Love Letter to Criminal Illegal Migrants

You Knew I was a Vicious Snake

... before you took me in:

Why the Democratic West Will Have to Crush Islam

Czech politician Klára Samková recently issued a searing speech in which she detailed out in exquisite detail why Islam is, and will always be in conflict with Western Democracies ... and any democracy for that matter.

 Below are just a few snippets, it's best to read the whole thing found at The Reference Frame:

The second reason why Islam likes to hide behind the religious mask is its permanent, deliberate, and purposeful abuse of the Euro-American legal system and values that the civilizations built upon the Judeo-Christian foundations have converged to. There's nothing better or more efficient than to abuse the value system of one's enemy, especially when I don't share that system. And that's exactly how Islam behaves. It wants to be protected according to our tradition which it exploits in this way, while it is not willing to behave reciprocally. It relies on our traditions, it claims that the traditions are important, while behind the scenes, it is laughing at us and our system of values.

[...]

For Muslims, the road to doom is the only one because they are denied even the essence of the human naturalness, namely the evolution. Islam doesn't respect development, progress, and humanity. In its despair, it is attempting to take the rest of the mankind with it because from the Islamic viewpoint, the rest of the world is futile, useless, and unclean.

After reading the entire piece, it becomes even more clear why the peaceful majority of Muslims are Irrelevant.

Steyn Takes on Progressive Gang Rape Comedy

German Girl Pleads for Help

This video was taken down by Facebook. Oh ... you are still on Facebook; shame on you.

The European Tribal War

Taking the Truth, Where we Find It

Speaking of Syrians: Here is One Talking About Islam

Muslim Safe Space

Muslim Safe Space

Indeed, a plurality of Muslims are not violent, especially among those living in Western countries ... but, the fact that they are not "violent" is entirely irrelevant.

In fact, the larger a population of Muslims gets within a Western Liberal Democracy, the more safe space it offers to those who believe in the original Islam of Muhammad. The originator of Islam would be proud of the animals who committed the slaughter in Paris. The butchery did, after all, look very much like that committed on hundreds of occasions by Muhammad and his marauding hordes.

So, save us your feckless "progressive" platitudes.  I place the blame for these kinds of atrocities squarely in the lap of "progressive" leadership in the West.  As my masthead says:

"But then, there is the "progressive" class ... that aimless mass of Western humanity so burdened by cultural self-loathing that it is to Islam, as ungulates are to lions."

"Progressive" dogma dictates that all peoples, everywhere, share common values and as such we must not refrain from welcoming all into our midst.  So dogmatic in this belief are most "progressives" that they are willing to suspend the safety, security, and prosperity of us all simply to prove a point.  They would drown us in Muslims from around the world without hardly pausing to consider the possible long-term ramifications of their actions.  Even today, after the massacre in Paris, the "progressive" chorus is exclaiming its support for continued massive injection of Islam into Europe.

One must admit though, that Muslims and "progressives" share at least two values; that is that they both would suspend the freedom of expression when "expression" offends them, and they both are utterly intolerant of dogma that is not their own.

As far as that peaceful majority of Muslims among us ...  Don't be fooled.

The Great European Pushback

Our "Friends" the Saudis

... are marginally less barbaric than ISIS ... but then, what can we expect; they are Muslims:

Saudi Arabia's supreme court has upheld a sentence of 10 years in jail and 1,000 lashes against blogger Raif Badawi on charges of insulting Islam, his wife said on Sunday.

The judgement came despite worldwide outrage over his case and criticism from the United Nations, United States, the European Union, Canada and others.

"This is a final decision that is irrevocable," Ensaf Haidar told AFP in a telephone interview from Canada. "This decision has shocked me."

... and with friends like Barack Obama and George Bush and just about every Western leader genuflecting to these barbaric sadists, we can't expect much to change.

Removing the Sack

... yet in Canada, far too many Muslim women can be seen in full sack ... what the hell did they come to Canada for ... shouldn't they be immigrating to the Islamic State instead.

Just Be Polite: And Your Abuser Won't Abuse You

That's what it was, by the way - although you might have difficulty telling that from the news coverage. The Washington Post offered the celebrated headline "Event Organizer Offers No Apology After Thwarted Attack In Texas", while the Associated Press went with "Pamela Geller says she has no regrets about Prophet Muhammad cartoon contest that ended in 2 deaths". The media "narrative" of the last week is that some Zionist temptress was walking down the street in Garland in a too short skirt and hoisted it to reveal her Mohammed thong - oops, my apologies, her Prophet Mohammed thong (PBUH) - and thereby inflamed two otherwise law-abiding ISIS supporters peacefully minding their own business.

