close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20110110000230/http://curiouscapitalist.blogs.time.com/

Audio

Host Katherine Lanpher talks with TIME business and economics reporters to sort through the headlines, forecasts, news and numbers that will help you weather these challenging times.

Download | Subscribe

The Curious Capitalist Categories

Archive
BERJAYAJanuary 2011
SMTWTFS
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
Commentary on the economy, the markets, and business

BERJAYA

Job seekers fill out applications (Mike Segar/REUTERS)

Being a temp is never easy. December was no different.

Friday's job report left many economy watchers scratching their heads. The report showed a much bigger drop in the unemployment rate than was expected in December. The number dropped to 9.4%, from 9.8% the month before. That was the biggest drop in the unemployment rate since the beginning of the recession. Great news, right? Maybe not. Overall, the economy added just 103,000 jobs in the last month of the year. That was better than 39,000 added in November, but it was less than the 160,000 jobs that many predicted would be added in December. And much less than you would expect at this point in a recovery. Back in July of 1983, when the unemployment rate posted its first major dip of that recession, down to 9.4% from 10.1%, the economy added 400,000 jobs. Two months later it added over a million.

So was the jobs report great news, or just another sign that the economy in 2011 will remain weak? The real answer may be in temp jobs. And over the next six months that may be the statistic to watch. Here's why:

Read More…

BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  

Is the Vampire Squid Wrapped Around Facebook?

BERJAYA

Goldman CEO Lolyd Blankfien has his hands around Facebook's shares (Jim Young/REUTERS)

Goldman Sachs has been trying to wrestle free of its reputation for sucking money out of every market it can. The new Facebook deal won't help.

You don't have to dig very far to find something vampire squiddy about the deal. Companies over 500 investors are supposed to disclose their financial statements. But while the Goldman deal could bring in as many as 750 investors into Facebook alone, those investors are going to be counted as one, as long as they agree to continue to go through Goldman and its new Facebook-specific fund. It's an arrangement that may suit both investors and Facebook, which doesn't want to disclose its financials. But it also wraps Goldman's tentacles pretty tightly around the market for Facebook shares, which could be as large as $50 billion.

The Securities and Exchange Commission was already looking into the growing ways shares of private companies are being traded. So Goldman is entering an area that was under scrutiny already. So far it seems the inquiry has been focused on this 500 investor issue. But there may be more at stake than defining who should or shouldn't be counted as an investor. Here's why:

Read More…

BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  

Why are Recoveries More Jobless?

BERJAYA

Still waiting for the right jobs or workers (Shannon Stapleton/REUTERS)

The cover story of TIME magazine this week is about the job market. Bill Saporito and reporter Deirdre Van Dyk have done an amazing job of finding employers who want to hire.

Kent Niederhofer can't find enough mechanical engineers to work for him — in southeastern Michigan. You know, where Detroit is, with its 13.3% unemployment rate. Niederhofer is president of the American branch of Ricardo, an engineering consultancy that designs the power trains of some of the coolest stuff around: Bugatti sports cars, huge wind turbines and unmanned aerial vehicles. "We are doing rocket science every day," says Niederhofer. "It's just not on rockets." So Ricardo got a little desperate, renting a billboard to place a help-wanted ad that featured a picture of a sexy-looking sports car, the tagline "Why you became an engineer" and a Web address for job seekers. He calls it engineer porn.

This might all seem very bullish. And it is. But the story also illuminates a much bigger problem than just the confidence issue or the bank credit issue or any of the other things that we talk about when we talk about why the recovery has been slow. And it says something not just about this recovery, but the last few as well.

Read More…

BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  

Are government jobs becoming dead end jobs?

There used to be no safer career path that landing a government post. Sure, you might be able to pull in a bigger salary in the private sector, but it was hard to beat the benefits, or the job security. Public sector labor unions are often politically influential and fiercely protective of the perquisites of the civil servant. In times of economic stress, when employees in private firms faced pink slips, government paychecks often kept coming, taken from the tax revenues raised from those under greater risk of unemployment.

