Mark has written of the tendency in language to make “ness” words such as presumptiousness instead of presumption and vacuousness instead of vacuity. He wants the needless “nesses” dropped, and I am generally sympathetic. But with one word, I am having the opposite impulse. In the U.K. a few weeks ago, a speaker at a [...]
Archive for the ‘Language and usage’ Category
Infinite loop, meet one-song shuffle.
What do you call a progressive who undermines his/her own party from the left, under circumstances where there is no chance his or her policy can be enacted?
The accusation by a Republican member of the House Armed Services Committee
Carly Fiorina brings her message to the people: “she leaned the company.”
Maybe so many people misuse the word “deconstruction” because no one understands WHAT it means.
Is it too much to ask that when commentators make confident statements about the reconciliation process and health care that they provide evidence for their position? Apparently. No one has yet shown why this cannot be done.
Since very few of us ride horses these days, perhaps we ought to admit that “free rein” is a dead metaphor and give it a decent burial. But if it’s to be used, it could at least be used correctly.
Evangelical Christian groups that claim to support Israel are misrepresenting themselves. They are not Zionists: they are anti-Zionists, and they should be called that.