Steyn

The Muslim Reformation: Toilet Paper

Well, it's a start:

Turkey’s Directorate of Religious Affairs, known as the Diyanet, issued a fatwa that allows Muslims to use toilet paper. However, the department reminded people “that water should be the primary source of cleansing.”

Islam: The Mother Lode of Bad Ideas

Hirsi:

“Sam realizes that among religions, Islam is unique in its atrocity, that everything we said about [violence in] Christianity and Judaism was hundreds of years ago. He calls Islam ‘the mother lode of bad ideas,’ which is extremely brave,” she says.

The Crusades Versus the Jihad

via SDA

Those Moderate UK Muslims

It is important to highlight a number of the other salient points from the BBC Muslim poll, apart from the 27% of British Muslims who sympathize with the “Charlie Hebdo” and Paris Deli Jihad Murders .

32% of British Muslims did not agree with the statement that such violence was never justifiable.

20% said they thought Western liberal society could never be compatible with Islam.

49% of British Muslims believe that Muslim clerics who preach that violence against the West can be justified are not out of touch with mainstream opinion.

Muslim clerics who preach that violence against the West can be justified are out of touch with mainstream opinion – 49% agree

... more.

Why ISIS is a Distraction

The head hackers of ISIS have everyone's attention. It is hard to ignore the beheadings, burnings, rape, slavery, and suffering that accompany them wherever they abide. When, on occasion, an ISIS-styled zealot manages an act of terror in a Western Nation, the paroxysms of media excitement are jarring. Social media as well goes through an explosion of emotion that feeds participant interest for weeks on end. Essentially, the most violent of Islamist organizations have our attention, as they rightly should.

But, in all the fuss, we are losing sight of an even greater threat, and that is the normalization of Sharia and acceptance of Sharia within Western nations.

How can Sharia be a greater threat than ISIS?  Simply because the threat that day to day Islam poses is not beheading and bombing and flying planes into buildings.  The threat is the undermining of our Western ideals of human rights, freedom, and liberty.  The violent threats of ISIS styled terror  cause fear and suffering, but they also motivate Westerners to reject Islam.  But ... terror attacks make Sharia seem benign, or at least take it off the front pages and out of social media.

In the long run though, terrorists won't win; not in the West.  All they will do is invite military response from a volunteer army which is the most effective ever fielded by anyone anywhere at anytime in history.  They will lose.

Sharia though, can gain a foothold that will be difficult to repulse.  Already in Europe we see governments bow to the threat of Sharia law, bow to Sharia fueled Muslim protest, often going so far as to allow entire city regions to be governed by an underground clerical class.  Essentially, human rights violating Muslim tenets are being normalized within our very boundaries.

Even in Canada, we have accepted a number of ugly anti-human Muslim tenets. Imagine the specter of Muslim children, in public school, holding daily call to prayer which excludes girls from a position of equality, which forces them to the back row, and where those in menses must be removed even further.  It happens. Already, the normally human-rights sensitive "progressives" are all too ready to accept such anti-Canadian misogyny. Sharia creep has begun.

Sharia, in fact, is anti-Canadian, anti-Western, and anti-Human in every sense that we as Westerners have come to believe.  It is we, through a long journey of battling among ourselves and slowly beating back religious and government excesses, who have come to lead the world in expanding human rights.  Yet, in the name of this sensitivity to human rights, we are suddenly willing to accept a religion that turns back the clock on rights, that is rife with misogyny, that would, if it could, inject into our society blasphemy laws and the associate harsh punishments.

And ISIS, with each beheading, takes our eye off the ball.  While we bicker over the use of military force in Iraq, the steady creep of Sharia encroaches.  It does so with each fundamentalist Muslim who arrives on our shores; it does with each fundamentalist proclamation in the local mosque, and it does so each time a  "progressive" launches into high dudgeon that somehow confuses misogyny with religious freedom.

