close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100828022629/http://www.vanityfair.com/online/wolcott

BERJAYA

Honor and Dishonor

Cynthia Yockey, the self-described "newly conservative lesbian" (sigh: a path that can only lead to disappointment, is inviting her readers to kick in some Confederate money to fund her car trip to attend Glenn Beck's "Restoring Honor" Lard-Baby Rally & Hate Festival (h/t: Wonkette) this weekend in Washington.

Which, as everyone knows, is being held at the site of Martin Luther King Jr's "I Have a Dream" speech on the anniversary of that momentous address.

Beck claims that it's a "coincidence," his "Restoring Honor" rally being staged on the same date and locale as MLK's speech, but anyone who's ever watched Beck at his Fox News blackboard or heard him on the radio knows that coincidences play no part in his worldview. Everything connects and is sinisterly significant.

So as a practitioner of Transcendental Meditation, Ms. Yockey might want to pause and ask herself, would Maharishi have smiled upon the prospect of the memory of Martin Luther King, Jr. being dishonored by a fear-monger like Glenn Beck?

Is that what Maharishi would have wanted? Well, is it?

Jai Guru Dev.

Helpful Hint for Uptown Panhandlers, One in Particular

If you're going to ambush me mere seconds after I've walked out of a grocery store, you might want to try not holding out an empty, beseeching palm with one hand while in the other clutching a fistful of lottery tickets you just bought at the corner newsstand.

Because it disinclines me to render on-the-spot financial assistance.

Like Dr. Johnson, I begrudge no destitute man or woman the consolation of bottled spirits, but I'll be dashed if I'm going to subsidize lottery tickets.

Hey, I'd Buy It!

Driftglass's proposed Handbook for Bloggers.

With a wry foreword by some McSweeney's guy, depending on who's available.

Smoke Gets in Your Thighs

Paris Review Daily has an interesting interview with Natasha Vargas-Cooper, whose invaluable guidebook Mad Men Unbuttoned sits on the corner of my desk, pulsating.

How did this book come about?

Last year I had quit my job in labor politics, left my boyfriend of five years, fled from Brooklyn and moved back in with my parents. Then my dog ran away. After a bout of some well earned wallowing, I sprang up at 4 A.M. and decided I’d rewatch the show. I popped in the DVDs, started a blog for kicks, figuring I’d be putting my degree in history to work. I got a call from Harper Collins about a month later.

Can you talk about the themes that give the book its structure?

I think the show depicts the social fissures that began to appear during the late 1950s and eventually entered the counter-cultural movement of the 1960s. The show has three main prisms through which it examines these changes: advertising, domestic life, sex. (I'm specifically interested in Peggy’s sex life since she is at the mercy of all the shifts in sexual mores given her age.) So the main themes of the book are the anxieties and exuberance that come with such accelerated change.

Why are people so delightfully geeky about the details and cultural theory behind Mad Men?

We’re watching the foundation of our modern taste come together—that’s fascinating! The show lends itself to a gleeful analysis. Its use of culture is deliberate. References to pop culture or politics aren’t thrown in to be cute or suggestive, but to enhance the themes of the show or our understanding of the characters. I think the audience appreciates not being treated like a mope so they get jazzed about it.

At the end of the interview the author is asked a question more suitable to the pages of Cosmo or Bust than the literary quarterly George Plimpton carved out with his bare hands at Valley Forge, nevertheless:

If Don Draper hit on you, would you be tempted?

Of course! Not only would I be tempted, I’d have my legs behind my head faster than he could light a cigarette. Don is actually like a fresh pack of cigarettes—sleek, simple, addictive, but he will ultimately rot your heart.

I trust Ms. Vargas-Cooper is sufficiently limber to be whipping her legs past her ears should she ever be hit on by a hypothetical Don Draper, or at least is properly "warmed up" before she attempts this sudden gymnastic move. Otherwise, she might find herself over-rotating while jack-knifing, as I have seen happen in yoga class, which can be a very awkward position to extricate yourself from elegantly, believe you me.

