|
For The Trees
Who is our economy FOR, anyway? About the Authors: Dave Johnson John Emerson Richard Reich Thomas Leavitt
Recent Posts: BEST OF STF: Dave's: Articles not at STF: The ATLA Speech on building a progressive infrastructure Lowering the Bar The Attack on Trial Lawyers and Tort Law Who's Behind the Attack on Liberal Professors On the Right and their communications infrastructure: Why Republicans Win Win or Lose The "Conventional Wisdom" Machine Some History of the Conservative Movement HOW TO FIGHT BACK An Amplifier Of Our Own Don't Blame the Democrats How They Do It 1 2 3 4 Getting Rolled Other: You're Gonna Get Drafted Scalia and Self-Government Who is Our Economy For? Voting Machine Story Link Collection What's Wrong with this Picture? (Voting Machines) Like Meat in the Supermarket Get Active Thin Line 1 2 3 Fixing Social Security Seeing the Forest I, II, III "Incredibly Positive News" The Breadth of It The Republican Crony Club Moon Bush Ralph Nader is a Scab John's Best Of: Kerry Smear Page Bandar Bush 9/11 Commission Report Damages Bush -- if you read it Florida Goon Squad Intimidated the Supreme Court The Use and Abuse of George Orwell Zizka's Archives (John's previous identity) Zizka Sampler News Sources: AlterNet BuzzFlash Common Dreams Cursor Drudge Retort Information Clearing House Smirking Chimp TruthOut What REALLY Happened Links to Other Weblogs: |
 4/30/2003 OK, That's Over, So Where Were We? A while back the press was closing in on a number of issues of corruption involving both the President and Vice President and it started looking like Bush and Cheney were in some real legal trouble. But suddenly there were a lot of great big terror alerts, everyone look over there, everyone get scared, there's a big scary dragon, glorious leader will slay the dragon that is making you all scared, run around, run around, kill Iraq, frenzy, frenzy, kill Hitler, war, war, glorious leader HOORAY, HOORAY -- whatever. So tonite Bush is going to tell us that He has led us to Glorious Victory and the "threat to the United States from Baghdad has ended." OK. Well that's out of the way, then. So where were we? Oh yeah, Bush and Cheney and Harken and Haliburton and conflicts of interest and SEC investigations and insider trading and tax evasion and corporate corruption, and a whole bunch of other things were starting to hit the news. Take a look at BuzzFlash's Bush Harken insider trading collection. Remember the stories about Harvard bailing out Bush at Harken? There's more here from The Nation. What about Cheney's business dealings and the SEC investigation of his dealings at Haliburton? Remember hearing about Bush and Harken setting up offshore subsidiaries to dodge paying their taxes? I remember I had several questions. Does it all just go away? Is that how the American system of justice works now? Or is it time to start looking at this again, pick up where we left off? --- Posted at 4/30/2003 02:32:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post  
It's Privacy They Have A Problem With Read this story in today's NY Times, Republican Lawmakers Back Senator in Gay Dispute. This is a story about Republicans standing behind Sen. Santorum's bigoted comments about gays. But toward the end is this: Mr. Santorum, who did not speak in public today, has refused to apologize and said that his remarks were more directed at the right to privacy rather than homosexuality. He said his position was shared by a majority of the Supreme Court in upholding a Georgia antisodomy law in 1986.Got that? They justify this by saying that they don't just have a problem with gays, they have a problem with PRIVACY! So if you thought you were safe from the Republican jihad against gays because you aren't gay, (or perhaps you're one of those right-wing gays who is well hidden in the closet), you're wrong. It's PRIVACY that Republicans have a problem with. YOUR privacy. --- Posted at 4/30/2003 10:25:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/29/2003 Virtual March May 22 Please go read the latest about the May 22 Virtual March and tell others about this! Actually, I'll help you read it: MAY 22: VIRTUAL MARCH TO SUPPORT THE TROOPS --- Posted at 4/29/2003 03:00:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/28/2003 Dancin to Dean The Dean techno mix. No kidding. And it's good. Click here to download directly. --- Posted at 4/28/2003 04:15:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Corporate Personhood and Silencing of Dissent Lisa over at Ruminate This is going off about corporate personhood, and the consequences when big corporations decide they want to silence dissent, like what has happened to the Dixie Chicks. And she has some suggestions on what to do about it. Go read, and thanks to tendentious for pointing this out. --- Posted at 4/28/2003 03:30:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
The Right's Goals William Greider has a great piece in The Nation, Rolling Back the 20th Century talking about the goals of the right, and how they are doing in their drive to reach them. --- Posted at 4/28/2003 02:13:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Voting Machines in International Herald Tribune Britain to Launch Electronic Voting Systems. From the story: The basic problem in current electronic voting systems, the security experts say, is the lack of an audit trail that would enable all voters to verify for themselves in real time that their vote was recorded as they intended and was counted as they intended. --- Posted at 4/28/2003 01:12:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/27/2003 Howard Dean House Parties I attended two Howard Dean house parties yesterday. Both included conference calls with Gov. Dean. Take a look at The Dean Speech and you'll understand why people are excited about Dean's candidacy for President. He would be a great President AND he can win. I'm heading out for the day so I'll write more later. --- Posted at 4/27/2003 09:34:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
The Disappeared Does anyone know what's up with DailyKos? Update - They're back. --- Posted at 4/27/2003 08:29:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/25/2003 They Lied This post over at Daily Kos talks about Bush officials admitting they lied about weapons of mass destruction, because they wanted a war for "a global show of American power and democracy". This Daily Kos post, the stories it links to, and the comments following are not just worthy of a read, they are worthy of telling others to read as well. I just did. --- Posted at 4/25/2003 01:58:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
No Sharon Bush Book After All Over at skimble. --- Posted at 4/25/2003 01:49:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
U.S. Reporter Who Protested Iraq War Fired U.S. Reporter Who Protested Iraq War Fired tendentious covers this. Go there. --- Posted at 4/25/2003 01:38:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Howard Dean House Parties Tomorrow This is a little bit short notice, but this story in today's news prompts me to write -- GOP: Dean's Support of Gays Will Hurt Him WASHINGTON - Supporters of Howard Dean's presidential campaign will be celebrating Saturday's third anniversary of his signing of the nation's only law giving gay partners the same legal rights as married couples.Ah yes, the Party of the Confederacy trying to tell us all how to live our lives. Read the article, there's more. Tomorrow (Saturday) is National House Party Day for Howard Dean, starting several days of events to, as the campaign puts it, "Celebrate the 3rd Anniversary of Governor Dean signing the Vermont Civil Union Law and his stand as a Democratic Presidential candidate for equal rights". House parties are local events in people's houses to bring together supporters and raise funds for the campaign. There are also larger (fundraising) events in Los Angeles, San Francisco and New York during the week. I know that in San Francisco there is a "Greet Dean" rally outside before that event, Tuesday. That's at 6pm in front of the Ferry Building. Click this to find a house party in your area. Use the pop-up menu next to "City:" to choose the city nearest you. There is also a Dean for America Students page listing campus events. From the page: Campus action across the country on April 26th: Berkeley University. . .Scream for Dean and Ice Cream! --- Posted at 4/25/2003 09:31:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/24/2003 High Taxes on the Rich are GOOD FOR a Consumer Economy In a comment to the Gephardt Health Care piece below someone wrote something about Europe giving people health care helps their economy do well "despite" their high tax rates. That set me off. I wrote: What do you mean Europeans do well "despite" their high taxation?And one more thing. Taxes don't "take money out of the economy." That's just focus-group crap that sounds good as long as you don't start thinking for yourself. Taxes on the rich put money back into the economy. Here's how: If you tax a rich person, and spend that tax money building a road, what you get is you employ a hundred people and you also get a road. Maybe a better example is if you tax the rich and use the money build a solar power plant you employ a thousand people, get a source of renewable energy, stop importing so much damn oil from the Middle East, and also stop putting so much damn carbon into the atmosphere! (Tax the rich MORE and use LESS oil! If Bush or Cheney read THAT their heads would explode!) --- Posted at 4/24/2003 03:31:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