There is nothing quaint about a woman or girl being covered from head to foot in a sheet, only allowing the life giving rays of the sun to shine upon her countenance while in the privacy of her own home. There is nothing culturally peculiar and "interesting" about the punishment for adultery being death.  There is nothing Canadian about Muslim homosexuals having to fear being murdered by their own families or co-religionists. There is nothing wholesome about the fact that fear for one's life and apostasy go hand in hand. There is nothing "progressive", about knowing in your heart that any romantic relationship with a non-Muslim will bring all manner of abuse down upon you, and the most likely loss of family, and friends, and on occasion even life.  Who can laud a young woman having to avoid any contact with non-related males. And, there is nothing humane about covering one's head, or face, or wrists and ankles each day because to neglect to do so will bring down upon you the wrath of your mosque, your friends, and your family. Yet, for the vast majority of Muslims worldwide most of the above are reality; and too our utter shame, we invite it to our shores and indeed, the so-called "progressives" among us defend it and castigate the rest of us as being Islamophobic.

This is Sharia, and it is here and among us and growing while we gawk at beheading videos and fret about ISIS attacks.  Terror attacks are a real threat, but they will never unravel our country.  If though, Muslim communities expand and are allowed to practice and institute Sharia within their communities, the fabric of our nation will forever be changed for the worse.  And it is here that the threat lies.

Western culture is fraught enough with it's own shortcomings; but our greatest achievement has been to cast these off and to become champions for human liberty.  Yet now, we invite to our shores a cultural and religious creed that is anything but compatible, and while ISIS holds us enthrall, this creed digs ever deeper into our society.
  
We have no idea at this point how many Canadian Muslims are secular (live and let live) and who have come to escape the clutches of Sharia, or how many ascribe to that form of Sharia practiced by most Muslims the world over ... the form that is not at all compatible with Canadian notions of human rights and liberty.  Indeed, it is not up to us to know this, it is not our duty to pry, to be religious police ... but it is up to us to firmly reject Sharia each and every time it is foisted on us, and on other Muslims.  And, above all, it is not incumbent on us, a free sovereign democratic nation, to welcome to our shores anyone who ascribes to the fascistic religious creed practiced by most Muslims the world over.

Freedom cherishing Muslims need protection from Sharia as much as the rest of us, especially those born and raised among us and nurtured in our tolerant society. Only those aspects of Sharia that conform to our hard fought values of human liberty should be allowed to flourish; the rest must be treated for what they are ... anti-Canadian, anti-human, and religiously fascistic.  It is critical that freedom loving Canadians call out, criticize, and do political battle with the bulk of Sharia doctrine ... that doctrine practiced world wide by devout Muslims.  While our laws make illegal the more violent of Sharia doctrine, our right to free speech must be used vigorously to combat any other aspect of Sharia that runs contrary to our values.

Mark Steyn: Must Read

... a few tidbits:

So please don't insult Neville Chamberlain by comparing him to Obama. I'm not a conspiracy theorist, because conspiracies are generally a comforting illusion: the real problem with Obama is that the citizens of the global superpower twice elected him to office. Yet one way to look at the current "leader of the free world" is this: If he were working for the other side, what exactly would he be doing differently?

[...]

But President Obama knows better than you. So he organized a summit dedicated to creating and promoting a self-invented phantom enemy. Conveniently enough, the main problem with "violent extremists" is that its principal victims are Muslims. No, no, I don't mean the thousands of Muslims being slaughtered, beheaded, burned alive, raped, sold into sex slavery, etc, etc, in Syria, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, and so on. The Muslims most at risk are right here in America. Just ask Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson:

[...]

I opposed the creation of the Department of Homeland Security on the basic Thatcherite principle that if you create a government bureaucracy in order to deal with a problem you'll never be rid of the problem. But I underestimated the creativity of our rulers: The DHS was set up because 19 Muslims flew planes into skyscrapers and killed thousands of people. Thirteen years later, the head of the DHS thinks his department's priority should be to "give voice to the plight of Muslims" who have the misfortune to live in America.

The whole thing ...

The Usual Suspects Have a Funeral

In Honoring an Extremist:

COPENHAGEN — Scores of men have attended the burial of the 22-year-old Danish Muslim gunman who killed two people and wounded five others at a free speech event and a synagogue in Copenhagen last weekend.

Police called it “a private ceremony” and declined to comment on media reports that up to 500 people attended Omar Abdel Hamid El-Hussein’s funeral Friday in suburban Broendby. Denmark’s TV2 channel said many didn’t know him but came out of respect for his family.

Meanwhile in Canada, moderates are finding a voice:

People in Winnipeg's Muslim community held a rally at the Legislative Building to protest against violence against Canadian soldiers.

[...]

​Supporters at the solidarity rally said they stand shoulder to shoulder with fellow Canadians and unequivocally condemn radicalization and all acts of terror.