“It was the best of times, it was the worst of times…”

Today was my first day of the semester, since I’m on a Tuesday-Thursday schedule this term. Meeting my students–and in many cases, seeing them again (since many of them were with me last term)–has me reflecting on this past semester.

I am going to write about something that I don’t often see professors write about, not under their own names, at any rate.  That thing is grading.

As the title of this post indicates, last semester’s basic writing courses were a study in extremes.  In Class A, 66% of my students either dropped, withdrew, or failed. No, that is not a typo–66% of the 20 students who started the semester with me did not successfully finish the course. Take a minute to process that number.

Then there was Class B, the class I’ve written about before.  50% of the students in this class earned As or A-s.  Even more earned Bs.

I’ve never had a group of basic writing students perform as poorly as Class A.  I’ve also never had a group of basic writing students perform as well as Class B. I taught these classes the same way, using the same assignments, the same activities, and the same texts. These classes were also offered at approximately the same time of day, too–I taught them back to back, with Class A starting at 10:30 and Class B starting at 12:00.

The question I’ve been left with ever since I turned in grades is, why did Class A fail so spectacularly? Why did Class B succeed so spectacularly?

The answer seems fairly obvious: the students. The students are the only “variable,” to use social scientist lingo, that was different between the two classes, and there were differences between the two student populations.  For example, Class B had far more returning adult students.  But Class B was also more racially diverse; I suspect there was more social class diversity as well. On the surface, one might expect Class B to struggle more, given some of the challenges–both personal and academic–I know some of the students were facing.

But those students didn’t struggle more–Class A did.  The vast majority of Class B was resilient in the face of the challenges (in some cases, quite serious) they faced; the vast majority of Class A did not have this kind of resilience, even though for most of them, their challenges were not as severe. Why? Furthermore, what might be the implications for my pedagogy going forward?

I suspect there wasn’t much I could do for Class A, and the student evaluations indicate a high degree of satisfaction with me and the course overall. In fact, the students gave me a perfect 5 for my overall effectiveness; that is slightly higher than Class B, who gave me a 4.94. I realize that is splitting hairs, but across the board, Class A’s evaluations were slightly higher (or equal) in almost all categories. These students didn’t think I had failed them.

But when I look at those grades, it is hard for me to feel like I didn’t. I feel a responsibility for that abysmal DWF rate and the clear lack of learning that occurred. I’m disappointed in the students–half of those who failed did so because they simply didn’t turn in final drafts. They would have passed if they had just turned in the work.

I’m also disappointed in myself. I’m not sure what else I could have done differently, but I feel like I failed this group of students somehow. It hurts me to see students who had the ability to pass, who were so close to passing, flame out. It seems like such a waste of time, money, and talent. It makes me angry.

This is something I wish more scholar-teachers discussed openly: the affective impact of student performance on us, their teachers. I know it’s risky to do so–I am certainly nervous about the possible responses this post may engender (“Yes, Sara, you really do suck”). However, I think most of us struggle with these feelings and worries as to whether we failed our students or if they failed themselves–or both.

Posted in Birth School Work Death | 1 Comment

Coming Out of the Dark

A new year, a new semester.

2010 was hard. Fall was hard. It’s a relief both are over.

I’m glad for a fresh start, though I am apprehensive. As you can probably tell from the tone of the blog, I’ve been doing better the past several weeks. The depression is lifting, at least a little.  The good days are starting to outnumber the bad. I feel like the emotional fog I’ve been fighting through is starting to dissipate.  That’s a relief.

I still have bad days, though, days when I don’t want to get out of bed, and feeling stressed out contributes to that dynamic. The first week of the semester is always stressful. I am looking forward to meeting my students (and greeting returning students), but I also know this week will be exhausting. I’m already feeling overwhelmed and anxious about that fact.

I know I’ll make it through, though.  I always do.

Posted in Birth School Work Death, Navel Gazing | 2 Comments

Why I Love My Job: Reasons 1,100,101-1,100,103

It’s been quiet around here lately due to a flurry of pre-semester activity this week; I’ve been working on several things in preparation for the new semester, which starts Monday. All of them remind me of why I love my job:

1.  Thursday night, I went to dinner with several colleagues and Cathy Small, Professor of Anthropology at Northern Arizona University and author of My Freshman Year. I taught Professor Small’s book in my basic writing courses last semester; in fact, since we use a common theme in BW courses here at IPFW, all sections of the course used the book.

