close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100706062101/http://www.huffingtonpost.com:80/2010/06/28/thurgood-marshall-elena-kagan_n_628662.html
 

Thurgood Marshall On Trial: Republican Senators Use Elena Kagan's Supreme Court Hearing To Trash Her Mentor (VIDEO)

First Posted: 06-28-10 08:51 PM   |   Updated: 06-28-10 08:51 PM

What's Your Reaction?
Thurgood Marshall On Trial

Republican senators sound increasingly unlikely to try and block Elena Kagan's confirmation to the Supreme Court, owing perhaps in part to public apathy, but in the meantime they've focused some of their attention on an even more difficult target: former Justice Thurgood Marshall, a civil rights pioneer, the first African-American to sit on the high court and one of Kagan's self-avowed heroes, for whom she clerked early in her career.

Marshall's name came up 35 times during the first day of Kagan's confirmation hearings, compared to 14 mentions of President Obama, by Talking Points Memo's count.

There's "no doubt he was an activist judge," Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) said of Marshall on MSNBC Monday. "Let's admire the man for the great things he did, but let's not walk over and wipe out the things that really didn't make sense as an obedient student of the practice of law."

The Salt Lake Tribune tracked Hatch down after Monday's hearing to ask if he would have voted for Marshall, the man who successfully litigated Brown v. Board of Education not long before he joined the Supreme Court. "Well, it's hard to say," was Hatch's response.

Sen. Jeff Sessions of Alabama, the ranking Republican on the Judiciary Committee, likewise decried Marshall as "a well-known liberal activist judge" in his opening remarks during the hearing. Other GOP senators have sought to press Kagan on whether she believes that, as Marshall once said, "you do what you think is right and let the law catch up," the Wall Street Journal reports.

And as Greg Sargent noted, Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) decided to hit Marshall for "his unshakable determination to protect the underdog."

"Perhaps because his first nominee failed to defend the judicial philosophy that he was promoting, the President has repackaged it. Now, he says that judges should have 'a keen understanding of how the law affects the daily lives of the American people ... and know that in a democracy, powerful interests must not be allowed to drown out the voices of ordinary citizens,'" Kyl complained. "Kagan wrote a tribute to Justice Marshall in which she said in his view it was the role of the courts and interpreting the Constitution to protect the people who went unprotected by every other organ of government. The court existed primarily to fulfill this mission. And later, when she was working in the Clinton administration, she encouraged a colleague working on a speech about Justice Marshall to emphasize his unshakable determination to protect the underdog."

Story continues below

WATCH some of the GOP attacks on Marshall:

Get HuffPost Politics On Twitter, Facebook, and Google Buzz! Subscribe to the new HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Republican senators sound increasingly unlikely to try and block Elena Kagan's confirmation to the Supreme Court, owing perhaps in part to public apathy, but in the meantime they've focused some of th...
Republican senators sound increasingly unlikely to try and block Elena Kagan's confirmation to the Supreme Court, owing perhaps in part to public apathy, but in the meantime they've focused some of th...
BERJAYA
BERJAYA
Filed by Jeff Muskus  |  Report Corrections
 
Comments
7,767
Pending Comments
0
View FAQ
You must be logged in to comment. Log in  or connect with 
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7  Next ›  Last »   (120 pages total)
Show: 
photo
Philclock   11:05 AM on 7/01/2010
Kyle's right; as a judge, taking away the freedoms of every dog does not protect the underdog.
SKOC211   08:56 PM on 6/30/2010
God forbid the courts protect the underdog! How would that give them any time to protect corporations!?

Gotta love those conservative activist judges!!
dao1947   04:21 PM on 6/30/2010
Lincoln is probably rolling over in his tomb because of what the Republican party has become.

HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR

1088   05:53 AM on 6/30/2010
And yet, we hear nothing from the blacks, or the civil leaders! Their silence is deafening!
photo
kannita   08:09 AM on 6/30/2010
Maybe because you are not listening!
photo
gettingitright   01:12 AM on 6/30/2010
Villifying a legend like Thurgood Marshall!! I thought I'd heard everything. These right-wingers have uber-arrogance and uber-ignorance.

