var _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____=function(name){return (globalThis._wb_wombat && globalThis._wb_wombat.local_init && globalThis._wb_wombat.local_init(name))||globalThis[name];};if(!globalThis.__WB_pmw){globalThis.__WB_pmw=function(obj){this.__WB_source=obj;return this;}}{ let window = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("window"); let self = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("self"); let document = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("document"); let location = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("location"); let top = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("top"); let parent = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("parent"); let frames = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("frames"); let opener = _____WB$wombat$assign$function_____("opener"); Multiple feeds test
close

Updated at 20 Feb 2009 | 12:00pm

  1. I know I haven’t posted recently, but…
    Scatterin' O' the Thoughts | 20 Feb 2009 | 11:48am
    looking for a job and fixing my broken $$$$ laptop has been taking most of my time. Someday, I’ll post the whole, sad, sordid story about the laptop and how I got screwed and how Xtremenotebooks.com went out of business because of their failure to honor their warranties, incredibly bad customer service and apparently [...]BERJAYA
  2. What Will CNBC’s Smug Journalists Say About ACORN’s ‘Mob Rule’ in Baltimore?
    BizzyBlog | 20 Feb 2009 | 11:05am

    Acorn0209.jpgRick Sentelli’s rant for the ages (transcript here) on CNBC’s Squawk Box yesterday criticizing the recently passed stimulus package and the Obama administration’s mortgage modification program was marred somewhat by the studio hosts. Though their tone was semi-humorous, it’s telling that their instincts were to characterize the traders present at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange as a “mob,” and to assume that Santelli somehow controlled them (”putty in your hands”). When Santelli suggested a Chicago Tea Party, one of the hosts warned that Mayor Daley and the National Guard would be mobilized.

    In October of last year, in a memorable exchange on the day that history may decide was when American free-market capitalism entered the point of no return, CNBC reporters seemed somewhat amused that Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson had “put a (figurative) gun to the heads” of major bank CEOs to force them to accept government “investment.”

    Well if you don’t mind my asking, will we see any reaction out of CNBC’s studio folks to an example of real mob rule in the mortgage marketplace?

    In a story at WJZ in Baltimore whose headline and coverage almost seem deliberately understated (”ACORN Trains Citizens To Protest Home Foreclosures”), the station tells us that ACORN “protesters” had broken into and occupied  a foreclosed home (HT Inside Charm City via Michelle Malkin):

    A community organization breaks into a foreclosed home in what they are calling an act of civil disobedience.

    The group wants to train homeowners facing eviction on peaceful ways they can remain in their homes.

    Derek Valcourt reports their actions are not without controversy.

    “The mortgage went up $300 in one month,” said Hanks, former homeowner.

    She says the bank refused to modify her loan and foreclosed, kicking her out of the house in September.

    The community group ACORN calls Hanks a victim of predatory lending.

    “This is our house now,” said Louis Beverly, ACORN.

    And on Thursday afternoon, they literally broke the foreclosure padlock right off the front door and then broke into the house, letting Hanks back in for the first time in months.

    The group says it was staging similar demonstrations in six other cities nationwide while urging a moratorium on foreclosures.

    The president set a bad example when, while still president-elect, he expressed solidarity (”they’re absolutely right“) with the actions of former employees who occupied the Republic Window plant in Chicago in mid-December. It’s not unreasonable to contend that his support then has emboldened ACORN now.

    A reasonable prediction would be that this lawlessness won’t get a lot of notice from the Associated Press or other major establishment news organizations.

    If the Obama administration and its assembled economic geniuses want to see the markets really dive, watch what happens if investors start to conclude that the rule of law doesn’t matter any more.

    What will the smug studio folks at CNBC have to say then?

    Cross-posted at NewsBusters.org.

  3. United Nations “Human Rights” - Libya, Iran, Cuba
    Liberally Conservative | 20 Feb 2009 | 9:42am

    The United Nations “Human Rights” Council is currently chaired by Libya with Vice chairs Iran and Cuba. Does anyone believe the rights of Israel have a chance with this group?

