close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20110202125650/http://thedailybackground.com/

In Egypt, Echoes of 1979 Iran

Filed at 9:02 am, Saturday January 29th 2011
by Arlen Parsa

BERJAYA

It’s not hard to understand why the Iranian government is cheering events in Egypt. Watching what’s going on in Egypt right now must be hard for American diplomats and CIA personnel on the job long enough to remember what happened in Iran in 1979. The two situations are eerily similar in many respects, and not just in the rhetoric of their faltering leaders. Ponder the similarities:

* Mubarak is an autocratic ruler who has been in power for decades, as was the Shah. In both cases they have been supported by the United States even though we don’t really like them but because we think they’re a crucial partner in a strategic region (during the Cold War the boogie man was the USSR with which Iran shares a 1,000+ mile border, today the boogie man is terrorism).

* In both cases, the White House administration in office during the unrest is one that talks a good talk when it comes to human rights promotion in general but doesn’t necessarily walk the walk when it comes to the country in question (Carter of course talked about human rights more than any other president but it’s hard to point to any lines he ever drew in the sand with regard to Iran’s treatment of its own people as he was agreeing to deliver, for instance, more AWACS military surveillance aircraft than the U.S. itself had deployed at the time).

* In neither case has the army turned out to be nearly as loyal to the ruling faction as it had been assumed beforehand (in Egypt Mubarak is of course a former military officer so the military’s apparent siding with the protesters is a bit of a shock; in the case of Iran the army has always been associated closely with the king, so much so that it came close to being disbanded out of mistrust under the Islamic Republic). Coincidentally, Mubarak’s chosen branch of service was the Air Force, as was the Shah’s.

* In both cases the autocratic ruler has announced a last ditch change in government (while maintaining the head himself) in hopes it will assuage the public unrest.

* In both cases the rulers even have relationships with Israel that are out of step with those of the surrounding region, not that that’s directly related to the current unrest.

* Egypt, like Iran during the Shah’s rule is notorious for corruption.

* In both cases there is an easy link to U.S. support of the regime. In the case of Iran there were countless examples. In Egypt today, protesters are picking up tear gas canisters fired by the police and realizing that they have “Made in the U.S.A.” stamped on them.

* In both cases you have an American government unprepared for the situation. Vice President Biden’s foolish recent comments that Mubarak isn’t a dictator and shouldn’t step down echo Carter in the waning days of the Shah’s rule.

* In both cases, Americans by and large are unaware of of the situation in Egypt and their perceptions of the country are rooted in ancient stories and stereotypes.

* In both cases there is a popular figure who returns amidst the chaos who has called for reforms while outside of the country for years (in the case of Iran this was of course Khomeini; in the case of Egypt this is Mohamed ElBaradei). Though this connection is tenuous at best since ElBaradei wasn’t exiled by Mubarak and there is no religious authority he can claim.

* Ironically, the Shah himself is buried in Egypt (which is where he fled to from his own country in 1979 while Mubarak was serving as vice president).

(One missing key element from all these comparisons though is that Mubarak has not tied his fates to the success of any far-reaching, lopsidedly carried out and ill-paced modernization program like the Shah’s White Revolution.)

So the question is, which side of history will the United States end up on this time around?

Update: While I’m listing similarities, I might as well also mention the low hanging fruit of comparisons– the ones that are so obvious that I didn’t mention before when I was typing up this post. For instance, both governments hold elections regularly but they’re also recognized universally as rigged. Both governments have rubber stamp legislative branches. In both countries human rights advocates have long-complained of torture and an unfair judicial system, both countries have been the recipients of staggering US military aid (Egypt receives $1.5B worth annually; in the case of Iran however most outright aid had ceased in the mid 1960s and by the late 1970s all military transactions were conducted on a cash basis because Iran was flush with oil money after OPEC staged a series of oil price increases), etc.

SOTU thoughts

Filed at 9:49 pm, Tuesday January 25th 2011
by Arlen Parsa

President Obama’s State of the Union speech was pretty decent, I thought. The mixed seating certainly made it a different experience to watch, and made the constant audience cutaways feel less motivated when there wasn’t big differences in who was standing up and sitting down. I was impressed at the emphasis the president put on the importance of investing in new technology in particular. It was certainly the most high-tech focused SOTU I’ve seen, which was nice.

