close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100924073730/http://www.sacbee.com:80/2010/09/21/3044468/whitman-willing-to-take-pension.html
Slideshow Loading
previous next
  • Hector Amezcua / hamezcua@sacbee.com

    Meg Whitman poses for a photo with Emily Lisa Packard, left, of West Sacramento, and Carlos Trebino of Vacaville, in a campaign stop at Sacramento printing and copying services firm Encompass.

  • Randy Pench / rpench@sacbee.com

    Meg Whitman holds up her gubernatorial policy plan during a campaign stop Monday at Encompass, a Sacramento consulting firm.

Capitol and California - Governor 2010
Comments (0) | | Print

Whitman willing to take pension cutbacks to the ballot box

Published: Tuesday, Sep. 21, 2010 - 12:00 am | Page 1A
Last Modified: Thursday, Sep. 23, 2010 - 10:25 am

Republican gubernatorial nominee Meg Whitman said Monday that she would place pension cutbacks on the ballot if negotiations with state workers fail and would consider using her personal fortune not only to win office but to advance her agenda if elected.

Taking the issue to voters is "not my first choice," she told The Bee's editorial board. "But if we have to … this is an issue we have got to take up."

The former eBay CEO and billionaire said she "possibly" would put her own money behind a ballot measure campaign.

"My preference would be to raise the money, would be to, you know, make sure that we had a broad constituency," she said.

Whitman also said the extension of collective bargaining rights to state workers in 1977 was "probably not a good thing."

Asked if she would try to revoke the law – a measure signed by her Democratic opponent, Jerry Brown, when he was first governor – Whitman said, "I won't take it off the table, but it wouldn't be the very first thing I do."

State employee unions have campaigned vigorously against Whitman, and her remarks Monday hinted at a possible re-match of the 2005 battle between Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and the unions. The California Nurses Association helped defeat several initiatives to overhaul state government that were championed by Schwarzenegger, who had boasted beforehand that he was "always kicking their butts."

Whitman has already demonstrated, however, that her wealth can alter the dynamic of an election. She has donated more than $119 million of her own money to her gubernatorial campaign, the most expensive self-funded effort in U.S. history.

"The danger for her is that it will be a re-run of 2005," said Jack Pitney, a government professor at Claremont McKenna College. "But a couple of things could be different. No. 1, she has a lot of cash. No. 2, public attitude may have changed. There may be a greater sense that public employees have to bear some of the cost of budget reduction."

Whitman wants to raise the retirement age for most state employees, increase employee contributions and put new hires on 401(k)-style retirement plans instead of defined-benefit pensions. She would exempt public safety workers, but not prison guards, from the 401(k) approach.

Brown has said he would keep defined benefits in place but increase employee contributions and reduce benefit levels for new hires. Schwarzenegger and six unions this year have negotiated tentative labor deals involving some of the same provisions.

Whitman said the self- financing of her campaign insulates her from the influence of unions, which have spent millions on Brown's behalf.

"If Jerry Brown is governor, there will be a meeting," Whitman said. "The meeting will be for the public employee unions to collect the IOUs that they are owed for funding his entire campaign."

Brown in his two terms as governor, from 1975 to 1983, did not always please employee unions, and he has said he is not beholden to them.

Brown spokesman Sterling Clifford said Whitman "has admitted she is in the pockets of the big banks on Wall Street and will be looking out for their interests."

In her meeting with The Bee and at a campaign event later in Sacramento, Whitman said she will decide by the end of the week how she will vote on Proposition 23, which would suspend implementation the state's greenhouse gas reduction law until the statewide unemployment rate hits 5.5 percent for four consecutive quarters.

Whitman has said she would suspend the law, AB 32, for one year, but she has yet to take a position on the proposition.

She said the law includes a proviso that allows for suspension in times of economic distress.

Brown, a supporter of AB 32, criticized Whitman, saying in a written statement on Monday, "While Texas oil pumps millions into the yes campaign, Meg Whitman continues to flip and flop her way out of taking a real stance on this harmful measure (Proposition 23)."

While willing to use the initiative process to fight labor unions, Whitman also said rampant use of the initiative in California is problematic.

"I do think it needs to be harder to get initiatives on the ballot," she said.

Among various spending-reduction measures, Whitman said she would consider housing some inmates at prisons in other states to reduce costs and prison crowding. She also said she would consider privatizing prison operations.

The California Correctional Peace Officers Association, the union representing the state's prison guards, endorsed Brown on Monday.

Whitman also told The Bee that change is necessary to stop inmates on death row from living for decades with cases on appeal.

"Basically, you've got to sort of say you can't just sort of appeal and appeal and appeal and appeal," Whitman said. "So I think there has to be some change in the process by which death row inmates live on for 20, 30-odd years on death row. I think we've got to take that up."

10 QUESTIONS

Suggest a question for the Brown-Whitman debate in "10 Questions."

sacbee.com/gov2010

VOTER GUIDE

Find your races and customize your ballot with our interactive voter guide.

sacbee.com/voterguide

© Copyright The Sacramento Bee. All rights reserved.

BERJAYA

Call David Siders, Bee Capitol Bureau, (916) 321-1215. Jack Chang of The Bee Capitol Bureau contributed to this report.


hide comments

About Comments

Reader comments on Sacbee.com are the opinions of the writer, not The Sacramento Bee. If you see an objectionable comment, click the "report abuse" button below it. We will delete comments containing inappropriate links, obscenities, hate speech, and personal attacks. Flagrant or repeat violators will be banned. See more about comments here.

What You Should Know About Comments on Sacbee.com

Sacbee.com is happy to provide a forum for reader interaction, discussion, feedback and reaction to our stories. However, we reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments or ban users who can't play nice. (See our full terms of service here.)

Here are some rules of the road:

• Keep your comments civil. Don't insult one another or the subjects of our articles. If you think a comment violates our guidelines click the "report abuse" button to notify the moderators. Responding to the comment will only encourage bad behavior.

• Don't use profanities, vulgarities or hate speech. This is a general interest news site. Sometimes, there are children present. Don't say anything in a way you wouldn't want your own child to hear.

• Do not attack other users; focus your comments on issues, not individuals.

• Stay on topic. Only post comments relevant to the article at hand. If you want to discuss an issue with a specific user, click on his profile name and send him a direct message.

• Do not copy and paste outside material into the comment box.

• Don't repeat the same comment over and over. We heard you the first time.

• Do not use the commenting system for advertising. That's spam and it isn't allowed.

• Don't use all capital letters. That's akin to yelling and not appreciated by the audience.

You should also know that The Sacramento Bee does not screen comments before they are posted. You are more likely to see inappropriate comments before our staff does, so we ask that you click the "report abuse" button to submit those comments for moderator review. You also may notify us via email at feedback@sacbee.com. Note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us the profile name of the user who made the comment. Remember, comment moderation is subjective. You may find some material objectionable that we won't and vice versa.

If you submit a comment, the user name of your account will appear along with it. Users cannot remove their own comments once they have submitted them, but you may ask our staff to retract one of your comments by sending an email to feedback@sacbee.com. Again, make sure you note the headline on which the comment is made and tell us your profile name.

If you choose to use our "reply to comment" feature, you should note that the length of the quoted comment will count against the size limits for your comment.

Sacramento Bee Job listing powered by Careerbuilder.com
Quick Job Search
Buy BERJAYA
Used Cars
Dealer and private-party ads
Make:

Model:

Price Range:
to
Search within:
miles of ZIP

Advanced Search | 1982 & Older

SacBee Marketplace

Featured Categories

Legal Worship Education Health View all
Powered by Planet Discover