Media, mothers, women, what are we teaching our daughters, our sisters, ourselves? Some would say that with the rise of “raunch culture” we are training ourselves to be sex objects. To dress trashy. To consume porn and sexually mold ourselves for the pleasure of men. Hooters restaurants, the playboy bunny, Pam Anderson, Victoria’s Secret, Girls Gone Wild, teen sex parties. All in effect. Yes, sex is everywhere.
But while some bemoan the thought that women are taught to be objects, I fear the thought that we are taught to be victims.
You know, it is true, every single time I walk out my front door, I could be raped. I could be raped in my home. Women like me are often raped on the job. I could be raped in a dark parking lot. I could be raped on a subway. I could go to a club or a party and get slipped a ruffie and get raped. I could be raped in broad daylight; I could be raped at night. I am female, therefore every second of every day I could get raped. This is true. My sex, by default, makes me a potential victim. My work makes me even more high risk. There is the very real possibility that I, or any other woman, could be raped at any time.
This is truth. But I see the world teaching women to be victims. I see the world telling women it is not a matter of if; it is a matter of when. I see the world telling women that no matter how hard they try, no matter what they do, they can be raped. And it is true. But I also see the world telling women to live in fear, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year.
The media tells us we are nothing but victims. Dateline warns us nearly weekly that the Internet predators are coming for our children. Oprah & Montel do the same, and also add that at any moment, any woman could be raped, kidnapped and killed. Court TV and A&E provide us with an endless stream of stories and studies and documentaries about serial killers and rapists and all the foul people out to get us. And the message is in fictional television as well. Law & Order, Law & Order SVU, CSI, Cold Case, Without a Trace, the Profiler, each week, each night of every week, we can turn on our televisions and see women victims. Women who have been raped, brutalized, killed. Women who are whores, or college girls, or naïve teenagers, or executives, or wives, or mothers. Women who are gay, women who are straight, women who are promiscuous, women who are virgins. Young women, old women, girls who are not yet women at all. All victims. All victimized. Generally, their tormentors are men, but L&O: SVU has even done episodes about the rare (yet really out there) female sexual predators who prey upon other women or children. And the message is clear, no woman, no matter who she is, can ever be safe. She is not safe from her father, her teachers, her friends, her husband, her neighbor, her boss, her family, a random stranger, a person on the net, or even other women. There is no safe place, not her home, her car, her gym, her favorite café, her place of business, the neighborhood bar, her webpage, her own body. Nowhere she can hide, nowhere she can run, nowhere that she is not a potential victim.
And this message is not coming from porn, or Playboy, or raunch culture, it is coming from EVERYWHERE.
So, what do we do? Do we take self-defense? Do we buy guns? Do we lock ourselves up and shut ourselves in and train ourselves and other women and girls that we are nothing but potential victims no matter what we look like or where we go or work or what a “good girl’ or “bad girl” we might be? Do we fear the world and men and everything that is out there? Do we teach every girl to look at every boy she ever lays eyes on as a potential rapist and act accordingly? Do we teach her that looking at boys might not be enough but she has to look at other girls that way to? Do we constantly have to wonder if any man in our life, from our father to that fellow we fancy might be a rapist? Might have raped, might rape us? Do we glance at every coworker and every neighbor and every passenger on our train or every person on the street and wonder if they might rape us?
We are, each and every one of us, potential victims, and I see the world teaching women that potential victims are all we are. I see the world impressing upon us the need to teach our daughters the same thing. I see the world telling us all to live in fear, because, true enough, at any second we could become victims, at any place, at any time.
And I, for one, will not play along. I know in reality all of it is true, and I can accept that, but I refuse to become a victim in my heart and head and soul when I just might not ever become one in reality. I refuse to lock myself up and shut myself in. I refuse to look at everyone I see, everywhere, and think the worst of them in my own overblown defense. I refuse to fear love or friendship or fun because I might be a victim. And I refuse to bow down and teach other women that they are all victims in waiting. I may pay for it later, but for now? I refuse to be a victim when what I really am is a woman.
Wednesday, August 23, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




15 comments:
Spot on posting, RE! A large part of the media seems to trade in fear and anxiety generally, but they certainly dole an extra dose of it out to women.
why thank you...my mind is still boggling at R Mildreds assertion that sexworkers are the only "abused" workers out there...but I did feel it was time for this rant.
