saints find themselves in desperate enough positions to keep letting Drew call the plays all season. It limits the damage Sean Payton can do to people's grandmas. So let's drop all this pretense and recognize that Brees is worth being paid in the same class as the quarterbacks he's being compared to at the negotiating table. And do it soon before Saints fans lower themselves to putting up their own billboard. - Jimmy Graham is not entirely off the hook here: We know everybody likes him but the dude nearly got the Saints beat all by himself vs Houston despite his key role in the comeback. It almost makes us want to do a "Good Jimmy Graham/Bad Jimmy Graham" segment here. It's definitely a pattern to watch for anyway. In the Texans game, Graham dropped 3 passes, was responsible for a sack in pass protection, and ran the wrong route on a play resulting in Brees' second interception of the game. (Brees' first interception we took as granted just as a result of the fact that he was, after all, dressed like Billy Kilmer that day.)

Although maybe a bit less red in the face.
Of course Graham also helped dig the Saints out of the hole he contributed much to the digging of by making some big catches down the stretch including the touchdown that brought the Saints to within 2 points of the lead in the fourth quarter. If he ever gets his head on straight he might not be half bad.
Graham also has the bizarre habit of beating himself about the head after successful plays. He should probably stop that - 2 weeks of It's Been Fun Indexes:

Week 2
Darren Sproles vs Bears: 4 carries for 17 yards, 8 receptions 43 yards and a touchdown, 2 punt returns 1 yard, 1 kickoff return 24 yards. TOTAL: 85 yards and a TD
Reggie Bush vs Texans: 6 carries 18 yards, 1 reception 3 yards TOTAL: 21 yardsWeek 3
Darren Sproles vs Texans: 2 carries 35 yards and a touchdown, 6 receptions 50 yards, 4 kickoff returns 103 yards, 1 punt return 5 yards TOTAL: 193 yards and a TD
Reggie Bush vs Browns: 11 carries 24 yards, 1 reception 12 yards, 1 punt return 12 yards, 2 fumbles. TOTAL: 48 yards and two fumbles.
On the year now that's 528 all-purpose yards and 3 touchdowns for Sproles vs 163 all-purpose yards and 2 fumbles for Bush.
Reggie also made news this week by claiming that during his time with the Saints, Sean Payton would regularly plan to have players fake injuries in order to slow down opposing offenses if need be. Reggie does know a lot about being injured as well as phony things in general, but Payton says he's full of shit.
Also of note, this past week's halftime entertainment at the Superdome featured about ten minutes of scrimmaging between local pee wee football teams which, from our viewpoint, looked like a whole football field full of Darren Sproleses which is just indescribably awesome.
Also, too, we've been alerted to this downtown real estate listing. Can be had for about $2.3 million. But there may be a discount involved to cover the difficulties of getting the Kardashian out of the rug. - 2 weeks of Diners, Drive-ins and Diving to the Ground Index:
Panthers tight end Jeremy Shockey vs Jacksonville: 3 receptions 30 yards.
Shockey vs Green Bay: 3 receptions 56 yards.
Shockey now has a total of 9 catches for 137 yards on the season which is actually pretty respectable given that he's the Panthers' second tight end behind Greg Olsen (12 receptions 169 yards and 1 TD). If we wanted to we could compare Shockey's numbers with Jimmy Graham's (14 receptions 235 yards 2 TDs) and find Graham, for all his faults (see above), has been more productive.
But the number we're actually concerned with is Shockey's touchdowns total compared against the number scored by whatever Saints backup tackle is lining up as the "eligible receiver" in short yardage situations. On the Saints' side of this equation, events have unfolded quite differently than how we had anticipated when we first developed this concept.
First, the Saints released tackle Jon Stinchcomb and promoted longtime Tackle Eligible Zach Strief to the starter's role. With Strief in the starting line up, we expected to see Charles Brown move into the eligible slot which was an intriguing thought given that most observers agree Brown is at least athletic enough to play left tackle and may actually prove more of a reliable receiver than Strief if ever given the opportunity.
