close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100827003545/http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com:80/2010/08/miller-may-pull-upset-in-alaska----murkowski-trailing-as-votes-still-to-be-counted.php
BERJAYA
BERJAYA

TPMDC

Miller May Pull Upset In Alaska -- Murkowski Trailing As Votes Still To Be Counted

BERJAYA
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)

Share

Twitter Fark Reddit Send to a Friend

Send to a friend!

To email:    Your Name:    Your email:

Political prognosticators were surprised to wake up this morning and see Joe Miller holding a narrow lead of less than 3,000 votes over Sen. Lisa Murkowski in Alaska's Republican primary.

Unofficial returns as of this morning -- with 84.2 percent of precincts reporting -- showed Miller leading with 45,188 votes to Murkowski's 42,633 votes. That's Miller 51.5%-Murkowski 48.6%. What's more, the votes outstanding are from rural areas and 8,400 so-far-unreturned absentee ballots, so the final result won't be known for at least a week and might be undetermined until Sept. 8.

Whichever Republican wins, conventional wisdom takes a hit. As we reported, broad consensus both in Washington and Alaska was that Murkowski would win by a wide margin. If the senator pulls it off, it will be very close. There were few public polls, and they all showed Murkowski in the lead.

We took a look at several internal polls as well, which also showed her besting Miller. But Miller's folks sounded very confident this week in an interview with TPM. He had the backing of former Gov. Sarah Palin, conservative groups and the tea party.

The Anchorage Daily News reports this morning that Miller credited Palin last night.

"I'm absolutely certain that was pivotal," he said.

Murkowski on Tuesday night took a shot at Palin, saying that when Palin resigned as governor last summer she said she would use her new national role to help out Alaska.

"I think she's out for her own self-interest. I don't think she's out for Alaska's interest," Murkowski said as she waited at her campaign headquarters for results to come in.

A Murkowski spokesman told the Daily News that the senator was looking to benefit from rural and coastal areas of Alaska: "We knew the race was going to be tight. The rural areas have yet to come in and we know Sen. Murkowski is going to be very strong in the rural areas."

The Daily News breaks it down:

Most of the precincts that hadn't reported were in rural areas, particularly Western Alaska including the regions around Bethel, Nome and Kotzebue, where paper ballots are counted by hand. Counting was to continue through the night, according to the Division of Elections. There were also some precincts yet to report in the Dillingham-Aleutians region and the university area of Fairbanks. But all those of tend to be Democratic-leaning areas where many independent voters might choose the Democratic primary ballot. Those who are registered Democrats aren't allowed to vote in the Republican primary so can't have a say in the Miller-Murkowski race.

The final results of the race won't be known for over a week. The Alaska Division of Elections said over 16,000 absentee ballots were requested and as of Monday night 7,600 had been returned. The first count of absentees will be next Tuesday and there will be two subsequent counts as the absentee votes trickle in on Sept. 3 and on Sept. 8.

Update: As of 6:30 pm ET, Murkowski continued to trail Miller, 45,128 to 46,620 with 99.5 percent of precincts reporting -- a margin of less than 1,500 votes.

Comments (58) | Join the Conversation!

Recommend Recommend (0)

BERJAYA

August 25, 2010 7:29 AM   

WOW!

If you thought Sarah Palin was insufferable already, just imagine how she'll be if Miller holds on and she sticks it to the Murkowski's again.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 8:19 AM    in reply to jdb316

Well, I guess she can brag that she's 2-0 against Murkowski's.... but sub .500 everywhere else. Has she backed any winners beyond Haley?

Perhaps if the Democratic Party would be so kind as to ask all their candidates to change their surnames to 'Murkowski'.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:59 AM    in reply to zonk

"sub .500 everywhere else"

I'm pretty sure she's packing a .45 caliber, though with the added need for security, she may be carrying a Desert Eagle these days, so watch out for Palin!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:49 PM    in reply to zonk

Welcome to visit

http://www.bizboysell.com

Buy these fashionable products

Buy gifts and send

We accept paypal payments

and delivery is free.


