close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100918223459/http://deanesmay.com/

Producer Ben Folds is a genius, and in the right hands, and 70 year old William Shatner is incomparable, as he is here:

I love this tale of the difference between inherited wealth and the rest of the world. Listen to the dripping sarcasm of Shatner’s delivery: “Because you think that poor is cool.”Like I said, when he’s in the right hands, the man is brilliant.

And Has Been was one of 2004′s best albums by the way. No lie. What a wonderful little gem.

Got any cool tunes to share yourself?

{ 7 comments }

Love is big

by Ron Coleman on September 17, 2010

in Spiritual Matters

We visited my father’s grave the day before yesterday. It happened to have been his birthday and not much more than three months since his passing. There is a custom among Jews to visit the graves of one’s ancestors between Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur, although there are many who do not visit a grave during the year of mourning. Nonetheless we did so. There is not even a headstone there yet; we follow the prevalent custom only to “unveil” the headstone at the end of that year.

This got me musing about something of obvious relevance, which in turn led me to consider the following thoughtlet sufficiently baked to throw up onto Dean’s World.

There are two main themes in how Jews and Christians conceive the ultimate Messianic Era.

Peaceable Kingdom - Edward HicksOne is social harmony, described by the lamb lying down with the lion; the beating of swords into ploughshares; universal brotherhood.  This messianic conception, this powerful human desideratum among all but the wicked, lies at the heart of even non-religious or even anti-religious conceptions of utopia.  Besides being, as we believe, revealed truth from God, the near universality of this vision in the West suggests that the end of strife among people has very powerful resonance with us.  And — especially in the West — we hardly think it could be achieved other than in the Kingdom of God.

The second common theme in most Judeo-Christian scenarios of the Messianic Era is the physical resurrection of the dead.  The appeal of this wish to anyone who has ever lost a loved one is pretty obvious.  Resurrection is also, even more than universal brotherhood, clearly understood to be a trick that man cannot pull off himself.

Thanatopsis - Asher B. DurandAnd what occurred to me is that as big and profound and universally beneficial the first of these eagerly awaited phenomena is, I believe that if they had to choose one or the other of them — let’s say, to be optimistic and also not heretical, to choose which of them will occur sooner — the vast majority of people would sooner want to be reunited with their departed loved ones if they could be back with us in this world the way we remember them.

As idealistic as we may be about the prospect of the reign of Peace over all humanity, I believe I am not alone in feeling more emotionally compelled by the prospect of seeing my dad again, and my grandparents, and . . . all the others.

This may seem a little strange, and maybe a little selfish.

But that’s how big love is.

{ 12 comments }

The Last Guardian

by Kevin D. on September 16, 2010

in Games and Gaming

Announced for a holiday 2011 release, The Last Guardian is the next release from Team Ico, the developers of the strongest arguments for video games as works of art: Ico and Shadow of the Colossus.

I am breathlessly awaiting this game. I think what Team Ico has done with the aforementioned titles is stunning and I have no reason to doubt this upcoming PS3 exclusive (their previous games were PS2 exclusives, recently revealed to be getting an HD upgrade and re-release for the PS3) will be any different.

But, you can see that for yourself:

{ 10 comments }

You can now follow Kim Jong Il on Twitter!

I still barely understand Twitter. I think maybe if I had it on my cell phone I’d get it. I otherwise still consistently refuse to see the point. Although being able to follow Kim might well change my mind. I heart Kim Jong Il, the world’s most wonderful mass murdering mass oppressing psychopath.

I don’t even know how to categorize this. There is nothing funny about the North Korean regime. And there is everything funny about it. There is almost no story that can be told about North Korea that is not believable. Somehow, this seems appropriate:


Kim Jong Il Announces Plan To Bring Moon To North Korea

(Thanks C.)

{ 0 comments }

I was gonna try to insert some kind of “izzle” into the title, but I couldn’t get it to look right. And it sure as heck wouldn’t have been pronounced right. Well, as well as anyone can properly pronounce Snoop Dog’s additions to the English lexicon, I suppose.