But now Strief is down for... well since this is a Saints injury report... nobody knows how long making Brown the new starting right tackle. Will the Saints ever find a way to work the Tackle Eligible formation back into their game plan? We're holding out a glimmer of hope for this since tight end David Thomas' questionable status may necessitate throwing an extra lineman in the mix somewhere but we'll admit it does seem a bit of a long shot.
Anyway despite all the upheaval the index still amusingly stands at
Jeremey Shockey: 0 Touchdowns to Various Saints tackles: 0 Touchdowns - 2 weeks of Jordan Jefferson Try Not To Kick Anybody In The Face Awards: For Week 2 this goes to Roman Harper who was errantly penalized for "roughing" Chicago's Jay Cutler. Later during the week, league officials publicly stated that Harper shouldn't have been penalized but the damage was already done by that point. The penalty rescued the Bears from a failed 3rd and 6 setting them up to score what would be their only touchdown of the day. On the other hand the penalty didn't do much to discourage the Saints from continuing to pummel Cutler as they went on to sack him 6 times and land numerous other blows more vicious than the one Harper was penalized for.
Week 3's award goes to Houston's Kareem Jackson who amazingly was not flagged for spearing a defenseless Drew Brees in the earhole with the crown of his helmet. Brees managed to keep it together and bring the Saints back for what I am told was a "special season-defining victory." Part of how he did that was by throwing the ball to Lance Moore a whole lot during the second half. WWLTV reported from the sideline that Moore was particularly fired up by Jackson's late hit on Brees and directed a steady stream of trash talk at Jackson throughout the rest of the game. Also Moore pretty much torched the Texans' defense all by himself. Here's the play by play of the fourth quarter drive where the Saints took the lead after Houston badly shanked a punt.1st&10 Hou 47 Drew Brees pass to the right to Robert Meachem for 11 yards to the Hou 36. Tackled by Johnathan Joseph.
1st&10 Hou 36 Drew Brees pass to the left to Lance Moore for 8 yards to the Hou 28. Tackled by Kareem Jackson.
2nd&2 Hou28 Drew Brees pass to the left to Lance Moore for 8 yards to the Hou 20. Tackled by Kareem Jackson.
1st&10 Hou20 Drew Brees pass to the left to Lance Moore for 4 yards to the Hou 16. Tackled by Troy Nolan.
2nd&6 Hou 16 Drew Brees incomplete pass to the left intended for Darren Sproles.
3rd&6 Hou 16 Drew Brees pass to the middle to Lance Moore for 16 yards for a TOUCHDOWN.
Drew Brees 2 pt conversion pass to Lance Moore is GOOD.
Pretty much all Brees to Moore with Jackson covering him. Moore had Jackson badly turned around on the touchdown as well. Oh yeah, and the 2 for good measure. Oh and another Brees to Moore 2 pointer later running the exact same play. Basically the entire second half of this game can be seen as one big fuck you from Lance Moore.
"THANKS HOUSTON" Also don't piss this guy off - Last week's winner of an award we had no idea existed
Something called a Morton's The Steakhouse Community Player of the Week Award went to Thomas Morstead apparently because he goes to hospitals and does nice things for people and stuff. Or maybe it has something to do with his grooming. Either way we were more impressed with the way Morstead neutralized Chicago's Devin Hester with a mix of well-placed directional punting and a few big booming boots including an impressive 59 yard blast from out of his own end zone. Between Morstead and LSU's Brad Wing, Louisiana may well be the world epicenter of punting excellence this year.
- Devery's Time: This is Devery's year. Not that we've had much tolerance for this sort of thing in the past but we are no longer entertaining any anti-Devery propaganda on this particular internet. Please take your whining elsewhere. We are getting one of those "Our Time" T-Shirts the Saints have been using re-worked into a "Devery's Time" shirt. Menckles just ordered a Devery jersey this week. We are going all in on this thing over here.