@@#%%#@%#@#@%^$#^$^$##$&^%*^*%^*%

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:35 AM    in reply to jdb316

Can't wait to read Palin's Twitter and Facebook posts. Maybe we'll even learn some new words.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 10:00 AM    in reply to Rick Jones

'Maybe we'll even learn some new words.'

Good one! ;-)

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 7:31 AM   

If anyone deserves to lose to a teabagger, it's Murkowski. Bubbye, Lisa!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 7:33 AM   

I'm beginning to wonder: who should fear the tea party most - President Obama and Senate Democrats or Mitch McConnell and Senate Republicans?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 12:43 PM    in reply to Jberry

You really wonder? All Republicans in Congress are already voting "no" in lockstep, so even if some of those elected are further right it won't make much difference. On the other hand, in every place where teabaggers have won, they've made the Democrats' chances far better, albeit still far from assured. Even if they win, when the political winds shift they'll get crushed. Unlike, for example, Olympia Snowe, who we can't get rid of because most independents and quite a few Dems keep voting her back out of habit.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 7:36 AM   

"I think she's out for her own self-interest. I don't think she's out for Alaska's interest," Ya think! A lot of Republicans are going to have the same feelings in Nov. they're going to think what the hell happened. You can't hate everybody who isn't a white christian and expect to win.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 7:37 AM   

Michael Jackson in drag

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 8:10 AM   

This race was just like the Bennet/Romanoff primary.

Bennet had been a very progressive democrat in the senate and took all the right votes. However, Romanoff nitpicked and trumped up charges of "corporatism" against him, while playing himself as the "true progressive" and suddenly, "progressives" bought into it and tried to oust Bennet.

Murkowski has been a down-the-line teabagger in the Senate but Miller convinced voters that, despite her right-wing voting record, she wasn't right-wing enough.

Fortunately, sanity prevailed in the democratic primary. Sanity can't prevail in the republican races because sanity isn't even in the room.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 8:40 AM   

Is McAdams viable? This could be huge for Democrats.
Alaska loses two senior senators in two election cycles.
Has that ever happened before anywhere else?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 8:55 AM    in reply to yellowdogD

I wouldn't count on it.

Dems (rightfully so) wrote off Alaska as unwinnable this election cycle.

Alaska isn't a state known for turning out particularly sane/honourable politicians: the Repubs have crooked assholes like Stevens, Young, and both Murkowskis as well as jabbering lunatics like Palin and Miller.

The Dems (Knowles, Gravel, Begich) are sane and honest...but those qualities don't matter to the electorate in one of the most solidly Republican states in the country.

Miller being a teabagging Palinite will only help his chances.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:13 AM    in reply to EnnuiDivine

Democrats wrote off Alaska because Murkowski was supposed to be a shoe-in. You can bet that decision is being reevaluated this morning.

Mike Gravel is hardly what I would call sane.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:31 AM    in reply to PollyJunkie

Had Ethan Berkowitz, Tony Knowles, or Hollis French decided to contest the election...they'd be in better shape.

Dems have to defend Nevada, California, Washington, et.al...Alaska's not typically high on their list of targets to begin with.

They barely won in 2008 and that was due to it being a Presidential election year (much larger turnout) and Stevens being incredibly corrupt.

And Gravel's the paradigm of mental health...when you compare him to Palin.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:51 AM    in reply to EnnuiDivine

Yep the DEMS would have a chance if say Berkowitz or Knowles had run. Berkowitz is running for governor instead after almost beating corrupt Rep. Don Young in 2008.

I think Murkowski is going down here. I really don't think she can make up enough ground in the remaining ballots. This is a stunning upset. An now another Palin backed nutcase will be a US Senator. Wow!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 10:24 AM    in reply to EnnuiDivine

Being more mentally healthy compared to Palin isn't much to brag about.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 1:25 PM    in reply to EnnuiDivine

I think you meant paragon, but point well taken.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:34 AM    in reply to PollyJunkie

Did Gravel become a flake after he left the Senate or was he always a flake? Don't know much about him pre-wacky Presidential candidate days.