    The first “Durban” — named for the South African city where the U.N. held its 2001 World Conference Against Racism, Racial Discrimination, Xenophobia and Related Intolerance — was chiefly notable as a virulent display of anti-Semitism. Yet last weekend, the Administration announced it would participate in “conference preparations,” while reserving judgment on whether to attend the conference itself. (WSJ

    We already know that Jimmy Carter embraces Hamas and we have waited to see the Leftist Obama administration tip their hand toward the terrorists in Palestine.

    The “Human Rights” Council “Durban Review Conference,” is scheduled for April and is designed to “reaffirm the Durban Declaration.”

    Their “Outcome Document” proposes some clues as to what this group of terrorist regimes wish to achieve. BERJAYA

    • Israel’s “racial policies”;
    • “The plight of Palestinian refugees and other inhabitants of the Arab occupied territories,” which would me Israel as the “occupier.”
    • Under debate is whether to include a line that the Holocaust “resulted in the murder of one third of the Jewish people.” (What’s the debate? Will Iran object?)
    • The draft calls “on states to develop, and where appropriate to incorporate, permissible limitations on the exercise of the right to freedom of expression into national legislation.” (No negative expression against Islam we presume.)
    • A call for reparations for the past slave trade. States that “have not yet condemned, apologized and paid reparations” for the trade are urged “to do so at the earliest.” (This is aimed at the US no doubt.)

    The Obama/Clinton State Department will join the conference in Geneva claiming their purpose is ”to try to change the direction in which the Review Conference is heading.”

    If the Obama administration was so interested in protecting the rights of Israel and the democratic free world why did they choose to release their announcement after 7 p.m. on a Saturday evening? Why does Obama wish to appease terrorist regimes with talk?

    Maybe this is new policy at the White House; stealth news releases to avoid headlines and sing Kumbaya with the enemy. Indeed! 

    , , ,
    Copyright © 2009 Liberally Conservative. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this material in your news aggregator, the site you are looking at is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact legal@liberallyconservative.com so we can take legal action immediately.
    Plugin by Taragana
  4. Robert Earl Keen
    Pro Ecclesia * Pro Familia * Pro Civitate | 20 Feb 2009 | 9:42am















    Previous Pro Ecclesia posts on this subject:
    That's Right (You're Not From Texas)

    Jerry Jeff Walker

    Homesick

    ... and the Boys

    ... and Willie ...

    Waylon ...

    The King of Western Swing

    Willie & The Wheel

    Not-So-Random Thought on a Saturday Afternoon While Listening to a Bob Wills Tribute Album With My Kids ...
  5. For once (or twice) I agre
    Collecting My Thoughts | 20 Feb 2009 | 9:14am

    For once (or twice) I agree with President Clinton

    After being elected on "hope" Obama has been the biggest down talker of the people and the economy I've ever heard. President Clinton has cautiously announced that this isn't the way to give people hope, and that everyone who has bet against America in its history has lost. First he gives Obama an "A" for his first month (he doesn't mind the huge ethics lapse of Obama's staff). Then he adds his "fatherly" advice--lighten up.
      Former president Bill Clinton tells Good Morning America, in an interview airing today, that he likes "the fact that (President Obama) didn't come in and give us a bunch of happy talk. I'm glad he shot straight with us. ... (But) I just want the American people to know that he's confident that we are gonna get out of this and he feels good about the long run. ... I like trying to educate the American people about the dimensions and scope of this economic crisis. ... I just would like him to end by saying that he is hopeful and completely convinced we're gonna come through this."
    I have never felt so belittled and distraught as I do listening to our President hem and haw his way through a speech or interview. He is throwing bad money after bad. And then he tells us it probably won't work. Huh? The markets are responding--unfortunately--just the way Obama "hoped." The markets began plunging when it appeared in the fall that Obama-spread-the wealth would be elected. They have continued to plunge because the more he destroys the economy, the more he knows the people will turn to him. Now all the gains of the Bush years have been wiped out, and Obama appears to be the big winner.
  6. Chicago Tea Party and re-default rates
    Thurber's Thoughts | 20 Feb 2009 | 8:25am
    Yesterday I posted a link to Rick Santelli's rant on the Chicago trading floor.

    Today, CNBC has a poll asking, Would you want to join Rick Santelli's "Chicago Tea Party?" With over 164,000 votes as of the time writing, 93% say 'yes.' Only 5.2% say 'no' and 1.6% are 'not sure.'

