The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20101015101233/http://bldgblog.blogspot.com/2007/09/huge-pipes-in-middle-of-ocean.html
BLDGBLOG: Huge pipes in the middle of the ocean
close



Huge pipes in the middle of the ocean

James Lovelock – of Gaia hypothesis fame – has recently proposed using "millions of vertical pipes across the oceans to pump nutrient-rich deep water to the surface." This would "fertilise the growth of algae, which in turn [would] fix carbon dioxide" – thus helping to assuage the effects of industrial air pollution, reducing global warming.
"The pipes," we read, "reaching to depths of 200 metres, would have flap valves at the bottom operated by the energy of waves, which would push deep water up the pipe."
The future of architecture lies in weather control.

BERJAYA[Image: A "proprietary wave-driven ocean upwelling system" by Atmocean].

Lovelock's idea was apparently inspired by a New Mexican company called Atmocean. Atmocean suggested last year that "100 million 10-metre diameter pumps across the oceans could capture one-quarter of human-made CO2 emissions."
From Atmocean's website:
    When fully deployed, our 3m diameter by 200m deep pumps spaced 2 km apart will be positioned across 80% of the world’s oceans. A single pump consists of a buoy, flexible tube, valve assembly, cable between the buoy and cylinder, and solar panel to power communications & remote control. Pumps are connected one-to-the-next at the base 200 meters deep, forming large arrays which maintain position from the sea-anchor effect. The pumps self-deploy when dropped into the ocean from barges. Arrays will be deployed outside of the 200 mile territorial limit to avoid busy shipping lanes.
Those pipes – a "proprietary wave-driven ocean upwelling system" – might also reduce hurricane intensity.
The problem, however, is that this strategy might also release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, making global warming substantially worse.
But screw it: I say let's do it. It sounds fun. Huge, self-deploying pipes in the middle of the ocean? We could station poets there and publish their work as part of a national literary undertaking in one hundred years' time, offering stipends to 19-year olds willing to risk the oceanic loneliness. Stanzas at Sea.

BERJAYA[Image: Sunset near the deep ocean pipes, via Atmocean].

Meanwhile, we witness what Archigram would have built had they gone to school in an era defined by global climate change.

For posts older than a few days,

comments have to be moderated;

this takes a few hours. Thanks!


html is both okay and encouraged.





10 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

take a look at www.seawatergreenhouse.com

the weather makers are already hard at work...

September 27, 2007 1:20 AM  
Blogger michael said...

This is one of those terrible "we had to destroy the village in order to save it" ideas.

September 27, 2007 4:04 AM  
Blogger Bernhardt Varenius said...

Yes, I am a bit bothered by it too. For someone supposedly used to thinking ecologically, Lovelock seems to give the possible effects on the ocean ecosystem little serious thought.

September 27, 2007 10:11 AM  
Blogger bluefin said...

Wonder what the flow rate is and whether you could put a turbine in there

September 27, 2007 10:40 AM  
Blogger maxwell said...

yeah...wouldn't this totally upset the deep-water ecosystem that depends on that water?

September 27, 2007 11:35 AM  
Blogger Patrick said...

Control the weather? Well, we know what that leads to. "The Avengers." That's right. We don't want to live in crappy tv-to-film adaptation do we?

September 27, 2007 3:49 PM  
Blogger Brad said...

similar concept here:

http://www.stevens.edu/csw/cgi-bin/index.php?p=miller2006

September 27, 2007 4:27 PM  
Anonymous jhtrefry said...

Yes, but won't it attract megalodons?

September 28, 2007 8:56 AM  
Blogger Mark said...

The Atmocean site video uses a track from the Matrix soundtrack as they talk about their product. I kept hoping for people in tight black leather to start shooting the greenhouse gases in slow motion. With lots and lots of guns.

September 28, 2007 2:19 PM  
Anonymous John C said...

There was a letter in The Guardian today (http://www.guardian.co.uk/letters/story/0,,2180616,00.html) disputing the feasibility of this plan:

"There is a fundamental flaw in the idea that enhanced ocean mixing might provide a technological fix to counter global warming (How sea tubes could slow climate change, September 27). Deep, cold water is not only rich in nutrients but is also high in dissolved carbon dioxide, at a concentration that can be nearly twice as great as in the air. Bringing such water to the surface will, at least initially, have the opposite effect to that intended - releasing carbon dioxide and adding to the problem. It seems that neither James Lovelock, Chris Rapley or the editor of Nature checked this basic biogeochemistry before announcing their equivalent of a perpetual motion machine, that would anyway require a major energy investment (and carbon dioxide release) for its large-scale manufacture. "

Dr Phillip Williamson
UK Surface Ocean-Lower Atmosphere Study, University of East Anglia

October 01, 2007 4:57 PM  

Post a Comment