I hope the Dems do re-evaluate but also hope they don't waste too much time on this race. Begich barely eked it out against a tainted Stevens in a very, very good year for Democrats. McAdams would need a miracle to beat Miller.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 10:29 AM    in reply to ogliberal

A sitting mayor (Begich) running against an entrenched incumbent who has delivered for the state time and again is quite different from a sitting mayor (McAdams)running against a Johnny-come-lately Palindrone who has never been elected to anything.

2008 was not a big democratic year in Alaska. Stevens and Young were in trouble because of corruption charges, not because of an Obama wave.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 12:03 PM    in reply to yellowdogD

Scott McAdams is quite viable, especially against Joe Miller. There are more non-party registered voters in Alaska than those from both major parties combined.

McAdams, who is en route to Anchorage from Sitka right now, has a very effective stump speech, is quick with answers that resonate, and has a vibrant sense of humor, something Joe Miller distinctly lacks. Scott also has a record of working with the opposite side, another problem for Joe.

We need to get some effective national fundraising going for Scott by this weekend. Howie Klein and John Amato, hopefully, will be leading the charge.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:13 AM   

McAdams badly needs a repackaging job. Miller has a JD from Yale against McAdams BA in Education from Sheldon Jackson College in Sitka, Alaska.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:30 AM    in reply to eggroll

But wouldn't Miller's JD from a fancy schmancy elite East Coast school make him less of a "real 'Murcan" than the guy with the BA from a local school? Aren't Alaskans supposed to love "real 'Murcans"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 10:31 AM    in reply to eggroll

We all know that politicians who don't have sterling academic credentials from Ivy League institutions don't do well in Alaska.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:19 AM   

ah yes those mind numbing meaningless polls. I wish the msm would rely on being a journalist more then relying on poll numbers to do thier job

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:36 AM    in reply to pmb50

Amen.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:32 AM   

Wonder if Miller is a member of the Alaska Independent Party - secessionists. He's a friend of Todd's and seems to have the same rhetoric.

I wonder how AK'ns will feel when he doesn't bring home all that money for the state, considering that AK'ns recieve more federal money per person than any other state.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:38 AM   

The race is filled with handouts.

Let's begin with the basic premise that serving as a senator would be a very cool thing to do. It's a hard job to win and most any thinking person would gladly take and enjoy a job like this.

Lisa, of course, is ex-senator Frank Murkowski's kid. She'd never have had a shot at serving as senator but for her name (which she kept after marrying). And, even with that name, Frank knew she'd have trouble winning the seat so as governor he appointed her to fill his seat.

And, then there is our friend Joe Miller. To say that he'd be in the wilderness of Alaska without Sarah Palin is the understatement of the year. But he must have done something to at least attract Palin.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:42 AM   

Wonder if Lisa can pull a "Joe Lieberman"?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 10:02 AM    in reply to Lucieann


Well, I think it's safe to say that she is ambitious and has no integrity. So if State law will permit; it is a good bet that she will. Thanks for flagging the issue.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 10:11 AM   

As much as I loathe Murkowski, I can't help pulling for her to beat the presumed (and rarely accurate) narrative.

However, having an extremist running in November might just help secure a Democratic victory.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 10:33 AM   

I wonder if Murkowski hates Palin so much that she'd refuse to endorse Miller in the general and/or back McAdams.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 10:47 AM   

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 11:02 AM   

It's a choice between Dumb and Dumber in the gop camp. But then there is a serious problem of alcoholism in Alaska, the state that elected palin.