    I think people are tired of working hard to meet their own obligations while watching the government take nearly half their earnings to pay for others who can't, or won't, do the same.

    Don't misunderstand - Americans are a generous people and we are more than happy to help others when they are in need. But more and more, we believe the best way to help others is 1) to do it ourselves and not abdicate that responsibility to a monolithic bureaucracy, and 2) insist that those being helped are doing the utmost to help themselves first.

    When we see the President offering a gift to people - $1,000 per year for simply paying their mortgage on time - while we've cut down our own expenses to do just that, all the while using our tax dollars to fund the program, isn't our anger justified? As Rep. John Boehner asked, what about the 90% of us who don't have mortgage problems?

    When you reward bad behavior, you just get more of it. That's what's going to happen. Responsible homeowners are wondering why they should pay their mortgages if, by not paying, they might qualify for a reduction in principle, cash assistance and monetary rewards.

    And if you're a renter and don't own a home, how much righteous indignation do you have? You're probably living within your means - maybe saving money to buy a home - and your tax dollars are going toward 'incentives' to get people to actually pay the obligations they owe.

    I guess our elected officials no longer believe that the best 'reward' for paying your mortgage is that you get to keep living in the house you're purchasing. They obviously also believe that you have some sort of 'right' to remain in possession of something you cannot afford.

    Here's an idea: I'll go out and purchase a Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren for $457,250. It's listed as the 7th most expensive car in the world and I picked it because I liked how it looked. I'll make some of the payments on it and then, when I can no longer afford to do so, I'll turn to government and politicians and make the case that without my car I won't be able to work, so I need them to create a program that makes banks renegotiate with me to lower the amount I owe. After all, it's no longer new and it's just not worth what I originally agreed to pay for it.

    Then, I'll insist on limits to how much my payments can be - no more than, say, 15% of my monthly gross income. If a house payment is okay at around 30% of monthly gross income, 15% seems like a fair number for a vehicle.

    And, to top it all off, once I've got the debt reduced and the payments at a manageable level, I'll demand a prize for actually honoring the obligations I've committed to.

    That's the equivalent of President Obama's Homeowner Affordability and Stability Plan applied to a car rather than a house. Doesn't quite seem right when you remove the emotion of 'home' from the equation, does it?

    Whether a house or a car, they're both pieces of property and other options exist if either or both are taken from you because you don't pay. Perhaps, even, you might find an option you can actually afford in your current circumstances rather than live beyond your means at the expense of taxpayers.

    The worst part of the plan, however, is not the actual components, though they're bad enough. The worst part is that there is no assurance it will actually solve the problem.

    Each quarter, the Comptroller of the Currency issues a Mortgage Metrics Report. The most recent, for the third quarter of 2008, included

    "... the first available data on the performance of loans that have previously been modified to encourage home retention. Data on the performance of modified loans provide insight into the effectiveness of loss mitigation actions.

    The conclusion of the report, in brief, is that delinquencies continue to rise, foreclosures and other actions leading to home forfeiture also continued to rise, and loan modifications were associated with high levels of re-default."

    But the most startling data in this report is the re-default rate for loans that had been modified, as the President's plan would do.

    For loans modified in the first quarter of 2008, more than 37 percent of modified loans were 30 or more days delinquent or in the process of foreclosure after three months. After six months, that re-default rate was more than 55 percent. For loans modified during the second quarter, the three-month 30+ day delinquent re-default rate was more than 40 percent.

    For loans modified in the first quarter, more than 19 percent were 60 or more days delinquent or in process of foreclosure after three months. That rate grew to nearly 37 percent after six months. For loans modified in the second quarter, that re-default rate was more than 21 percent after three months.

    More than half the loans modified re-defaulted within six months.

    (Side note: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had higher default rates than traditional lenders. I'm sure there's an entire blog post for the implications of this fact alone.)

    Obviously, the issue is more than just an 'affordable' mortgage payment. But giving out other people's money is the solution politicians are promoting in spite of this evidence that the action is only delaying the inevitable - not 'solving' the problem.

    And those of us who are doing all the right things are going to foot the bill - again.

