close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100820032712/http://thinkprogress.org:80/2010/08/18/walters-aids/

Think Progress

GOP IA state candidate deletes offensive Facebook posts, but unsure if AIDS is punishment for gays.

Yesterday, the Iowa Independent broke the story that Jeremy Walters — a Republican candidate for the Iowa State house — posted Facebook messages in which he quoted biblical verses saying that gay people should be “put to death” and suggested that AIDS is a punishment for the sin of homosexuality:

JeremyWaltersFaceBook

Walters’ statements were immediately condemned by One Iowa, the state’s largest lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) advocacy organization, and the Iowa Republican party, leading the candidate to remove the posts. But in a subsequent interview with the Wonk Room, Walters explained that his outburst was motivated by the recent Prop 8 decision and that he was still uncertain if God was trying to kill gay people. Read the interview here.



161 Responses to “GOP IA state candidate deletes offensive Facebook posts, but unsure if AIDS is punishment for gays.”

  1. ralph the wonder llama, official spokesllama for a Troll-Free America™ says:

    Anyone who posts something publicly as stupid as:

    “the Holy Bible says if your “GAY” homosexual they shall surely be put to death”

    has no business running for public office, just on grammatical offenses, let alone the ignorant faith-based bigotry issues.


  2. majii says:

    Why didn’t these faux conservatives stone Foley, Haggard, Rekers, and Craig to death when it was discovered that they had engaged in an activity which they say they believe leads to death?

    Why didn’t they demand an HIV?AIDS test from these men?

    Why didn’t they chastise Haggard a few weeks ago when he said that he had “over repented?”

    Stupid Hypocrites.


  3. har5125 says:

    Guessing that is his son in that picture. Just wondering will he still have this ignorant faith-based bigotry belief if say in fifteen years his son tells him, “Dad, I’m gay.”


  4. wolfsinger says:

    Like I’ve said before, when it comes to Christian GOP Goober hate and intolerance….

    “It’s The Christian, Stupid”

    Why do Christians always back up their hate with OLD TESTAMENT chapter and verse?


  5. blogbob says:

    If this clown is the best the Iowa Tea Party can offer, I feel bad for them. His grammar, punctuation, and spelling all would earn him an “F” in most Chater Schools.


  6. MCMetal says:

    What should be done with stupid people , Jeremy , besides putting them all in the GOP (if they aren’t in it already) ?


  7. blogbob says:

    sorry that was supposed to be “Charter Schools.”


  8. Zooey (I am Patsy) says:

    OT: Combat troops are pulling out of Iraq even as I write this.

    In your face, trolls.


  9. blogbob says:

    har5125 says:

    Guessing that is his son in that picture. Just wondering will he still have this ignorant faith-based bigotry belief if say in fifteen years his son tells him, “Dad, I’m gay.”

    My guess is that he’d ship his son off to Haggard’s gay deprogramming camp. Just ask Phil Schalfly’s son how much fun that was.


  10. krazeeinjun says:

    If Yahweh’s implicit instructions (via holy scripture as Walters implies) implicitly state that Homosexuals are to be put to death, why does Jeremy Walters state that he and his fellow believers should not kill them? I wonder what the penalty is for disobeying the direct, unambiguous teachings of their lord thy god? Could it be death? Oh what a tangled web they weaveth.

    Just saying …


  11. missmolly (sponsored by Troll-B-Gon®, now with MORE PermaRid™!) says:

    Does this idiot have an explanation as to why there are more straight people with the AIDS virus than gay people? Surely if God had meant AIDS to be a scourge among gays only, he would have kept it from running rampant over the entire continent of Africa.

    Does this idiot have an explanation as to why LESBIANS are among the lowest risk groups for AIDS (as well as STDs in general)? Surely, according to his logic, lesbians must be God’s chosen people.

    As much as he really, really WANTS God to kill all the gay people, he’s obviously having a hard time twisting the facts around to suit that theory.


  12. KayInMaine says:

    What if these wingnuts found out the Catholic Church and/or the Evangelicals added these “death to the gays!” parts in the bible and none of it was in the original text?


  13. missmolly (sponsored by Troll-B-Gon®, now with MORE PermaRid™!) says:

    blogbob says
    August 18th, 2010 at 7:44 pm

    sorry that was supposed to be “Charter Schools.”
    ___________________________________________________________________________

    That’s OK — your command of the English language is STILL better than Walters’.


  14. wolfsinger says:

    krazeeinjun @ 10 says:

    If Yahweh’s implicit instructions (via holy scripture as Walters implies) implicitly state that Homosexuals are to be put to death, why does Jeremy Walters state that he and his fellow believers should not kill them? I wonder what the penalty is for disobeying the direct, unambiguous teachings of their lord thy god? Could it be death? Oh what a tangled web they weaveth.

    Just saying …

    It begs the bigger question…why do religious zealots of virtually any stripe feel compelled to “DEFEND their God?”

    Why does GOD need defending?


  15. KayInMaine says:

    #
    #
    krazeeinjun says:

    If Yahweh’s implicit instructions (via holy scripture as Walters implies) implicitly state that Homosexuals are to be put to death, why does Jeremy Walters state that he and his fellow believers should not kill them? I wonder what the penalty is for disobeying the direct, unambiguous teachings of their lord thy god? Could it be death? Oh what a tangled web they weaveth.

    Just saying …
    August 18th, 2010 at 7:47 pm

    Exactly. By them not killing the gays as their allah demands, they are in essence supporting gay rights. Brilliant!


  16. har5125 says:

    wolfsinger says:

    Why do Christians always back up their hate with OLD TESTAMENT chapter and verse?

    These people are just Christian in name only, if they were actual Christians in their hearts then they would remember what is one of the most important verses in the Bible:

    Matthew 7:12 So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.


  17. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Could we please follow Article 6 of the Constitution and tell these religious freaks to keep their paranoia to themselves? I don’t care if the Bible says homosexuals should be eaten by Great white Sharks with wasabi sauce! The book has no more relevance to US law than HP Lovecraft.


  18. Badmoodman says:

    Why do Christians always back up their hate with OLD TESTAMENT chapter and verse?

    – - Do the Christianists really wanna play this game of bible quotes as to how we should live our lives in the 21st century?

    The entire tome is metaphorical and if they want to interpret the bible literally, there’s going to be some radical changes to society, including killing my neighbor for planting rows of different seeds next to each other.


  19. wolfsinger says:

    har5125 @ 16 says:

    wolfsinger says:

    Why do Christians always back up their hate with OLD TESTAMENT chapter and verse?