I still don't see raunch culture. I don't see anything new going on. Is it because I live in Florida? Is it because I don't watch commercial TeeVee?
I mean -- everyone keeps telling me it's out there, but honestly? -- I wouldn't have noticed anything weird at all until I read about Ariel Levy's book. And even then, I didn't get it.
So, Jenna Jameson has a book? And...?
Teens are having sex. And...?
I know that sounds belittling. I really don't mean to, but I don't see it! And I'm trying to see it, but so far I don't see how it's pornofied any more than it's already been.
Someone mentioned something about our weird Victorian approach to it all -- which I see. When I went to France as a kid 25 yrs ago, our jaws dropped at the billboards featuring nude women and tons of sexual innuendo and more in them.
this was not happening in our world -- though it may have been in NYC, not yet reaching bumfuck.
Anyway, can anyone help me understand it better?
BL:
Meh, I think for the most part raunch culture is a load of crap. I still have not made it all the way through the book, because I just do not get the narrow scope of her idea (that it is all about men)... I've been to FL several times (heh, heading down there in October actually) and its too damn HOT to wear a lot of clothes :)
The only concession on raunch that people are going to get out of me is the way that revealing clothing, which I feel is FINE for adult women, is marketed to young girls. I have a neice who since about age 13 has been dressing like stripper (an at work stripper): short shorts, short skirts, tight tops, showing a lot of skin (and no, I do not dress like that around her, off duty, I am a baggy and comfortable is good kinda gal) and I do not think it is a good thing. Yes, her friends all dress like that, but I suppose I do not see the need for young teen girls to dress like that. But, it is after all, what the pop princesses and such dress like, so it makes sense that they would want to...
Heh, I dressed more like Trent Reznor back in my teen years...yay Trent.
I agree with your post that society tends make US want to feel like victims,...It could make anyone never want to leave the house. But the world is what it is and harm can come at anytime in anyplace.
As your comment about dress...I can accept an adult woman choosing to dress however she wants, but I agree kids need to dress like kids, but sadly they mimic what they see.
I don't know. I guess it's just that I'm old.
I've been through this stupid sex panic dog and pony show at least twice in my life and we all get over and survive.
as for little girls, what are they wearing that's unacceptable?
Thongs hanging out their pants? Faux leopard thigh highs?
I don't know - at what age do you think its acceptable to stop dressing like a kid and, presuming they want to, start showing some skin? Adolescents aren't exacty children anymore. Not entirely adults, either, but not kids.
of course, the interesting thing is we expect girls to dress like "little girls". and boys? same rules don't apply
"The media tells us we are nothing but victims.
You know, I've often wondered why this is and why I continually get those "I care about you that's why I'm sending you this email about how not to wear your hair in a pony-tail because 'the rapist' will see you as an easier target and don't park next to the white van in the supermarket car park because that increases your chances of getting raped by the men lying in wait for you etc. etc". WTF??
Why are the media continually presenting women as 'victims'? Why are they complicit in attempting to restrict the lives of women through fear of male sexual violence?
I don't know about where you are but over here, when there's a rapist on the loose, we even get police warnings to women to "always be in company" and "don't walk about at night on your own" and "go out in groups, go home with people you know". Jeebus...don't they know that most women are at risk of rape and sexual assault from someone they know?
There's an agenda here, methinks.
It pisses me off, too, RE - this 'you're a victim' approach. I am NOT a victim. I may be a potential victim but that's not my fault. All I'm doing is living my life - and I'm by no means extraordinary - but I am very aware of the fact that my femaleness makes me a target for a very particular kind of violence. My daughter too...
Neither of us behaves like 'victims' - although we both have been - because we believe in our right to fully live our lives.
Wouldn't it be fab if, instead of attempting to put the fear of the gods into women and girls, the media attempted to make the perpetrators of sexual violence against women/girls as scared as we are of their actions? But the media doesn't, does it. It focusses on us and our supposed 'victimhood' with a purience that is scary in itself.
" I refuse to be a victim when what I really am is a woman."
Yay for you!!! Really and truly, a huge YAY! Well said!
WRT Bitch|Lab and "as for little girls, what are they wearing that's unacceptable?
I saw a little girl, maybe 8 years old, the other day. She was wearing a pink T shirt with PORN STAR emblazoned on the front in spangly glitter.
Now I know it's wrong that her parents/whoever let her wear it in the first place but what does it say about a society that something like that could even be made to fit an 8 year old...