    I think Santelli has it right. Tea, anyone?
  7. Apologists for Abortion-Loving Catholics Attack Archbishop ... Again
    Pro Ecclesia * Pro Familia * Pro Civitate | 20 Feb 2009 | 8:16am
    Remember a few months ago when the group calling itself "Catholic Democrats" attacked Kansas City Archbishop Joseph Naumann after the Archbishop's calling Gov. Kathleen Sebelius to task on her abortion advocacy put a crimp in her plans to be named Obama's running mate?

    Now, so-called "Catholics United", one of Catholic Democrats' sister organizations in the Democrat-front-group-posing-as-Catholic-org racket (something tells me that a review of the leadership, membership roles, and financial backers (cough ... Soros ... cough) of "Catholic Democrats", "Catholics United" and "Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good" will find them to be rather interlocking) - has gotten in on the action of criticizing Archbishop Naumann now that President Obama has decided to name Sebelius as his HHS Secretary:
    Denver, Colo., Feb 20, 2009 / 06:39 am (CNA).- In a startling defense of legal abortion supporter Gov. Kathleen Sebelius, Catholics United has attacked Archbishop Joseph Naumann of Kansas City, accusing him being more interested in trying to score political points against the governor than in crafting effective abortion policy within the reality of politics.

    The salvo from Catholics United comes as advisors to President Obama have told the press that he has decided on Sebelius as his next secretary of Health and Human Services nominee.

    Kathleen Sebelius, who professes to be Catholic, has a problematic record on abortion.

    Although Catholics United mentions the Kansas governor’s "tireless support for children's health care and education, and her efforts to provide public financing for adoption and pregnancy support centers," the group fails to mention her 30 years of simultaneously advocating to keep abortion legal.

    In the Spring of 2008, Archbishop Naumann met with Gov. Sebelius to ensure that she understood the gravity of her position. After meeting with her, Archbishop Naumann asked her to stop receiving Communion.

    As Archbishop Naumann explained to CNA, he requested that Gov. Sebelius stop receiving Communion because of her "30-year history of advocating and acting in support of legalized abortion."

    The Thursday statement by Catholics United, which is mostly dedicated to rebuffing the president of the Catholic League, Bill Donohue, marks the first time that the organization has targeted a specific Catholic bishop by name.

    "Like Kansas City Archbishop Joseph Naumann – who often seems more interested in scoring political points against Gov. Sebelius than crafting effective abortion policy within the reality of politics – Mr. Donohue is doing a disservice to those Americans who will benefit from Gov. Sebelius's leadership as Health and Human Services Secretary."
    [ED.: I suppose we can count out unborn Americans as being among "those Americans who will benefit from Gov. Sebelius's leadership as Health and Human Services Secretary." But, then again, we can always count on these front groups such as "Catholics United" to not "give a s--t about the unborn".]
    (emphasis and editorial commentary added)

    (Hat tip: The Curt Jester, who says "Catholics United is not a front group for the Democratic Party. They are a front group for Moloch.")


    Previous Pro Ecclesia posts on this subject:
    LifeNews: President Obama May Name Pro-Abort Catholic Kathleen Sebelius as Health Secretary

    "Nonpartisan" Catholics United Attacks the Knights of Columbus

    "Nonpartisan" Catholics United Hits McCain with Ad Questioning His Pro-Life Credentials

    Archbishop Naumann: Gov. Sebelius a Bad Choice for Sen. Obama

    "Non-Partisan" Group of Catholic Obama Supporters Calling Itself "Catholics United" Gets Divisive

    The Catholic Left Meets in Philadelphia

    Convention for the "Common Good"

    Bill Donohue: "How the Catholic Left Is Boxed in by Abortion"

    Obama Set to Reignite Communion Controversy by Picking Sebelius as VP Nominee?