The Siren Slaps Graham Greene's Little Winkie!

Now get your mind out of the gutter.

No lewd, lascivious, or legally actionable entendre is intended.

It is Graham Greene's infamously infamous review of Shirley Temple and her saucing about in John Ford's Wee Willie Winkie (1937), where (in Greene's review, which helped hasten the end of the sterling magazine that published it, Night and Day,* London's answer to The New Yorker) she behaves like "a complete totsy" in her kilt, "her well-shaped and desirable little body" the object of pedophile-pandering ogling--it is this that the Siren is chastising.

Followed by the Siren's own reflections on Shirley Temple and Wee Willie Winkie after returning to it after many years:

The first thing to know about Wee Willie Winkie is that it isn’t a Shirley Temple movie that happened to be directed by John Ford; it’s a John Ford movie that happened to star Shirley Temple. What makes it such a good film is that Ford doesn’t condescend to the material or the star. He shot it with the same loving attention to detail and deep, beautiful precision that would characterize Stagecoach two years later. And the themes that Ford, via Kipling, brings to bear--the civilizing influence of women and children, sacrifice, courage, respect between enemies—-are also familiar from countless other Ford films.

To the uninitiated the name Shirley Temple tends to evoke one of two things: a ringleted, short-skirted, tap-dancing relic, or Graham Greene’s celebrated charge that there was something less than wholesome in her audience’s adoration. More on the latter in the sidebar below; here we will deal with the first. Temple was, in fact, a phenomenally gifted child performer, with charisma that leaps at you even today. She wasn’t the kind of transparently emotional actress that Judy Garland was, for example, and the Siren’s as grateful as everyone else that 20th Century Fox wouldn’t lend Temple for The Wizard of Oz. But Temple was frequently excellent and surprisingly subtle.

Temple has always said Winkie is her favorite of her films, and she got along well with Ford, who seems to have brought out the very best in her acting...

I don't disagree with the Siren's criticisms of the limitations of Greene's film criticism and his crotchety tastes, but he took movies more seriously in the Thirties than most of the reviewers in London weeklies since (especially The Spectator), where the tradition of the Gentleman Hack (and Hackette) endures.

*The telephone operators at the magazine became tired of greeting a caller, "Night and Day" and hearing the voice at the other end crooning, "You are the one..."

Jim Norton's Dick Jokes Are Better than Judd Apatow's--There, I Said It

This Christian Lorentzen--I am unsure as to whether I have read him before and I am as certain as anyone with amnesia can be that we have never met, and yet I embrace him as a soul brother. From "Dicking Around" at n + 1:

America is a country of overgrown boys, stunted and warped, who, left to their own devices, are fit to do little more than play video games, stare at pornography, and crack jokes about genitals, flatulence, and defecation. The country’s womenfolk match men’s obnoxious behavior with a reflexive shrewishness. They are ever vexed by anxiety about their diminishing horizons and fading looks. The men need to be tamed, and the women gain purpose from the taming, marching the men through a program of self-improvement consisting of grooming, gainful employment, relinquishing their toys, and disavowing their fraternal bonds. The women laugh and coo as the men emerge, docile clowns consoled by a friendly gaggle of children to whom they can pass on their dick jokes. This is Judd Apatow’s vision of America, as realized in three self-help fables—from the unmediated crudity of The 40 Year Old Virgin, through the mock cryptoconservatism of Knocked Up, to the pseudosolemnity of Funny People. Over the last half-decade it has really struck a chord.