So, I’m back on the front page as your resident Gaming Czar! That’s right, bringing you all the gaming news I deem fit to print. For my first post in this lofty position I’ve decided to bring you a video from Funny or Die. Enjoy Snoop, LL, and TV’s Chuck (no one really cares what his real name is) playing Halo: Reach.

Be warned, there are some dirty words flung about. But the age check should stop minors from viewing it, right? I mean, no one ever lies in those things.

Yes, I was born in 1935. Totally.

{ 4 comments }

Dean’s World contributor Celia Farber’s latest article for Media Magazine, which you can pick up at news stands or just read online through Media Post, is An Internet With No Walls. Ostensibly about Chat Roulette, it’s really a piece about privacy, intimacy, and the ongoing upheavals of the internet. Here was my favorite part:

Here’s what the money guys will try to do, and eventually succeed: Sell back intimacy to the isolated modern masses with a new, all-enveloping, everlasting, electronic condom. Try to control creativity and freedom. Try to keep people feeling that they are in a tank, and it has walls, and they’re inside those walls, and they will always be fed.

They will induce people to forget that intimacy, or sex, or “meeting people,” was ever something one did without electronic mediation. It’s an ancient formula: Take something crucial away from people and then sell it back to them. What’s valuable now is not privacy, like the cognoscenti believe, but rather, any and all means of being seen, heard, touched, and re-connected to others. He may not have known it, but that is what Ternovskiy understood, intuitively. He coded his way out of his own isolation, for his generation, who were being offered essentially nothing in the baby boomer media world. They were invisible and casteless. “I always believed that the computer might be that thing that I only need, that I only need that thing to survive,” he told The New Yorker. “It might replace everything.”

I’m not even sure I agree, exactly, but it’s great discussion fodder.

There’s more. Read the whole thing here.

(And yes, I’m quoted in it. Whee, I’m famous!)

{ 4 comments }

I am not just unashamed that I voted for George W. Bush twice. I am proud that I voted for him twice, and campaigned for him.

This is my my America.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

by Dean Esmay on September 13, 2010

in humor

I told my psychiatrist that everyone hates me. He said I was being ridiculous, everyone hasn’t met me yet.

— Rodney Dangerfield

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

The 7th Annual Brass Crescent Awards are now open! What are the Brass Crescent Awards, you ask?

They are named for the Story of the City of Brass in the Thousand and One Nights. Today, the Islamsphere is forging a new synthesis of Islam and modernity, and is the intellectual heir to the traditions of philosophy and learning that was once the hallmark of Islamic civilization – a heritage scarcely recognizable today in the Islamic world after a century’s ravages of colonialism, tyrants, and religious fundamentalism. We believe that Islam transcends history, and we are forging history anew for tomorrow’s Islam. These awards are a means to honor ourselves and celebrate our nascent community, and promote its growth.

If you are looking to sample some the authentic voice of the Islamic blogsphere and see for yourself what other muslim americans are saying beyond just me, then check out the blogs and past winners at the official site. I think you will find that after reading the Islamsphere you wont be quite as concerned about grandiose jihads and generational wars and whatnot. You can also follow on Twitter (@brasscrescent) or on facebook.

(posted with permission of Dean. I am also plugging the Awards at LGF)

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Nu?

by Dean Esmay on September 13, 2010

in Politics

Celia Farber recently sent me a note that has given me impetus to continue a thinking process I’ve had about this weblog for some time now. I have been, and still am, in the process of rethinking what Dean’s World is and should be.

I am its editor-in-chief, always have been. At its height this blog was bringing in over 10,000 daily readers (not “hits,” but “visits”), we were doing conference calls with the White House, doing interviews with national figures of importance, bringing in material from outside submitters in the scientific community on important political topics, and more, and bringing in, well, certainly not enough revenue to make a living but enough revenue to make it worth the time and effort and, had I continued the path I was on, I have little doubt it would have turned into a full-time effort. I won’t retread the awards, accolades, recognitions we got; they were plentiful, and this was indeed one of the top weblogs on the planet by numerous independent measurements.

For a wide variety of reasons, there was a crash and burn.