It's What They DO, Not What They SAY I left a comment in response to this post over at Daily Kos, discussing why there have been no weapons of mass destruction found in Iraq. You gotta learn to just ignore what these guys say -- EVERYTHING they say -- and look only at what they DO.Bush shows up in New York after 9/11 and promises billions of dollars for reconstruction and for the fire and police departments. It never shows up. Bush says his tax cuts won't cause deficits, as a way of getting Congress to vote to pass the tax cuts. Of course, they caused the biggest deficits in history. Bush does a photo-op at an environmental site, later they cut the funding. Bush talks about being the "Education President" and later cuts funding. Bush talks about patriotism and supporting the troops, then cuts the budget for veterans' benefits. Need I continue? The only relationship between what these guys say and what they do is they say whatever is necessary to trick the public into believing one thing while they do another thing. Under the Soviet system, people came to realize that they could not trust government sources of news. They learned to look for what was being done. Under Saddam Iraqis learned to trust what they saw instead of what they heard. By now the pattern is clear. By now we should all be learning not to waste our time and energy refuting their arguments. That's just getting yourself bogged down in the fog and smoke. That's just looking "over there" when they point their finger and shout, "Look over there!" Their "facts" and arguments are just trees. See the forest. The forest is this: they lie. They just lie. They say whatever their polls and focus groups tell them to say. Learn to see only what they do. --- Posted at 4/24/2003 12:01:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/23/2003 Virtual March for Veterans Update I previously posted about a "Virtual March" to support restoring the funds cut from the Veterans' benefits budget. The Watch has posted a more detailed piece on the subject and has reset the date to May 22. Please go read. This is such a great way to show our support for "the troops" where it counts. The chickenhawk Republicans and their propaganda machine crow about their "patriotism" and then turn around and cut veterans' benefits. This is a chance to seize their issue, publicize their hypocrisy AND, most important, to help out the vets. --- Posted at 4/23/2003 04:34:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Dean Calls For Santorum To Step Down Over at the Dean Call To Action Weblog, Dean says, Yesterday, I called on President Bush and the Republican Party leadership to condemn Senator Rick Santorum for his deeply offensive remarks comparing homosexuality to bigamy, polygamy, incest and adultery. As additional reports have come to light, revealing a disturbing history of inflammatory, anti-gay rhetoric by Senator Santorum, the deafening silence of President Bush and his party has become inexcusable.The next entry below that one has Dean's remarks yesterday on the subject, including: It is a policy that must end, and it is a policy that will end with a Dean Presidency. This Saturday, April 26th, marks the third anniversary of the signing of the Civil Unions bill in Vermont. I signed that bill because I believe no human being should be treated with less dignity than others simply because that person belongs to a different category or group. I also believe that, as Americans, it is our duty to speak up when others are treated wrongly—especially when others are treated wrongly by a member of the Senate leadership. --- Posted at 4/23/2003 10:47:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Gephardt - Repeal Tax Cuts, Provide Health Insurance Washington Post: Presidential candidate Dick Gephardt called for completely repealing Bush's tax cuts, and providing a tax credit to pay for employers to provide health care for all employees. In the story is a quote from "an operative from a competing campaign": "There isn't going to be a single candidate who disagrees with the goal that Gephardt has laid out," said an operative from a competing campaign. "However, by taking money out of the economy, which is what his plan would do, he will be criticized not only by the right, but by some Democrats, and by any economist worth his salt. The debate prior to this point has been about rolling back the unenacted portions of the tax cut, in large part because it is commonly understood by experts that taking money out of the economy in the midst of a downturn would only exacerbate that downturn."Now let's see if we can guess which competing campaign would exactly quote Bush, saying that "taxes take money out of the economy." Could it be ... LIEBERMAN? As a matter of fact, the tax CUTS take money out of the economy, causing layoffs of government workers as well as layoff of workers at companies that supply the government, and spending cuts by those laid-off workers in all the places they otherwise spend money, like clothing andgrocery stores, etc. and on like that through the economy while the Bush tax cuts just hand money to idle rich who then put the money in offshore accounts. On the other hand, this health care plan, paid for by repealing the tax cuts, would put $200 billion a year INTO the economy. I wonder if "any economist worth 'his' salt" -- and maybe some female economists as well -- would disagree with that? From the story, The Gephardt campaign asked Kenneth A. Thorpe, chairman of the health policy and management department at Emory University -- and a former Clinton White House adviser -- to do an analysis of the proposal. Thorpe concluded that the plan would cost about $214 billion a year and cover about 30 million of the nation's 41 million uninsured, resulting in about 97 percent of the population being insured.Not quite universal health coverage, but a big step. --- Posted at 4/23/2003 10:42:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/22/2003 Virtual March To Support Veterans The Watch is leading a "Virtual March" May 1 to restore funding for Veterans' benefits recently cut by Congress. Tell the government that if they're going to wrap their agenda in some kind of concern for people in uniform, they better show some serious concern for people in uniform.This is such a great idea I hope that you'll tell everyone about this, send e-mails, etc, asking people to phone their representatives on May 1, demanding restoration of full veterans' benefits! --- Posted at 4/22/2003 06:16:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Sweet'N Evil pseudorandom asks if the sugar industry is evil. --- Posted at 4/22/2003 12:46:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/21/2003 Blatant Corruption Over at Open Secrets you can see how all of the companies invited to bid on Iraq building contracts are major Republican Party donors. Companies were not even allowed to bid on projects if they were not big donors, and everything was done in secret! This is blatant corruption! This is blatant abuse of office. It is right out there in our faces, saying "you can't do anything about it so shut up!" And how come I have not heard every single Democrat screaming their lungs out about this? I wrote about this the other day, but it is just so bad, so blatant and so corrupt that I want to write about it again. I am restraining myself from using bold and italics. Thanks to Bitter Shack of Resentment for making me angry all over again. --- Posted at 4/21/2003 04:02:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
