close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20110611065948/http://reason.com:80/poll/2011/05/27/differences-on-social-security

Reason Magazine

A public opinion research project exploring attitudes about government.

Print|Email

Differences on Social Security Reform

The recent Reason-Rupe poll asked respondents if they would support or oppose reducing Social Security taxes and allow individuals to invest in their own retirement instead. 

For the following proposal, please tell me whether you would strongly support, somewhat support, neither support nor oppose, somewhat oppose, or strongly oppose this proposal: “Reducing Social Security taxes and allowing individuals to invest in their own retirement instead?”

Strongly Support 25
Somewhat Support 16
Neither 10
Somewhat Oppose 13
Strongly Oppose 32
Don't Know 4
Total 100

Support significantly varies across demographic and household characteristics.  As detailed in an earlier blog post, more Americans aged 54 and younger favor reducing Social Security taxes and allowing individuals to invest in their own retirement instead. In stark contrast, Americans 55 years and older oppose such measures roughly 60% to 30%.

BERJAYA

Support for this reform divides college graduates, those with some college education, and high school graduates. However, a majority of those without high school diplomas (52%) and those with post-graduate degrees (53%) oppose this reform. Little difference exists across income groups, except among those making less than $25,000 a year with 52% opposed and 35% in favor.

BERJAYA

BERJAYA

Significant differences emerge across racial/ethnic groups on reducing Social Security taxes. A plurality of Caucasians (44%) and Asians (44%) favor this measure. However, a majority of African-Americans  (59%) and Latinos (52%) oppose this reform.

BERJAYA

Women are also less likely to support this proposal, whereas men are evenly divided with slightly more in favor.

BERJAYA

Significant differences emerge across the political landscape, with 57% of self-identified libertarians in support of this reform, and 58% of progressives opposed to it. 50% of conservatives support the reform in contrast to the 51% of moderates and 52% of liberals who oppose it. Partisanship reveals that 64% of Tea Party supporters favor this proposal, as does 50% of non-Tea Party Republicans. In contrast, a majority (58%) of Democrats, and a plurality (46%) of pure Independents oppose this proposal. This is especially interesting because although the Tea Party tends to be older, they are the most likely group to favor this proposal—even more than regular Republicans.

BERJAYA

Note: Ideological groups self-identified.

BERJAYA

Note: Tea Party supporters reported they were “very favorable” to the Tea Party movement. Non-TP Republicans self-identified as Republican and were not Tea Party supporters. Independents only included Independents who did not lean Republican or Democratic. Democrats self-identified as such.

A majority of union households oppose this proposal (53%), whereas non-union households slightly favor reform. Further blogs will explore the differences between union and non-union households.

BERJAYA

Note: “Neither”, “Don’t Know”, and “Other” responses were omitted for this blog post. “Total” refers to the topline results from the 1200 respondents. 

Full Reason-Rupe Q1 2011 Poll Results 

Editor's Note: We invite comments and request that they be civil and on-topic. We do not moderate or assume any responsibility for comments, which are owned by the readers who post them. Comments do not represent the views of Reason.com or Reason Foundation. We reserve the right to delete any comment for any reason at any time.

Cabeza de Vaca|6.1.11 @ 1:14PM|

"57% of self-identified libertarians in support of this reform"

How could a libertarian not support social security reform?

|6.3.11 @ 2:26PM|

"Progressive". This word does not mean what you think it means.

|6.5.11 @ 8:57PM|

I've been an investor for many years, and I used to think that privatizing Social Security was a good idea. But then came the 2008 meltdown and subsequent stock market crash.

Anyone who retired in 2008-2009 had no choice but to pull some money out. Had their entire retirement income been tied to the market, they would have been screwed. Even though returns might be better with private accounts, most people are better off with a guaranteed return. I feel that the system is rigged toward the hedge funds and giant Wall Street firms, and I simply cannot trust them with 100% of my retirement income.

Leave a Comment

advertisements

Get Reason E-mail Updates!

Manage your Reason e-mail list subscriptions

Site comments/questions:

Media Inquiries and Reprint Permissions:


(310) 367-6109

Editorial & Production Offices:

3415 S. Sepulveda Blvd.
Suite 400
Los Angeles, CA 90034
(310) 391-2245