I'm not making fun of alcoholics, but after seeing what they seem to prefer to run our government I can't help but wonder if Alaska should adhere to voting laws of not being able to vote while under the influence.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 11:03 AM   

i wish the dems would throw out some of their deadwood - like mr rangel and others.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 11:25 AM   

I think the "unwashed tea partier beats sitting senator" storyline on this is a little off -- this guy went to friggin Yale, worked at a fancy law firm in Anchorage, was quickly appointed both a state judge and a federal magistrate -- his is admittedly very right wing, but he is an insider playing tea party -- sort of like Lee in Utah.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 12:13 PM    in reply to Subliminability

I'll bet he drives a pick-up truck, or at least has one on hand for those special occasions when he needs to present his "just a regular guy" facade.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 11:55 AM   

Tragic that Ben Quayle won his primary, but should help Jon Hulburd the D nominee! my take....

This was 23% of Republicans voting against Obama and for Civil War...and 77% of Republicans voting against that.

It's ludicrous that AZ has no runoff!

The Democrats are 100% behind their nominee Jon Hulburd (a good and reasonable man) and the Republicans are 77% embarrassed by their nominee...MR. POTATOE HEAD!
http://chipshirley.com/


Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 11:58 AM   

Wow. What gets me about this story is how few people we're talking about! 45,188? That's fewer than in my little unpopulated RURAL Ohio county, just one county out of 88. And a Senate seat is at stake? I know nobody but me is surprised that this is how it works, but still. I remember watching 90% of DC line up to vote for Kerry, who never campaigned there, and the votes of those hundreds of thousands of people were basically meaningless.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 12:17 PM    in reply to johnpdeever

WOW! Thanks for making the point of how few IGNORANT REDNECKS it takes to elect a Senator in one of the backwater states! This is why you cannot get shit done in the Senate! There are less people in Alaska and Wyoming than DC yet THEY GET A GOD DAMNED SENATOR and DC gets nothing. America is SCREWED! This may have been OK a hundred years ago but in this world we are being dragged back to the stone age just exactly when we need to be moving into the fast changing future. Alabama gets the same votes in the Senate as California! Mississippi gets the same votes as New York. Idaho cancels out Illinois. YOU GET THE PICTURE!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 1:01 PM    in reply to hollywood

I agree. Look at what the health care bill the House passed and look at the health care bill the Senate passed.

The House is a truer representation of America and passes more liberal legislation.

Alaska and Wyoming have total populations less than the city of Tucson and they get two Senators each. Should "Tucson" get a two Senator say in our Federal Government? How about ranking Senator Ted Stevens in his day? Should a Senator that represents less than 750,000 people have that much power??

I don't think tearing down the Senate would be an answer, but it does feel like a lead weight around the neck of progress.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 1:07 PM    in reply to hollywood

That is what the House of Representatives is for, at least in theory. The House is supposed to represent the people (representation based on population) and the Senate is supposed to represent the states. The presence of the Senate keeps the Alaskas and Wyomings from getting stampeded, while the House rewards states like California, New York and Texas.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 1:17 PM    in reply to jdb316

Represent the States, as in, the slave holding States. The Senate was formed for the same reason as the Electoral College, to protect slavers, and both should have been abolished after the Civil War.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 5:13 PM    in reply to jdb316

You say the Senate represents the "states". But can you define the "states"? I mean, exactly WHAT is a U.S. Senator representing? To put it differently, WHAT are those interests that accrue to a STATE but do not accrue to the PEOPLE in that state?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 12:07 PM   

These Tea People are gonna wipe out the Republican and very few will win in November.

Those who do will prove themselves laughing stocks and help us in 12

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 12:51 PM   

Ballot measure 2 was voted on yesterday in Alaska. It was passed. It requires a pregenant teen to inform her parents before getting an abortion. That ballot measure brought pro-life, religious types to the voting booths. Pro--life religious types are also the type to vote for a Palin backed, tea party candidate.

Joe Miller has the story that Alaskan's love. Ex-military, religious, anti-abortion, anti-government. And he is a Chuck Norris clone with glasses. 2nd Amendment friendly too!!! Oh my, the "True Alaskans" are swooning over this guy.