Some of that was ideological. We got most of our early popularity in right-wing circles. That was bound to end because I was never a doctrinaire conservative or really a doctrinaire anything, the only thing I was “Right Wing” on was the War On Terror. I predicted, correctly, that we would become very much disliked on the right after Obama was elected, and I was correct. Although that started with other issues (the Islam Wars), once Obama was elected the die was caste: I would not allow this place to become a right-wing version of Daily Kos, where our main focus was bashing the President and his party.

Some of it was personal. The last 10 years have been pretty hard for me, in ways I never dreamed of when I was in my 20s.

Blogging in the early days also tended to be more diffuse; the personal and political joined as one, transparency in all things, sometimes to a ludicrous degree. Blogs have matured in a number of ways since then; there are now hordes of professional and semi-professional bloggers, although almost all of them involve a specific target audience and target subject matter. There are still plenty of crap blogs, although as Ted Sturgeon once famously said, 90% of everything is crap. It actually appears that social networking services like Facebook have cut down on the number of pointless blogs, since people who just want to have fun and be social can go do that there. An independent weblog has to have a purpose to be justified.

Now I am at a crossroads and have to decide what I want this blog to be. There are a number of wildly successfully, highly profitable weblogs out there. Do I want Dean’s World to be one of them? Or do I want it to be moderately successful, useful side money and otherwise just a side passion? Or do I not want financial success at all, but merely a forum and a community and a place to write and not care about any of that at all?

“Successful” in a financial sense would change this place dramatically. Do I want that? Or do I want “success” in terms of personal fulfillment? And what would the community of users who still frequent this place want to see?

I’m not sure. I know where I’m leaning, which is to say that no, this will remain a hobby and a personal forum and if it makes a little side money then fine. A place of learning and exploration and discovery, and defined as a “success” on those terms, and if it happens to make enough money to help pay some bills, good enough. And that probably means accepting submissions now and then but not having a huge stable of contributors, not going out of our way to find controversy, just being what we are and no more, and that could be fine.

But that’s where I’m leaning.

{ 29 comments }

BERJAYAMy article, “Trademark, Copyright, and the Internet: Time to Return Balance to Civil Litigation” in the August 31, 2010 edition of the Federalist Society’s Engage magazine is now online.  The opening paragraph is as follows:

The law and business of intellectual property are in upheaval today. Essentially, the concepts that underlay the conceptual, statutory, and judicial schemas that govern each of patent, trademark and copyright are rapidly being overwhelmed by technologies that could not have been foreseen even half a generation ago, much less when the roots of the legal doctrines surrounding each of these types of IP protection and the economic models on which they are premised took hold. The purpose of this essay is to consider one of these areas in particular, namely trademark, and to focus in particular on how developments in copyright arising from the new digital media have affected this area of law. I argue that a series of legal developments has turned an area of law historically meant to shield consumers from non-authentic merchandise and preserve entrepreneurial investments in “brands” into a weapon to stifle competition and protect entrenched, inefficient business models. These developments have taken trademark law far beyond the language of the Lanham Act, the modern trademark statute, into a world where judges have not feared to tread and “make policy” affecting broad areas of economic activity to Congress’s silent assent…

You can download the whole piece at the Federalist Society website here.

{ 1 comment }

I have rarely–oddly enough–been asked who’s my favorite blogger.

My favorite blogger, from the first day I found her blog until this very day, today, is the once-famous, always wonderful Michele Catalano. She used to run a blog called “A Small Victory” which, to me, was a constant source of inspiration. It still is, or the memory of it anyway. She was brilliant. She could make me laugh, she could make me cry, she was rock and roll, and she was definitely a chick who kicked ass and took names. She also did great things, like a little project called Trooptrax that no one seems to remember but they should, sending music to troops over in Iraq and Afghanistan so they’d have music and know people back home care. I had a mad crush on this woman, still do. I would be her creepy stalker if she’d let me. ;-)

At some point she started getting more and more erratic, then suddenly one day she up and quit. I knew a little about her personal life and that explained some of it, but it didn’t explain everything. She kept writing in other forums, other places, mostly now about music and family life, having shut down “A Small Victory” permanently.

Finally she explained why. This was why.

These days, I feel almost exactly like that. Not the same, but close.