Against Chicago Devery only caught 3 passes one of which happened to be the 79 yard touchdown that more or less ended the Bears' day early in the second quarter. Against Houston, he caught another 3 passes including a 44 yarder that ended up as the Saints' longest completion of the day. Devery doesn't kill you all day the way Lance Moore does when you piss him off, or the way Marques Colston does whenever he emerges from his hyperbaric chamber. Devery kills you one time in any one game. But he kills you real good when he does.
When all else fails, get the ball in your Tiger's hands - Garrett Hartley: Whatever. Don't care. Moving on.
- Horrifying signage spotted just near the Dome on gameday:

- Odd Fact Robert Meachem has scored a touchdown in every game so far despite not seeming all that involved.

Meach has gotten so little attention that you can smack him on the head like this and, as far as the referee is concerned, nothing happened - Odd Observation: These two games were our first opportunity to watch Mark Ingram run in person and we like what we see so far. We don't think he's quite settled down yet and, to put it in a way someone pretending to know what he's talking about might, he looks like his timing isn't right yet. But he's getting there and we're happy to report that he looks faster than we were expecting.
Anyway we noticed there was something distinctive about his energetic, quick stepping, fist pumping running style that reminded us of something we'd seen before and after careful study of the game film, we've decided that what we've seen before is Dig Dug. Here's that game film we studied.
You can kind of see it, right? Short choppy steps, ability to make his own holes, maybe someday soon he'll start blowing up his opponents with more regularity. We're feeling pretty good about it.
So the Saints are sitting nicely at 2-1 with a presumably easy stretch of schedule sitting ahead of them. Now please don't mistake what we are about to say because we are certainly all #iamnotworried and everything but there's something still bothering us about the fact that we're only just past Week 3 and the Saints are already struggling through some pretty significant injuries.
Something we said in passing at the end of last season was that we've begun to wonder if the Saints should invest in a new training and conditioning staff. In each of the past few years (even during 2009) they've appeared to fade down the stretch at the end of the regular season. Injuries mount up and the whole team takes on a sort of tired aspect. Maybe it was just us but we thought we were seeing some of that listlessness even as the Saints were fighting through it during the Houston game. We hope we're wrong about that but... well it's just something to watch.
Of course it could just be us. You see the Dome is doing two new things this year that contributed to our discomfort. For one they're selling lemonade in our nearby concession area now which means we had to share the contents of our flask with Menckles who, as it turns out, really likes lemonade. Also they're selling an $11.00 "bottomless" soda which makes a hell of a lot of sense if you're planning to mix cocktails but only if you've got enough alcohol to go around. We didn't have quite enough but we certainly were going to get our 11 bucks worth of Diet Coke anyway. And so during the "special season-defining" comeback everyone keeps talking about, we were not only not quite drunk enough to appreciate the full import of what was happening but we also really really had to pee.
So again, in some small way, this is still all Tom Benson's fault for arranging the concessions the way he has. I hope the protest marchers remember that.
All you need to know about Nagin and "Some people Uptown"
The former mayor was in that number, although he was more peacemaker than protester, according to Timothy Reily, who put up the signs. Reily, who noted he was an early supporter of Nagin during his first campaign for mayor -- campaign finance reports show he gave Nagin $1,000 in January 2002 -- invited the former mayor to come inside his house. The two men had a 30-minute discussion that Reily described as "congenial."
Labels: douchebaggery, free speech, Nagin, New Orleans, politics, signage
Thursday, September 29, 2011
Radtke to the rescue?
Labels: Fred Radtke, free speech, New Orleans
Indentured Servitude
Because the sale of these licenses,termed Certificates of Public Necessity and Convenience (CNPCs), is controlled by private brokers, the city sees only a miniscule percentage of what is estimated to be an $8 million market in transfers. At least I take it, that's the above-the-table market anyway. Meanwhile the brokers and cab company owners charge their drivers as much as $350 per week in rental fees on their cabs leaving us with a system whose benefits accrue almost exclusively to the owners at the expense of both the drivers and the city.
The city could have retained control of the market for cab permits over the years and capitalized on their value to offset the cost of taxpayer-financed services such as libraries, parks, or policing.
