close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20231124084655/https://freedom-writing.blogspot.com/search/label/mystery
Showing posts with label mystery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mystery. Show all posts

Friday, August 2, 2013

The Mysterious Death of Warren Harding


BERJAYA

President Warren Harding and his wife, Florence


Today is a milestone anniversary of a presidential death that is still shrouded in mystery.

No, I am not speaking of the Kennedy assassination.

Here in Dallas, we know (or most of us do) that this year is the 50th anniversary of that assassination — which is, of course, still a subject for debate, but this year it seems to be even more of an industry than usual (until just recently, the city was taking applications for free tickets for people who want to be in Dealey Plaza at the precise moment on November 22 — 50 years later, of course — when the president was shot).

Before we turn our full attention to that anniversary, let us pause for a minute or two to think about another presidential death that happened 90 years ago today.

I'm speaking of Warren Harding, America's 29th president, of whom H.L. Mencken wrote
"He writes the worst English that I have ever encountered. It reminds me of a string of wet sponges; it reminds me of tattered washing on the line; it reminds me of stale bean soup, of college yells, of dogs barking idiotically through endless nights. It is so bad that a sort of grandeur creeps into it. It drags itself out of the dark abysm of pish, and crawls insanely up the topmost pinnacle of posh. It is rumble and bumble. It is flap and doodle. It is balder and dash."

Based on what I have read of President Harding, he was an amiable, well–meaning individual, but he was also someone who was easily manipulated.

He was a journalist by trade and had a relaxed management style as publisher of a newspaper in Marion, Ohio. It has been said that, in some 30 years as the newspaper's publisher, Harding never fired anyone. He seemed to like people, and they liked him. But, as I say, there were those in his administration who took advantage of him.

On Aug. 2, 1923, President Harding died of an apparent heart attack in San Francisco. But there were suspicions at the time of other causes — and those suspicions have lingered. It might have been a stroke, some thought, or it might have been ptomaine poisoning.

Or it might have been a deliberate act.

Harding had been on a speaking tour of the western United States that summer. It could have been anything, people said at the time — heat, food, whatever — and an autopsy would have clarified things considerably. But, as Kennesaw State professor Russell Aiuto observes at Crime Library, there was no autopsy. The president's widow, Florence Harding, would not allow it.

"Within an hour of [Harding's] death, he was embalmed, rouged, powdered, dressed and in his casket," Aiuto writes. "By morning, he was on a train, headed back to Washington, D.C."

That got suspicious tongues wagging. Think the Kennedy assassination is awash in conspiracy theories? For nearly a century now, Harding's death has variously been attributed to natural causes, negligent homicide, suicide and murder. There is a solution to suit every taste.
BERJAYA

President Warren Harding and
Vice President Calvin Coolidge


Natural causes is supported by the knowledge that, as Aiuto observes, Harding "lived the fat–filled, tobacco–infused and alcohol–drenched life of early 20th Century America with gusto." There are indications that Harding suffered from coronary artery disease that went undiagnosed and, consequently, untreated.

Negligent homicide had its defenders, too — like one of Harding's physicians, who believed Harding could have been saved had it not been for medical treatment he had been given, treatment that would have been effective if Harding suffered from indigestion but not effective for angina.

Then there have been suggestions that Harding may have killed himself.

It seems to be beyond dispute that Harding was despondent, presumably about Cabinet members whose conduct was under fire, during his tour of the West. And his behavior during that time prompted questions at the very least. He had made out a new will before leaving Washington in June. He sold his newspaper, which he had owned and published for decades, a few weeks earlier — and for far less than its value.

But suicide seems less likely when one considers that the signs pointed to his intention to seek re–election the next year.

That brings us to the last prospect, murder. Like the current occupant of the Oval Office, Harding's administration was beset by numerous scandals, any one of which could have led to homicide.

Even Mrs. Harding has been mentioned as a suspect. A book that was written by a man with a checkered past and published several years after her husband's death alleged that Mrs. Harding had two motives: 1) to save his reputation by having him die while he was at his most popular, and 2) to get even with him for his extramarital affairs, especially one that supposedly produced an illegitimate child.

Mrs. Harding died a year after her husband so it wasn't possible for her to defend herself against the charges — which don't seem to have been given much credibility.