How Did I Miss This? How did I miss this from April 9 when I read Ruminate This almost every day? Must have been something big going on the last few weeks... Go see for yourself what I'm talking about. --- Posted at 4/21/2003 02:36:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Thom Hartmann On The Radio Thom's show starts today and I'm listening right now. You can listen over the internet! Go to ieamericaradio.com and click where it says "Listen Live" over on the left. You can also listen to Peter Werbe and Mike Malloy. Seeing the Forest has pointed to a number of articles by Thom Hartmann. --- Posted at 4/21/2003 09:31:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Luntzspeak.com Luntzspeak.com --- Posted at 4/21/2003 09:19:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/20/2003 Voting Machines Voting Machines, at Slashdot. (Good, if you know what Slashdot is and how it works. Otherwise ... ?) --- Posted at 4/20/2003 03:36:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
'A Chill Wind is Blowing in This Nation...' For anyone who hasn't yet read this -- please go read it. 'A Chill Wind is Blowing in This Nation...', Transcript of the speech given by actor Tim Robbins to the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., on April 15, 2003. Here is an excerpt: A chill wind is blowing in this nation. A message is being sent through the White House and its allies in talk radio and Clear Channel and Cooperstown. If you oppose this administration, there can and will be ramifications.And look at the great photo, too. I post this as much for you have a handy source for the speech, and can forward it to others, as for you to read it yourself. (Like The Dean Speech that I posted a source for previously.) Things that others should read. Things that can move people to think about making a difference. Things you should be passing around, as a way of making a difference yourself. As Robbins says later in his speech, "A bully can be stopped, and so can a mob. It takes one person with the courage and a resolute voice." What I'm saying here is, Go be that voice! --- Posted at 4/20/2003 02:19:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/18/2003 Good One at Bartcop There's a good one over at Bartcop. --- Posted at 4/18/2003 11:10:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
An Amplifier Of Our Own Michael Finley's weblog worldgonewrong amplifies on something I wrote recently about the need for a "left wing" Message Amplification Infrastructure to counteract the "Wurlitzer" of the right. (I wrote something here as well.) Also, the watch weblog addresses a related issue a the piece titled Framing the Message. Please read these two pieces. Ruminate This and Wealth Bondage have also written repeatedly on this subject. (Bloggers -- Please let me know if I missed you and I'll add you to this list.) (Update - Digby at Hullabaloo was writing this while I was woprking on the piece you are reading.) I am glad to see more weblogs writing about this issue of forming an organization that works to move people toward a more progressive perspective. It is so important to spread the word, and get people talking about the need for this. If you look at why the right has become so powerful and successful you see that they have a well-coordinated and well-funded web of organizations that pump out carefully crafted, coordinated right-wing propaganda to the masses, following long-term strategies, slowly moving public attitudes to the right, thereby generating UNDERLYING SUPPORT for their overall ideology. This is not about just PR and advertising for particular current issues, this is about the long-term ever-ongoing push of their overall ideological framework -- slowly pushing the public ever onward to the right with a steady drip, drip, drip of messaging. The messages are pounded out day after day, through books, magazine articles, talking points read by talk show hosts, TV pundits, newspaper commentaries, and many other outlets. The resulting shift of general underlying public attitudes then translates into ready-to-go support for their issues, their organizations, and finally, into votes for their politicians. THIS is how they have done it, and this is how we can do it, too. The solution - the way to win our country back - is to develop an infrastructure of our own that works to change underlying public attitudes in a general way, thereby supplying support that strengthens and reinforces progressive and moderate organizations, issues, and leaders in general. Here's a brief description of the goal of the Commonweal Institute, that I sent to someone just this morning: Commonweal is a think tank/communications organization that will work to bring positive progressive/moderate messages to the broad general public, working to change underlying attitudes. Think of Commonweal as a Heritage Foundation of the left.Commonweal is an organization working to help the public understand and support progressive and moderate positions in general, bringing them back from the right, and thereby bringing support for our (moderates and progressives) organizations, issues and leaders. This is the component that is missing from "our side's" approach to reaching our goals. This is "infrastructure" because this general issue work, directed at moving the general public away from the right in general, will underlie and support the work of all kinds of other organizations and leaders. And these organizations and leaders will be able to use the work of Commonweal, getting talking points and other messaging that has been developed by messaging and communication experts. To put it in a simpler way - if that rumored liberal talk-radio network gets started, Commonweal will give them things to say that is put together in ways that resonate with the general public. Take a look at the credentials of the communications specialists on Commonweal's advisory board. Specifically, people like George Lakoff, Laurie Dorfman, Efrain Fuentes, Celinda Lake, Harvey Gotliffe, Geoffrey Nunberg, Paul Ray, Brooke Warrick, David Zucker, and Joan Blades. This will help you understand the nature of what they mean by "communications organization." (The Framing the Message piece over at the watch discusses the works of George Lakoff.) Here's the endorsement Commonweal Institute recently received from House Democratic Leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi: "In these challenging times, we need an advocacy think tank like Commonweal Institute to communicate our principles and programs in ways that will resonate with the broad public and empower citizens to take a more active role in our democracy. Commonweal takes a strategic approach to advancing issues in a way that will help decision-makers be proactive in confronting the challenges of the future."From Jim Hightower: "It's always good to put your brain in gear before you put your mouth in motion. The folks at the Commonweal Institute do the heavy mental lifting so agitators like me can arm ourselves on the front lines of the ideological battles taking place every day in America. For too long progressives have walked fearful of their shadows, whimpering and whining about what's wrong and fighting amongst themselves over crumbs. With the help of the Commonweal Institute, that time is over."Congressman Mike Honda: "Moderate and progressive members of Congress need a substantial resource that can develop public support for our whole range of issues in a timely fashion, and defend our gains from right wing attacks. The Commonweal Institute is positioned to be that organization. I hope to see them grow quickly."Former U.S. Secretary of Labor Robert B. Reich "America needs a true marketplace of ideas, not a one-sided monologue by the right. At a time when airwaves and emails are filled with conservative voices, the Commonweal Institute is more important than ever."Imagine a public environment where people trying to bring environmental or peace issues to the public's attention, or running for office, don't have to start from scratch explaining why it is good to support strengthening community, protecting the environment, helping the poor, etc.! Imagine if each of us didn't have to constantly be on the defensive, fighting the widespread ideological nonsense spouted by Rush Limbaugh, before we even get a chance to start talking about what we believe in. Wouldn't it be nice to have an organization doing that for you? Working in the background to improve the public's attitudes about progressive/moderate ideals? Wouldn't it be nice to be able to be PROUD to say you're a "liberal" or a "moderate" or a "lefty?" It isn't up to the Democrats or the Greens or moderate Republicans to change people's underlying attitudes - politicians RESPOND to the public, and it is a mistake to blame them for what is going on or rely on them to fix it. Here is what I am trying to say today. This "infrastructure" concept is the solution that I have come to believe is the answer to the problems we face, and I think that anyone engaging in a comprehensive analysis of what is going on will also come to this conclusion. But this is a somewhat complicated issue, and it seems to take some time to understand. As more