“At a time when the city is looking for additional financial resources, we should explore all possible revenue streams,” City Councilman Arnie Fielkow wrote in an emailed statement.
The City Council’s Transportation Committee Chairwoman, Kristin Gisleson Palmer, went much further, although she would only address the industry generally, and not discuss specific companies.
“I believe the whole system needs to be reformed, and we’re working with the administration to do that,” she said. “This system with CPNCs being sold even though it’s technically the city’s property, the city of New Orleans has seen no economic benefit from those transfers, and I’m not sure whether all of those transfers have even been notified to the city.”
She said she wants changes that will make it easier for drivers to get a certificate.
“I think the process also creates a system where the little guy cannot afford to purchase a CPNC number, and has to lease out the use of the number,” Gisleson Palmer said. “So you have many drivers out there without benefits, medical, who are just leasing the CPNCs, and you create a system of indentured servitude.”
Update: Just wanted to add one thing here. Ann Duplessis and Ryan Berni, in this quote, illustrate everything that is wrong with New Orleans and its current administration right now.
Deputy Mayor Duplessis said the administration is reviewing the section of city law that governs cab regulation to see what changes might be made. But the review will not be complete until sometime in 2012 and even then, Duplessis isn’t sure whether the city should change.Duplessis is telling us that the city's "reform" priority is a completely irrelevant style-over-substance "branding" initiative. I wonder how many marketing consultants they've hired to assist them with this. Meanwhile Berni is telling us the reason we can expect little more than ineffectual action from the city is that the people they're "meeting with" and whose interests they're going to protect are the "entrenched" brokers.
Duplessis said one of the priorities for the overhauled department was “building a brand” for the city’s cab industry, and that opening up the market for cab certificates may, or may not, come later.
“But we’re definitely going to look at it,” Duplessis said.
One reason it is difficult to reshape the system is that private interests stand to lose a great deal of money from any reforms, and the administration has been meeting with cab companies as it looks to shape its new approach.
“There will always be people in these entrenched industries with interests at the table,” said Landrieu spokesman Ryan Berni.
Labels: cabs, New Orleans, transportation
Wednesday, September 28, 2011
Mean justice
I know we all know the system is fucked, it's unfair, etc., but I really do need to specially mention that Robin Pittman is vile and literally, medically, provably insane. She is not just a "mean judge," she is a mean judge who is off her rocker. Her jaw-dropping displays of viciousness, paranoia and immaturity, her talking on her cell phone and reading her bible during trials, her ugly, unprovoked and unprofessional insults towards the defense (not just Willy's, everyone's) and above all her histrionic savagery towards the human wreckage dragged before her in chains daily make Pittman not merely a bad judge, but a sad, bad, mad judge, the most pathetic and repugnant specimen among the whole twisted pantheon... the unhinged and monstrous Queen of Hearts holding forth in her bizarre, Kafka-like crawlspace courtroom, a "blind and aimless Fury" ruling the rafters of our criminal courthouse's nightmarish Wonderland.
Labels: Krewe of Eris, police, Robin Pittman
Leave your opinions at home
"It disrespects the nation -- and President Barack Obama represents our nation," said Skip Alexander, as he looked at one of the signs. "He represents everybody, not some people."You might actually be subscribed to a more monarchist political theory than the one on which our government is based.
Labels: Barack Obama, douchebaggery, free speech, Nagin, politics
Clay reads the US Coast Guard/Interior Department report on Macondo so you don't have to
Also see:
Gulf of Mexico oil spill hurt common Louisiana marsh fish, study finds
BP and Transocean argue over fresh Gulf of Mexico oil 'leaks'
Busy day. Will try to hammer out something about the Saints later.
Labels: BP, Gulf of Mexico, oil
Tuesday, September 27, 2011
Which one is the white guy?
