close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20110728144348/http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/07/24/president-pushover/
The New York Times


July 24, 2011, 10:11 am

President Pushover

Updated: Drew article now available.

The redoubtable Elizabeth Drew has a forthcoming article in the New York Review of Booksnot yet online — that confirms all our worst fears. She tells us that past concessions have

established in both Democrats’ and Republicans’ minds the thought that Obama was a weak negotiator—a “pushover.” He was more widely seen among Democrats and other close observers as having a strategy of starting near where he thinks the Republicans are—at the fifty-yard line—and then moving closer to their position.

Even more alarming, however, is her window on what the White House is thinking:

It all goes back to the “shellacking” Obama took in the 2010 elections. The President’s political advisers studied the numbers and concluded that the voters wanted the government to spend less. This was an arguable interpretation. Nevertheless, the political advisers believed that elections are decided by middle-of-the-road independent voters, and this group became the target for determining the policies of the next two years.

OK, I’ve never won a tough election. But neither has Obama! The 2008 race was looking close until Sarah Palin and Lehman came along. And as far as I can tell, this assessment both of what 2010 was about and what matters for 2012 is just ludicrous.

As I recall, two things happened last year: voters were angry about the weak economy, and older voters believed that Obama was going to take away their Medicare and send them to the death panels. And so the way to win those voters back is to cut Medicare and weaken the economy?

A further point: even if Obama really does cut spending, will anyone notice? Even people who are supposedly well informed believe that there was a vast expansion of government under Obama, when in fact there wasn’t. So we’re supposed to believe that independent voters will actually be able to cut through the fog — the deliberate fog of Fox, the he-said-she-said of most other media organizations — and give him credit for spending cuts? Remember, whatever he does Republicans will claim that the government is getting bigger — and news organization will report only that “Democrats say” that this isn’t true.

What a disaster.


About Paul Krugman

Paul Krugman is an Op-Ed columnist for The New York Times.

Recent Columns

Messing With Medicare
By PAUL KRUGMAN

It’s actually good that the “Grand Bargain” is apparently dead, because what President Obama offered to the Republicans was a very bad deal for America.

The Lesser Depression
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Even if Washington and Brussels succeed in avoiding immediate financial catastrophe, the deals being made will surely make the broader economic slump worse.

Letting Bankers Walk
By PAUL KRUGMAN

The two principal arguments being made for letting the banks off easy don’t make much sense.

Getting to Crazy
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Commentators seem shocked at Republican unreasonableness as a debt default looms, but it is the end result of a process that has lasted decades.

No, We Can’t? Or Won’t?
By PAUL KRUGMAN

Our failure to create jobs is a choice rationalized by an ever-shifting set of excuses.

Archive

Recent Posts

July 28

Eurofail

Things falling apart, again.

July 27

Obama the Moderate Conservative

Really truly.

July 27

Conservative Origins of Obamacare

Heritage, 1989.

July 27

Eurowoe

Bad all over.

July 27

The Guilty Parties

Careerism at America's expense.

From the Opinion Blogs

Opinionator
Over the Verrazano, Into the Shadows

I have never been ghost hunting before. I have also never been to Staten Island. Now a silent battle rages within me as to which of these firsts is more exciting.

Opinionator
Slavery and Freedom at Bull Run

How John Parker, a slave, found liberty at Manassas.