    These people are just Christian in name only, if they were actual Christians in their hearts then they would remember what is one of the most important verses in the Bible:

    Matthew 7:12 So in everything, do to others what you would have them do to you, for this sums up the Law and the Prophets.

    Amen!


  20. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Odin said anyone killed in combat would go to Valhalla, escorted by valkyries to battle again. Can we quit running the world on ancient mythologies? None of them have provided anything useful beyond some cool movies.


  21. alfoduane says:

    before christmas we’ll find out that jeremy is gay,wait for it


  22. wolfsinger says:

    Of course har5125,…

    It can be argued that the “golden rule” you speak of only works when your heart is not full of vile self-loathing fear and rage like so many of these Christian GOP Goobers.

    Then the rule applies but in reverse. Right into the sewer or RNC/Tea Party platform. Same Same.


  23. MCMetal says:

    This guy is talking about gays/homosexuals and the King James version of the Bible ?

    Uhhhh , wasn’t King James notorious for being gay ?


  24. Xisithrus says:

    so god wants to kill his gay children. so why not? according to many, which i dont follow, wants the world to end in a huge ball of flames..taking out everyone.


  25. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Certain sects of Muslims and Christians have been fighting and screwing up the world for over 1,000 years. In those years, there has not been one bit of evidence that either of them had any idea of what was real or right.

    Can we please tell them both they are delusional and get on with civilization?


  26. geoffdmiller says:

    I bet one Jason Bellinger wasn’t expecting this kind of attention when he “liked” this offensive post.


  27. ralph the wonder llama, official spokesllama for a Troll-Free America™ says:

    OT: another instance of domestic terrorism, this one in McKinney, Texas.

    No word yet on which right-wing pundit the terrorist was inspired by in this case.


  28. bizarrobrain (brought to you by The Citadel of Satanic Kitten Worship and Tidy Cat) says:

    “The Holy Bible say if your ‘GAY’ homosexual they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them. This tells me alot so should we kill them NO. They Need to ask God to forgive them of their sins and mean it turn away from it. They also need to know that when it says that their blood shall be upon them that tells me it is AIDS. Thats how I feel.”

    I thought TP’s homophobic trolls were retarded but, this guy takes conservative homophobia and retardation to a whole new level. Also, this guy proves once again that there is no rational argument against homosexuality, the only thing you have to justify your bigotry is a couple sentences from a very old book which also includes other rules that nobody follows anymore. Talk to me when you start protesting poly-fiber blends in clothing and Red Lobster then I might take you a little more seriously.

    Here’s how I feel after reading this crap.


  29. Metcalf0819 says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  30. Buckie Boy (New Improved Troll Ignore) says:

    God doesn’t exist, the bible was writen by many ancient and very primitive men.

    Only a fool believes by faith alone.


  31. Carrolldgjhdfjdf says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  32. Xisithrus says:

    leviticus wanted to put alot of people to death for things he deemed to be a sin.

    he wasnt god though.


  33. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Frankly, if the world is to survive, we need to tell these Gods to go lay by their dish. I don’t care if you believe in the Christian God or Allah, it appears they are both homophobic xenophobes. Either that or their followers are so wimpy they let the nuts run the asylum.

    Either way, it is time to get them out of politics because they sure aren’t omnipotent there.


  34. blogbob says:

    krazeeinjun says:

    If Yahweh’s implicit instructions (via holy scripture as Walters implies) implicitly state that Homosexuals are to be put to death, why does Jeremy Walters state that he and his fellow believers should not kill them? I wonder what the penalty is for disobeying the direct, unambiguous teachings of their lord thy god? Could it be death? Oh what a tangled web they weaveth.

    While you’re at it, why not stone them for eating bacon, or rump roast, or shrimp too?


  35. tombaker says:

    tough talk that gets walked back quickly…

    yep – he’s a GOPer.


  36. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    If you want the ultimate oxymoron it would be “God Hates…”


  37. katy says:

    OT – of course the guy is nuts, but –

    watching countdown, says BREAKING NEWS, COMBAT TROOPS LEAVING IRAQ…

    i see CNN is covering it now, but until the hour, MSNBC was the only channel, covering it LIVE…

    but, it this a new thing? are they leaving early?

    also, a few channels on my MEDIACOM cable are not working right -
    the sound is f’d up… guess which ones: MSNBC, COMEDY CENTRAL…

    hmmmmmm… i called, there’s nothing to be done at this time…
    it’s a loud fuzzy buzzing noise… very annoying.


  38. bizarrobrain (brought to you by The Citadel of Satanic Kitten Worship and Tidy Cat) says:

    MCMetal says:
    This guy is talking about gays/homosexuals and the King James version of the Bible ?

    Uhhhh , wasn’t King James notorious for being gay ?

    http://www.smirkingchimp.com/thread/19763

    “Those who practice homosexuality should swiftly be put to death by the government. God emphatically condemns the practice of exchanging proper gender characteristics among men and women. God justly calls for the death-penalty for anyone who practices homosexuality.”

    Citizens for the Ten Commandments

    Would fundamentalist Christians put King James to death? After all, his subjects joked “Elizabeth was King: now James is Queen.”

    Anti-gay fundamentalists might not like to hear it but just listen to what King James wrote to George Villiers, 1st Duke of Buckingham: “I naturally so love your person, and adore all your other parts, which are more than ever one man had.” James also wrote Villiers that “I desire only to live in the world for your sake.”

    Lest there be any doubts among fundamentalists about this being erotic as opposed to platonic affection, the far older James called angelic young Villiers “my sweet child and wife, and grant that ye may ever be a comfort to your dear dad and husband.” In return, Villiers, the subject of the nursery rhyme, Georgie Porgie, wrote James that “I cannot now think of giving thanks for friend, wife, or child; my thoughts are only bent on having my dear Dad and Master’s legs soon in my arms.” Villiers wrote as a man who “threatens you, that when he once gets hold of your bedpost again, never to quit it.” James wrote to Villiers that “whether you loved me now . . . better than at the time I shall never forget at Farnham, where the bed’s head could not be found between the master and his dog.”

    James’ sexual activity can be traced back to when he was 13 and king of Scotland, a title he had gained after his mother, Mary, Queen of Scots, had been removed from the throne. James was an only son and grew-up with rumors that his mother had his father killed so that she could have the throne. Like Georgie Porgy, Mary was the subject of a nursery rhyme:

    Mary, Mary quite contrary,
    How does your garden grow?
    With silver bells and cockle shells
    And pretty maids all in a row.