I am young enough in my career that it is still a thrill for me to meet the scholars behind the work I admire, yet I’ve been around long enough to know that sometimes meeting them is a disappointment. In Cathy’s case, it was simply a thrill. She was everything I hoped she would be from reading her book (and then some). I will treasure for a long time to come our conversation about students and college life.

Evenings like Thursday remind me of how lucky I am to be a professor–good food, stimulating conversation, and generous colleagues.

2. Professor Small was at IPFW to speak at the College of Arts and Sciences’ first faculty development day. Our Vice-Chancellor for Student Affairs and Professor Small spoke in the morning, and then in the afternoon was a catered lunch and small/large group discussion.  Because I taught her book last semester, I was asked to be one of the small group leaders, which was a lot of fun. I immensely enjoy discussing pedagogy with my colleagues, and this particularly conversation was enlightening since I was working with several political scientists. I really appreciate those cross-disciplinary conversations.

So yeah, Friday was another moment where I was grateful to be not only a professor, but also a professor at my particular university. I’m excited that my dean (who is still relatively new–this is only his second year on the job) started this initiative, and I’m happy that I’ll  be on the planning committee for next year’s event. I’m very much looking forward to it!

3. This weekend, I finished my syllabus for the grad seminar I’m teaching next semester. Because my department has a small M.A. program, most of our grad courses are cross-listed with undergraduate courses–in other words, grads and undergrads are in the same class.  It’s a pedagogical challenge to figure out ways to enrich the course for the grad students while not overwhelming the undergrads. Grad seminars, OTOH, are restricted to grad students.

I’ve taught one grad seminar before, and it was a required, foundational course–the purpose of the course was to give students an overview of writing studies. Thus, I felt a responsibility to adhere to a “coverage” model and ensure that the students read the foundational texts and recent, influential scholarship, regardless of my personal interest or feelings about any particular work.  I very much enjoyed teaching the seminar and would like to do it again, but it will probably never really feel like “my” course.

This time around, however, I’m teaching a seminar that I designed from scratch, and wow, did I have a good time planning it. :) I had so much fun this weekend finalizing the readings, designing the assignments, and everything else. I get to teach what I’m interested in, what I think is important–this is my course, through and through. In what other job do people have the opportunity to do what they want to this extent?

There you have it:  three more reasons why I love my job.

Posted in Birth School Work Death | Leave a comment

Going Public

Thanks to ProfHacker and the most recent Teaching Carnival, this blog has gone public in a big way.

I started this blog as a public blog; it was never intended to be private. Still, though, given where I was with life this summer, it was kind of nice to have a little blog that was only read by twenty-thirty of my fellow bloggers, people who’d known me online for several years. Yeah, it was a public blog, but very few people knew about it. I didn’t hide it; it’s always been indexed by Google. I simply didn’t advertise. I didn’t link to my posts on Facebook, and I didn’t go out of my way to tell anybody about the blog. It was a nice way for me to gain my footing in this new space.

By September, things started to change. Because I wrote about her, I shared my blog with one of my graduate students. The blog became one of the top results for Google searches of my name. My readership started to increase. Around that time, I told Billie I’d edit one of the Teaching Carnivals this year.  When I submitted the post to Billie, I included the fact that I am the author of this blog.

I knew that by editing TC, hits to my blog would increase; the post I linked to above was included in an earlier TC this fall, and I saw a bump from that.  But I was blown away by just how many hits the blog has received this time. I more than doubled my previous high for daily visits.

I also didn’t expect the attention I’ve received on campus. Yesterday someone from university relations emailed me, congratulating me on editing TC; he said he had discovered the blog last week and then saw the TC post yesterday. I had a meeting on campus today and heard many comments, too.

Because so many people in my offline life had noticed the TC post and my blog at that point, yesterday I linked to the TC post on my FB profile. I still have no plans to start linking to my blog entries on FB, but anybody who followed the link from my profile knows about my blog now.