Paul Ryan (R-Wis)’s Republican rebuttal from what looked like the back of a poorly-lit auditorium fell into the predictable role of being a debbie downer after an inspiring speech. Also, did anyone else think he looked (and sounded) an awful lot like Gabe from The Office?

BERJAYA
Is this Gabe or Paul Ryan? I’m not sure.

Incidentally, the fact that there is a separate “Tea Party Response” to the State of the Union is the most solid evidence to date that there is indeed an ongoing civil war within the GOP. The two factions’ split can only become more and more evident from here.

Update: One moment that sticks with me in the president’s speech is when he said that we need to celebrate not just the people who win the Superbowl, but also the people who win the science fair. I was quite pleasantly surprised to see the number of people giving him a standing ovation for this line for the length that they did.

Video - An incredible archival film repository

Filed at 1:42 pm, Monday January 17th 2011
by Arlen Parsa

Not long ago at Groundswell Educational Films (the nonprofit where I work) we paid a visit to J. Fred MacDonald’s archival film collection here in Chicago. Fred’s archive, which included millions of feet of old films was an incredible thing to see for a budding documentary-filmmaker like myself. On the day we visited him he was just about to donate his collection to the Library of Congress and retire from the historical film repository/stock footage business.

We caught him before he donated the material and talked to him about one of his projects, the American Indian Film Gallery, which will continue on the web, retirement or no. Here’s the video we put together introducing visitors to Fred’s online Native American film collection. It was a lot of fun to shoot in such an extraordinary environment but I must say it was also a little sad knowing that such an incredible collection was leaving Chicago for good. But hopefully the Library of Congress will make it accessible to researchers and filmmakers for generations to come.

Fantastic news from the JFK presidential library

Filed at 5:49 pm, Saturday January 15th 2011
by Arlen Parsa

This is very cool: this past week the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library in Boston announced it has become the first of the presidential libraries to put a major portion of its holdings online. This includes documents, photos, audio recordings, and (yes!) even full-length public domain video with accompanying shot lists. All four are of interest to me, coming from a documentary filmmaking background (though I don’t have any specific interest in making a film about Kennedy).

Personally I think they’re missing a tremendous opportunity by not providing a download button for the video (as well as the documents and images and audio), but people will find ways to rip them anyway. The quality isn’t really usable for any serious professional purposes, but this is a damn cool tool for documentary research and free low quality archival screener material. Hopefully they are telecine-ing the films at a decent enough quality that they have full-resolution digital masters lying around on hard drives for filmmakers who want them and are willing to pay a nominal fee.

They say they plan to digitize an additional 100,000 more items per year (though at this rate it will take more than 100 years to put everything online!). Hopefully other presidential libraries and major archives will follow their lead and put their materials available online as well.

More NARA photo entries

Filed at 8:00 am, Tuesday January 11th 2011
by Arlen Parsa

Here are some more of my entries to the National Archives photo contest.

Al Capone’s Soup Kitchen, then:
BERJAYA

And now:
BERJAYA

The opening of the Michigan Ave bridge over the Chicago River then:
BERJAYA

And now:
BERJAYA

The Wabash Ave bridge then:
BERJAYA

And now:
BERJAYA

Michigan Ave by the Chicago Cultural Center (then a library):
BERJAYA

And now:
BERJAYA

A tragically prescient quote on today’s shooting

Filed at 4:57 pm, Saturday January 08th 2011
by Arlen Parsa

Representative Gabrielle Giffords said on March 25, 2010: “Sarah Palin has the crosshairs of a gun sight over our district and when people do that, they’ve gotta realize there are consequences to that action.”

Unfortunately, she was right.

My National Archives Photo Contest Submissions

Filed at 8:55 pm, Sunday January 02nd 2011
by Arlen Parsa

So, the National Archives is having a somewhat under-publicized photo contest where the goal is to take photos in the same spot as historical photos from their holdings. The trick is, you have to hold up the old photo from their archives and align it with today’s environment.