    Mary’s garden was a graveyard. Silver bells referred to thumbscrews while cockle shells were a similar torture device which corresponded to the anatomical part with the appropriate sounding name. The pretty maiden was the name for an early form of the guillotine, a device devoutly Catholic Mary freely used in persecuting Protestants.

    However, James became king of Scotland when he was only thirteen months old. As he had no father, James relied on male courtiers. One such courtier was his thirty-seven-year-old French cousin, Esmé Stuart d’Aubigny, 1st_Duke_of_Lennox who introduced the thirteen-year-old James to gay sex. The young James became so enamored of Esmé that Scottish nobles kidnaped the king and would not release him until James expelled his cousin back to France.

    James did marry but was said not to have been affectionate, although he sired several children. His wife and he lived apart after the birth of their daughter Sophia. After he became king of England in 1603, James fell in love with a seventeen-year-old poor Scotsman named Robert Carr who would become his Groom of the Chamber. James met him when Carr fell off a horse during a jousting contest. James ran onto the field and cradled the nimble, somewhat effeminate and not so bright teenager in his arms. James ensured Carr received the best care. King James eventually was To “treat Carr in public with the same exaggerated, gross affection as in private.” Many were shocked by a middle-aged, paunchy, balding and unclean man kissing and hugging on a pretty young boy. Thomas Howard, Earl of Suffolk, wrote that James “leans on his [Carr's] arm, pinches his cheeks, smooths his ruffled garment, and when he looks upon Carr, directs his speech to others.”

    One historian wrote that “This slobbering, lolling King, who never washed his hands least the delicacy of their skin be inured, who was unable to stand upright without leaning on the nearest courtier, who wore padded clothing for fear of stabbing, who was a glutton and a spendthrift (of other people’s money), had a keen and devious mind . . . he came to England as a man comes to a banquet; he left government to others and occupied himself with processional visits, routs, and masques. And freed from the firm hand of Elizabeth, the courtiers ran riot, and provided under James’ influence one of the most corrupt and dissolute courts in English history.”

    When Carr finally broke away as Groom of the Chamber, James wrote him that “I leave out of this reckoning your long creeping back and withdrawing yourself from lying in my chamber, notwithstanding my many hundred times earnest soliciting you to the contrary . . .”

    As to James’ relationship with his last significant other, Georgie Porgie Villiers, in 1617 there was a debate in the Privy Council. Sir John Oglander testified that

    “The King is wonderous passionate, a lover of his favourites beyond the love of men to women. He is the chastest prince for women that ever was, for he would often swear that he never kissed any other woman than his own queen. I never yet saw any fond husband make so much or so great dalliance over his beautiful spouse as I have seen King James over his favourites, especially Buckingham [Villiers].”

    Before the Privy Council James boldly defended their relationship by saying that he was “neither a god nor an angel, but a man, like any other. Therefore I act like a man and confess to loving those dear to me more than other men. You may be sure that I love the Earl of Buckingham more than anyone else, and more than you who are here assembled. I wish to speak in my own behalf and not to have it thought to be a defect, for Jesus Christ did the same, and therefore I cannot be blamed. Christ had John, and I have George.”

    Somehow I don’t think that fundamentalists would tolerate someone, not even a Republican king, favorably comparing his gay relationship with that of Christ to John. Then again, as one religious right site states it: “The morality of King James has come under attack from a number of groups. Among the most vociferous are sodomites and apologists who defend modern Bible versions like the NIV.” Another religious right site says that anybody that tries to tell you that James was gay or bisexual is hoping “that vilifying King James, would tarnish the Bible that bears his name so that Christians would turn away from God’s book to a more ‘modern’ translation.”

    How ironic it is that gay unfriendly fundamentalists are the biggest proponents of the King James Bible. Then again, given that King James was remarkably arrogant, out-of-touch and torched “sodomites” and “witches” in the name of God while all the time being a sanctimonious hypocrite engaging in gay relationships, he could blend right in along side Ted Haggard putting the heat on gays and feminist abortionists.


  39. tombaker says:

    how many more of these domestic terror attacks are we going to allow before we start getting serious about their cult leaders in the media??


  40. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Takes me back to 75. American troops finally leaving. Good luck, Iraq! May you find your way without us. Just as Viet Nam did.


  41. tombaker says:

    ralph – any suspicions as to which former TP troll today’s TX shooter was?


  42. dasm says:

    And I’m sure this moron calls himself “pro-life”.


  43. katy says:

    speaking of leviticus, here it is again:

    The West Wing- Bible Lesson

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S1-ip47WYWc&feature=related


  44. Xisithrus says:

    didnt kings used to think they had a heavenly mandate?


  45. ElBruce says:

    Exodus 31:14 (also in Exodus 31:15, Exodus 35:2)

    Observe the Sabbath, because it is holy to you. Anyone who desecrates it must be put to death

    The Sabbath runs from sunset Friday from sunset Saturday. If you’ve ever worked past sundown on Friday, God says you die.

    Exodus 21:17

    Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.

    That’s a lot of people.

    Leviticus 20:10

    ‘If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.

    Hi, Newt!

    Leviticus 20:15

    If a man has sexual relations with an animal, he must be put to death, and you must kill the animal.

    Death to farmer John!

    Leviticus 20:27

    A man or woman who is a medium or spiritist among you must be put to death. You are to stone them; their blood will be on their own heads.

    So, pretty much all hippies have to go.

    Leviticus 24:16

    anyone who blasphemes the name of the LORD must be put to death. The entire assembly must stone him. Whether an alien or native-born, when he blasphemes the Name, he must be put to death.

    Fcuk you, God! Wingnuts, come ‘n get me.

    Leviticus 27:29

    No person devoted to destruction may be ransomed; he must be put to death.

    Sounds like John Bolton and all the neocons.

    Numbers 3:10

    Appoint Aaron and his sons to serve as priests; anyone else who approaches the sanctuary must be put to death.

    No going to church, folks.

    Numbers 15:32-36

    While the Israelites were in the desert, a man was found gathering wood on the Sabbath day. Those who found him gathering wood brought him to Moses and Aaron and the whole assembly, and they kept him in custody, because it was not clear what should be done to him. Then the LORD said to Moses, “The man must die. The whole assembly must stone him outside the camp.” So the assembly took him outside the camp and stoned him to death, as the LORD commanded Moses.

    Executed for gathering wood.