of us discuss what is going on and how the right has moved the public over time, and talk about the need for this approach, more people understand what we're saying and come to agree. And different and better ways to explain the concept will surface. Bloggers - please write about this. People - please talk to people about this. Funders - please fund this. It may be the most worthy cause. --- Posted at 4/18/2003 10:33:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/17/2003 President Dean Presidential Candidate Howard Dean has a piece over at Common Dreams today, Bush: It's Not Just His Doctrine That's Wrong. Here's how it begins: When Congress approved the President’s authorization to go to war in Iraq – no matter how well-intentioned – it was giving the green light to the President to set his Doctrine of preemptive war in motion. It now appears that Iraq was just the first step. Already, the Bush Administration is apparently eyeing Syria and Iran as the next countries on its target list. The Bush Doctrine must be stopped here.Go read more. And here's where to find his official weblog. --- Posted at 4/17/2003 03:56:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Look Busy Over at Liberal Oasis, Look Busy. --- Posted at 4/17/2003 03:25:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Only Donors To The Party Need Apply The construction contracts for "rebuilding Iraq" are being awarded a special way. A company is not even allowed to bid on a project unless invited. According to the Centre for Responsive Politics, the invited bidders together contributed almost $3.6m during the current election cycle, mostly to the Republicans. The amounts, though individually not large, are part of the process of ensuring a seat at the table, said Charles Tiefer, professor of law at Baltimore University and an expert in government contracting.The process of ensuring a seat at the table -- money to The Party. The Republican Crony Club. This is flat-out, blatant, in-your-face corruption -- and if you complain you are branded as a traitor to the country. And there is nothing you can do about it; there is no one but Party cronies in any kind of position to investigate this sort of thing. This should be spoken of by every single progressive elected official until every member of the public is informed! The right did that under the direction of Newt Gingrich. But look where that got them. --- Posted at 4/17/2003 02:55:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Redlining America There is a good piece over at Black Commentator, exploring the possible economic consequences of Bush alienating the world. Only a fool would not assume that last weekend's St. Petersburg summit of Germany, France and Russia was not consumed with the nuts and bolts of erecting defenses against American geopolitical aggression. And only foolish heads of state would admit it. Every actor in each emerging or mature economy is compelled to pursue alternatives to doing business with America, the rogue state that recognizes no rules but its own declarations. China's economy has surpassed Japan's and remains a command system, able to move as a body to favor or disfavor the United States if her political will is tested. --- Posted at 4/17/2003 02:32:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/16/2003 Was The Museum Looting Planned? Take a look at this story in London's [Correction - Glasgow's] Sunday Herald, from April 6, US accused of plans to loot Iraqi antiques. (Hint - the museum was looted after April 6.) There is a reason that Mike Malloy, on his radio show, talks about "The Bush Crime Family". From the Sunday Herald story: FEARS that Iraq's heritage will face widespread looting at the end of the Gulf war have been heightened after a group of wealthy art dealers secured a high-level meeting with the US administration.Now, combine that report with this, from CNN: They now believe, because of some of the evidence that they have found, that some of the items were taken [by art and cultural] professionals. Among other things they found were glass cutters that they said are not sold in Iraq. They are looking into that.Keep in mind that the Pentagon was fully aware of the need to protect these treasures, and had promised to do so. "I thought I was given assurances that sites and museums would be protected," Gibson said. Instead, even with U.S. forces firmly in control of Baghdad last week, looters breached the museum, trashed its galleries, burned its records, invaded its vaults and smashed or carried off thousands of artifacts dating from the founding of ancient Sumer around 3,500 B.C. to the end of Islam's Abbasid Caliphate in 1258 A.D.So, they promised to protect the museum, but when the looting was happening they instead refused. Meanwhile professionals from outside Iraq were ready to enter the museum and take what they wanted. Does this sound like the looting of the museum was planned and coordinated with Bush officials? Would this really be a surprise? Thanks to Cursor, and especially, pfaffenBlog. Please go read pfaffenBlog's much more thorough look at this! Thursday Update - San Jose Mercury News, Experts: Looters Had Keys to Iraqi Vaults: "It looks as if part of the looting was a deliberate planned action," said McGuire Gibson, a University of Chicago professor and president of the American Association for Research in Baghdad. "They were able to take keys for vaults and were able to take out important Mesopotamian materials put in safes."It really looks like there's something to this! One problem, however, where the guy says, "if a good police team was put together" -- fat chance the Bush administration will want to investigate. --- Posted at 4/16/2003 04:24:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
skimble I love visiting skimble. Always good stuff there. --- Posted at 4/16/2003 04:06:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Who's Your Daddy? I think "Who's Your Daddy?" is a great name for a weblog. tendentious says it's "relentlessly stupid!" Who is right? Leave a comment. Update - he informs me he meant that I am "relentlessly stupid!" Leave a comment. --- Posted at 4/16/2003 02:39:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
The Wurlizter Go read about the Wurlitzer at worldgonewrong. --- Posted at 4/16/2003 02:11:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
SARS Deaths - Uh Oh I have been reading this report over at The Agonist. It looks like the SARS death rate is higher than we have been thinking. To sum up -- we have ben comparing the total number of reported cases to the current number of deaths. The problem is that a SARS case shows up and is reported 1-3 weeks before death, so we really should be comparing the number of deaths with the number of cases reported 1-3 week previous. To understand this, hypothetically suppose the number of deaths is 100 and the number of reported cases is 2000. That makes it appear that the death rate is 5%. But if these 100 deaths represent 1000 SARS cases 2 weeks back, then the death rate is really 10%. Go read the report. Update, from the report: Close personal contact or being directly in front of a person with SARS, who is coughing or sneezing, is likely the most common way that SARS spreads. SARS can likely be transmitted by other means, and these are under investigation.Wash your hands, a lot! Start making it a habit now. --- Posted at 4/16/2003 12:32:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/15/2003 Repeal the 22nd Amendment Something else I was going to write about -- the Republicans have introduced a resolution to repeal the 22nd Amendment to the Constitution. This is the amendment that limits Presidents to two terms. (Think Clinton in 04.) But I see that Blah3 is covering this, so go take a look. (Scroll to "While you weren't looking....") --- Posted at 4/15/2003 04:08:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Preventative War to Prevent Just What Exactly? I was going to write about the term "preventative war" when there really was nothing we were preventing. Iraq's military obviously was not a serious threat to anyone. (The administration knew this, saying in advance that conquering Iraq would be a "cakewalk.") Iraq obviously did not use chemical or biological weapons during the war. And so far not so much as a small canister of tear gas has been found. So what were we preventing that justifies calling this a "preventative" war? I was going to write about this, until I came across this transcript of a Washington Post online question and answer session with Mel Goodman, Senior Fellow, Center for International Policy covering the same subject and saying so well what I have been thinking. So I suggest taking a look. I just heard President Liar on the radio saying, "Iraq was a haven for terrorists, with an arsenal of weapons that threatened the world." Oh really? --- Posted at 4/15/2003 02:54:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Just an Arm of the Republican Party From this story in today's San Jose Mercury News: KUWAIT - To understand the philosophy of Jay Garner, the retired American general charged with rebuilding Iraq, look to Vietnam.I wonder about the appropriateness of such a blatant partisan political statement. (Never mind that we dropped more bombs on North VietNam than all of Europe in WWII, and never mind the threat of war with the Soviet Union...) --- Posted at 4/15/2003 01:23:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