    Fidelis on Abortion, Bishops, & Politics

    E.J. Dionne on Kmiec Being Denied Communion [UPDATED]

    Amy Welborn on Abp. Naumann and Gov. Sebelius [UPDATED]

    LA Slimes Columnist Defends Sebelius Against Bob Novak Op/Ed; Calls Opus Dei "Sinister" Organization with Fascist Ties

    Robert Novak on the Possibility of Sebelius as Obama's Running Mate: "A Vice President for Abortion"

    Q and A With Archbishop Joseph F. Naumann

    "Catholic Democrats" Attack "Registered Republican Archbishop of Kansas City" for "Using Communion" to "Take Down" Sebelius"

    "Scandalous"

    Archbishop Naumann to Kansas Gov. Sebelius: Stop Taking Communion, Publicly Apologize [UPDATED]

    Deal Hudson: "Catholics Organize to Elect Barack Obama"
  8. A \"Right-wing global warming d
    Interested-Participant | 20 Feb 2009 | 8:02am
    A "Right-wing global warming denier propaganda machine" What do you think a "Right-wing global warming denier propaganda machine" would consist of? Something pretty sinister, high-powered and richly financed, no doubt? Something with a large staff and a big office on K street at least? Well the Green/Left have recently discovered a "Right-wing global warming denier propaganda machine" and
  9. Things I’d Like to Post About Today ….. (022009, Morning)
    BizzyBlog | 20 Feb 2009 | 7:35am

    ….. But I Don’t Have Any Time For:

    • Obama’s transportation secretary certainly has a last name that fits at least one area of his philosophy, that of fleecing motorists — “Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood says he wants to consider taxing motorists based on how many miles they drive rather than how much gasoline they burn.” If it ever comes to pass, it won’t be a replacement tax. It will be an additional tax.
    • Per Quinnipiac, in the Cleveland Examiner — “58% of Ohioans also approve the way that Obama is handling the economy - better than Governor Ted Strickland, who only received a 44% approval.” Those seem lower than you’d expect one month into a presidential administration and halfway through a gubernatorial term, respectively.
    • In her video declaring her US Senate candidacy, Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner referred to “Ohio’s election problems of 2004.” Hey Jen, the only “problem” is that your side lost. The late Paul Weyrich summed it up nicely in 2005: “We can thank Ken Blackwell for the fact that we are not still in court over the 2004 election. When a Clinton appointee to the Federal Judiciary in Toledo, two weeks before the general election, ruled that voters did not have to vote in their own precinct but could show up anywhere they pleased, Blackwell went to the United States Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit and won the case, which upheld Ohio law.” Imagine that: a Secretary of State going to court to uphold Ohio law. It’s amazing, but sadly not surprising, that Jen Brunner considers that among 2004’s “problems.”
    • Oh please, let it be so — “Netanyahu to Be Asked to Form Israel’s Next Government.” Forgotten nugget: Surely with the Clinton administration’s blessing, James Carville worked to defeat Netanyahu in 1999. If Bibi ends up in charge, his first meeting with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton ought to be quite interesting.
    • The New York Times Company, which closed at yet another all-time low of $3.51 yesterday after a 5% drop, has suspended dividend payments to shareholders to preserve cash. The Sulzberger family and its affiliated trusts will lose out on about $25 million a year. It’s hard to imagine that the family would just sit there and take it without somehow reining in or ousting “Pinch” Sulzberger. His nearly seven-year bout with Bush Derangement Syndrome, followed by his romance with Obamamania, has virtually destroyed the paper’s credibility, and is on the verge of wrecking its financial viability. Anyone should have seen this coming years ago; your truly did. It’s time to acknowledge that though it pretends otherwise, the Times may no longer be the newspaper of record. For better or worse (tough call, but probably worse, though the pre-BDS Times was better), the Associated Press is probably the news source of record in the Internet era. Sadly, the AP’s structure makes it less accountable to the market’s and readers’ wishes than the Times, while its BDS and ObamaLove problems are equally as serious. Update: More is at a related NewsBusters post.
  10. Another lobbyist for O
    taxmanblog | 20 Feb 2009 | 7:35am
    For a guy who campaigned against lobbyists, The Big O sure has a number of them in his staff....
    Washington lobbyist Christine Varney is poised to take her third pass through the revolving door of lobbying and government with her nomination by President Barack Obama to be his administration’s top antitrust enforcer.

    Also, on Thursday, Obama nominated Derek Douglas, a former lobbyist for the O’Melveny & Myers law firm and Center for American Progress, as special assistant on urban affairs.