That’s a big step for me, given my history with blogging. I’m glad to be at this point, after so many years of blogging under various guises.

It feels good to own this voice and this space in ways that I haven’t before.

Posted in Meta | 8 Comments

Teaching Carnival

Check out the newest edition of the Teaching Carnival, if you haven’t already–I was this month’s guest editor. It has some great links from names familiar (and possibly unfamiliar) to readers of this blog.

Posted in Meta | 2 Comments

Just Breathe

I went back to the doctor, and his verdict was a bit of a mixed bag: the ear infections have healed; the sinus infection is better but still hanging on; and my asthma, which was not a problem at all during the previous visit, is now acting up. Sometimes my asthma kicks in as my sinus congestion starts to break up, and that’s what happened this time.

So, another round of antibiotics for the sinus infection, and a cortisone shot for the asthma. The shot has definitely helped. I went to the doctor late Wednesday afternoon, and my cough has dramatically improved since then. I finally feel like I am on the mend, just in time for the new year.

Also resolved before the end of the year: the revision of the co-written article. It’s done, and the editors say it looks great. It will be available online in just a few weeks; of course I will share the link when it becomes available. :)

Now, off to the grocery–we’re having some folks over tonight. If you are going to be out and about tonight, stay safe.

Posted in Birth School Work Death, Doctor Doctor | Leave a comment

The Little Engine That Could

Here is the good news I alluded to in my last post: I found out right before break that I’ve had another article accepted, pending revisions.

Remember the grant article? The one that gave me fits this summer?  That’s the one. It was accepted by a journal that has played a formative role in my scholarly development, which just thrills me to no end. Knowing that my work will soon be published in the same journal as that of so many scholars I deeply respect is a bit of a mind-trip.

That said, I have a lot of work ahead of me, with a January 15th deadline to boot. As the manuscript stands now, it is divided between theoretical analysis and pedagogical implications, and the reviewers want more theory, less pedagogy. One of the reasons why I had such a hard time drafting this piece in the first place was because it was more of a polemic and more focused on theory than what I usually do; most of my literacy research has taken the “here’s the data, let me tell you a story about it” approach. That’s not what this piece does at all, which is why it was a struggle. While I know the reviewers’ advice will make for a better piece, I am nervous about these revisions, given my previous struggles with this very issue.

I know I can do it, though–I’ve made it this far with the manuscript, after all, and I’m very heartened by the reviews. It’s clear to me that the reviewers think this piece is well-written and important; one wrote that it was “enjoyable and inspiring academic writing.” That is one of the nicest and most meaningful things someone has ever said about my writing.

With both of the acceptances I’ve received in the last month, all of the reviewers have made a special point of noting that the manuscripts were very well-written. I’ve been pleased by these comments, but also surprised by them. I know I’m a good writer–I have a PhD in English, and I’m a rhet/comp/literacy specialist, so that seems a given.  But it’s really validating to receive that kind of praise for my writing from scholars I respect.

So, yeah, another article accepted. That means I have five articles in print or forthcoming; I need four for tenure. As my dissertation director said when we emailed recently, now I have insurance. It’s a very satisfying feeling, especially after the year I’ve had. Life was pretty dark this summer and fall, and I wanted to give up. I didn’t.

This has been an important lesson in perseverance for me.

Posted in Birth School Work Death | 5 Comments

I’m Back–For Now

Sorry for the silence around here. I was hit hard by end of semester grading, illness, and the holidays.

I finished my grading last Sunday (the 19th), and pretty much the instant after I submitted my grades, my ears started hurting and I could literally feel the sinus pressure building. I went to the doctor the next day, the 20th, and had it confirmed–infections in both ears and a sinus infection, too.

Because I had been so busy with the end of the semester, I had to finish my Christmas shopping while sick. Schlepping around Fort Wayne while feeling so miserable was no fun, and my lack of energy made everything take longer. At least I had almost all of the kids’ and parents’ shopping done at that point; it was really just G for whom I needed presents. Oh, and wrapping–I wrapped a lot of presents.