While politically my views have not shifted all that much–mellowed a little, but still very much in the Joe Lieberman/Scoop Jackson/John McCain mold, liberal on some things, centrist on others, quite hawkish on defense, still a big supporter of what we’re doing in Iraq and Afghanistan–I understand hers have. And you know, I’m OK with that, because one thing Michele never was was a fake or a phony. Crazy? Different question. But not a fake.

And in a world of fakes and phonies and self-promoting posers, that’s a real treasure. She may feel like she cracked up, may have been in the bottom of depression and drink and a life she didn’t want–been there, done that–but she was still real.

John Eddy recently reminded me of one of her best lines, about parenting: it’s not a direct quote (her archives are gone, dammit), but it was something along the lines of, “When my son grows up, the cops may catch him with a pound of cocaine and a dead hooker in the trunk, but he’ll damn well be saying ‘please,’ ‘thank you,’ ‘yes sir’ and ‘no ma’am’ to the officers as they take him away.” How can you not love someone who writes like that?

But when I look at her “goodbye to all of that” statement, and why she quit political blogging and shut down “A Small Victory,” I can understand it. It is very difficult to dance out here in the mind field taking stances and arguing with people, having thousands of people reading you and wanting a piece of you and wanting to praise or condemn you at every turn, questioning your motives, questioning your ideological purity, insulting you, demeaning you, or just wanting you to scream with them at whatever they’re screaming about, especially when they suddenly realize you were never on their “side,” you were just saying what you thought at the time.

Unlike Michele, I won’t shut down this blog. But it has to be a place where I can open up the front page and not be afraid of what I’m going to find there with my name on the top of the page, or don’t look back (too often) and say “man, I’m ashamed of that.” I have to exert strong editorial control, and I haven’t figured out what “strong editorial control” means exactly yet–although it’s firming up in my head. What I’m thinking at this point is telling contributors that they are still contributors, but they have to run things past me first, and furthermore, certain topics are just off the table because I said so, and I will not put up with any grousing or recriminations.

And I’m just not going to get into it with people anymore: if I’m your target I’m just not playing with you.

By the way, Michele still writes a bunch of places, for publication and just for the internet, mostly about parenting, family, and music. I won’t link them right now because, well, I don’t need people who are mad at me following her around (and there are people who do that, it’s weird but they do). But I still love everything she writes. Even though her kids are delinquents and her favorite bands all suck. ;-)

{ 32 comments }

9/11

by Dean Esmay on September 11, 2010

in Politics

I will be observing a day of silence here.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

Fabulous afternoon with my younger son (even though he threw a tantrum at the grocery store because I wouldn’t let him zoom around with the shopping cart all by himself, ramming into people and things), and now a fabulous evening planned with my older one playing video games and bullsh*tting. Happy happy joy joy joy!

I asked him to recommend a music video. He recommended “Blow Me Away” by Breaking Benjamin. So here it is, for your pleasure:

It appears my kid likes metal, huh?

Looks like I’m going to slowly reintroduce front pagers again, for people who still want to and will accept a limited, specified role. Like Music Editor, or Games Editor. I’m afraid I’m going to have to leave the most contentious issues, like religion and politics, to my domain, because I simply will have to do so to keep my sanity. More on that as people get notes and such over the next week or so. My apologies in advance to anyone who was upset by my abruptness.

So, anyone got any cool music to share, or anything else they want to blab about?

{ 14 comments }

Ugh. Reflexive anti-Americanism rears its ugly head again:

This is posted on YouTube as “Ronald Reagan dedicates the Space Shuttle Columbia to the Taliban.”

It was posted by some people who claim to be “9/11 Truthers.” Which gives you some idea why the 9/11 “Truth” movement has a bad odor in some quarters. As I’ve said many times, I do not believe everyone who questions the official account of events of 9/11 is stupid or evil, but these particular people are stupid or evil or both.

Please watch this to make sure my neocon brain is not hallucinating and just missing the part where Reagan says even one word about the Taliban. Does he say one thing about the Taliban at all? I do not think so.

It requires an almost willful ignorance of history to call this “dedicating a shuttle launch to the Taliban.” Afghanistan was in this era engaged in a brave, almost hopeless fight against Communists who butchered Afghan civilians by the hundreds of thousands–wontonly, brazenly, with mass graves dug just to throw people in, sometimes still alive, throwing gasoline on them and setting them on fire just to make sure they were dead before burying them with bulldozers. Cutting entire villages to ribbons using machine guns. And worse. Much worse.