    Deuteronomy 17:2-6

    If a man or woman living among you in one of the towns the LORD gives you is found doing evil in the eyes of the LORD your God in violation of his covenant, and contrary to my command has worshiped other gods, bowing down to them or to the sun or the moon or the stars of the sky, and this has been brought to your attention, then you must investigate it thoroughly. If it is true and it has been proved that this detestable thing has been done in Israel, take the man or woman who has done this evil deed to your city gate and stone that person to death. On the testimony of two or three witnesses a man shall be put to death, but no one shall be put to death on the testimony of only one witness.

    All it takes is two witnesses claiming someone is “doing evil.” The “evil” can be whatever you want.

    I think that’s enough for now.

    Note that none of these say that God is going to kill these people for you. They quite explicitly states that you have to commit these murders, or else you are violating the will of the LORD. So get to it, wingnuts. Let’s see that killing spree we all know you have all pent up inside you.


  46. OutstandingInMyField says:

    Badmoodman says:

    The entire tome is metaphorical and if they want to interpret the bible literally, there’s going to be some radical changes to society, including killing my neighbor for planting rows of different seeds next to each other.

    Oh heck, I’d be toast. In any event, if something happens to my husband I am not sleeping with his ne’r do well brother.


  47. gelfling545 says:

    If this person’s “god” did not want people to be
    homosexual he would not have to kill them. He could
    have just not made them that way. The answer for gays
    to someone like this is “God made us and this is how
    he likes us.” This particular god seems have poor aim
    as well.It seems he wants to destroy gays but he keeps
    hitting other targets with some regularity. Not
    terribly omnipotent of him, is it. I sometimes wonder
    how some of these people get through the day, much less
    run for public office.


  48. har5125 says:

    tombaker says:

    how many more of these domestic terror attacks are we going to allow before we start getting serious about their cult leaders in the media??

    Or as the morons on the right are probably thinking, ‘how many more of these domestic terror attacks are we going to allow before our librul govmit will finally give our God-fearing militia groups the right to go after these terrorists?’


  49. katy says:

    American troops finally leaving.
    Good luck, Iraq! May you find your way without us.
    Just as Viet Nam did.

    good one, hooda!


  50. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    But Outstanding, 2.000+ year old rules. Ya know, in ancient times they knew everything. They even called Dog by his first name.


  51. tombaker says:

    if anyone had ever taken the old testament seriously, the human population of planet earth would stand at about 560 today.


  52. katy says:

    This particular god seems have poor aim
    as well.It seems he wants to destroy gays but he keeps
    hitting other targets with some regularity.

    very rich, gelfling… good post!


  53. longredzillions says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  54. tombaker says:

    yet fully support a religion

    wtf are you jabbering about, dummy?


  55. tombaker says:

    who insist the US leave regimes alone because they have a right to kill gays, every single one of them

    y, i resented the way bush coddled the Saudis, too.

    i know he owed/owes them a lot, but still…


  56. pags2 a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chicago Democratic Party says:

    ElBruce says:
    Leviticus 20:10

    ‘If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress must be put to death.

    I have always thought that the right wing religious arguments about “teh gay” can be easily dismissed with the above Bible verse. People should challenge anyone who relies on the Bible for authority. The religious right like the rest of the conservatives have a supermarket mentality. They like to pick and chose some parts and ignore the others. This logic applies to every person who is against the mosque yet demands Obama and the Dems respect the parts of the Constitution that Republicans like.


  57. OutstandingInMyField says:

    Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    But Outstanding, 2.000+ year old rules. Ya know, in ancient times they knew everything. They even called Dog by his first name.

    Luke 16:16 “The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of God is preached, and every man presseth into it.” KJV

    Whew! I really dodged a bullet there.


  58. Xisithrus says:

    collecting wood. is that like toe tapping in an airport restroom?


  59. Xisithrus says:

    i dont support religions killing gays zillions i support our constitution that you can practice the religion you choose.

    you say your god is a loving god. is your god the same god of leviticus?


  60. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Another trollish question. If Capitalism is so great, why did the US have to pump over a billion dollars into its structure two years ago to keep it from collapsing? Why are European countries having to pump public dollars into private capitalist markets to keep them from collapsing?

    If capitalism is so wonderful and perfect, why do governments have to keep bailing it out?


  61. longredzillions says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  62. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    But I doubt it since I believe in a loving God.

    Pffft, you have to because only a truly loving and forgiving god would claim you.


  63. Xisithrus says:

    i read where jesus. st issa, traveled for seventeen years in india and tibet and they knew and loved him as their ‘buddah’ i dont know how factual this is but still find it interesting and plausible

    http://reluctant-messenger.com/issa.htm


  64. longredzillions says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  65. tombaker says:

    you’d best pack out for somalia red,

    where a man can truly be free.

    we’ll keep an eye on the news for reports of the emergence of your dynasty of purity over there, or whatever.


  66. MCMetal says:

    Know what’s even more dangerous , longreddipshit ?

    Believing you know EXACTLY what is written in a long since dead language that no one can translate properly , jackass …………


  67. OutstandingInMyField says:

    The profit, and equity, that was destroyed in 2008 was the result of unregulated capitalism, absent “socialist” fixes. I invite the troll to come visit reality, so you know the basics of economics.


  68. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    So the mixed economy has dictated Wall Street behavior and compensation since 1920. That’s why after the collapse and bailout they still need to pay bonuses for failure in the capitalists system.


  69. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    So come one, troll, please tell me what nation or economy has made your fantasy capitalism work in over 4,000 years of human civilization?


  70. ralph the wonder llama, official spokesllama for a Troll-Free America™ says:

    longredherring says:

    We haven’t had a capitalist system in America since at least the 1920’s.

    And look how well that turned out.


  71. Keith brought to you by the RDA Corporation says:

    shortreddozens says: We haven’t had a capitalist system in America since at least the 1920’s

    So which one of the lousy liberals ruined America? Harding, Coolidge, or Hoover? Please tell me their evil policies.

    BTW, for a Christian, you sure spew a lot of hatred and calls for violence.


  72. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Come on, name a capitalist society that has survived, trolly nematode.


  73. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Just one society that has espoused collecting 90% of the wealth into 10% of the population that has survived, let alone thrived. There is 4,000 years to pick from. Lots of civilizations and such. Name one.


  74. ralph the wonder llama, official spokesllama for a Troll-Free America™ says:

    Silly me… longredherring is surely about to educate us about how the Roarin’ Twenties would have never come to an end if Roosevelt’s New Deal hadn’t caused the ‘29 Crash.