Apatow delivers a method as well as a message. He films his actors improvising many scenes—film enough dick jokes and you can weave them into a plot. The improvisatory style has taken on the proportions of legend in the press of late, as if it were a novelty, or anything other than a sign of the lassitude of contemporary screenwriting. At certain points in the Apatow oeuvre reliance on the method is obvious, as in a montage from The 40 Year Old Virgin of Seth Rogen and Paul Rudd calling each other gay (as in: “You know how I know you’re gay?”) while playing video games. In that sequence at least the pair seem like friends. On average, the method yields a scene like Rogen’s visit to the bookstore with Katherine Heigl in Knocked Up. He rattles off a series of vulgar jokes about sex, pregnancy, and parenthood as she forces a series of laughs, none of which is timed right. Their lack of chemistry belies the movie’s premise—that the sweetness beneath the Rogen character’s oafishness is enough to charm a woman with Heigl’s TV-ready good looks.

[snip]

It turns out that Funny People is the movie Apatow wanted to make all along. It takes as its subject the misery of success in Hollywood. Poor Adam Sandler basically plays Adam Sandler if Adam Sandler were a barely redeemable asshole with leukemia. The redemption he seeks is reunion with a now married ex-girlfriend on whom he cheated. That doesn’t work out, but he is redeemed through friendship with his assistant/protege Rogen, whose character, by means of a subplot, lands a redeemer, too, his in the form of a girl.

It’s unclear whether Sandler’s success is corrupting or just a force that gradually empties you out by allowing you to buy anything or fuck anyone. Clips of movies starring the fictional Sandler—one resembles Look Who’s Talking, except Sandler’s head is placed on a baby’s body; in the other he plays a merman (a woman Sandler beds screams “Fuck me like Merman! C’mon! Do Merman! Do the Merman call!” and he obliges)—imply that Hollywood movies are stupid as a rule but that Funny People itself is operating at a higher level. Yet for all its self-consciousness Funny People relies at every turn on the basest level of humor, and when the solemnity of the leukemia plotline is shaken off it descends quickly to a repertoire of plot-forwarding antics functionally no different than what we might expect from another Look Who’s Talking sequel. Apatow and his cohort, confident in their status as showbiz machers, have discovered self-consciousness but have little idea what to do with it.

Which is why they fall back on dick jokes...

And they're not even good dick jokes. I happen to be immersed inch-deep (that's not a double entendre, so just even even "go there") in the works of standup comic Jim Norton, self-described "fit-titted nothing," and his dick jokes make Judd Apatow's dick jokes look like the uninspired worms that they are. One of the most slumming aspects of Funny People, the entire movie a slumming expedition in search of laughter, tears, and critical esteem, is that none of the stand-ups who are part of the Apatow repertory buddy system here shows the least flair for timing, delivery, and material that would justify the praise they receive once they slouch off-stage ("Funny shit, man"--really, when, where?). Absolutely nothing about Rogen's standup performance would make a rich, man-boy zero like Adam Sandler's movie-star funnyman pause at the entrance and say to himself, "This kid has something--I think I'll hire him to hang around me the rest of the movie and teach me what is to care."

And the stand-ups are no funnier offstage, hanging out and trading dick-fart-pussy one-liners like baseball cards. Any episode of Marc Maron's WTF podcast showcases more energy, honesty, and critical understanding of monologue craft than what you get with Apatow's slackers, who are little more than talking dicks--handheld mikes that ejaculate or at least dribble a few tadpoles,* to borrow a poetic image from Jim Norton, who can be heard with Maron here.

For me the sorriest thing about Apatow's auteurism is that the guy who gave us Freaks & Geeks has so coarsened in humor and human understanding; maybe that's what Hollywood does to you, or at least Hollywood success, topped with the accolades of bearded intellectuals.

*I'm surprised the movie wasn't titled Funny Peeholes, which is what it wants to be.

Siobhan Breaks Her Silence!

Her blog silence, that is.

Siobhan hadn't gone vocally mum, articulating herself solely through the art of pantomime and blackboard writing, but it's been a long desert spell since she has spoken to us online from the shadowed entrance of the Egyptian pyramid of mystery.

But now she is a back at In the Next Apartment, with a long tribute--an illustrated love letter of appreciation--to the actress Marian Seldes, whose bone structure alone is a national treasure.