Noticing that only a few dozen entries have been cast ahead of its January 21st deadline, I thought I’d enter (the top 20 photos get made into postcards available at the NARA gift shop). Unfortunately their database of Chicago pictures that are digitized is somewhat sparse (and most aren’t explicit as to their location), but here are two photos whose locations I recognized. Hopefully I’ll have time to do some more photos like these– I had about twenty of the National Archives’ Chicago photos whose locations I recognized printed for free at CVS.

BERJAYA
Montrose Beach jetty, Chicago, Illinois, 1973.

BERJAYA
Montrose Beach jetty, Chicago, Illinois, 2010.

BERJAYA
Loyola stop, Red Line, Chicago, Illinois, 1973.

BERJAYA
Loyola stop, Red Line, Chicago, Illinois, 2011.

Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes Coming Soon.

Filed at 11:29 am, Thursday December 16th 2010
by Arlen Parsa

I started this blog to post my thoughts about news and politics in December 2005, about five years ago. Back then, I was in my first semester in college and almost everything I blogged about was politics-centric.

I graduated from college a year and a half ago and now work full time at a nonprofit documentary organization here in Chicago (documentary film was what I majored in at college). Since my graduation, I’ve had little time to blog about politics, and posting has been limited to brief comments about weekly (or less frequently). Even though this blog is 100% mine, I haven’t felt really free to diverge from politics. I’ve felt an obligation to keep this site going and although I still care about politics and follow it fairly closely, I don’t have the time or energy to devote to keeping up a blog purely focused on it.

So, some 7,798 posts into this grand experiment, after putting together posts that get hundreds of thousands of hits, raising a little hell among Republican senatorial campaigns (and in the corporate world!), breaking a little news, and having my writing referenced in places like the Dilbert comic strip, I want to shift things in this space a bit. I’ll still write about politics when I have something to say (that isn’t just repeating what other people have to say or linking to other people’s analysis), but I’m going to blog more and more about personal stuff as well. For instance, cool documentary stuff I’m working on at Groundswell, my opinions on the latest in technology, or interesting stuff I’ve been up to lately.

What will this change mean for people who read this blog? Hopefully it’ll mean more regular posting on my part, for one. And secondly it’ll mean that I’ll be posting on a much broader range of topics with more unique stuff to say. Maybe you’ll find it interesting and maybe not.

If you’re interested, dear reader, that’s fine. And if you’re not interested, that’s fine too. At last check this morning, I had about 200 people who subscribe to my RSS feed. This is kind of neat, but I suspect many of them may unsubscribe when they read this and find out that I’m not going to be blogging purely about politics anymore, and that’s fine.

I’ll probably also redesign this blog’s theme when I have the time to reflect this change in direction. So, stick around if you like, and don’t if you don’t want to. I won’t complain either way– it’s just time for me to make this space my own again.

Rahm Emanuel’s Facebook ad Campaign Flips Reality

Filed at 4:27 pm, Tuesday December 07th 2010
by Arlen Parsa

BERJAYA
Living in Chicago, I saw this ad on Facebook and thought the framing was interesting. Instead of it being a question of whether Emanuel has the right to run as mayor here, the question the ad poses is whether or not voters have the “right” to vote for him. Gee whiz, you mean our rights as lowly citizens are at stake here? Give me a break.

Also somewhat arrogantly backwards: the name of the URL. Similar to the name of the third party Joe Lieberman was elected to his Senate seat the last time around (Connecticut for Lieberman), Emanuel’s website is Chicago for Rahm.com, not Rahm for Chicago.com.

The whole messaging here flies in the face of the idea of being a public servant and flips the equation on its head, as if all Chicagoans should be angry that their right to vote for somebody who hasn’t lived here for two years may be trampled on due to a pending inquiry into his eligibility due to residency status (in fact, it’s arguably longer than two years if you consider that he hasn’t held a job in Chicago since 2002 and may have spent most of his time in DC from 1993-1998 when he worked at the White House, and 2003-2010 when he worked in the House of Representatives and later the White House).

Original “Mission Accomplished” banner to be unfurled at Bush’s presidential library?

