close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100819051108/http://mediamatters.org:80/strupp/201008160044
About us Login Get email updates
Strupp
Print BERJAYA BERJAYA BERJAYA

Retired General and Bush Official Blast Mosque Opposition

August 16, 2010 5:39 pm ET by Joe Strupp

A retired general and a former Bush Administration official harshly criticized efforts to block the building of a mosque in lower Manhattan, contending such a position is unconstitutional and could harm U.S. relations overseas.

Major General Paul Eaton, a retired Army commander who oversaw the training of Iraqi troops following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and Lawrence Wilkerson, a retired Army colonel and former chief of staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell, both slammed right-wing opposition to the Mosque.

"What we are seeing out of the Republican Party here is just appalling," Eaton told me Monday. "From a constitutional perspective, from a common sense perspective and from a military perspective."

Eaton added, "This is an extreme right-wing backlash to what we stand for: freedom to practice religion of your choice."

Eaton also pointed out that it is a local decision in which federal officials should not be involved: "It is a very local issue."

Wilkerson agreed, stating: "If they want to build something on private land, it is unconstitutional to say otherwise. It is all about religious freedom, they can build wherever they want to build."

Both men also pointed to a detrimental impact such opposition can have on U.S. relations overseas with Islamic countries, and even put U.S. military men and women at risk.

"It is like offering your opponent two or three whips with which to beat you," said Wilkerson. "The impact on our military people would be injurious if we say 'no.' It would put another instrument in the hands of those who want to exploit the fear that Americans are at war with Islam and not the radical elements within it."

Eaton echoed that view, noting: "It is a slap in the face to a great many people we wish to have as allies. We are trying to make allies of our colleagues in Iraq and Afghanistan and this is not helpful."

He also added, "This is unhelpful to the American fighting men and women and counter to the image we wish to portray in Afghanistan and Iraq."

Expand All Expand 1st Level Collapse All Add Comment
    • Author by 1st Republic 14th Star (August 16, 2010 6:24 pm ET)
      8  
      How come General Eaton and Colonel Wilkerson hate America and don't support the troops... oh, wait...
      Report Abuse
    • Author by grmce (August 16, 2010 8:35 pm ET)
      9  
      It is interesting to compare the small minded bigotry of the Parochial Right to the views of people with a perception outside their immediate circle.

      The biggest problem for the U.S. in ts relationship with the rest of the world is the rank hypocrisy that is so often on display. The most common one being the matter of national sovereignty - in this matter, the sovereignty of all other nations is so often subject to the sovereignty of the U.S. whether it is the matter of extra judicial imprisonments (extraordinary rendition) or any of the other much bragged about "rights", such as freedom of religion, that are violated in other nations and even, so it seems, at home as a matter of expediency.

      It doesn't take much sophistication to spot a humbug and it is the height of arrogance to assume that "foreigners" don't see the rank hypocrisy so often inherent in the sanctimonious preaching we get from the U.S.
      Report Abuse
    • Author by proudconservative (August 16, 2010 9:48 pm ET)
        7
      Gee, I guess us, dum, hick, bible-toting, gun carrying Americans just don't got the lefty sofistsycation to shypher these high-faluting issues.

      Maybe then someone else can speak to the matter..

      Speaking truth to/about progressives with a shout out to Imam Feisel Abdul Rauf and his Cordoba House, which I'm certain will contain a significant amount of space dedicated to calling the form of violent islam that caused that crime, pure evil.
      Report Abuse
      • Author by oneleft (August 16, 2010 10:02 pm ET)
        7  
        First, you're right about you don't have the sofistsycation.
        Second, the point to your link would be... what exactly? You might want to read the end of that again.
        His opinion has nothing to do with what the General and Colonel addressed. Nothing at all.
        And last... " I'm certain will contain a significant amount of space dedicated to calling the form of violent islam that caused that crime..."
        Your opinion, no matter how "certain" it is, is nothing but that, an opinion. It's certainly not a valid arguing point.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (August 16, 2010 10:45 pm ET)
            5
          rapturevictim,

          As for the link:
          Last week, a journalist who writes for the North Country Times, a small newspaper in Southern California, sent us an e-mail titled "Help." He couldn't understand why an Islamic Centre in an area where Adam Gadahn, Osama bin Laden's American spokesman came from, and that was home to three of the 911 terrorists, was looking to expand.

