close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100529172011/http://www.guardian.co.uk:80/society/2010/may/26/immigration

A child's eye of life inside Yarl's Wood immigration removal centre

As the new coalition government moves to end keeping children in detention centres, Wells Botomani, now 14, relives his family's nightmare at Yarl's Wood removal centre

Wells Botomani with his mother and sister.

Wells Botomani with his mother and sister. Photograph: Christopher Thomond for the Guardian

Dark, early morning, 6 January 2009. A big bang on the door woke me. The mailbox flapped and clanked. More bangs. My mother went downstairs, opened the door. I trembled in my bed. Two men came upstairs, into my bedroom, told me to get out of bed and go downstairs.

Downstairs, the room was full of people. My sister came down escorted by more people. A man carrying a big file was talking in a loud voice telling my mum about removal dates. My mum has always told us at prayer times every evening to be calm and always depend on God in difficult times. So we stayed calm and said silent prayers.

Another man appeared at the door with three sacks. I was taken to my bedroom to pack. I was confused, so I packed dirty and torn clothes; no underwear, no pyjamas. I did make sure to pack my school uniform because I thought we would still go to school. I was rushed downstairs without going to the toilet or brushing my teeth. I felt very bad.

My sister, who was almost 17, was escorted into her bedroom to pack her belongings. And finally, my mum was too. Like criminals, we were taken out of the house, put into a van and driven away.

We were driven to a nearby reporting centre. We were taken into a building with no carpet or heaters, with plastic chairs attached to the wall and a toilet. The door was locked and we sat there trembling. It was very cold. I wondered how long we were going to be there. My mum told us not to hate these people – they were carrying out orders. She said to keep praying to God for help. Soon my heart felt better and some strength came back.  

A man with a bandage on his hand opened the door and asked us if we needed anything to drink. My mum asked for a cup of tea. The door was locked again. Then opened again. The same man pulled a huge heater towards the door. The flex was too short so the heater was left in the doorway. The warmth barely reached us, but I was thankful because the room was freezing.

At 8.30am our bags were loaded into a police cage van. We were taken into the van and told we were going to a very nice family detention unit, four hours away – "One of the best detention centres in the country." We were locked in the van. I felt like a criminal.

On the way, we could not talk to each other. I felt sick inside. I thought about friends left behind and wondered about my future. I felt like screaming. My lips and throat were dry, and my head was spinning. A woman and the driver watched us on a screen in the front of the van. 

Everything was snowy white at Yarl's Wood. The van stopped outside a huge gate and we could see razor wire around the perimeter. It looked like a prison. It was very quiet and deserted. The gate finally opened and the van entered. Then, another black gate. The van stopped again. We waited anxiously. The female officer in the van came and opened the back door. "Wait here," she said.

She asked us: "Have you ever seen snow before?" I felt angry, as she seemed to be mocking us. My mum calmly said: "Ya, it also snows in Leeds." The woman sneered.

Then the gate opened and a woman came out. She searched the car and scanned our bags. Then we were handed over to the detention team, and were searched by officers wearing latex gloves.

We saw many detainees with sad faces. My mum told us not to wear sad faces or do anything stupid, but to be co-operative. It was hard. A day had gone without us being in school. I sobbed inside. They took us to a different room. We were kept there until 6.30pm. I had missed school for the first time in my life. I had never even been late for school before. Education was the only thing that promised a future for me, that would take me out of the many problems my family faced. But now it looked like that chance had gone.  

An officer told my mum that we could take anything from the fridge or make a drink from the machine, but we were still frozen inside. He said: "Make sure you take fruit."

While we were waiting to be taken to our rooms, a woman came in. We went to the fridge, but suddenly she shouted: "WHO TOLD YOU TO TAKE FOOD FROM THE FRIDGE?"

I could see tears in my mum's eyes, and I felt traumatised. I was told to carry my own bag, which was too heavy for me. So I dragged it. Life had totally turned against me.  

The officer strode off and told us to walk fast as she unlocked door after door. We dragged our heavy bags up the stairs. We entered our two-room accommodation. We chose where we would sleep and sat there like stones.