However, those halcyon days for the government worker may be coming to an end. Around the world, public sector employees are beginning to feel the bite from austerity measures aimed at reducing government debt and deficits, putting their pay, benefits and jobs at risk. The trend could have major consequences not just for the welfare of millions of civil servants, but the performance of the economies of the West.

Read More…

BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  

Ah, yes, it's that time of year again, when we all sit pensively with pen and paper and scrawl out our resolutions for the New Year. In that spirit, I thought I'd lend a hand to the leading figures of global economic policy with a few suggestions of what I think should be on their 2011 lists:

Angela Merkel, Chancellor, Germany: Give more to the poor. So we all can recall what the penny-pinching Ebenezer Scrooge discovered when the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come time-warped him to his lonely, unkempt gravesite. Merkel runs the risk of ending up like old Scrooge, and for similar reasons. Her repeated rejection of or resistance to proposals that could stem the European debt crisis, for selfish political reasons, will end up backfiring, not just for Europe, which still faces the threat of cascading sovereign meltdowns, but also for her own legacy. It's time for Merkel to catch some Christmas spirit and stop blocking the kind of comprehensive solutions that could start to solve Europe's problems. Her Germany needs to take a greater leadership role in Europe, backed by a willingness to make more sacrifices for the future of its neighbors. If not, the monetary union, and her political standing in Europe, will remain at risk. Perhaps Merkel needs her own private ghost to escort her to her future, one without a euro, where she is maligned as the chancellor who let European integration slip away.

Read More…

BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  

Is Facebook Really Worth $50 billion?

BERJAYA

This guy's company may be now worth $50 billion. (Photo: Robert Galbraith/REUTERS)

There are a growing number of signs that a bubble is building in tech.

The latest and potentially most disturbing: Investors now believe Facebook is worth $50 billion. Facebook is indeed an innovative and very successful company. It has 550 million users, and accounts for about 1 of 4 American page views. And, as you have probably heard, we at TIME named Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's CEO, the Person of the Year. But the company isn't making that much money yet. Its revenue, while impressive and probably growing fast, is nowhere near $50 billion. And because it has undertaken an unorthodox means of making money, it's not clear when the big bucks for Facebook will start rolling in. It has also struggled with privacy issues. So are the high values for tech stocks, particularly Facebook, setting investors up for a dangerous fall? Perhaps. Here's why:

Read More…

BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  

Will Home Prices Rebound in 2011?

BERJAYA

A sign that may make a comeback in 2011 (Photo: Rick Wilking/Reuters)

A very successful hedge fund manager is making the case that housing prices may rebound sharply in 2011. He may be right.

The guy's name is Bill Ackman and his hedge fund is Pershing Square Capital, which had $3.5 billion under management in mid-2010. He has spent most of his career investing in consumer and retail businesses. But he made a killing in the late 2000s by spotting early problems in the credit markets and betting against bond insurer MBIA. Basically, he was early to recognize that Wall Street's system of credit default swaps was just a shell game--shift risk around, not eliminating it. Now Ackman says he is believes residential housing could be the next great investment. He has a presentation called, "So... How to Make a Fortune."

Nonetheless, Ackman's call that housing will rise has been met with a lot of skepticism. Market strategist Gary Shilling says housing prices will fall another 20%. Ezra Klein, the Washington Post's popular blogger, says Shilling is clear and comprehensive. Felix Salmon says Ackman's thesis is based on two points, both of which have major problems. Daryl Jones of Hedgeye on sister publication Fortune.com says Ackman and other housing bulls are wrong. In today's Journal, Peter Schiff, the strategist and failed Senate candidate, says housing prices are still too high. Lastly, Dr. Doom, and NYU professor,  Nouriel Roubini says housing is already double dipping and will continue.

So Ackman clearly has the contrarian point of view here. Here's why he could be right:

Read More…

BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  

Is the Economy Making You Fat?