The Goldman Environmental Prize I attended the Goldman Environmental Prize ceremony last night in San Francisco. I was planning to write about it when I got home last night, but it was late and I was, frankly, somewhat inebriated. From the Goldman Prize website: "The Goldman Environmental Prize is given each year to six environmental heroes - one from each of six continental regions: Africa, Asia, Europe, Island Nations, North America and South/Central America." Think of it as the Nobel Prize for environmental achievement. It was an impressive ceremony in San Francisco's War Memorial Opera House, followed by a reception at City Hall. (Yes, Mayor Willie Brown does wear very, very nice suits.) I have to tell you that I never before been to a reception where the people ran out before the food and bar. The smoked salmon didn't even run out! The ceremony was hosted by a previous Goldman Prize winner, Jane Akre. If you follow that link and read some of the stories you will learn that she was an investigative reporter fired by Fox TV for refusing to read a script that contained intentional falsehoods favorable to Monsanto Corp. A Fox network attorney had placed false information in a story about bovine growth hormone, or BGH, manufactured by Monsanto. The initial report by Akre said that medical experts had found a number of potential problems from the use of this genetially-engineered product. The report that aired said that BGH was the most-tested product in history. Akre refused to read this script. Initially she was offered a six-figure payoff to keep her mouth shut. (Remember that -- reporters are offered six-figure payoffs to lie about corporations.) She refused and was fired. She sued, won, but recently lost on appeal. The appeals court ruled that it is OK for Fox to intentionally mislead their viewers. (Remember that, too.) A short video explaining what happened to her is available here, scroll down and click on her name in the 2001 video clips. Nancy Pelosi talked for a bit. She is a very impressive and pleasant person. Please visit the website to read about this year's six winners and why they won. (Click on each of the six photos.) Also go here to see short videos about each. They are quite an impressive group of people. I'll write a bit about the American Prize winner Julia Bonds, who is fighting to stop mountaintop removal coal mining. Mountaintop removal is just that - they take the entire top off of a mountain. The waste (all of the mountain that is not coal) fills up what had been valleys and streams, ruining the local water. All of this done by a bullying big corporation that pushes everyone around, forces them to move from their homes, and pays off local politicians. From a press release describing her achievement: In 2001, Bonds and her family became the last residents to evacuate from her own hometown of Marfork Hollow where six generations of her family had lived. Marfork had been virtually destroyed by mountaintop removal mining, which involves completely blasting off the tops of mountains so that huge machines can mine thin seams of coal. Mountaintop removal mining completely annihilates streams and forests, and causes extensive flooding and blasting damage to homes. The pollution from mining and the toxic chemicals used in the preparation of coal for market have been linked to rising asthma rates and other serious respiratory ailments, particularly among children, including Bonds’ grandson. Residents who live near the mining blast zones also suffer from traumatic stress. Slurry dams thick with heavy metals such as arsenic, mercury and lead routinely overflow into watersheds, contaminate drinking water and drive toxic sludge into residents’ backyards. As a result, thousands of local residents have been driven out of their homes.Julia Bonds gave a powerful acceptance speech. She is an excellent speaker. I hope that she runs for the Senate. Sen. Byrd is very old and is likely to retire. She was a waitress and she should be a Senator. Julia Bonds is clearly the right person for that job! --- Posted at 4/15/2003 09:42:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/14/2003 The Liar President II Just came across this, U.S. Cold Shoulder Likely for Iraq War Opponents, which contains this: A day after the younger Bush and Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien put off a planned May 5 meeting in Canada -- citing the demands of Iraq and denying tensions over Canada's opposition to the war -- the White House said the president would host "strong ally and close friend" Prime Minister John Howard of Australia at his Texas ranch May 2-3.The liar. --- Posted at 4/14/2003 02:48:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
The Liar President Liar, Liar, over at The American Prospect. Excerpt: It is no exaggeration to say that lying has become Bush's signature as president.Gotta go read it to see what they say about the particulars. --- Posted at 4/14/2003 02:09:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Nation As Person Metaphore Please read Metaphor and War, Again, By George Lakoff --- Posted at 4/14/2003 01:26:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Syria Next Yes, Syria really does appear to be next. --- Posted at 4/14/2003 12:45:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
The Secret Cheney Energy Task Force A question -- was the secret Cheney Energy Task Force a planning session for the invasion of Iraq? Were the invited corporations placing orders for particular buildings,bridges, etc. to be destroyed by bombing, and was Cheney parceling out rebuilding contracts in exchange for campaign donations or other compensation? --- Posted at 4/14/2003 11:13:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Badges? From this NY Times story (for the next 30 days, then you're on your own) U.S. May Have to Allow Others to Inspect Iraqi Arms: But they added that the White House, which has resisted help from the United Nations in the search for weapons, may decide to ignore such legalities.The Bush Doctrine, stated simply: "Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges!" --- Posted at 4/14/2003 08:32:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/13/2003 Tikrit How many of you have been following Back-in-Iraq 2.0? I've been reading about Tikrit: The fact of the matter is that Tikrit is “hot” as the journos here say. It is not “fine” as I thought it might be from CNN’s early footage. A Kurdish journalist and his crew that I’ve become friendly with were chased by men in black in black sedans later in the afternoon when they got within a few kilometers of the entrance of the city. Fedayeen. From Mustafa’s description of his pursuers, they sound like James Bond villains.James Bond villains. --- Posted at 4/13/2003 05:05:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Keep In Mind Keep in mind that Iran attacked Iraq with gas during their war, and Iraq borders Iran and they remain hostile. Because of this gas masks and decontamination gear would necessarily be standard equipment for Iraq's military. When you read about discoveries of Iraqi gas masks, decontamination facilities and other precautions it does not necessarily follow that Iraq was preparing to use gas. I am not saying that Iraq did or did not have these weapons, I am pointing out that discoveries of chemical weapons gear does not necessarily mean they had or were going to use these weapons. Our forces also had gas masks and protective gear. --- Posted at 4/13/2003 03:43:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/11/2003 Free Mike Hawash! I posted this the other day, but the way I posted it ("You Could Be Next!") might have diminished its importance. Please go visit the Free Mike Hawash! site. --- Posted at 4/11/2003 04:48:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Trauma I've been thinking about our soldiers. It is unavoidable that for years they will be thinking about and reacting to the horrible death and destruction they have seen and/or participated in. Not just the inevitable civilian casualties but also the Iraqi soldiers that we killed and