  75. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Trolly, maybe you better call for help. Get a few of your buddies to spew nonsense to distract. But I will keep hounding you for an answer. Name a successful capitalist society


  76. Xisithrus says:

    We haven’t had a capitalist system in America since at least the 1920’s. We have had a mixed economy in America since then, with government “fixes” that have favored monopolies and socialist fixes that have destroyed profit.

    i think it was lincoln, iirc, that said ‘the capitalists work in concert to rob the people of their wealth’


  77. longredzillions says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  78. southrnbelle says:

    Me thinks Mr. Walters doth protest too much.

    Let’s give him what he wants and put a microscope in his closet, see what falls out.


  79. just the bleepn facts says:

    robotard, why does your anger always prevent you from recognizing the left is always right? ;)


  80. pags2 a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chicago Democratic Party says:

    longredherring says:

    We haven’t had a capitalist system in America since at least the 1920’s.

    There are a lot of people in this country that given the choice to trust the government to protect them or the “capitalist” utopia the libertarians promise, will choose the government. And for good reason. When we had a pure capitalist society after the Civil War, the abuses were so abundant and grave that the government had to step in to regulate. Stop fooling yourself that decreasing the size of the government is going to result in the illusory society where no abuses will occur. They will happen without government action.


  81. just the bleepn facts says:

    robotard, then according to your argument we don’t need capitalism since it didn’t exist until the late 1800s! ROTFL!


  82. Xisithrus says:

    Abraham Lincoln: “These capitalists generally act harmoniously, and in concert, to fleece the people, and now, that they have got into a quarrel with themselves, we are called upon to appropriate the people’s money to settle the quarrel.”

    i guess settle the quarrel means bailouts.


  83. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    longredzillions says:
    Why does my being right always anger the Left?

    Because you talk out your butt and never supply answers to questions?

    Name one, troll.


  84. just the bleepn facts says:

    robotard the closet queen attacking her fellow gays like all self loathing GOPerverts who prefer tap dancing in bathrooms to coming out of the closet? Shokkker!


  85. longredzillions says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  86. Keith brought to you by the RDA Corporation says:

    At the height of “roarin 20’s” prosperity, the majority of Americans were below the poverty line. And no, FDR who came in March 1933 was not responsible for the ‘29 crash. And Obama who came in Jan 09 was not responsible for the Great Recession that began Dec 07.


  87. Bob, Teabaggers Are Terrorists, wurst says:

    lyingredjillions says:

    Who cares? You’re a liar!


  88. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    red herring, you can run but you can’t hide. Just one example, fishboy.


  89. Xisithrus says:

    Why does my being right always anger the Left?

    if you were right their would be no reason to get angry.


  90. just the bleepn facts says:

    robotard might get credibility for her comments on capitalism if she had a job! She might get credibility for political criticism if she didn’t refuse to blame KKKons for their failures… zzzz…


  91. MCMetal says:

    longredzillions says:

    ——————————————————————————–

    Why does my being right always anger the Left?
    August 18th, 2010 at 9:12 pm

    Because it always occurs in your otherwise empty head and nowhere else ……


  92. Xisithrus says:

    the bush policy was not to take the punch bowl away from wall street even after it crashed.


  93. just the bleepn facts says:

    robotard is now claiming Obama time traveled and created the bush depression? Shokkker! ROTFL!


  94. pags2 a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chicago Democratic Party says:

    Xisithrus says:
    Abraham Lincoln: “These capitalists generally act harmoniously, and in concert, to fleece the people, and now, that they have got into a quarrel with themselves, we are called upon to appropriate the people’s money to settle the quarrel.”

    If Lincoln were alive he would be a Democrat. The Republican paradox is that the current party is taking the opposite position that the Republicans had during the Civil War era. All Republican dogma is inherently a repackaging of “states rights” which was settled by the Civil War.


  95. longredzillions says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  96. Bob, Teabaggers Are Terrorists, wurst says:

    longredzillions says:
    It’s like when liberals who blame “Bush policies” for our economic mess are asked, “Which Bush policies?”, and they always answer that they can’t think of any.

    Here’s another lie! Bush’s deregulation of the banking industry. His policy of allowing mortgages to be bundled and sold. His policy of borrowing money from the commies to fund his illegal war.


  97. MCMetal says:

    longredzillions says:

    ——————————————————————————–

    It’s like when liberals who blame “Bush policies” for our economic mess are asked, “Which Bush policies?”, and they always answer that they can’t think of any.

    But to trust Nancy Pelosi because she said so.
    August 18th, 2010 at 9:17 pm

    Tax cuts for the wealthy , you retard ; it’s all you GOP suckholes ever have to drool out……..And it , like all cancervative policies , turned out to be an unmitigated disaster ……….Tool


  98. OutstandingInMyField says:

    Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    red herring, you can run but you can’t hide. Just one example, fishboy.

    Not gonna happen Hooda. When challenged they always leave or invoke their unrelated talking points, but I guess you probably already knew that.


  99. Bob, Teabaggers Are Terrorists, wurst says:

    ongredzillions says:
    Attacking me is always the same as conceding the argument.

    That’s acceptable.

    lying is acceptable too. And it’s not an attack, it’s telling the truth.


  100. Xisithrus says:

    Attacking me is always the same as conceding the argument.

    totally illogical and completely untrue.


  101. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    The question is a single capitalist society that has survived or flourished, fishboy. No attack, just a question to answer.

    Why do you not answer?


  102. missmolly (sponsored by Troll-B-Gon®, now with MORE PermaRid™!) says:

    longredzillions says
    August 18th, 2010 at 8:32 pm

    What I don’t understand is why liberals claim to support gays yet fully support a religion which specifically targets them for execution by beheading. In fact, liberals who insist the US leave regimes alone because they have a right to kill gays, every single one of them.
    ______________________________________________________________________________

    You’re operating under some incorrect assumptions here.

    First, liberals don’t “fully support” any religion. What we support is the right to worship as one wishes, in accordance with the first amendment. Liberals are as diverse as anyone else when it comes to personal religious matters. Some of us are Christians, some are Jews, some are atheists, etc. We all have different personal theological viewpoints, and we don’t “fully support” any theology as a monolithic bloc.