If you’re not a theater nut, you may not have heard of Marian, and for that, I am truly sorry. She’s a grande dame of the New York stages, with her first role in 1947, for god’s sake, in Judith Anderson’s Medea, directed by — get this — John Gielgud. An appropriate starting point for us, I think, as Marian reminds me of those great hammy Brits like Gielgud and Guinness and McKellan. No one but no one can declaim like Marian, no one can roll words around in her mouth like she can, no one can arch an eyebrow with devastatingly hilarious effect like she does.

I’ve seen her in quite a few things over the years, perhaps most memorably in the unsettling Play About the Baby, which, for all its creepiness, had some of the funniest moments you can imagine, like Marian (as Woman) suddenly making up sign language to accompany Brian Murray (as Man). It’s a scene that is so clearly Marian, you know Albee wrote the part with her in mind:

(Woman begins signing — clearly absurd signing-like gestures.)

MAN. What are you doing?
WOMAN. Signing.
MAN. You know how? You know how to sign?
WOMAN. (Signing.) It would seem so.
MAN. When did you learn? And why? Why did you learn?
WOMAN. (Shrugs; signs.) It came upon me.
MAN. When?
WOMAN. Just now; I just realized I could do it.
MAN. Sign away.
WOMAN. (Signing; smiling.) Thank you.

What I am always reminded of when I watch Seldes on stage is that she studied dance under Martha Graham, for no other actress of any generation commands such expressive angularity and diagonal thrust with her body--such tubular force and semaphoric clarity in the service of Albee-esque comedy and mayhem. Her vocal range and timing are a marvel, but she needs her entire apparatus to deliver her full effect, which is why it's so frustrating to see her on screen sometimes, her body hidden in headshot close-ups, the editing and camera movements colonizing the rhythm-responses that she and her fellow actors can bring to life on stage.

And unlike some other Broadway Legends one could mention, Seldes had nothing of the monstre sacre in her grande damehood; she is gracious, witty, and utterly reality-grounded, as the pair of exchanges Siobhan has had with Seldes sweetly attest.

Mad Men's Post-Mortem Double Take

Take one: "Cry U.N.C.L.E."

Take two: "Shame Is the Name of the Game."

Your Homework Assignment for Tonight

Familiarize yourself, however glancingly, with the work of the late Alice Miller, with The Drama of the Gifted Child, Thou Shalt Not Be Aware, and Banished Knowledge.

And how Miller's insights and advocacy may inform discussion of the trauma of the gifted child that is unfolding with a certain girl named Sally.

Here, to that end, is a good place to start.

Or you can simply watch tonight's episode of Mad Men and do the reading later.

I see a hand raised.

"Will this be on the test?"

Yes, it will be on the test. Everything will be on the test. Everything.

All the Girls Loved Illya Kuryakin...

Explanation later.

After Mad Men.

An episode you won't want to miss, advice which so far this season applies to every episode.

BERJAYA

Subscribe to Vanity Fair magazine

Follow Us

Newsletters

to get our weekly newsletter
I understand and agree to the user agreement, privacy policy, and terms of service.

Podcast

Podcast

BERJAYA
Authors including Jay McInerney, Martha Sandweiss, and Tracey Morgan read from their new books.

RSS

RSS

BERJAYA
Stay up-to-date with everything happening on VF.com.
BERJAYA
Subscribe to Vanity Fair magazine
BERJAYA

Featured Photograpahy

BERJAYA

The 2010 International Best-Dressed List

The 2010 style elite includes princesses, First Ladies, a sitcom star, a venerable director, and a polo player. But who’s its most intriguing newcomer?
BERJAYA

Behind the Hamptons Hedges

Eight young people who summer in style show Alix Smith and Jessica Flint around their East End habitats.
BERJAYA

The Contra Girl’s Modeling Portfolio

The reluctant cover star of Vampire Weekend’s recent album shares clips from her modeling heyday.
BERJAYA

BERJAYA

BERJAYA