injured by the thousands. This will have a traumatic effect on a human being. Right now most of our soldiers are certainly pumped up, proud, thinking that they have gone on an important mission to protect the country and their loved ones from the terrible threat posed by Iraq to our national security. Thinking they have won a great and important victory to protect us and the world. Thinking that they have avenged the September 11 attack. But one day sooner or later many of them are going to realize that Iraq did not attack us on September 11, and that if Iraq even has any weapons of mass destruction they did not threaten the United States. And many will realize that a country that could fall in three weeks certainly posed no military threat to us. And they will read about the lucrative construction and oil contracts Bush's buddies and campaign donors are getting. How will they react? Back in January I wrote about a piece I had read that discussed the role of 'cognitive dissonance' in the public's support for Bush. What happens when the conditions for that dissonance fade? Will people feel tricked? Or will they require further dissonance in their thinking to avoid facing how they have been used and the feelings that will trigger? Either way, how will that play out? Will they need to become fanatical right wingers to justify how they were used and the damage it has done to them? Will they turn on those who sent them there? Will they withdraw from participating in our democracy? --- Posted at 4/11/2003 10:08:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/10/2003 Winning tendentious, on winning. Friday Update - I'm having an "Instant Message" conversation with the author of tendentious: (My end of this might be edited to make me look literate.) tendentious: i was thinking of elaborations of my idea -- robert blake hires mike tyson, who proves his complete innocense by ko-ing the LA asst da in 1.8 seconds!skippy - Notice how he avoids using capital letters to start sentences and proper nouns? Of course, he can steal it thanks to The Bush Doctrine: getting away with stealing it proves he originated it. --- Posted at 4/10/2003 06:17:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Republicans Then and Now How many readers are familiar with President Dwight D. Eisenhower? (How many younger readers know we had a President Eisenhower?) Eisenhower was the first Republican President since Hoover, and he is worth learning about. Here are some Eisenhower quotes. "I hate war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has seen its brutality, its stupidity." Canadian Club. Ottawa. Canada January 10. 1946And then there is his "Farewell Address" of January 17, 1961, just before leaving the Presidency. It is worthwhile to take the time to read the entire address, but here are some excerpts: Until the latest of our world conflicts, the United States had no armaments industry. American makers of plowshares could, with time and as required, make swords as well. But now we can no longer risk emergency improvisation of national defense; we have been compelled to create a permanent armaments industry of vast proportions. Added to this, three and a half million men and women are directly engaged in the defense establishment. We annually spend on military security more than the net income of all United States corporations.Eisenhower was a great leader who cared about our country and the world and the future of both -- rather than focusing just on the short-term gains of his political party. He warned of the consequences of "unwarranted influence" of a "military-industrial complex." How the Republicans have changed. Now Eisenhower's party is the military-industrial complex, and we see the consequences of the "disastrous rise of misplaced power" he warned us about. --- Posted at 4/10/2003 09:56:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Republicans Still At It This story in the Washington Post describes Wyoming Republican Representative Barbara Cubin's remark that, "One amendment today said we could not sell guns to anybody under drug treatment. So does that mean that if you go into a black community you can't sell any guns to any black person?" Right. All black people are drug addicts. So, naturally, North Carolina Democratic Representative Melvin Watt said the remarks were offensive to black people and demanded they be "taken down" from the record, meaning they are inappropriate for House debate. So how did the vote turn out? From the story, In a largely party-line vote, the GOP-controlled House voted 227 to 195 to uphold the chair's ruling that the remark fell within House rules. So, even after the Trent Lott episode, Republicans still are willing to go on the record with a vote that saying all Black people are drug addicts is "appropriate." Great. Republicans never forget who butters their bread: The South shall rise again! Abe Lincoln was a tyrant. The Civil War wasn't about slavery. Welfare Cadillacs. Welfare mothers have babies so they can get an extra $25 per month. States Rights. Etc. Heard it all before -- sick of it. --- Posted at 4/10/2003 07:33:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/09/2003 Scoobie Explains Bennett Please read The Truth about William Bennett, over at Scoobie Davis Online. To explain Bennett he does a bit of explaining of Moon as well. (Until links are working, just scroll to it. I'll fix the link later.) --- Posted at 4/09/2003 03:27:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
"Reasonable" Democrats, Read This. Tomasky Nails It. In Rupert Redux How the media magnate continues to take advantage of "reasonable" Democrats. Michael Tomasky shows just one example of how "reasonable" Democrats paved the way for unreasonable right wingers to stomp them. In the 1990s Rupert Murdoch needed to obtain a waiver allowing him to own the New York Post along with a local television station. And to get the waiver, he needed backing from Democrats and liberal institutions. He needed Sen. Ernest Hollings (D-S.C.), who chaired the relevant committee at the time. He needed Mario Cuomo, then New York's Democratic governor, to help behind the scenes and to speak publicly about the importance of diverse viewpoints. And he needed major concessions from the paper's unions. This was March. Phone lines were worked furiously; one thing led to another, and by July, Murdoch had the players right where he wanted them.He got the waiver. Then a few years later many Democrats helped pass the 1996 Telecommunications Act which largely got rid of cross-ownership rules and helped build the Murdoch-Fox empire. And how did Murdoch repay those Democrats? Back when Hillary Clinton was running for Senate, a research assistant and I undertook a study. We looked at the unsigned editorials and the pieces by staff columnists (not those by guest op-ed columnists) of all three New York City dailies and asked, How have these papers and their writers assessed her candidacy?But I'll make you go read what that lesson is. --- Posted at 4/09/2003 02:55:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/08/2003 Internet Joke This just came in the e-mail; you probably already saw it: Top 10 Reasons Dorothy Was Greeted As A Liberator --- Posted at 4/08/2003 04:13:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
For Page 16 You'll see this on page 16 of tomorrow's paper. --- Posted at 4/08/2003 03:44:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
A Comment At No War Blog Here is a comment I left in response to the discussion after my recent post at No War Blog. (Of course, edited to make me look better.) "Miltiades" is an Iraqi-American who left comments arguing that the war is good because it gets rid of Saddam: DO NOT TELL TO ME WHAT OUR PEOPLES HURT CAUSED FROM IF YOU DO NOT LIVE THERE! I KNOW I SAY I SPEAK NO MORE. YOU ASUME YOU KNOW IRAQ. YOU DO NOT KNOW. SADDAM HAS KILLED MUCH PEOPLES IN IRAQ NOT AMERICA. AMERICA DID NOT TAKE OIL FIRST TIME AND I DO NOT THINK THEY TAKE OIL THIS TIME. MAKE NO MISTAKE SADDAM HUSSEIN IS VERY VERY EVIL MAN. HE CARES NOT FOR THE PEOPLES OF IRAQ ONLY HIS OWN POWER. IF YOU ARE NOT BORN IN IRAQ DO NOT TELL ME WHAT IRAQ IS LIKE AND WHO KILLS. LETTING SADDAM HUSSEIN STAY WILL ONLY CONTINUE IRAQI SUFERING. MY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN SUFERING TO LONG. AMERICANS ARE ENDING SUFERING. MY FAMILY SAYS THIS TO ME. I DO NOT CARE WHO SADDAM WORKED FOR BEFORE KILLING IRAQI PEOPLES. INTERNET WILL TELL YOU ALL YOU WANT EVEN LIES. NO POLITICIAN IS ALL HONEST. THAT IS WHY I AM NO POLITICIAN. DO NOT TELL ME ABOUT MY HOME IF YOU HAVE NOT LIVED THERE. THAT IS ALL I WILL SAY NOW. THANK YOU FOR CHANCE TO SAY THESE WORDS.Miltiades has a point. The "liberate the people of Iraq" justification for the war might have only come along