That's unacceptable to my mind.
WW:
I would be thrilled if more media focused on putting the "fear" into would be perps. Yes, shows like Law & Order, the bad guy often gets his in the end, and there are plenty of vengence/revenge themed things out there, but, no, not good enough.
"what does it say about a society that something like that could even be made to fit an 8 year old..."
I am actually with you on that...I don't understand why you can go into the juniors department (clothing generally geared towards pre-teen/teen girls, though women on the smaller side also often shop there...but it is not intended for them) and see t-shirts with slogans like "Sexy", and (I am serious, I saw this one the other day) "Looking for Mr. Right- Now". If an adult wants to wear things like that, I have no problem with it whatsoever, but I am just not okay with the idea of
11-15 year old girls and such wearing that kind of stuff, and I wonder if often times they even know what it implies, or just want it because that's what Britney/Christina/Whoever is wearing. I don't think they need to be in skin-tight ultra low rise jeans either....
This is such an odd topic for me (clothing marketing to young girls), one that I just can't wrap my mind around often. I mean, I am very much a fan of free speech & expression and for adults dressing (or underessing) as they wish, but I feel very differently about kids. I would not want my (theoretical) underage daugther running around in revealing clothing with suggestive slogans any more than I would want my teenage son running around in vulgar or offensive clothing...as soon as a person is of age, they have the right to dress/express what they want, but kids? Well, they are just not adults, and in truth, do not have the same rights as adults for a reason. I guess I wish the fashion industry would realize kids are kids and treat them that way.
I guess I wish the fashion industry would realize kids are kids and treat them that way.
Yes. So do I.
But, lets face it, little girls/boys are so much in vogue for the sexual preditor these days - anyone over 16 being over the hill - that a minor is no longer seen as a 'kid'. Not by anyone in the 'game'.
Thing is: the fashion industry is dictated to by.....whom?
Just look at the influences...
It's either the right wing funamentalists or the pornographers.
These are the two groups of people who are dictating appearance and/or behaviour to all women.
Sorry. I've had enough.
WW:
Just as I hate to see women placed in the role of victim, I hate to see kids placed there as well. I think teaching a child caution is one thing, but filling their heads constantly with fear? Not so much.
As for who I think dicates fashion trends...magazines, MTV, American Idol, Hollywood...
I think the "porn star," etc. marketing to kids is creepy, too.
I do also think there's more stuff to unpack there, though--
well, maybe because of the JonBenet hoopla (god, just frigging SHUT UP about it already, major news channels, please? she's still dead, and nothing new is happening for a good while; this is what fucking Court TV is for; would you kindly get back to shit that actually affects most of us? oh, wait, "back," haha anyway) and a Feministe thread inspiring me to reread Lolita, but: it's worth remember that the whole idea of "childhood" per se is actually a relatively recent one. and that the whole notion of children as "innocent" is deeply ambivalent at best;
well, one, there's a bigger problem with "innocent" that I don't really have time to get into here;
but also that, as with the purity of women thing only more so, it's very much a class thing. The dear sweet innocent (white, middle-to-upper-class) child archetype was at its height when thousands of actual (poor, from some despised group or other) children were working twelve hours a day in the "dark satanic mills."
None of which really says much to the marketing of "porn star" shirts to little kids of course. But then, too, you factor that this is not only patriarchy but advanced corporate capitalism. Ultimately they're pushing this shit because they think it's gonna sell well; turns out they're often right. It's certainly worth considering -why- it sells well; but, while I certainly think sexist and possible even murkier, creepier impulses are just as present in big advertising execs as anyone else if not more so (remind me again how we explain the existence of child beauty pageants?), in a way I almost think it's giving them too much credit to suggest it's I don't know some sort of conscious plot or something. They see it as cash on the barrelhead. Again: the interesting question is -why- they came to that conclusion. I think it's a whole bunch of reasons.
As for fear-based talk...ahhhh, well, that's something else again. Yeah. Very reminiscent of the "War On Terror" business, innit?
OHMIGOD THERE'S A TERRORIST QUICK QUICK GET THE DUCT TAPE CALL THE FBI RUN AWAY...
oh, wait, it was a pigeon. my bad.
still you should stay constantly alert just in case. i mean, like, get all your muscles permanently tense to the point where you have shooting pains through your jaw and lower back and your shoulders are permanently glued to your ears. that'll show those terrorists/rapists/predators.
oh and you'd probably be best to stay at home and do pretty much what the nice man in the suit and the reassuring smile tells you. i mean it's really only for your own
BOO!!!!!!!!