The Vitty ticket also includes Billy Nungesser in the Lt. Governor's race as well as Attorney General Buddy Caldwell and Gov. Jindal, although Jindal and Vitter enjoy an uneasy relationship at best. The generally agreed upon point is that Vitter will be using his endorsements as well as his PAC money in this year's elections to both purge the state of insufficiently conservative so-called "RINOs" and, of course, beef up his own power within the LA GOP.
Beyond that, there isn't much substantive disagreement between these two candidates. Tucker criticizes Schedler for being too unhappy with the state's already shoestring museum budget. Schedler attacks Tucker for the now three year old non-issue of legislative pay raises. You'll forgive us if we pause to yawn.
The good news is, thanks to Schedler's (for the moment) Secretary of State website's Candidate Database, voters should have no difficulty discovering the race or gender of any of the candidates in this fall's elections as that information is prominently displayed.

Labels: Bobby Jindal, David Vitter, elections, Jim Tucker, Louisiana, politics, Tom Schedler
Monday, September 26, 2011
Interesting word choice
"His chain is being yanked now by Sen. (David) Vitter"
Really really bad imagery at work in this race so far.
Labels: Billy Nungesser, Jay Dardene, Louisiana, politics
Saturday, September 24, 2011
Looks like we're doing it live
I may have blown my load of these already but just for posterity's sake, my best ideas are:
- The CRN Initiatives Disaster Consulting Dome
- The Kevin Houser Tax Shelter Dome
- Beyond Superdome (Payment for this would obviously only be available once the Restore Act passes)
- The Deuce McAllister Nissan Dome
- The River Birch Robinette Dome and Art Studio
Update: Jesus didn't we just get finished punishing Jay Cutler for exactly this sort of thing?

Begs the question, how does one get reimbursed for immolated living room furniture anyway?
Labels: douchebaggery, LSU, saints, sports, Superdome
Tower to the skies
As proposed, most of the building would be 193 feet high, with a penthouse reaching to 205 feet, or three times the 70-foot limit allowed by the site's current zoning. The ordinance approved by the council will limit the building's tallest portion to 190 feet.Because, for some reason, 120 feet beyond the so-called limit is better than 135 feet? I'm not sure I understand what is being gained there. Later in the story it gets even more confusing.
Although the site's current zoning sets a 70-foot height limit, a draft of the city's proposed new comprehensive zoning ordinance would raise that to 120 feet. The planning staff recommended approving a 120-foot building, but the commission voted 5-3 last month to approve the 190-foot height Kailas sought.Preservationists had been arguing that the building's height would contrast with its surroundings despite the obvious presence of taller structures on Canal Street within only a few blocks of the site. To this they added an equally silly appeal to the supposedly good government principle of adhering to the limits of the master plan.
Even the preservationist and French Quarter leaders said they would accept a 120-foot building, but Kailas said that limit would make the project "100 percent non-financeable." He said he has financing in place for the 205-foot building, though he would accept limiting it to 190 feet.
(French Quarter Citizens President Brian) Furness and leaders of the Vieux Carre Property Owners, Residents and Associates organizations said the proposal also would violate the city's master plan, which calls for buildings of low to medium density in the neighborhood, but Kailas noted that the City Planning Commission staff urged approval of a 190-foot building at the site.At Thursday's meeting there was more complaining about the violated sanctity of the master plan although it wasn't clear that the plan actually prohibits this sort of development or even imposes a height limit. The city zoning ordinance calls for a height limit of 70 feet but nobody was arguing that be strictly observed.
At one point, Jackie Clarkson even claimed to have written the Master Plan herself although this probably is not true. We're pretty sure she would have been too busy flying helicopters and firing canons at runaway barges to take that on. Unless she had one of her father's black friends draft one back during the 1950s, there's just no way she would have had the time. Anyway I'm told Jackie eventually voted for the proposal because it "pushes the envelope" which we'll just assume is something that needs doing.
The whole argument is yet another example of preservationist incoherence. Nine times out of ten these arguments are really about different groups of well to do property owners arguing over who gets what set of rights and privileges with the appeal to "preservation" being merely a tool of convenience for whichever side isn't proposing the specific development in question. Rarely, though, is any of this ever about mere aesthetics.