recently, and is only a pretext for something they were going to do anyway (or perhaps we would have heard about it sooner than March), but it is VERY powerful. The focus groups that came up with this did their job well. Good work, General Rove! No one can disagree that getting rid of Saddam Hussein is a good outcome of this war. It is almost worth the war all by itself. But it is not worth destroying the entire structure of international law, the UN, NATO, as well as the relationships between the U.S. and the rest of the world, radicalizing Muslims and increasing the terrorist threat worldwide, along with all the other consequences of the war as conducted by Bush. Of course, if you look at the outcome of our adventure in Afghanistan, you see that the slogan and the actual intentions are not related in any way. In fact, in his last budget Bush included ZERO dollars for rebuilding Afghanistan and working toward a democratic government. He just ignored Afghanistan and everything he had promised and got away with it. But, again, getting rid of Saddam WILL be one outcome of this war, and people like Miltiades and his family will benefit from this no matter what comes next (assuming his family isn't bombed before the war ends.) And I only wish him the best! --- Posted at 4/08/2003 03:31:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Greeley Read about Greeley. And while you're there, read more Pedantry. --- Posted at 4/08/2003 01:01:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Kill The Leader? Thinking about how this war is being conducted, one thing occurred to me -- the effect on people under a certain age, who don't know how things have been done in the past. For example, for a large number of people under a certain age, they must think that war is about trying to kill (or sometimes capture, like Noriega) the leader of the enemy country by blowing up his house, civilian government buildings, even apartment buildings or restaraunts he might be in. --- Posted at 4/08/2003 12:28:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Who Is Our Justice System For? Nathan Newman writes about the Supreme Court today ruling that large lawsuit punitive damage awards for corporate crimes are "excessive," after recently ruling that a person receiving a life sentence for stealing $153 worth of goods is justified. --- Posted at 4/08/2003 10:59:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/07/2003 Prosperity? SOMEthing is just around the corner, but maybe it isn't prosperity. WASHINGTON - Confronting new fears of recession, the Federal Reserve is refining an emergency economic rescue plan that includes further interest rate cuts and billions of dollars in extra cash for the banking system.Great. Because of this, some economists believe the Fed will not wait until its May 6 meeting to put its plan into effect, opting to cut the federal funds rate through an emergency conference call, possibly as soon as this week.Right, the war will end "early" and everything will be roses. Never mind record levels of public, corporate and private debt. Never mind record low saving rates. Never mind record concentration of wealth. Never mind that all the new jobs are exported to other countries. Tax cuts for the rich, program cuts for the rest of us, and wars -- all laying on a bed of propaganda to keep the sheep in the corral so they can be sheared. Yep, that's a real prescription for prosperity, all right. --- Posted at 4/07/2003 04:35:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/06/2003 Jobs In A World With High Unemployment A friend sent me this e-mail she had received: Our company is developing web sides for several companies last four years inHere comes the punch line: Total Time for the Job: Two weekGreat prices, right? Every company in the country is being approached by hundreds of businesses around the world with offers similar to this. Many of them much more credible than the business that sent this e-mail. What this means is many fewer new U.S. web design jobs from now on. The same is happening with customer service jobs (both e-mail and phone centers), programming, and many other fields. They even have shops set up for analyzing medical x-rays. And yes, they are good. These are competent, educated people. India is graduating more engineering students each year than the United States and their schools are very good. What is going to happen to American standards of living? We enter this new era of globalization with incredibly high levels of national, corporate and personal debt. The problem with unregulated globalization is there are no protections against exploitation, and our world has pre-existing unemployment, forcing everyone to "race for the bottom" by trying to outbid those poorer than themselves. So Mexico is losing jobs to Thailand, which is losing jobs to VietNam, which is losing jobs to China and Bangladesh, where many people work for just enough to survive (or less). Meanwhile, because of the job loss, people everywhere can afford less and less, so the volume of trade drops along with prices and wages. AND the countries with no environmental regulations, worker protections, etc. have an economic advantage over those that care about their people and the earth. It is a recipe for a race to the bottom, with now winners except those who start out with the most. Short-term they benefit from paying lower wages -- until the customer pool dries up. But, of course, they've made a killing by then. What matters is getting that corporate jet next year, not killing of your industry five years down the road. If you pay attention to right-wing ideology (and I do) then you know they say that if someone will work for less than you, they should have the job and you should not, period, end of story. If they will work without health insurance, they should have the job. If they will work on a machine that might cut their hand off, and you won't, then they should have the job. They say the only criteria is corporate profit. I do believe that people in other countries have every right to jobs. I don't think it's right to say that just because they are not Americans we should protect our industries. However, there are beneficial ways to accomplish world economic growth. Those who, like me, are "opposed to free trade" are asking for worker safety protections, international minimum wages, the right to form unions, environmental protections - things like that. For that we are marginalized, scoffed at and called "anti-free-trade" fanatics. Why? Because those things threaten the short-term profits of the big corporations. Imagine if people in other countries were paid enough to purchase the things we make. Imagine what would that would mean for our prosperity as well as theirs! If they could buy refrigerators made here, and the shoes made there brought them enough to live better, what a world we would be making. This is what I want, and the anti-globalization people want. Update - I just saw this story, which says it all, Tax Returns Taking Passage Through India. From the story: The accounting industry has recently begun using the burgeoning India outsourcing and technology markets to process American clients' returns. In some cases, the work being performed is replacing tasks of U.S. accountants.What did I just tell you? Style note - OK I used all caps for one three-letter-word. I couldn't help it. Blow me. --- Posted at 4/06/2003 02:40:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/05/2003 Why Did We Do This? The justification for war with Iraq was that they have weapons of mass destruction and will use them against us. If they find chemical or biological weapons in Iraq, perhaps history will see this as a somewhat justified takeover of another country. So far they have not found them, and Iraq has not used them. If they do not find them, what are we doing there? How will history record this takeover of a country that did nothing to us? But here in America, Bush will be wildly popular for killing and injuring tens of thousands of the people who attacked the World Trade Center, whether they actually did or not. This LA Times poll tells the story. (Remember, to understand the message the right is spreading, don't listen to the words, instead find out what the intended audience HEARS.) Nearly eight in 10 Americans now accept the Bush administration's contention — disputed by some experts — that Hussein has "close ties" to Al Qaeda (even 70% of Democrats agree). And 60% of Americans say they believe Hussein bears at least some responsibility for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks — a charge even the administration hasn't levied against him.That's eight in ten! Where are people getting their information? I think historians will see this as an important story. Democracy