Why was I doing all of the wrapping? Because G got sick, too! It hit him a day or two after I got it, so at that point I was the one capable of doing the wrapping. Oh, and M and P were also sick. P and I went to the dr on the 20th; G and M went on the 22nd. The girls had sinus and ear infections; the boys just had the sinus infections.

The 22nd was our anniversary–15 years. G took me out for a very nice dinner, and we had a wonderful evening together, in spite of how awful we both felt. Then, two days later, it was Christmas Eve. We went out to dinner as a family and then went to church. P didn’t last long in the service; he was way too excited about Santa Claus to be able to sit still.

We spent Christmas morning at home, then we left that afternoon to visit our families in Cincinnati. Saturday and Sunday were extremely rough–I felt awful. I developed a wicked cough (thank you, asthma), and some female issues complicated things, too. By Sunday evening I was finally feeling human again.

Because I was under the weather, our visit to Cincy was pretty low-key, but I enjoyed the time with my parents. The kids had a blast, especially P–he absolutely adores my dad–and I have to admit that it was nice to be fussed over by my mom when I felt so terrible Saturday night. Mom told me something hot would help, so she brewed some gunpowder tea (what my dad has drunk every morning for as long as I can remember). I hadn’t had any of that for a long time, and it tasted wonderful. I spent a lot of time simply watching the kids play, reading, and talking with my parents and G. It was very relaxing. G and I watched The Town on demand Sunday night after the kids were in bed, and I really enjoyed that. It was a great movie.

We came home today, and I am still fighting through everything. Tomorrow is my last day of antibiotics, and I’m seriously thinking about going back to the dr. I cannot shake this cough, which is probably just my asthma, but since the last time I had a sinus infection it turned into bronchitis, I guess I should err on the side of caution. At least the other issues that had me in so much pain have just about resolved themselves, which is a relief.

So yeah, that’s why I haven’t been blogging. Over the next few days, as I catch up on other parts of my life, I’ll fill you in on what’s been going on there, too.  Good news to report, thankfully!

Posted in All in the Family, Doctor Doctor | Leave a comment

Who, Me?

BERJAYA

My bloggy friend phd me has named me a Versatile Blogger. According to the rules of this, I am now supposed to tell you seven facts about me that you are unlikely to learn elsewhere.

That is a hard job for me, as I’ve been blogging in various guises for a long time and am pretty open about my life. I will try to think of a few facts that might be news to y’all, however.

1. The first album (yes, album–I’m 37, people!) I ever bought was Amy Grant’s My Father’s Eyes. Remember, I went to a fundamentalist Christian school for 12 years, so as a very young girl, I listened to a lot of Amy Grant.

2. I became an aunt when I was nine years old.

3. I have never been drunk in my life. This can be explained in part by my issues with control–not being in control of myself is one of the scariest scenarios I can imagine.  This is also why I have never engaged in drug use.

4. My favorite book is The Scarlet Letter. The fact that I went to a fundamentalist Christian school for 12 years explains why. I read the book when I was 17, and it felt like a revelation. Growing up in such a repressive environment, I could not help but feel a kinship with Hester Prynne.

5. Many of you know of my involvement in college and community theatre; I also took voice lessons for six years and have danced in some form or another for most of my life. My dream job would be Broadway actress.

6. My beloved grandma made delicious peanut butter fudge that she called “Sara’s Special.” I make it every year at Christmas in memory of her.

7a. Well into my 20s, I was often assumed to be someone other than a white Christian. As a child, I was most frequently asked if I was Native American, biracial, or Jewish. As a teenager and young adult, it became Spanish, biracial, Hispanic/Latina, or Jewish. Now it seems that most everyone assumes I am a white Christian, though I think that says more about Fort Wayne than it does about me; when I go home to Cincinnati, I find that strangers think I am “something,” to use the parlance that often gets thrown around (“What are you? You’re something, aren’t you?”–”yeah, a person” is how I am tempted to respond).

7b. On a related note, during the first couple years of my pseudonymous blogging, I saw references to my blog as being written by an African-American woman (my blog was included on lists of African-American academics’ blogs). I’m not sure why that assumption was made, but I found it an interesting moment in terms of performance of identity; the construction of race, class, and gender; and pseudonymity/anonymity.