The Taliban at the time of all this was one of a very large number of groups fighting the Soviets. A very large number of wildly different groups. America gave weapons to resistance fighters, plural. Those resistance fighters were from a variety of political viewpoints; some former communists who’d realized their foolishness. Some democracy advocates. Some loyalists to the ousted king. Some, religious extremists. Most, people who didn’t give a damn about any of it, they just wanted the Soviet mass-murderers out of their damned country.

The US covertly aided the resistance. And when the Soviets were ousted, we said nice words and left. It boiled down to, “welp, that’s good, the Communists are gone. Good luck with your country then. Buh-bye!”

We stood by and considered it none of our business when fighting began between previous resistance groups. We simply turned our backs and allowed whoever wanted to take power to take power. After all, despite decades of hateful lies, we were not an imperialist country, and when the Taliban emerged victorious we considered it none of our business. Until 9/11.

The Taliban was never our “friends,” they were never endorsed by us, or any US President, ever.

Our great crime in Afghanistan was turning our backs on all those resistance fighters, and letting the ones who wanted peace and freedom to be cut to ribbons by the likes of the Taliban. We betrayed them. By abandoning them.

Now we are in Afghanistan trying to correct our mistake. The best movie Hollywood has made in years was Charlie Wilson’s War.

Having read extensively on Afghanistan, studied it for years, even having friends there, I can tell you, this movie is the closest you’ll find, in cinematic form, to what the real story of America’s role in Afghanistan was in the 1980s. And it draws the right conclusions about our biggest mistake on Afghanistan: we did great and amazing things, and then we f*cked up the end game. We’re still paying for that fatal mistake.

{ 11 comments }

I have a completely unrepentant loathing for Corporate America–meaning, specifically, large corporations–for many years. It interests me how often people respond to that by suggesting that corporations are the basic means by which the “Free Market” unleashes entrepreneurship and economic growth, which is nonsense because entrepreneurs are individuals or small groups not large corporate entities.

Even more amusing is those who say I just don’t understand what corporations are, even though I’ve actually founded or co-founded multiple corporations, both for-profit (chapter C and subchapter-S) and non-profit corporations in the past, and held stock in numerous publicly traded corporations through a 401(k) program (back before I was forced by circumstances to cash it out).

I get it. I’ve seen them up close and personal, from corporations owned by one person, to corporations owned by a handful, to corporations owned by millions of people. What I noticed is consistent: the larger the number of owners, the less human and more machinelike the entity becomes, until pretty soon it’s not human at all, it is entirely a machine, no better or worse than any government bureaucracy.

I feel the same way about large government bureaucracies, in case that wasn’t clear.

One of the reasons I don’t like these machines is because of how they treat people. I think this video brilliantly illustrates much of what’s wrong with these burueaucratic machines–government, private, or mixed public-private. They incentivize poorly, they crush innovation, they crush creativity, and they put money at the top of the agenda for everything. This isn’t a good way to live, and doesn’t motivate many people very well at all from what I’ve seen and experienced.

{ 10 comments }

Swing With The Marx Brothers

by Dean Esmay on September 9, 2010

in Music,humor

{ 0 comments }

Treason

by Dean Esmay on September 8, 2010

in Politics,Spiritual Matters,The War

I keep getting questioned about my referring to people like Pastor Terry Jones, and others who go out of their way to take antagonistic stances toward Muslims as a whole, of treasonous behavior.

The term “treason” is defined by the Random House Dictionary as follows:

1. the offense of acting to overthrow one’s government or to harm or kill its sovereign.
2. a violation of allegiance to one’s sovereign or to one’s state.
3. the betrayal of a trust or confidence; breach of faith; treachery.

The U.S. Constitution states the following:

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

The Constitution says a few more things, but otherwise leaves it up to Congress to define it. So far as I know, Congress has never declared that treasonous speech as a crime, unless it involves an overt act like blowing national security secrets.