    Second, Islam doesn’t “specifically” target gays for beheading or any other form of execution. The closest the Quran comes to condemning homosexuality is to condemn any sexual act outside of marriage. And the Quran doesn’t give any specific penalty for violators. There are, however, some predominately Muslim countries that have such laws. But the Quran isn’t to blame. Unlike the Old Testament, which DOES call for death for homosexual activity in Leviticus. Of course, Leviticus bans a whole lot of things, many punishable by death, that have already been detailed by other posters.

    Third — you really think that liberals think we shouldn’t invade or bomb countries like Iran because they execute homosexuals? And you think liberals want to somehow protect that right, as in, “oh no, we can’t invade that country because they execute gay people and we want them to continue doing that”? Dude — what have you been smoking? I doubt you will find many liberals who want to see gays executed — that’s more of a wingnut thing. It’s just that we tend to think we need better reasons to bomb other countries than their system of laws. If we were to invade, occupy, and change the regime of every country in the world that had laws we didn’t like, we wouldn’t have the resources.


  103. Bob, Teabaggers Are Terrorists, wurst says:

    hey liar, how far are you from Ground Zero?


  104. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Outstanding, I walk with badger. I’m persistent.


  105. Keith brought to you by the RDA Corporation says:

    “Which Bush policies?”

    Trickle down economics. Tax cuts for the rich. Totally unregulated derivatives market of $50(?) TRILLION. Housing bubble. Middle class wages going nowhere for 26 years. All banks allowed to gamble with people’s money. Unaffordable healthcare. Unaffordable gasoline. Two unnecessary and unfunded wars. A trillion dollars a year for military. No spending on infrastructure (Katrina). Cuts in education. Doubling the debt from $5.5 to 11 Trillion. etc., etc.


  106. Bob, Teabaggers Are Terrorists, wurst says:

    Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:
    The question is a single capitalist society that has survived or flourished, fishboy. No attack, just a question to answer.

    Why do you not answer?

    answer the question, just lie, it’s not like anyone will notice…


  107. Xisithrus says:

    Why of course the people don’t want war. Why should some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally the common people don’t want war neither in Russia, nor in England, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the peacemakers for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”

    gee. sounds just like what bush/cheney did. tell the people they are being attacked and denounce the peaceful people for lack of patriotism to fulfill an agenda the people never wanted or are represented by.


  108. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    redherring, a single capitalist society that has survived or thrived. Surely for a troll of your intellect you can find several in 4,000 years of human history.


  109. ralph the wonder llama, official spokesllama for a Troll-Free America™ says:

    longredzillions says:
    Why does my being right always anger the Left?

    That’s like asking “why does gravity reversing itself upset animals?”


  110. The Moderate Squad says:

    Longreddildo quoted: The conscientious Christian need not be distracted by their fanciful dreamings.

    Two points: Longreddildo is not a conscientious anything, and of course some fundamentalist magazine is going to try to assuage the fears of other fundamentalists. Note that the section quoted did not give specifics, just palliative verbiage for those in danger of questioning which of two very different viewpoints in the same book is correct.


  111. ralph the wonder llama, official spokesllama for a Troll-Free America™ says:

    missmolly (sponsored by Troll-B-Gon®, now with MORE PermaRid™!) says:
    longredzillions says

    You’re operating under some incorrect assumptions here.

    Oh, missmolly, you virtuoso of understatement, you.


  112. ralph the wonder llama, official spokesllama for a Troll-Free America™ says:

    Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:
    The question is a single capitalist society that has survived or flourished, fishboy. No attack, just a question to answer.

    Why do you not answer?

    My guess is because it’s far easier to proclaim victory and strut around the Troll Central common area with one’s fists raised above one’s head.

    It appears that longredherring has been taking some lessons from the recently departed fake dr hunt.


  113. Keith brought to you by the RDA Corporation says:

    There is no country with more capitalism and doing better than the US. There are about 16 countries with less capitalism and doing better than us:
    Denmark, Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland, Germany, Austria, Japan, New Zealand, etc.


  114. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    fishbreath, can I take your lack of response to mean capitalism is a fraud? That the concept of making profits is a short term excuse for an old style practice of the elite hammering the poor?


  115. Bob, Teabaggers Are Terrorists, wurst says:

    Attacking me is always the same as conceding the argument.

    so you’re saying Saddam was right, because bush attacked him. You’re saying Bin Laden and the Taliban were right, because we attacked them. Why do you hate America?


  116. Whenwillthisnightmareend says:

    Who are these people. They certainly feel free to proclaim their brand of hate, without any concern for its acceptability. Well once they get over the hurtles of Gay bashing, they’ll get on with N**** bashing….What, Sarah palin is defending Dr. Laura’s right to use the N**** word as often as she likes? WTF? They already passed that one. Now, after they bash the N*****, it’ll be the Mexicans and Hispanics. What! They have been doing that? Where have I been? Muslims? Done that? Continuing to do that? What? Where have I been? Jews? Oh, they’re our friends, but only until Christ comes for us Christians, then God will kill all of them, with the muslims, N******, Mexicans, and especially the Sodomites who are an abomination. When Sarah Palin rules,God WINS.


  117. Xisithrus says:

    why, red, have we become a debtor nation?


  118. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Capitalism is the morphodite child of monarchism. It is the means where a small group exercise control over a large group through economic means. The small concession in America has been that one can join the manipulators if who is willing to manipulate.


  119. Keith brought to you by the RDA Corporation says:

    Xisithrus says:
    why, red, have we become a debtor nation?

    That’s easy: Reaganomics. We’ve been the biggest debtor nation ever since the second year of Reagan. We were the biggest creditor nation under Carter.

    I’m going to call plagiarism under you give Hermann Goering credit. :-)


  120. ElBruce says:

    longredzillions says:

    There have been many efforts across the centuries to destroy the integrity of the biblical record.

    You’ll find I’m one of the strongest proponents here regarding the strength of the Bible as a historical document compared to just about any others. There are more/older fragments of the Christian bible than any other document of antiquity in existence. Furthermore, there are plenty of new translations (NIV) which are direct retranslations from the oldest fragments, so the “copy of a copy” thing doesn’t fly.

    It says what it says. However, much of what it says happens to be stoopid.

    This isn’t unique to Christianity/Judaism/Islam. All ancient texts say a lot of silly things. The practice of theology is to determine which points made should be highlighted, and which should be downplayed. Without that, every religion would still be as ridiculous as it was when it started out as a wacky local cult.

    .

    longredzillions says:

    Why does my being right always anger the Left?

    Let’s say somebody walks up to you and starts punching himself in the head while shouting “TWO PLUS TWO IS FIVE!” Then you find out he’s a candidate for political office, and is polling at 49% currently. Wouldn’t you be angry too?