Sometimes it's not even that. In some cases, preservationists have little more on the agenda beyond just calling attention to themselves. Take the demolition of this blighted building just a few blocks up Canal from the proposed apartment complex for example.
At 18 stories, the Grand Palace hotel is the largest building in the fooprint. Its demolition will cost nearly $2.5 million.Yes, isn't it interesting that people would prefer vacant lot to this festering empty tower. If this thing is such a nice building, why not just move it down to 1031 Canal? Soves everyone's problem, right?
"I think it's time to knock down that building and some of the other stuff on Canal," said Patrick White, general manager of nearby Handsome Willy's. "I think it's time that Canal Street make a return to what Canal Street was back when our parents were growing up."
White believes demolishing the blighted hotel will help improve the neighborhood.
"Currently we have a bunch of issues with a lot of the homeless and the vagrants that come around and they break into our stuff," said White. "I know a lot of them like to use the abandoned buildings as temporary housing."
Others would rather see the long-abandoned structure brought back to life.
"I find it interesting that people think an empty space is better than having buildings around," said Sandra Stokes, board member of the Foundation for Historical Louisiana.
Preservationists argue that because developers don't plan to replace the hotel with another structure, tearing it down is premature..
"There's parking, a garage attached to this building, give us a litle while, let's study it, see if it can structurally support a parking garage," said Stokes.
Also, since our local news media are operating now in the post-Garlandgate era, we should point out it's been noted elsewhere that WIST's Eric Asher has spent an inordinate amount of time agitating for Kailas' apartment project on his radio show over the past month or so. Just yesterday afternoon, that same station's Joe Cardosi interjected a brief but glowing editorial of sorts during the Sports Hangover show praising the City Council for approving "progress". Is it too much to ask whether Kailas has been paying WIST to push his project?
Labels: City Council, city plan, developers, Eric Asher, Jackie Clarkson, media, New Orleans, Praveen Kailas, preservation, zoning
Elephant Jokes
Also, I know it's kind of silly to use this word in association with Billy Nungesser but here's hoping he can muster up more grace than David Vitter could back during the height of media focus on his similar problem.
Note also, Vitter has endorsed Nungesser making this statement.
Vitter said that Nungesser "represents our mainstream, conservative Louisiana values. He is not a RINO (Republican in Name Only) in any way."While we can at least understand why Nungesser's supporters would take pains to make sure their candidate is not mistaken for a "RINO" we wish they wouldn't say it out loud like that. It just makes some jokes a little too easy and we find it difficult to restrain ourselves. This is especially true when we learn that one of these events Nungesser ducked out on was hosted by something called the Pachyderm Club.
Lt. Gov. Jay Dardenne told a Baton Rouge Republican group that his opponent in the Oct. 22 election for the state's second-highest office is not the fiscal conservative he makes himself out to be. Dardenne addressed the Pachyderm Club of Greater Baton Rouge alone, after Plaquemines Parish President Billy Nungesser failed to show. The two candidates are Republicans and the only candidates in the race.
He alleged that while Nungesser was criticizing BP and its role in the Deepwater Horizon oil spill on news shows almost daily last year, "we have a candidate who has profited personally" from the disaster.
Dardenne said that a marina in which Nungesser has an interest was making money from the oil company by leasing it space. Nungesser has said in the past that his businesses -- including the marina - are in a trust and he has not received any money from them.
Dardenne said while Nungesser portrays himself as a "fiscal conservative," some of his businesses in Plaquemines have been hit with $100,000 in tax liens. Dardenne did not specify which companies were involved.
"He is not willing to talk about his past, but is willing to talk about mine," Dardenne said. "He has attacked my credibility and misleads voters about my record. ... Lying and buying are not going to win the election."
Nungesser has about $1.66 million on hand for the last month of the race, including $1 million in loans he made to his campaign. Dardenne has more than $600,000 on hand, and he has not loaned his campaign any money.