In a strict legal sense, then, it would seem that under American law you probably can’t try someone for treason for giving aid and comfort to the enemy by non-overt acts like speech and protests; the First Amendment is still in force, for goodness sakes. But you can judge people as morally guilty of treason, in my view, such as by outright endorsing our enemies. Or, just about as bad, giving propaganda gifts to our enemies (like Pastor Terry Jones is doing). Or, by making our armed forces’ jobs harder when they’re busy fighting our enemies.

Arrest people for burning books? No. Censure them? You bet.

There are Muslims buried in military graves around the United States. There are Muslims who’ve given their lives fighting in our armed forces, or shoulder-to-shoulder in parts of the world where we desperately need help from the locals. P*ssing all over American Muslim service members, some of whom have fought and died for this country, and p*ssing on our allies who’ve done the same, because of some religious or anti-religious axe you have to grind, or some misplaced sense of guilt-by-association, should be called morally treasonous in my view. Would I put you in jail? No. But condemn you in very strong terms? You bet. We don’t need to lose the War on Terror by making enemies out of people who want to be our friends, and who show that they’re willing to be our friends in very tangible ways.

It is a subject that makes me very angry, no question about it. It always has. It always will. Our troops and our allies deserve better than this.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

General Petreus illustrates perfectly why Islamophobia is borderline treasonous activity–backstabbing our troops in the field, and the Muslim allies fighting and dying side by side with them.

Of course, most Muslims over here in the US have a perfectly sane response (and despite endless claims to the contrary, it’s hardly impossible to find such Muslims, you just have to spend all of five minutes actually, y’know, making a sincere attempt), but that isn’t the point: in places like Afghanistan in particular, we are looking at a largely illiterate, extremely poor population easily manipulated by a single image accompanied by these words:

“The Americans hate us and all we care about! Just look!”

I know from experience that most people don’t get this, and I’m done trying to explain it, because I believe most people don’t want to get it. And no, I don’t want to discuss it; if you want to rant and rave about the Islamic faith because Muslims in poverty-ridden, impoverished cultures, ground their whole lives under the bootheel of fascist tyrants, tend to have angry reactions when you piss on everything they hold dear, go find somewhere else, probably someplace loaded with atheists or fundamentalist Christians, where they’ll happily agree with every word you say.

Terry Jones is a disgraceful traitor, just like most of the tools at Jihadwatch and Atlas Shrugs. He’s not standing up for “free speech,” he’s indulging in hate speech, and stabbing US armed forces in the back. Thanks, a$$#0les.

And no, I have no interest whatsoever in debating the matter.

*Update*: The BBC shows reactions in the Muslim world. Predictably, violent reactions are not the norm, although I’m sure someone, somewhere in the world’s 1,000,000,000 Muslims will act like an idiot and be used in a “see! see! here’s all the proof you need!” demagogue fashion.

I am proud to see that the Vatican was front and center in condemning this filthy behavior.

If you’re making excuses for Pastor Jones, I don’t even want to talk to you. His “free speech” isn’t at issue, he’s free to burn crosses, burn flags, burn Bibles, burn the Book of Mormon, burn the Baghavad-Gita, burn the Koran, he can burn whatever book he wants. Hey, the Nazis loved burning books too, Pastor, you’re in good company!

*Update 2* Here’s how Gainesville’s Muslim community plans to respond. Good for them.

*Update 3*: I hear that the Pastor has finally decided to do the Christian thing and not give offense simply for the sake of being offensive. Good for him.

{ Comments on this entry are closed }

I’ve known a lot of scientists, including a number who’ve quit in disgust, and this description of how so much of science works today matches what an awful lot of them will admit privately if they won’t state it openly.

I continue to view it as genuinely scandalous that “peer review” got hijacked as the way to determine who got money. It’s so rife for corruption, abuse, and conflict of interest it’s ridiculous. But it won’t get better until it’s reformed, and who, in the current system, has the cojones to demand real reform?

It’s about institutions, not the scientific method, far too much of the time.

{ 24 comments }

Roku.com-The Little Black Box That Streams Thousands of Films! WordPress MU, WPMU and BuddyPress plugins, themes and support at WPMU DEV Thesis Theme for WordPress:  Options Galore and a Helpful Support Community
traffic stats