    Probably not; you’d vote for him.

    .

    longredzillions says:

    It’s like when liberals who blame “Bush policies” for our economic mess are asked, “Which Bush policies?”, and they always answer that they can’t think of any.

    Deregulation of all industries. No regulation of derivatives. Slashing taxes on the top 2%. Starting unnecessary wars. Appointing watchdogs from the industries they’re supposed to watch over. Politicizing the MMS. Etcetera…

    .

    just the bleepn facts says:

    robotard is now claiming Obama time traveled and created the bush depression?

    It’s all they got. And they’re willing to believe whatever it takes.


  121. Democrat Soldier says:

    If AIDS is God’s punishment, then it’s a judgement totally against straight people. Seriously! If you look at global numbers and statistics, then it’s clear that the vast majority of people infected with HIV/AIDS are straight people.

    If God developed HIV/AIDS as a punishment, then God’s “chosen people” are lesbians. They have the lowest rate of HIV/AIDS than any other demographic in the world.

    Unless right-whiners are going to claim that breast-cancer is God’s punishment for having the xx chromosome in order to remain consistent with their argument. Also, alzhimers must be God’s punishment for living to darned long, and salmonella is God’s punishment for being to close to chickens.


  122. lm945 says:

    Ryan White, Arthur Ashe and Elizabeth Glaser all contracted AIDS through tainted blood transfusions. Ariel Glaser contracted it through her mother’s milk.

    If AIDS is G0d’s punishment against gays, explain why your precious G0d used it to kill these innocents. Including a 7 year old child.


  123. barackobomber says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  124. Xisithrus says:

    I’m going to call plagiarism under you give Hermann Goering credit.

    yes, it was goering. i was waiting to see if one of our trolls recognized it, keith. =]


  125. Democrat Soldier says:

    #120 – ElBruce says:
    ——————————————————
    longredzillions says:
    It’s like when liberals who blame “Bush policies” for our economic mess are asked, “Which Bush policies?”, and they always answer that they can’t think of any.

    “Deregulation of all industries. No regulation of derivatives. Slashing taxes on the top 2%. Starting unnecessary wars. Appointing watchdogs from the industries they’re supposed to watch over. Politicizing the MMS. Etcetera…”
    August 18th, 2010 at 9:40 pm

    Don’t forget: Single-handedly turning a surplus into a deficit in 1 year, and increasing the national debt 100%+ in 8 years!

    Why don’t the “teabaggers” ever mention that fact? Doesn’t support the talking-points they were given to regurgitate, I guess.


  126. barackobomber says:

    This comment has been voted down. Click to read.


  127. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    I guess the redherring could only get the low rent troll to back him.


  128. Xisithrus says:

    lol at b o b.

    this is 2010.


  129. ralph the wonder llama, official spokesllama for a Troll-Free America™ says:

    Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:
    I guess the redherring could only get the low rent troll to back him.

    Because it’s the omega troll, it was the only one who wasn’t passed out in a Cheetos and Diet Mountain Dew coma.


  130. Xisithrus says:

    it doesnt matter if its deleted or not. what i find odd is that this politician doesnt know the bible he claims to follow and hasnt killed himself yet for working during the sabbath.


  131. Keith brought to you by the RDA Corporation says:

    lm945, I believe Mrs. Dole was head of the blood supply when it got tainted. Opposition to regulations.

    Xisithrus, in #119, I was answering to trade deficit vs. trade surplus—while you were prolly talking about national debt.


  132. Democrat Soldier says:

    #123 – barackobomber says:
    ———————————————————-
    “Sorry, but Republicans Reign in 2010 and 2012…”
    August 18th, 2010 at 9:43 pm

    Ah, so Republican reign-iing is remaing the minority party? I think you’ve been falling for the spin & re-writing of history by the right-whiners.

    Don’t worry, by the time Pres. Obama finsihes his second term in office all the failures of the previous administration will be set on the track to correction. Much like Pres. Clinton did with Pres. Bush’s & Pres. Reagan’s failed policies.


  133. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Nothing worse than a drunk low rent troll babbling about facebook.

    Is this the best you could do, redherring?


  134. snoopy says:

    Capitalism is the morphodite child of monarchism. It is the means where a small group exercise control over a large group through economic means. The small concession in America has been that one can join the manipulators if who is willing to manipulate.

    More to the point these cheap labor republicans want us all over a barrel working for slave wages so they can maximize their profits while telling us it’s our fault we can’t make it in the world.

    They hate unions because wages go up when a union exist, that goes against the cheap labor republicans wish for you to be a slave to the system.

    They hate safety nets like social security and minimum wage laws for the same reason.

    They love NAFTA because 3rd world countries are full of desperate people who will work for a bowl of rice and spend 80 hours a week doing it.

    Cheap labor republicans care nothing about the bible or religion, but they sure know how to spin it and draw in a crowd of gullible fools to fight for them…


  135. Xisithrus says:

    I was answering to trade deficit vs. trade surplus—while you were prolly talking about national debt. -=keith=-

    yeh, i was talking about natl debt.


  136. Zooey (I am Patsy) says:

    Sorry, but Republicans Reign in 2010 and 2012, bye bye libs.

    Dream on, teabagger.


  137. Democrat Soldier says:

    #133 – Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:
    ———————————————————–
    “Nothing worse than a drunk low rent troll babbling about facebook.

    Is this the best you could do, redherring?”
    August 18th, 2010 at 9:49 pm

    The only other thing the right-whiners have is a contined chorus of “NO PROGRESS!”, “NO CORRECTING THE ECONOMY!”, “NO NEW JOBS!” and most certainly “NO ADDRESSING THE FAILURES OF PRES. BUSH!!!!!!!!”

    They have no ideas, no leadership, and no clue. I kinda feel sorry for them, if they weresn’t so adamant about regurgitating the taling-points they’ve been given over and over and over again. It’s almost like they enjoy not engaging their brains! Go figure.


  138. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    For dog’s sake, don’t anyone light a match.


  139. Xisithrus says:

    the b o b troll thinks a party should reign over people in a democracy?

    politicians are supposed to represent b o b not reign. not create hidden agendas, not lie the country into war for reasons you will never know.


  140. Xisithrus says:

    i bever got into facebook. prolly never will.



  141. The Moderate Squad says:

    Longreddildo said: It’s like when liberals who blame “Bush policies” for our economic mess are asked, “Which Bush policies?”, and they always answer that they can’t think of any.