BERJAYA

Lose your job, pick up a snack (Photo: Getty Images)

Can lean times lead to wider waistlines? It appears so. If you are finding it harder to keep off the weight recently, it's not just you or holiday parties that are to blame. The recession and its aftermath are making you fatter.

A new research paper published by the National Bureau of Economic Research finds that people tend to eat fewer fruits and vegetables when they either lose their jobs, or are at a higher risk of losing their jobs. And for the past few years, that's been all of us. Worse, not only do we eat fewer veggies, but our consumption of Cheetos and McDonald's tends to go up as well. Here's why:

Read More…

BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  

Why don't Chinese spend more money?

If anyone on the planet can afford to head down to the neighborhood mall and indulge in a shopping spree, you'd think it would be the Chinese. After all, they live in an economy that routinely posts growth rates of 9% or higher, resulting in surging incomes and boundless job opportunities. While much of the world experienced GDP contractions and dramatic spikes in unemployment during the Great Recession, China, supported by massive stimulus programs, barely missed a beat. In theory, as income increases, and the prospects for future earnings become brighter, families should be more willing to postpone savings and spend now.

But in China, just the opposite is happening. It's still proving difficult to convince the average Chinese to part with his or her money, even though his or her stash of cash is bigger than ever. Sure, Chinese consumers are spending more and more each year on items like cars and appliances. But simultaneously, the urban Chinese household saves twice as much of its income today as 20 years ago – from 15% in the early 1990s to over 30% in recent years. Oddly, as Chinese incomes have grown, so has their propensity to save.

The fact that Chinese are saving more is of great importance to all of us. Getting the Chinese to spend is necessary to restore the global economy to true health. If the world is to “rebalance” – or eliminate the massive surpluses and deficits that underpinned the Great Recession – consumers in surplus nations like China need to spend more. If they did, China would import greater quantities of stuff from the rest of the world and reduce its giant trade surplus, while simultaneously shifting China's sources of growth away from its unhealthy dependence on investment (in sectors like property). However, the role of consumer spending in China's economy has been heading in the wrong direction. Private consumption accounted for 46% of GDP in 2000; by 2009, that ratio had fallen to about 35%. Very simply, the sources of Chinese growth aren't rebalancing, and without that, the entire global economy can't rebalance either.

Why won't the Chinese loosen their wallets? A new study by economists Marcos Chamon, Kai Liu and Eswar Prasad sheds some light on the financial calculations of the average Chinese. After studying Chinese statistical surveys of household incomes dating back to the 1980s, they conclude that even though Chinese incomes have increased, so has the uncertainty Chinese feel about their income, due to the market-oriented nature of Chinese reforms. And as a result of that heightened uncertainty, Chinese are more inclined to save a larger proportion of their income even in a rapid-growth economy.

Read More…

BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  

What Does the 2010 Census say about America?

BERJAYA

The New Americans: US Commerce Secretary Gary Locke unveils the US count (Photo: Yuri Gripas/REUTERS)

For the first time in history, there are more than 300 million Americans. But two recessions, an increased wariness of immigrants and a souring of opinion of the United States abroad led to the slowest growth in US residents since 1940. "It's still a big growth," says Kenneth Johnson, a population expert and professor at the University of New Hampshire. "But the indications are that immigration slowed dramatically at the end of the decade."

The census results were also potentially a boon for Republicans. The new count of Americans, which was released Tuesday, is used to determine how to distribute the 435 seats in the House of Representatives. And, based on the count, Texas will gain four U.S. Congressmen. Florida picks up two seats in the House. The voters of both of those states have regularly gone for Republicans. Meanwhile, New York and Ohio, two states won by Obama in 2008, lost two seats each. The results may also affect the 2012 US Presidential election, by redistributing the make up of the Electoral College.

Economies do tend to thrive on size. So is the slower rate of growth more bad news for the US GDP? Not necessarily. Here's why:

Read More…

BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA  BERJAYA