I’m also supposed to tag seven blogs. I read many blogs, some public, some private; here are some that I am pretty sure haven’t been tagged for this yet:

Dr. Four Eyes

Laura @ 11D

Clancy

Nels

Profgrrrrl

Jackie

Ragey

Posted in Meta, Things That Are Random | 2 Comments

The Lives of Others

As you all know, this semester has been a tough one for me.  Hell, this year has been awful, but that’s not really the point of this post.

What has kept me going this semester has been my teaching. Even though there have been many days when all I’ve wanted to do is stay in bed and pull the covers over my head, once I made it to campus and started my day, I felt better. The hours in the classroom were a welcome respite from all of the emotional and mental turmoil I’ve been experiencing.  During those hours, I was able to block all of that from my mind and focus only on something that gives me a lot of joy–teaching writing.

While all of the classes I’ve taught this term gave me that release, one of my basic writing classes was particularly special. Honestly, I think this might have been the best group of basic writing students I’ve ever had, and by “best” I don’t mean the best writers (though they are pretty good).  I mean the best students–the most engaged, the most responsible, the most hard-working, the most respectful. I frequently tell students that I would rather teach 100 students who struggle with writing but who work hard than 1 student who is a gifted but lazy writer, and this particular group of students proved why I say that. No, they’re probably not among the best writers at my university–not yet!–but they were truly a pleasure to teach.

On the last day we met together, I wanted to express to them what they have meant to me this semester. While most of them will be continuing on to my first-year writing class next term, not all of them will, so I wanted to take the opportunity while I had it and tell them how much I enjoyed our learning together.

I opened my mouth, started to talk, and promptly burst into tears.

I don’t think I’ve ever lost my composure like that in front of students; I’ve teared up, sure, but this time I was flat-out sobbing. The students were stunned, and I was mortified. I managed to get myself under control just enough to say what I wanted to say to them; I also added that I had had a tough semester personally and that their class always gave me something to look forward to on what were otherwise tough days. Given my apparent emotional distress, I felt like I had to explain. I quickly gathered my things and got out of there so they could complete their student evaluations and so I could recover my composure.

Although I was embarrassed at the time, I feel better about it now. I’ve been conferencing with these students since then, and several of them have told me that they were touched that I cared about them enough to become emotional. One student even added a P.S. to her final assignment, in which she told me not to feel bad about crying in front of them and added, “Every other teacher I have never shows that they care that much about their students, which leads me to believe that they don’t really like being there. The fact the you did shows you really like helping us, and you care about us, and you really want us to succeed.” I’m glad the students recognize that I truly do care about them and want them to succeed on their own terms, and I’m glad they see me as a multi-faceted person, not just a talking head on a stick. I think it’s important that we recognize the affective nature of teaching in general, as well as our own particular pedagogical strategies. The role of emotion is an important one in a writing classroom (or any classroom, for that matter, though I do think it’s especially important in a writing course).

But something that a couple of students have said has also been interesting to me; their comments have indicated that they picked up on my emotional state this term, even though I thought I hid it very well. When I teach, I usually feel that I get to know my students better than they know me; after all, I read their writing, which is often an intensely personal act. Because I read so much of their writing, observe them in class, listen to their discussions, etc., I believe that I usually get a pretty good read on the students, can predict how they’ll react to certain situations, and the like.

However, I also feel that students don’t usually get that same kind of “read” on me. Of course, that’s not their job–they don’t have to  think about ways to motivate their professors to do their work, for example (though wouldn’t it be funny if they did?). :)  I think some of that feeling is also due to the lore we professors have about our students. I remember being told as a brand-new TA not to worry too much about what students thought of us if we had an off day in class, for example; the exact words were, “We spend way more time thinking about them than they ever do about us.” I do still believe that to be true.

However, that doesn’t mean that they don’t spend any time thinking about us. I’ve been thinking more this semester about how students perceive me, and this most recent episode, which confirmed my private turmoil has not been hidden from students as much as I had thought, triggered these thoughts again.  Partly, I suppose it’s because I’ve been concerned about keeping up my usual teaching persona (enthusiastic, extroverted, optimistic, energetic) during a time when I am even more withdrawn, introverted, pessimistic, and exhausted than usual.  My hyper-awareness of the performative aspect of my teaching has had me thinking about students’ awareness of it, I guess.