relies on the informed consent of the citizens. If the citizens are this badly informed we have already lost our democracy and the world is in great danger. The right can plant any idea into the public mind, cause an attack on any country to take their oilfields or whatever they have. I think we are in for a very rough period. Update - Daily Kos agrees with me, therefore they are billiant. Apparently not brilliant enough to link to Seeing the Forest, however, but I link to them so I guess it works out about even. Right? Note that I still have not used all caps, bold, italics or any other device to break up the pain text. I do not know how long I can hold out. --- Posted at 4/05/2003 07:46:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/04/2003 Kerry Fights Back Against Republican Smear Attempt From Kerry Lashes Out at Republican Criticisms: "The Republicans have tried to make a practice of attacking anybody who speaks out strongly by questioning their patriotism," the Massachusetts senator said in a telephone interview with The Associated Press. "I refuse to have my patriotism or right to speak out questioned. I fought for and earned the right to express my views in this country."It's good to hear this! --- Posted at 4/04/2003 02:50:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Using Akami? Does your company's website depend on Akamai Technologies? Here's the kind of cusomter service you should expect from them. --- Posted at 4/04/2003 01:17:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Voting Machines Are American elections fixed? Might it be possible that, due to GOP control of computer voting machines, the electoral ""fix"" is in, and that as a result nothing short of a revolution will ever budge the Republican Party from control of the Congress and the White House? In other words, is it not conceivable that our ""democracy"" is more than ""threatened""––it is in fact finished, done for, kaput? And we are not even aware of it?And, in case you missed it, I wrote about a voting machines story in the Washington Post the other day. --- Posted at 4/04/2003 12:57:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
No More NYTimes Archive The New York Times online archive is no longer free. Any NYTimes stories and commentaries linked to by this weblog that are older than 30 days now display an abstract, and ask you for money to see the rest of the piece. This will dramatically affect weblogging. --- Posted at 4/04/2003 09:51:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Iraq's Weapons It strikes me that the arguments about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction are a lot like the right's accusations during the "Clinton Scandals" of the 1990s. It was a pre-ordained assumption that the Clintons were guilty of something, and that an investigation was required to find out just what it was. The lack of any evidence of wrongdoing was proof of a coverup. Every new disclosure was infused with sinister connotations. In the end it turned out that not one single accusation was true - it was all made fabricated as part of a campaign to destroy Clinton's presidency. The blowjob was not related to the initial accusations in any way. I don't know whether Iraq has weapons of mass destruction or not. But have seen no evidence that they do, and I know that inspectors found no evidence. Gas masks found with Iraqi army units is not necessarily as sinister as it seems. Iraq was attacked with gas by Iran, so this would be standard equipment. And the U.S. has said they will be using CS and CN gas. I have seen many discussion of why the Iraqis haven't used chemical weapons yet. Perhaps the non-use of chemical weapons isn't part of a plot to draw the forces closer and then gas them, and isn't part of a propaganda plan to increase sympathy. Perhaps the non-use is because they non-possess. We'll see. Update - "Coalition" forces also have not yet found documents linking Iraq to 9/11. Update - "Coalition" forces have encountered resistance from Iraqis they are supposedly "liberating." Update - "Coalition" forces have not yet validated any other pretenses for this war, either. However, the oil fields have been secured and campaign donors are getting contracts to manage the oil fields and rebuild Iraq. So the operation is successful regardless of further events. Note to the commenter on the Hullabaloo piece below - I didn't use caps, I didn't use bold, I didn't use italics, and there are no exclamation marks in this piece. I think it looks like a lot of plain text that non-academics might choose to skip over. Yes, I used to be in marketing. --- Posted at 4/04/2003 09:09:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
You Could Be Next! UK Doctors Advised on Ethics of Circumcision Guess what disappeared. (Remember, this is a blog, deteriorating in reverse chronological order.) --- Posted at 4/04/2003 07:39:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
You Could Be Next! SARS death toll rises as Singapore woman dies --- Posted at 4/04/2003 07:38:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
YOU Could Be Next! More Companies Cut 401(k) Contributions Retirement plans, "disappeared." --- Posted at 4/04/2003 07:36:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
YOU Could Be Next! Businesses Cut 108,000 Jobs in March Programmers, secretaries, and others, "disappeared" form cubicles and offices. --- Posted at 4/04/2003 07:34:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
YOU Could Be Next! Free Mike Hawash! A programmer at Intel, in Portland. "Disappeared." --- Posted at 4/04/2003 07:30:00 AM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
4/03/2003 A Comment I Left At Hullabaloo I left a comment after this piece at Hullabaloo, Quisling Chalabi. It restates things I have written recently, so I'll repeat myself again. (Edited to make me look better, of course.) (Actually, completely reworked, but still sort of based on the comment.) Hullabaloo wrote: "If Democrats operated like Republicans, every single Dem would be pounding the neocons at this moment. Salon would do a story a day. Bill Press would enlist Pat Buchanan in a rousing denunciation on each show. The backbench firebrands in the congress would hold press conferences. Oppo researchers would distribute literature about the wacky neocons to every journalist on the beat. "My thoughts: I don't think it is about about Democrats and Republicans. In my opinion the Republicans are now just an extension of the Scaife/Coors/Bradley, etc.-funded web of ideological think tanks and advocacy organizations -- Heritage, Horowitz, Federalist Society, etc. -- that call themselves "movement conservatives." They have this magnificent "message amplification infrastructure" in place - the "Wurlitzer" - that is able to move the public more and more to the right, and their politicians just rest on top of that. I think that is really the key to understanding what is happening to us so I'll repeat it. The "Wurlitzer" moves the public more and more to the right, and their politicians just rest on top of that. Messaging and activities are coordinated at the "Wednesday night meetings." The organizations and people are unified because it ALL depends on the Scaife/etc. money, and, more importantly, because discipline is brutally enforced, often by ruining anyone who doesn't toe their line. Moderates and progressives, on the other hand, do not have any system (which I call "infrastructure") that is designed to reach the general public with messaging designed to move them back from the right, bringing UNDERLYING PUBLIC SUPPORT for their organizations and elected officials across the board. So while it appears to be the fault of a Democratic Party that can't muster a counterattack, it really is something else. I think the fault lies with the lack of understanding on the moderate/progressive side of the role of having an "infrastructure" in place, reaching out to the general public, supporting their elected officials, candidates and organizations. The right has been doing it for some time, providing us with a a model. (We can, however, skip the ruining-lives-of-those-who-don't-toe-the-line part.) It isn't the party that accomplishes this -- it's the web of ideological organizations and funders that do the "advance work" of messaging that sets up the public environment that UNDERLIES the party. The problem is that "we" don't HAVE one. --- Posted at 4/03/2003 04:13:00 PM by Dave Johnson Link to this | | | | e-mail this post
Copyright © 2002-05. |
Blogger's RSS feed 
Please help Seeing the Forest meet expenses. You can contribute using Paypal or Amazon by clicking either of the following buttons. Thanks! I took out the Amazon "donate button" because they are a red company, helping fund the right. Archives 
|
|||