So this could have been a pretty interesting debate had Nungesser actually been there to answer any of these charges. Although maybe not so much from a public safety standpoint.

Labels: Billy Nungesser, David Vitter, Jay Dardene, Louisiana, pachyderms, politics
Retroactive Serpas Signal
View Larger Map
I keep saying I'd like to start tracking the checkpoints to get a better handle on where to expect them when the vague announcements are made. But I'm only one guy. I guess some data is better than no data, though.
Labels: New Orleans, police
Thursday, September 22, 2011
Mission Accomplished
First you go to your library's site and log in. Then you "check out" the book. Then you go to Amazon. Then you log in there. Then you read a bunch of ads and maybe buy some shit from Amazon. Then you "check out" the book again. Next you download it to your Kindle via USB cable or Wi-Fi connection but not over Amazon's 3G network because.....
Okay look. If it wasn't for all the crazy Facebook changes and the idiotic new NOLA.com Saints page, this would surely be the most ridiculous thing on the internet this week. And, yes, that is saying something.
To save a whorish industry, turn to a real whoremonger
New Orleans area hotels continued to see the annual summer slowdown have an impact on business in August with the second lowest occupancy rate among the Top 25 markets Smith Travel Research tracks. The 55 percent rate was down from the 61.3 percent rate in July and from the 55.7 percent rate in August 2010.Even more challenging is figuring out a way to sell New Orleans as a cultural destination while its city government takes an increasingly hostile stance toward traditional cultural institutions.
It's interesting to note, then, that Nungesser's unique experience with alternative forms of recreation might position him to perform well in these circumstances.
Labels: Billy Nungesser, economy, music, New Orleans, politics, prostitution, tourism
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
More like this
Labels: Barack Obama, economy, Elizabeth Warren, politics
Tuesday, September 20, 2011
Poster Child
Before 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on Tuesday, a return to the Navy wasn’t something Nicole Barbe could even consider. Twelve years ago, she was forced to leave the Navy, one of about 13,000 people discharged from the military under the 18-year-old “Don’t ask, don’t tell” policy barring gay men and lesbians from serving openly in the military. Even before Tuesday’s repeal of that policy, she had begun talking to a recruiter about re-enlisting in the Navy Reserve.
“It feels like — I don’t know, like Christmas morning,” Barbe said Tuesday.
Gay and lesbian communities across the nation celebrated the reversal of the controversial policy enacted in 1993 under President Bill Clinton.
It was no different at the Boondock bar in the French Quarter, which was adorned with signs Tuesday evening announcing “Goodbye, Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” Barbe hosted the celebration on behalf of the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which helped her receive an honorable discharge after the Navy sent her packing in 1999.
Labels: DADT
Tuesday digest
I can report that there lots and lots of Bears fans sitting near us. They were a little scary at first but seemed to become more and more tame as the game went on for some reason. One of them even let us have a prize which the kids are holding up in the picture below. By the end of the day she just didn't want it anymore.

Let's see, what else is there today? Oh look oil on the sea floor doesn't degrade. What's the matter? Is it no longer Magic Microbe season?
Okay next thing.. um. Oh, going on right now! The Lens is hosting a live web stream of a community forum about conditions at Orleans Parish Prison. I'm told you can access the video by clicking here.
Also, there's this.

I call it T.P. Rex. I hope King Logan doesn't sue me because of that.
Finally, today is the official repeal of DADT. Consult your internets for news stories like this one on the event. There's an informal gathering this evening in the Quarter to commemorate the passing of this singularly stupid policy. I'm planning to drop by there for a while but not for too long as I'm exhausted. And on that note, I think that's enough for now. More football later in the week. Try to stay out of any bar fights in the meantime.
Labels: BP, Carnival, DADT, Gulf of Mexico, Marlin Gusman, New Orleans, oil, Rex, saints
Monday, September 19, 2011
Recipe replay
Baton Rouge is quite a puzzle
Labels: Cedric Richmond, crime, LSU, politics, sports
"Civil liberties and all that"
We are officially living in a war zone.