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

Jim Pasterczyk   11:26 PM on 6/29/2010
Perhaps the GOP of the 21st century would like to return to the time Plessy v. Ferguson and Dred Scott were good law.
photo
YoungConservative53   12:32 AM on 6/30/2010
Funny you should mention Plessy... the dissent in that case argued that our constitution was "color blind".... That's now the conservative position of the court, as liberals argue for seperate standards for seperate races in upholding affirmative action programs.
stape45   12:39 AM on 6/30/2010
Actions speak louder than words.

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

ddanimal   01:02 AM on 6/30/2010
Today we have a conservative court that argues that corporations are people, that money is speech, and that money and wealth should determine a persons access to justice.

Its completely backwards and offensive to democracy.
BlackTantalus   01:07 AM on 6/30/2010
Jim Pasterczyk is absolutely correct; and the most hysterical Confederate on the Court is the self-loathing Justice Thomas.
photo
gettingitright   01:11 AM on 6/30/2010
You're stuck on affirmative action? With all these other wedge issues being bandied about? And affirmative action is a remedial program. You think that Brown v. Board made the playing field even right then. Also, you should know that it is about giving qualified, not unqualified people a traditionally-deprived opportunity. Don't believe the hype.
photo
kaptaintripps   11:05 PM on 6/29/2010
What else does the GOP have? Of course they have to cling to cr@p like this! What have they got left?
photo
YoungConservative53   12:37 AM on 6/30/2010
Lol, you're kidding right?? Look at some poll numbers for the upcoming election and I think you'll see that the GOP has quite a bit to look forward to! The Dems on the other hand....
december30   05:40 AM on 6/30/2010
Trust me, all American people are not misinformed like you. You, in need, like so many others and the entire Repughlican party would continue to stay ignorance than work with the President. This is all about this Black man and, it is so sad that the election of this Black man caused/causes the worst Americans to lift their heads. Do you really believe the Repughlicans care about you? They only care about party politics. What have they done other than say NO. And you think the American people will elect these? The majority of the American People are not stupid, ignorant or misinformed. Please youngconservative53, try taking advantage of the education reform that is out there for you and stop hating.
gatlinggun6   09:14 AM on 6/30/2010
Has it ever occurred to you how silly your little snake flag looks? Your flag may as well be adorned with garden snake. Otherwise it's sheer laughable that you all run around carrying that toothless symbol. So what if we tread on you as we already have. One of these days maybe you all will pull your heads out of the past and realize that this is the 21st Century. Don't you have any symbols that are relevant to the present or future?
photo
taijiredlion   09:19 AM on 6/30/2010
You may make some temporary gains in the midterms. The party out of power almost always does so. But the demographics of the country are tending rapidly in the liberal/Democrat favor. Look at the Republican Limbaugh/Tea Party -- old, white and male. A party based on a demographic rapidly declining in relative size and power does not have a very bright long term future. So enjoy your little bump in the polls. Just don't ignore the tidal wave on the horizon.

And as for "conservative"? Burke would roll over in his grave.
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

ScapeGoat   10:37 PM on 6/29/2010
And as Greg Sargent noted, Senate Minority Whip Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) decided to hit Marshall for "his unshakable determination to protect the underdog."

So is it better to protect the rights of the average person or is it better to protect the rights of the rich and big corporations?

The rePUKElicans make me sick. If it were up to them we would still have segregation. They have yet to name one decision that Marshall made that did not uphold the equal justice for all motto emblazoned over the supreme court.

But I can show you rulings by Roberts and the unjust 5 that have limited individual rights and have upheld and expanded rights for big corporations.
mandinka   09:57 PM on 6/29/2010
Trashing Marshall they are calling a spade a spade.
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

ScapeGoat   10:37 PM on 6/29/2010
Neanderthal.
stape45   12:38 AM on 6/30/2010
(No wonder he's a scapegoat.)

HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR

Billyguitar   09:52 PM on 6/29/2010
It's so embarrassing to watch that leprechaun Sessions and these other fools insult her and Marshall. She has to just sit their and look nonplused. They'll pass her anyway. What a farce!
photo
ljmck   10:04 PM on 6/29/2010
Please, don't insult leprechauns by linking them with a Republican!
photo
ljmck   09:51 PM on 6/29/2010
The Founders would turn over in their graves at the thought of corporate personhood. That's judicial activism of the most corrosive kind.
photo
ljmck   09:46 PM on 6/29/2010
I guess Republicans will never let prejudice die. It saddens me tremendously.
jcabowers   09:38 PM on 6/29/2010
The Republicans are steadfast in their desire to appeal only to aging white folks and absolutely to no one else. Not exactly a good long term strategy given the demographics of the US. More power to them as they reduce themselves to irrelevance.

HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR

Billyguitar   09:56 PM on 6/29/2010
Well I'm one aging white person that wouldn't mind wearing my kneecaps out by kickin' their backsides into the middle of next week!
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

ScapeGoat   10:44 PM on 6/29/2010
at 61 I'm with you!
faned and faved
photo
muhair   03:11 AM on 6/30/2010
You wish! And so do I. It's pretty clear the Repugs or whatever they're called here have managed to scare the pants off most Americans -- certainly not just oldsters -- about the national debt, and are all too easily in subverting the economic recovery, thus allowing them to tilt Congress their way in Nov. and regain the White House in 2012.... UNLESS they nominate Palin, but they're way too smart to do that. Then they'll screw things up even more for a term or two (#2 stolen) ensuring that a Democrat will be elected to the impossible task of cleaning up their latest mess.....
Don Giovanni   09:09 AM on 6/30/2010
They continue to follow the "2 Santa Claus Theory" proposed by Jude Wanniski, Republican strategist, in the mid-'70s. Republicans could be Santa Clauses by cutting people's taxes. For working people it would only be a small token – a few hundred dollars a year on average – but would be heavily marketed. And for the rich it would amount to hundreds of billions of dollars in tax cuts. The Republicans' spending would be "starving the beast" of government by running up such huge deficits that Democrats in the next election cycle would never, ever be able to talk again about national health care or improving Social Security. There was no way, Wanniski said, that the Democrats could ever win again. They'd have to be anti-Santas by raising taxes, or anti-Santas by cutting spending. Either one would lose them elections. This has been the Republicans' strategy ever since.
seeksthetruth   09:13 PM on 6/29/2010
According to the GOP, we can't have a Supreme Court Justice who tries to protect the unprotected (the underdog) and fights for equal rights for all. That's not acceptable. We must have justices who only support the rich and powerful as Roberts has done every time. Apparently, you're only and "activist" judge if you fight for the average American.
Sharon1951   07:55 AM on 6/30/2010
Cosigned. Good post.
photo
DreamWeaver2nd   08:50 PM on 6/29/2010
This is what the neo-confederates criticize Justice Marshall for, and General Kagan for her support of him.

Republican Jon Kyl complained. "Kagan wrote a tribute to Justice Marshall in which she said in his view it was the role of the courts and interpreting the Constitution to protect the people who went unprotected by every other organ of government. The court existed primarily to fulfill this mission. And later, when she was working in the Clinton administration, she encouraged a colleague working on a speech about Justice Marshall to emphasize his unshakable determination to protect the underdog."

Wow! That's damn terrible.
Nowadays, Congress is only there to protect the interests of crony, monopolistic capitalists. Money makes their political world go 'round.

"Underdog"s? Kick them to the curb.
photo

HUFFPOST SUPER USER

sheaintsayin   09:12 PM on 6/29/2010
See, the real problem is that she's already indicating her activism, simply by acting like she's got good sense...!
AinOK   04:12 PM on 7/01/2010
yeah, the rabid right only want "common sense" (or lower), none of that above average intelligence stuff, no sir.

Twitter Edition
BERJAYA
BERJAYA