Aiuto describes Harding's life and presidency as both comic and tragic. "Harding had many admirable traits — kindness, charm, generosity — but he was basically an inept man, without many talents," Aiuto writes.

"Besides the buffoonery of his days in the Senate and the White House," Aiuto goes on, "there is the tale of a man in over his head, trusting of untrustworthy associates, trying to do his best."

It's possible that one of those untrustworthy associates — with unguarded access to the president — poisoned him. It's just as possible — maybe even moreso — that Harding's lifestyle or medical malpractice hastened his demise.

After 90 years, though, it seems highly unlikely that the truth of the matter will ever be known.

Friday, October 23, 2009

A Mystery That Remains Unsolved

I had high hopes for the movie "Amelia" that opens today in theaters across the country.

BERJAYAI've always enjoyed a good "biopic," as such films are called — as long as they have something meaningful to say or to contribute to discussions about their subjects. And Amelia Earhart was probably one of the first historical figures I heard anything about. But I never learned as much about her as I would have liked.

I have a vague memory from my childhood of luggage that belonged to my grandmother that bore Earhart's name. In hindsight, I suppose the luggage was some sort of line that was marketed for women. In my grandparents' day, that may have been what luggage makers did — perhaps there were other luggage lines that were named after pioneering pilots.

For all I know, Granddaddy may have had luggage that was named for Charles Lindbergh. Or the Wright Brothers. I don't know. I don't recall looking at his luggage. I might have more of a memory of that if he hadn't died when I was in first grade.

But my vague memory includes a brief conversation I had with my grandmother. I was about 8 or 9, I guess, and she had come to visit us. I remember looking at the label on her suitcase, and I asked her who Amelia Earhart was. I probably thought it was the name of the person who designed the luggage.

Grandmother simply replied, "She was a pilot." Nothing else was said because, at about that moment, my mother appeared in the doorway to tell us that dinner was ready. And I don't recall ever discussing it with her again.

When I got older, the name came up in history class but only briefly. And I was never able to get any of my teachers — whether in high school or college — to say much more than Earhart disappeared while flying around the world. It's been 72 years now, and Earhart's disappearance is still a mystery.

Anyway, when I heard that a film about Earhart was going to be released this fall, my curiosity was aroused again. But I realized that anything that the movie had to say would be speculative in nature. I'm certain that, if the filmmaker had uncovered some information that could answer the enduring question of what happened, it would have been the subject of numerous articles and documentaries. But nothing like that has happened.

Speculation is OK with me, though. If it makes people think about what may have happened and they start asking questions, that's fine. "JFK," after all, didn't definitively answer the questions that have swirled around the Kennedy assassination for decades, but it prompted people to ask them.

Unfortunately, from what I've been reading, "Amelia" doesn't seem to contribute anything to the discussion of what happened when she disappeared in July 1937.

Earhart's destination on July 2, 1937, was a sliver of an island in the Pacific Ocean called Howland Island. There are plenty of theories about what happened:
  • One theory, which has been popular with quite a few researchers, is that Earhart's plane ran out of fuel and was ditched at sea. The "crash and sink" theory certainly would explain why no wreckage has ever been found, although many deep sea expeditions have tried to locate the plane.

  • Another theory holds that Earhart and her navigator, Fred Noonan, landed on another island and eventually died. Searchers on the island never found any plane wreckage, but they did discover some items, like improvised tools, an aluminum panel and a piece of plexiglas, that encouraged none other than Earhart's stepson to believe the mystery of her disappearance had been solved.

  • Other theories, which have been mentioned in documentaries, have suggested that Earhart was a spy who was captured by the Japanese and either executed or forced to make propaganda broadcasts as "Tokyo Rose." It has even been suggested that Earhart survived, returned to the United States and assumed a new identity, but that claim, which originated in a book titled "Amelia Earhart Lives," was refuted.
An exploration of an existing theory — or, perhaps, the presentation of a new theory supported by new technology — would have been an acceptable reason for a film about Earhart.

Lisa Schwarzbaum of EW.com writes that "Amelia" is a "frustratingly old–school, Hollywood–style, inspirational biopic."

"The mystery we ought to be paying attention to is: What really happened on the legendary American aviator's final, fatal flight in 1937?" Schwarzbaum writes. "But the question audiences are left with is this: How could so tradition–busting a role model have resulted in so square, stiff, and earthbound a movie? Why present such a modern woman in such a fusty format?"