S0me of it is also connected to my weight loss.  While most of my students do not say anything to me about it directly, it’s pretty obvious that they have noticed the changes in my physicality. A colleague has mentioned to me that students have brought it up with her; I think she suspects a student or two might have a bit of a crush. I share that suspicion.  This doesn’t bother me, as I see that type of attraction as very normal, but it has surprised me. I’m not sure why; after all, I do think a student crush on a professor or teacher is a normal part of their maturation process and intellectual growth, so why wouldn’t it happen?

I guess I’m just surprised that I am the recipient of such a crush. I can totally understand it when it comes to some of my colleagues, but not me. I don’t see what about me would draw the students in, I guess.

It reminds me of a conversation I had with a former student a few years back; she was looking at Ohio State for grad school and wanted to visit, and I went with her. As we were driving over to Columbus, we talked about a good number of things, and I made some off-handed, derogatory comment about my weight or appearance (I can’t remember exactly what). She stopped me and said very seriously, “But you know you’re beautiful, right?”

I shrugged off her comment and reminded her that I was overweight, to which she responded, “But Sara, you are beautiful. And it’s not just me who thinks so! We all talk about it!” She then went on to name several former students of mine.

I was absolutely gobsmacked by this conversation. I changed the subject very quickly, partly because I was uncomfortable with the topic and felt like we were veering into, “So, tell me how wonderful you think I am” territory. But it was also astounding to me that students–even majors who had spent a lot of time with me, taken multiple classes with me, etc–would sit around discussing me on their personal time.  Well, I wouldn’t be surprised to hear they were talking about my grading, my reading load, or that sort of thing, but this topic of conversation definitely went against the whole “we think about them way more than think about us” mentality I’ve always had.

As I’ve thought about it more, it has started to make more sense.  I think some of our students, especially those we’ve had for multiple courses, develop a curiosity about our “other life,” aka our life outside the classroom. I’ve heard students talking about a colleague’s wardrobe (he is very fashionable); they wonder where he shops, what labels he buys, and the like, but most of them are too in awe to ask him. I’ve overhead other students talk about a faculty gathering and make comments like, “If only I had an invisibility cloak!” Twice now, I’ve invited upper-level or graduate courses to my home for an end-of-semester gathering, and the students get very excited about it; I think they’re intrigued to see where I live and how I interact with my family. I think they enjoy taking a peek into the lives of others, behind the curtain of the professional persona.

I don’t know why this is surprising to me, however. When I think back to my own undergrad days, I felt the same way about my professors. I remember being very excited to go to a professor’s home for the annual English department “welcome back” party. I also remember being enthralled by my Shakespeare professor; well, she taught every single one of my Brit lit courses, but her Shakespeare course was legendary. She has a larger-than-life presence, and her clothing reflects that. I loved going into class each day and seeing what she would wear, right down to her glasses; she had probably hundreds of pairs of glasses to coordinate with each outfit. My best friend–also an English major–and I would always talk about what she was wearing, what she said, etc. We were absolutely fascinated by her.

In retrospect, we both probably had a platonic crush on her, even though I am about as straight as can be and my best friend from those days is a gay man. :)  My former professor is extremely intelligent and charming, a gifted teacher, and has a plethora of interests (she’s a self-taught expert on art history, and I acted in campus plays with her as well).  To top it off, when she swept into class (and she always made an entrance), she was absolutely dressed to the nines. How could any student not adore such a professor? No wonder we were enamored.

While I certainly do not live up to her standard, my own experience reminds that yes, students do notice us more than we think.  They talk about us in ways that might surprise us. They care about us, too. My students have taught me that, especially this term.

I guess I shouldn’t be caught off-guard by students’ interest in my other life, the life they don’t see in the classroom–especially when, given the Google searches that lead to this blog, I suspect some of them are reading along (and hello if you’re here). This, too, seems to me to be part of their maturation process.

Posted in Birth School Work Death, Navel Gazing, Our Bodies Ourselves | 4 Comments