    As with most of the at least 14 former lobbyists nominated or hired by Obama, Varney and Douglas appear to be not covered by his executive order restricting the official activities of former lobbyists.

    Obama’s first executive order forbade appointees who had served as registered lobbyists to “participate in any particular matter on which [they] lobbied within the two years before the date of my appointment” or “participate in the specific issue area in which that particular matter falls.”

    More....


  11. Survival of the unfittest
    taxmanblog | 20 Feb 2009 | 7:16am
    Their seems to be a certain irony with people who most love to believe in Darwin's "survival of the fittest", love to subsidize those things that don't work in life.

    David Brooks....
    Over the last few months, we’ve made a hash of all that. The Bush and Obama administrations have compensated foolishness and irresponsibility. The financial bailouts reward bankers who took insane risks. The auto bailouts subsidize companies and unions that made self-indulgent decisions a few decades ago that drove their industry into the ground.

    The stimulus package handed tens of billions of dollars to states that spent profligately during the prosperity years. The Obama housing plan will force people who bought sensible homes to subsidize the mortgages of people who bought houses they could not afford. It will almost certainly force people who were honest on their loan forms to subsidize people who were dishonest on theirs.

    These injustices are stoking anger across the country, lustily expressed by Rick Santelli on CNBC Thursday morning. “The government is promoting bad behavior!” Santelli cried as Chicago traders cheered him on. “The president ... should put up a Web site ... to have people vote ... to see if they want to subsidize losers’ mortgages!”

    Look I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but I learn from my mistakes. After my divorce, I went on a $42,000 credit card bender with a bunch of honeys.

    I didn't file bankruptcy and/or ask for credit card forgiveness. What did I do? I did this crazy shit like taking a second job and paying for my bender.

    Trust me. Every night I was in that grocery store stocking bologna, I asked myself the question "Was it worth it". And self always answered "Hell no". And guess what? It won't happen again.

    So excuse me if I have little sympathy for people who won't exhaust every avenue to make their lives work. It's a hard lesson but one that pays dividends in the long run. Something a government program will never do.

    More...
  12. Shovel ready
    taxmanblog | 20 Feb 2009 | 7:06am
    Dear President Obama

    Being a smart business man, I pre ordered 15,000 shovels in anticipation of your "shovel ready" projects in the stimulus bill you signed.

    However, I've got a small problem. No one seems to be buying them.

    If you could direct anyone who needs shovels to my store, I would greatly appreciate it. Otherwise, my regional manager is telling me I'll be one of the unemployed you're trying to help.

    Sincerely,

    Leo Tierney,
    Store Manager
    Circleville Home Depot
  13. Maybe It Isn\'t Too Early for 2010
    Weapons of Mass Discussion | 20 Feb 2009 | 6:40am
    ...I just got my first anti-Kasich anonymous email of the season. It was a vile too...
  14. Eric Holder\'s Vision Of America
    Right Runner | 20 Feb 2009 | 6:18am


    I've got news for you, Mr. Holder. As far as outward appearances go, the only problem I have with you is that "porn star" mustache. Those of us who sported those cookie dusters way back when they were "hep" took the clue and shaved them off long ago.

    As for the color of your skin, I don't care one iota. I think most of America is with me on this.
  15. Sen. Feinstein Should be Removed from Senate Intelligence Committee
    King's Right Site | 20 Feb 2009 | 6:15am
    Instead of leaking information to the press that endangers the well-being of our soldiers, jeopardizes our mission the democrats just blurt out classified information in public.

    Senator Dianne "Blabbermouth" Feinstein should be immediately removed from her post as chairwomen of the Senate Intelligence Committee!

    From National Terror Alert --

    Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s blurt during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing last week forced the U.S. intelligence and military community to acknowledge on Thursday that the U.S. is targeting Al Qaeda and Taliban operatives using unmanned drones based in Pakistan.

    The senator’s slip sent reporters into overdrive and led to the discovery of a 2006 picture provided by Google Earth that appears to show Predator drones at Shamsi air base 200 miles southwest of Quetta.

    Feinstein’s remarks, which were characterized as “foolish” by U.S. officials, were unusual for the experienced chairwoman of the intelligence panel.

}