...for your own protection.
Hi RR,
I’ve been reading threw your blog and I just wanted to tell you that I like your style and I like your attitude. It’s a refreshing change of pace for me to actually find a women’s blog that isn’t either cluttered with banalities or else loaded with over-the-top feminist bitching about the patriarchy. Get a life ladies! The middle-class patriarchy died during the stagflation years of the 1970’s!
As you might guess, I share many of your concerns and complaints regarding feminism. Although, politically I’m a paleo-conservative (and not to be confused with today’s fascist neocon Republicans who are now helping the Dems to destroy our country) on most issues, I do have allot of respect and empathy for women who work in the sex industry.
Although sex work is a better way of earning a living than working in the retail or the restaurant industry, I have also heard some stories of abuse inside the NYC commercial BDSM scene. In fact, some of those stories were told to me by a women who I’d been seeing for years. It’s my understanding that the abuse; not only from clients, but sometimes even from the dungeon owners themselves; is bad enough to drive most women out of the profession within their first year.
In light of this, I really have to wonder what’s going threw the minds of these supposedly polite and submissive gentleman who plunk down $2 or $3 bills, then give the women a line of shit while expecting her to deliver a mind-blowing session? Life just doesn’t work like that! I find it depressing to hear about this garbage because it seems like a few dickheads, within the scene and without, are poisoning the environment for the majority of guys, like myself, who really do appreciate the rare talents that these women posses and should be encouraged to develop.
Anyway, I get the impression that you’re a strong and down to earth women. I respect that, and I really like reading what you’ve had to say. I’m hoping that we can link up once I figure out exactly how to get my own blog up and running? ……… I think I’d better get on topic now:
The dilemma that you describe here is something called “problem - reaction - solution”. In other words the corporate/government controlled media finds a problem and then they blow it way out of proportion for political and economic reasons. As a result, the dumbed-down public freaks out in panic when they hear about the new crisis every night on the evening news and, as a result, the sheeple demand that government and industry step in to round up the bad guys and stop the chaos. The result of this institutionalized manipulation of the public consciousness is that the police force, the prison system and the security industry all see an artificial spike in the demand for their products and services.
This destructive cycle manifests itself in many ways such as in an increase in the budgets for law enforcement and the prison system, a spike in corporate profits for corporations that finance our political campaigns, new and stricter laws being passed in response to the panic followed by the inevitable crack-down on civil liberties; as well as the need for higher taxes to finance the necessary growth within the law enforcement establishment and the prison industry.
Of course, after all of this public coercion and the unnecessary expansion in the size and scope of government, the problem only gets worse no matter how many more tax dollars we throw at the new monstrosity! Of course, our insane immigration policy in combination with a wide open Mexican border, are the two government sponsored safety valves which guarantee that terrorist threats and violence against women will only get worse no matter how many more new freedom killing laws are passed and no matter how many more new prisons are ever built.
In the end we’d all be better off by telling government that they can keep their domestic protection racket and we’ll keep our hard earned tax dollars. The savings would be better spent on self defense classes and a new shotgun!
Nevertheless, this is how politics actually works in America 2007! Remember the formula for “problem - reaction - solution” whenever you see either the next horrific “junk science” extravaganza on the evening news about “the global warming crisis” or the next doomsday report about “the imminent threat for the next major terrorist attack on U.S. soil“. Both of these threats, as well as the war on women, are actually government sponsored scams designed to frighten us into spending our money and surrendering our civil liberties, as defined in the Bill Of Rights, in exchange for the false promise of greater government protection. Don’t buy into it!
Take care1 I’ll post again soon!
Agree: I never taught my kids victim mentality.
I taught them to welcome strangers; not "stranger-danger" avoidance and suspician.
I never taught them fear of rape. I can claim some expertise in the circumstances of rape, at least in my community. 90+% rapes occur either when 1) a young women gets stone cold drunk at a party, or 2) a woman accepts a ride from a stranger. I understand rape can be nebulous or underreported, but at least for the reported cases, those two situations cover almost all.
Disagree: Pornification of culture. Sexual topics and images intrude into my own life beyond enjoyment. I hate having to explain sexual topics to my kids before they are ready.
Post a Comment