Filed at 8:25 am, Tuesday November 23rd 2010
by Arlen Parsa

Either this is a joke, or somebody over at the George W. Bush presidential library planning committee has a sick sense of humor:

One of the most enduring symbols of George W. Bush’s presidency may soon have a prominent new home.

USA Today reports that the “Mission Accomplished” streamer, which was displayed during a speech in 2003 aboard the USS Lincoln and came to encapsulate the Bush Adminisration’s premature announcement of success in Iraq, has been shipped to the future site of George W. Bush’s presidential library, and may even be rolled out as an exhibit when the facility opens its doors in 2013.

AICPAC sends illegal unsolicited text messages to Illinois voters

Filed at 7:25 am, Tuesday November 02nd 2010
by Arlen Parsa

BERJAYA
I’ve never had any contact with the right wing American Israel Public Affairs Committee something called the Americans In Contact PAC and yet they apparently found my cell number and have texted me– IN ALL CAPS no less– a very important unsolicited message to vote for Republican candidates.

FCC regulations clearly state:

The CAN-SPAM Act supplements some consumer protections already put into place by the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Under the TCPA the FCC and FTC established the national Do-Not-Call list. This list contains telephone numbers that telemarketers are prohibited from calling unless they have an established business relationship with the called party or are otherwise exempt. FCC rules prohibit sending unwanted text messages to your wireless phone number if they are sent using an autodialer, or if you have placed that number on the national Do-Not-Call list.

Once again, I’ve never had any contact with AICPAC whatsoever, and have no idea how they got my cell number. They say their mission is:

The mission of Americans in Contact PAC (AICPAC) is to identify social and fiscal conservatives throughout America and engage them at the Grassroots level in the political process of elections and legislation at all levels of Government (local, county, state and federal).

The goal of Americans in Contact PAC (AICPAC) is to identify the political opinions and preferences of the 120,000,000 homes in America that are contained in proprietary databases to which AICPAC has access.

Update: Apparently this is happening in North Carolina too– the same group with the same illegal tactics.

Have you voted yet?

Filed at 6:28 am, Tuesday November 02nd 2010
by Arlen Parsa

Tiffany and I early-voted last Saturday (the weekend before this past Saturday). If I had to make a prediction, I’ll guess that the Republicans will take the House, but by a smaller margin than a lot of people are predicting, and that the Democrats will keep very slim control of the Senate. But who knows. We’ll see.

The most amazing video I’ve seen in quite a while

Filed at 6:05 am, Wednesday October 20th 2010
by Arlen Parsa


Just watch. I simply cannot believe this.

Another victory for equal rights– once again on the judicial front

Filed at 6:40 am, Wednesday October 13th 2010
by Arlen Parsa

Naturally the ruling by a federal judge yesterday that “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” is unconstitutional is a positive thing. The case was originally filed in 2004, it’d be a major embarrassment for Obama’s Justice Department to pursue it further in an appeal (and now that the case has been decided they have no technical obligation to defend it). If Obama says anything other than that “I always said this policy was unconstitutional and now a federal judge has agreed,” he’d lose major credibility on the issue.

Moreover, this makes two major gay rights victories by federal judges in a span of just a few months. At a time when we had been hoping that more equality would be restored by the legislative branch, it looks like judges are still the easiest route to take (which is a shame because their decisions are most easily overturned when compared to legislative and ballot proposition routes). Oh well, at least there’s (hopefully) an imminent victory here in Illinois on the legislative front, with the governor and others saying that “the votes are there” for at least civil unions created by the state legislature.

So, Rahm will run for mayor here in Chicago

Filed at 6:40 am, Thursday September 30th 2010
by Arlen Parsa

Meh, okay. He should get out of the White House as soon as possible, especially with the elections coming up. What’s more interesting is who Obama will appoint as his new Chief of Staff. It probably goes without saying that it’d be better if he chose somebody not currently part of his administration, but it’s tough timing, again with the elections coming up, for somebody to come in completely new or controversial.



Asides


 # Every progressive blogger ought to read Chris Bowers post on building a bigger carrot.

 # Obama formally announces Tim Kaine as the new DNC Chair.

 # Eugene Robinson eviscerates McCain on the economy

 # McCain & Palin are lying about their crowd sizes