    Typical neoCon Liar – I don’t know of a single progressive who “can’t think of any.” There may be some, but they are far more scarce than neoCons who think, for example, that Ronald Reagan was a fiscal disaster, despite the solid evidence.


  142. Hoodathunk(sponsored by Free Speech for Fish) says:

    Expecting a troll to think is like expecting a Republican to be honest.


  143. Reggie, sponsored by Brawndo ™ says:

    longredzillions says:

    Why does my being right always anger the Left?

    It doesn’t, what bothers me about you is that you’re a worthless troll. I miss the days when we had a better grade of troll.
    They at least tried, you’re phoning it in.


  144. Zooey (I am Patsy) says:

    longredalzheimers has a terminal case of delusions of adequacy.


  145. Zooey (I am Patsy) says:

    Why do nematodes persist in believing they have any ability to anger us?

    Projection, anyone?


  146. ElBruce says:

    barackobomber says:

    mommy, they didnt delete a facebook message. hahah this is what the dmocrap party has become. This is why you are exposed and are going down. Losers!

    Well then, allow me to retort in terms you can understand…

    sdfjio wo we kikin yo ass GOOPers WOO!!!!!11! fijsiodapiwj you goin down ye ha


  147. Reggie, sponsored by Brawndo ™ says:

    Zooey (I am Patsy) says:

    longredalzheimers has a terminal case of delusions of adequacy.

    Maybe the sock-puppet has delusion of adequacy. The troll wearing it must know that he is in way put of his league.

    If he had delusions of adequacy, he would try and debate, not make these stupid comments that make him look like a slow child.

    Think about it, this intellectual moron has been banned dozens of times. In all the time he has been here the troll has never come anywhere near winning a debate.



  148. dug_down_deep says:

    Why do the dumbest damned people run for office?


  149. cd (temp spokesman for satan) says:

    If God acts the way John er Jeremy Waters thinks he does then God would have tailored AIDS so that it only afflicted gays.

    But God’s ways like many other things are clearly above Waters head.


  150. Eugene Debs sponsored by the Church of the presumptuous assumption says:

    BO’MORON

    You conservaTARD RAPEpublicans are just too retarded to even recognize factual reality. Go FCUK yourself you pathetic inbred moron


  151. Leftside Annie - brought to you by FOX Pasteurized Process Newsproduct says:

    I sent the following message to Jeremy Walters:

    Leftside Annie August 18 at 7:22pm

    You were banned because you’re a bigoted homophobe, Jeremy, NOT because you told any kind of truth. I read your ugly posts – which were captured before you deleted them. You were simply spewing hatred against your fellow Americans. God help us if homophobic ignorant JERKS like you get elected. You should be ashamed of yourself. Oh – and learn to spell, won’t you? You’re just embarrassing.

    Jeremy replied:

    Jeremy Walters August 18 at 8:34pm Report

    I appologize for the mistake and if this statement offened anyone. Both postings have been removed and these comments do not pertain to my campaign or the Republican Party of Iowa.My passion is to listen and learn from the people so I can represent them at the state house. Everyone makes mistakes, please forgive me.

    Leftside Annie August 18 at 8:39pm Jeremy: I’m impressed that you’re man enough to apologize. Now, please, be man enough to walk a mile in your fellow man’s (or woman’s) shoes before you condemn him or her so harshly. Jesus said “what you do to the least among you, you do also to me” – that’s the lesson you should learn from this. Thank you for your apology. ~ A

    ~~~
    At least Jeremy has the courage to apologize. I’ll give him that.


  152. dae says:

    Taliban alert! Taliban alert! Stoning will begin ASAP.


  153. dae says:

    These people only apologize when they’re found out.


  154. Mr. Sonia Herecomestheangst (a division of Tim Tebow Smiley Shucks Media Groups) says:

    I’m guessing multiple internet webposts and deletions is God’s gift of idiocy to this moron and other Republican trolls like him.


  155. Carrickdfshdfhdf says:

    our website: Ebiz cool.COM

    BEST QUALITY GUARANTEE!!
    SAFTY & HONESTY GUARANTEE!!
    FAST & PROMPT DELIVERY GUARANTEE!!

    Packing: All the products are packed with original boxes and tags also retro cards/ code
    numder
    A ir jo rdan (1-24) sh oes ($33)
    Ha ndba gs(Coach,ed hardy,lv,d&g) ($35)
    Bik ini (Ed har dy,polo) ($25)
    TN REQUIN Air Rift Nike Air Rift


  156. Biot says:

    Oh, not again
    I don’t want to live in a wingnut state.
    Is there a Trailways or Greyhound bus route to Alaska so I can dupe these guys into leaving?


  157. Vinnie says:

    Some Christian this guy is. The bible is clear “they shall surely be put to death”. What part of ’surely’ don’t you understand. And yet he is against killing them.

    If you only go a bit further in Leviticus you find the following:

    However, you may purchase male or female slaves from among the foreigners who live among you. You may also purchase the children of such resident foreigners, including those who have been born in your land. You may treat them as your property, passing them on to your children as a permanent inheritance. You may treat your slaves like this, but the people of Israel, your relatives, must never be treated this way.

    What anti-Christian fools said slavery was a bad thing?


  158. ralph the wonder llama, official spokesllama for a Troll-Free America™ says:

    Leftside Annie – brought to you by FOX Pasteurized Process Newsproduct says:

    At least Jeremy has the courage to apologize. I’ll give him that.

    Even if it IS a prepared statement expressing generic contrition. Fair enough, Annie. Good on ya.


  159. bonncaruso says:

    Now, how much do you wanna bet that this Walters clown is one of those types who sneaks off into a dark alley when the missus isn’t watching and lets some gay stud ride him like a horse, bareback? But he must have had to pay a lot for that cock, the way he looks.

    Lord, of Lord, did I just write that? No, that must have been my evil twin out of that Star Trek parallel universe.

    The hypocrisy of this is just astounding.


Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Jump to Top

About Think Progress | Contact Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy (off-site) | RSS | Donate
© 2005-2010 Center for American Progress Action Fund
View Most Popular

Advertisement

BERJAYA
What We're About

Featured

image
Subscribe to the Progress Report




imageTopic Cloud


Visit Our Affiliated Sites

image image
Reports


Got a hot tip?
Have a hot news tip? We'd love to hear from you. Use the form below to send us the latest.

Name:
Email:
Tip:
(required)


imageArchives


imageBlog Roll



BERJAYA