Similarly, Manohla Dargis writes, in the New York Times, that the movie is an "exasperatingly dull production."

And Claudia Puig writes, in USA Today, that "it's too bad that a film about a daring and audacious woman taking on staggering challenges plays it so safe."

Of course, those are critics' opinions. And I'm usually the first to say that people should form their own opinions and not take a critic's word for it.

It may well be an entertaining film. Hilary Swank certainly bears a striking resemblance to Earhart. So perhaps there are worse ways to spend a few hours.

But I think I'll pass on it. If The History Channel chooses to take this opportunity to show some documentaries on Earhart, I'd like to see some genuine footage of her achievements.

She was certainly a remarkable figure, and her accomplishments are worth retelling — even if we don't know what became of her.

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Questions That Need to be Asked

The City Edition speculates that Arkansas Democratic Party chairman Bill Gwatney may have been the victim of a Manchurian Candidate-style assassination.

The post makes for interesting reading. And it raises some points that observers who are closer to the scene in Arkansas than I am might be better equipped to handle.

But the people I know in Arkansas who have e-mailed me about this matter have used words like "weird" to describe it.

They seem to be as baffled by this as I am.

Clearly there are questions that need to be asked. The City Edition is to be commended for talking about something that hasn't been getting the attention it deserves.

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

The Mysterious Death of Marilyn Monroe

BERJAYAIt's one of the enduring mysteries of our time.

How did Marilyn Monroe die?

Forty-six years ago today, her dead body was found in her Brentwood, Calif., home.

Brentwood has made the news before — not just because it's been home to countless celebrities over the years.

O.J. Simpson's wife and her friend were murdered there in 1994. Also, during the 1990s, Monica Lewinsky was often referred to as being from Brentwood — but, although her father lives in the area today, she was raised elsewhere.

Monroe's death, at the age of 36, was suspicious, and it has remained a starting point for conspiracy theories for nearly half a century. The coroner, Dr. Thomas Noguchi, ruled her death a "probable suicide," but there wasn't enough evidence to rule conclusively that it was either a suicide or a homicide.

The rumors have continued to swirl. They have included rumors of her relationships with rich and powerful men (i.e., John and Robert Kennedy) and the possibility that she was murdered because she was a security risk (based on allegations of discussions she had about atomic testing issues with President Kennedy).

A former Secret Service agent told CBS that it was "common knowledge" among his cohorts that John Kennedy and Monroe had an affair, but the rumors involving Robert Kennedy were never verified.

There have also been tales (never confirmed) that she was murdered by organized crime figures.

And Monroe's housekeeper/housemate Eunice Murray (who was 60 years old when Monroe died) told the BBC that Monroe was still alive when the doctor arrived at the house after being summoned in the early morning hours of Sunday, Aug. 5, 1962.

Murray died in 1993 without ever elaborating on that claim.

Like President Kennedy's assassination, the death of Marilyn Monroe will probably remain shrouded in mystery. So many years have now passed and so many of the people who would have made the most plausible witnesses are gone now.

It is highly unlikely that we'll ever know the truth. Monroe's death is now the fodder of conspiracy theorists.

What we're left with are her films, and most of them only hint at the potential that was lost. But you can see one of the best examples of her work later this month, when Turner Classic Movies shows "Some Like It Hot" on Wednesday, Aug. 27 at 7 p.m. (Central).

It's no exaggeration to say it's one of the finest films ever made. It was directed by Billy Wilder and it also stars Tony Curtis and Jack Lemmon. If you've never seen it, trust me, you'll be entertained — right up to Joe E. Brown's memorable final line, "Well, nobody's perfect!"

(Believe me, it will make sense to you after you've seen the film. And the American Film Institute thought highly enough of the line to rank it #48 on "AFI's 100 Years ... 100 Movie Quotes" list.)

But if you want to explore Monroe's psyche, you may have to rent the DVD of HBO's "Norma Jean & Marilyn." It's an imaginative examination of the conflicting emotions that certainly tormented Monroe, starring Ashley Judd and Mira Sorvino.

It got mixed reviews when HBO first aired it in 1996.

I thought it was a remarkable film, and, although it sheds no new light on the circumstances surrounding Monroe's death, I recommend it.