Eastern New Orleans mayoral hopeful Rep. Austin Badon raised eyebrows last night with a call for a new Stazi-style approach to crime fighting, telling a roomful of District B voters that if he is elected mayor they will see “the NOPD kicking in at least four doors a day.”
The line appeared to stun many in the audience of uptown neighborhood leaders who had come to hear Badon, many of them for the first time. Upon reading furrowed brows, Badon quickly added that he would not lose track of “civil liberties and all that” and pointed out in a style reminiscent of police chief Warren Riley that most of the violence in the city was between “thugs and drug dealers killing each other off.”
Labels: Austin Badon, New Orleans, police, politics
Saturday, September 17, 2011
This should go well
Other Badon facts: Dislikes rap music but does enjoy Hannah Montana especially when free tickets are available.
Labels: Austin Badon, New Orleans, politics
"Manmade disaster"
Some of those whose homes were inundated have taken to describing the flooding as a "manmade disaster," suggesting the corps moved too slowly to release the water. Waiting too long, politicians and affected residents said, forced the corps to release massive amounts of water in a compact period and the levees stood little chance against it.
Former South Dakota Gov. Bill Janklow has been a vocal critic of the corps' handling of the waterway, calling the agency "slow-witted."
"I just think they are going to waste money," Janklow said Friday. "It's simple; there was too much water when the melt came. And I realize it rained more than they expected. We may have still had floods this year, but they wouldn't have been on the magnitude where we were looking for Noah to build an ark."
Those of us familiar with the degree to which the Mississippi River has been altered by human management and competing human interests will recognize some of the issues being discussed here. Back in July, the New York Times printed this story about the Missouri which explains this a bit more.
Even as (Senator Claire) McCaskill praised the collaboration in fighting flooding, she noted that she and other leaders from both parties in Missouri remained committed to supporting shipping interests on the river. “While navigation is much more important than recreation, we should not let the fight between navigation and recreation get in the way of flood control,” Ms. McCaskill said.
Her colleagues north of the dams have a different view.
“Frankly, navigation never developed as anticipated,” said Senator Kent Conrad, Democrat of North Dakota, who called for a revision of how the river was operated. “The basic operational assumptions from the management of the river are really no longer valid.”
Asked about the continued emphasis on navigation despite the sparse traffic, Jody Farhat, the chief of water management for the Missouri River Basin for the Army Corps of Engineers, said: “The primary reason is it’s because it’s the law. The Corps of Engineers does what Congress tells us to do.”
Once wide, shallow and unusually winding, the Missouri River has been drastically reshaped over the last century, at a cost of more than $650 million, to create a channel friendly to modern vessels, according to federal estimates. The result is a narrower, deeper, straighter river, which the government spends about $7 million a year to maintain.
The Mississippi and Missouri River systems (they're really the same system anyway) are so firmly controlled by the Corps of Engineers at the behest of political leaders that any flooding event can only be described as a "manmade disaster." This doesn't mean, as some know-nothing types would suggest, that we're wrong to alter or control the river at all. Only it means that when flooding happens, there are specific policies and persons responsible for it which merit examination.
Labels: flood, MIssissippi River, Missouri River
Friday, September 16, 2011
Walgreens dissonance

Although the actual contents of the cooler don't do much to assist us with that task.

"Enhanced pat-downs"
Fresh off Sunday night’s taser-fueled fan violence at Metlife Stadium in New Jersey, the NFL will conduct pat downs from the ankles up this season.
In the past, the pat downs went from the waist up.
“The enhanced security procedures recommended by our office before the start of the season will further increase the safety of fans but will require some additional time,” NFL spokesman Brian McCarthy told USA T0day in a statement Thursday. “We encourage fans to come early, enjoy their tailgating tradition, and be patient as they enter the stadium.”
Things have changed. We're one step away from waterboarding Saints fans just for showing up. Not that it's entirely without precedent. At one point, the same fans were actually made to sit and watch Heath Shuler play football.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 License.