As a true, home grown Alaskan, I do not like the path my state is taking. Alaska is filling up with Christians from outside tying to make it into some kind of Bible fantasy, holy land. It is becoming more and more white, armed, ignorant and intolerant. If the South is the Bible Belt, Alaska is the Bible Bib.

Also the Anchorage Daily News is reporting Miller's lead is down to a 40 votes.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 1:32 PM   

I'm a liberal Democrat, registered as "non-partisan" in Alaska. That means I can vote in the Republican primary. I did, and voted for Miller, just to get Lisa out of the Senate. I know many of my friends did the same thing. We hate Palin, and wont vote for Miller in the general.

When Lisa was in the state legislature she was a moderate Republican. Now she panders to the right. She alienated many moderate and liberal voters. So if Lisa loses this, and that's a BIG IF, there's more than just the Tea Party behind this upset.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 1:42 PM   

Also the Anchorage Daily News is reporting Miller's lead is down to a 40 votes.

I was just at the Anchorage Daily News website and could not find this. It says:

With 429 of 438 precincts counted this morning,, Miller had 45,909 votes (51 percent) to 43,949 (49 percent) for Murkowski.

http://www.adn.com/2010/08/24/1423423/miller-holds-slim-lead-in-early.html#ixzz0xdm7roE0

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 2:16 PM    in reply to booch221

Yeah, my bad. I just checked the ADN for updates and saw that it is a 2040 lead not 40. I was going to post a correction. That's what I get for not wearing my reading glasses. A 3 looked like a 5.

Anyways.....

A 2040 lead at this point will be hard for Murkowski to overcome.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 2:20 PM    in reply to lilysdaddy

My math is still off isn't it.....

A 1960 lead will be hard to overcome.

Screw it. That's it for me.

I'm done looking like an idiot for today.......

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 5:33 PM    in reply to lilysdaddy

It's not very likely, but far from impossible either. If the 16,000 absentee votes they mentioned are all for the Republican primary, Murkowski only needs to win 9,000 of them - or about 56% - to overtake Miller.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 2:05 PM   

I think Murkowski's still in this, no?

Most of those mail-ins were probably done before Sarah teabagged it up.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 5:27 PM   

I think Murkowski is still in this. Remember on election night in 2008 it looked like Ted Stevens had won reelection over Mark Begich. But when they counted the absentee ballots everything changed. There were 16,000 absentee ballots sent out by the Division of Elections for this primary. So far 7,600 have been returned, and more could arrive by mail in the coming weeks.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 6:31 PM   

We fans & supporters of the Gorgeous Governor are quite gracious in victory, so...Heh, Heh, Heh. And bring it on, 2012!

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 8:18 PM    in reply to Ahmedsaid

I was looking for a comment by you sailorboy. Didn't I tell you to take a day off?

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:28 PM    in reply to Hobbes83

He's too excited that Ken Mehlman came out, so he's giddy.

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

August 25, 2010 9:26 PM   

Hello, summer, good place for shopping, fashion, sexy, personality, maturity, from here to begin. Are you ready?


http://www.pointingtrade.com/

New era cap $10

Bikini (Ed hardy,polo) $16

Sunglasses(Oakey,coach,*****,Armaini)$12

Tshirts (Polo ,ed hardy,lacoste) $16

Air jordan(1-24)shoes $33

********(Coach,ed hardy,lv,d&g;) $30

Jean(True Religion,ed hardy,coogi) $30

http://www.pointingtrade.com/

Reply | Flag Abuse

Are you sure this comment violates TPM's Terms of Service?

Leave a comment

Your response:

Follow us!

BERJAYA BERJAYA BERJAYA
BERJAYA

TPM PollTracker

TPM Poll Averages

ObamaBarack Obama
Job Approval
44.5%Approve 51.2%Disapprove -6.7Spread
CongressCongressional
Generic Ballot
41.8%DEM 47.3%GOP +5.5SpreadR

Most Popular

TPM Stories Now Surging on

BERJAYA