          The man has a very valid point, which leads to the ongoing debate about building a Mosque at Ground Zero in New York. When we try to understand the reasoning behind building a mosque at the epicentre of the worst-ever attack on the U.S., we wonder why its proponents don't build a monument to those who died in the attack?

          New York currently boasts at least 30 mosques so it's not as if there is pressing need to find space for worshippers. The fact we Muslims know the idea behind the Ground Zero mosque is meant to be a deliberate provocation to thumb our noses at the infidel. The proposal has been made in bad faith and in Islamic parlance, such an act is referred to as "Fitna," meaning "mischief-making" that is clearly forbidden in the Koran.

          The Koran commands Muslims to, "Be considerate when you debate with the People of the Book" -- i.e., Jews and Christians. Building an exclusive place of worship for Muslims at the place where Muslims killed thousands of New Yorkers is not being considerate or sensitive, it is undoubtedly an act of "fitna"

          So what gives Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf of the "Cordoba Initiative" and his cohorts the misplaced idea that they will increase tolerance for Muslims by brazenly displaying their own intolerance in this case?

          Do they not understand that building a mosque at Ground Zero is equivalent to permitting a Serbian Orthodox church near the killing fields of Srebrenica where 8,000 Muslim men and boys were slaughtered?

          There are many questions that we would like to ask. Questions about where the funding is coming from? If this mosque is being funded by Saudi sources, then it is an even bigger slap in the face of Americans, as nine of the jihadis in the Twin Tower calamity were Saudis.

          If Rauf is serious about building bridges, then he could have dedicated space in this so-called community centre to a church and synagogue, but he did not. We passed on this message to him through a mutual Saudi friend, but received no answer. He could have proposed a memorial to the 9/11 dead with a denouncement of the doctrine of armed jihad, but he chose not to.

          It's a repugnant thought that $100 million would be brought into the United States rather than be directed at dying and needy Muslims in Darfur or Pakistan.

          Let's not forget that a mosque is an exclusive place of worship for Muslims and not an inviting community centre. Most Americans are wary of mosques due to the hard core rhetoric that is used in pulpits. And rightly so. As Muslims we are dismayed that our co-religionists have such little consideration for their fellow citizens and wish to rub salt in their wounds and pretend they are applying a balm to sooth the pain.

          The Koran implores Muslims to speak the truth, even if it hurts the one who utters the truth. Today we speak the truth, knowing very well Muslims have forgotten this crucial injunction from Allah.

          If this mosque does get built, it will forever be a lightning rod for those who have little room for Muslims or Islam in the U.S. We simply cannot understand why on Earth the traditional leadership of America's Muslims would not realize their folly and back out in an act of goodwill.

          As for those teary-eyed, bleeding-heart liberals such as New York mayor Michael Bloomberg and much of the media, who are blind to the Islamist agenda in North America, we understand their goodwill.

          Unfortunately for us, their stand is based on ignorance and guilt, and they will never in their lives have to face the tyranny of Islamism that targets, kills and maims Muslims worldwide, and is using liberalism itself to destroy liberal secular democratic societies from within.

          Raheel Raza is author of Their Jihad ... Not my Jihad, and Tarek Fatah is author of The Jew is Not My Enemy (McClelland & Stewart), to be launched in October. Both sit on the board of the Muslim Canadian Congress.


          I think these two see the purpose behind this mosque and the absence of supposed offense if a more appropriate option is chosen as to placement, contents and openness of the mosque. Their experience as muslims, understanding the tyrannical rule that muslims live under outside of North America speaks to how the vindication of islam is paramount, especially when compared to the success of the freedoms of infidels economically.

          You're correct, my opinion of evil behind the crime of 9-11 is mine, but I think shared by a vast amount of Americans. That until we see muslims and their leaders demonstrating abhorrence for the terrorists and the reasons for their actions, then it will always be difficult to believe that muslims only want equity, not superiority.
          Report Abuse
          • Author by Conchobhar (August 16, 2010 11:46 pm ET)
            4  
            ... until we see muslims and their leaders demonstrating abhorrence for the terrorists and the reasons for their actions, then it will always be difficult to believe that muslims only want equity, not superiority.


            Put on your reading glasses, PC. The demonstration you want is here, not that I think it will change your opinion a whit.
            Report Abuse
            • Author by proudconservative (August 17, 2010 2:26 pm ET)
                1
              Conchshellohar,

              This is all well and good, but where are the muslims continually giving us chapter and verse? Where in here are the points that we hear from this imam?

              Maybe these guys ought to be out and about in Afghanistan speaking to the taliban about this document. Imagine the reception they might receive.

              So again, until muslims make an effort to demonstrate this document, share its points in every news conference and declare these jihadists as bound for hell, I find it hard for them to convince anyone of their sincerity.

              When pat robertson, or jerry falwell made their off the wall statements, Christians, their leaders and the media never left them off the hook. We should expect the same for the religion of peacers.

              Report Abuse
      • Author by bintx (August 17, 2010 9:11 am ET)
        7  
        I'm a a hick, Bible-toting [the word is capitalized, fauxconservative] mother of a hunter, conservative American who is sophisticated enough to understand that the BS your heroes are shoveling day in and day out about hatred of Islam and basically of ALL non-whites is dangerous and is affecting our relationships throughout the world. It is also affecting our national security. The fact that dumb faux conservative A**holes like you REPEAT their crap verbatim and keep it going on the internet makes it even worse.

        The point of this piece was to show the DAMAGE that this faux controversy stirred up by Fox and the hate talkers is doing. It is putting our troops in danger. You don't care and neither does Fox and the hate talkers. Why do you hate our troops and our country, fauxconservative?

        BTW, reposting over and over and over again an opinion piece by folks who are not members of the group wanting to build the community center still does not make it valid to the issue. Nice try. I'm sure that it was a popular link on freerepublic, but it is completely irrelevant.
        Report Abuse
        • Author by proudconservative (August 17, 2010 2:45 pm ET)
            1
          Gee, I'm feelin the agape. Right back at ya!

          My link to a Canadian newspaper were no different than media matters (for very little), giving a viewpoint from 2 people as gospel. Both had concerns, I believe that powell and the other general were reflecting the same naivete that the muslim writers saw in the genuflections of leftys in the US. They saw this as DAMAGING, creating an unnecessary backlash against muslims because of how insensitive this pure mischief making because of this imam's stance.

          I don't know of the link's popularity on any other site, but I know that a few lefty's were confronted with the truth. Besides, I go to mm(FVL) because I feel I am called to enlighten folks here. Just like with Zaccheaus, "For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost.", give some Bible thumping a chance here.

          Remember, that anyone who calls upon the name of the Lord, will be saved! :>
          Report Abuse
          • Author by rumpleteasermom (August 17, 2010 11:15 pm ET)
               
            I believe that powell and the other general were reflecting


            Did you even read the article MMfA posted ^up there?
            Report Abuse
      • Author by txthinker (August 17, 2010 4:55 pm ET)
        4  
        Notice how nothing-to-be-proud-of-conservative had to go to CANADA to find an opinion piece that agrees with his moronic position????

        Canadians don't have to concern themselves with our Constitution, you dope - WE DO!!!!!
        Report Abuse
    • Author by peebs755 (August 16, 2010 11:26 pm ET)
      5  
      The problem with your link is that the "facts" in the story are all wrong. Strike three your out.
      Report Abuse

my.MediaMatters.org

Login  Sign Up

About Joe Strupp

BERJAYA Joe Strupp comes to Media Matters as an investigative reporter and senior editor with 21 years of news experience across newspapers, magazines, television, radio, and the Internet. Most recently, he was a senior editor at Editor & Publisher magazine, from 1999 to late 2009, writing for its print edition, website, and blog.

Strupp, 44, started his career at The Daily Journal in Elizabeth, New Jersey. He has also worked at The Argus in Fremont, California; The San Francisco Independent; and The Press-Enterprise of Riverside, California.

He has appeared on Fox News, MSNBC, National Public Radio, and Air America Radio, among other local broadcast outlets. He also spent time as a reporter and anchor at Pacifica Radio in Berkeley, California.

Strupp has earned awards from the New Jersey Press Association, Society of Professional Journalists, Jesse H. Neal Business Journalism Awards, and Folio. He lives with his wife, Claire, and their two children in Northern New Jersey.

Weekly Columns

Feed Icon
BERJAYA