Meanwhile, my teachers had sent my mum text messages to find out what had happened to me. She told them that we were detained at Yarl's Wood, and that we were going to be deported back to Malawi on 11 January.

I've since learned that my friends cried when they were told about this, and that some told their parents, who started a big campaign for us.

That night I couldn't sleep. I just shook. My mum read us Bible verses and told us to be strong. It took a long time to get to sleep. I could hear footsteps all night. Officers kept locking and unlocking doors. Then, early in the morning, when I was falling asleep, I heard a loud, scary knock on the door. It was the teacher telling my mum that I had school.

The school was just one room for primary kids and another for secondary kids. The place was full of people, from pregnant women to teenagers. There were even babies.

When we had been told that there would be school we were very happy. But one teacher and all ages in one classroom – it was hopeless. We didn't learn anything and mostly played football.

Scary stories

We heard scary stories about how the immigration authorities were working hard to deport people. One day we heard that if you refused to go back to your country, they sometimes sent your parents separately – or even took you to social welfare homes.

I felt so scared. I imagined my mum being thrown into the plane, alone. I could not sleep and I didn't have the courage to tell my mother. But one day, I told her what some staff were telling us. She was very angry and told me that if anyone started on this again, we should tell them that they didn't have the right to terrorise our weak and bruised minds.  

I stopped going to class. I felt I was learning nothing. I was having sleepless nights. I was also watching violent films, which the centre put on. My mum tried to make me sleep, but I couldn't.  

During the first month, I became stick-like because I couldn't eat. My lips were dry and red, and my mum was scared. She used to force me to go into the dining room to eat, but I couldn't. I felt dead inside. Soon I got bad diarrhoea. I tried to get in to see the nurse, but we had to wait two days. I could drink, but couldn't take solid food. When we went to see the nurse, she just looked at me and said I looked OK, but my mum insisted. Then the nurse weighed me, and I had lost some weight. But she still said I was OK.  

There was sickness everywhere: chickenpox, urinary tract infections, flu, diarrhoea and fever. Health staff didn't seem to care.

Forced to go back

Every day we heard terrible stories about how people were being beaten and handcuffed and forced to go back to their countries. Every day we saw people crying and being taken to the airport. Sometimes I felt death would have been better than being sent back to a place where I would end up living on the streets.  

The nights are the worst in Yarl's Wood. Doors being banged and sometimes people crying. You always think they may be coming to your door. This fear lives in me, and I don't know how to get rid of it.  

The 65 days I was in Yarl's Wood was hell. My plea to this government is please think of us children. We do not deserve this treatment. We deserve a future. Let immigration be hard on real criminals, not people who are seeking refuge.

It is my prayer that the British government shows mercy towards children. Detention for us is hell and detrimental to our fragile minds.  

• The Botomani family are appealing a Home Office rejection of their asylum claim.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Comments are now closed for this entry.
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

  • RedTom RedTom

    26 May 2010, 8:45AM

    If you want only one reason why New Labour deserved to lose the general election, it's the scandalous treatment of young asylum seekers in Yarl's Wood. Accounts like this make me boil with rage. How could a government, a so-called Labour government, sanction this kind of inhuman treatment of anyone, let alone young people. Shame on you Gordon Brown, shame on New Labour!

  • meskelund meskelund

    26 May 2010, 9:36AM

    i am a member of a group, soas detainee support which visits detainees in yarls wood immigration removal centre, and we have at first hand seen the impact detention has, not only on children, but everyone. and despite numerous reports from the royal colleges, the children's commissioner sir aynsley-green, bail for immigration detainees and refugee and migrant justice, all showing the detrimental impact detention has on children's health, development and wellbeing, the government continues to detain children and families. while their pledge to end detention of children is certainly welcomed, there is no need for their promised 'review,' extensive research has already been done by various organisations, and there are no obstacles to immediate release of all families currently held under immigration powers.

    in fact, we urge all to participate in 'release carnival' on the 5th of june, a huge demonstration from torrington square (close to russell square) to downing street, where we will show the politicians that there is wide support in the population to end this abhorrent practice! there will be speakers from refugee and migrant justice, mp jeremy corbyn, lib dem dave ravel, clare sambrook, citizens for sanctuary, no one is illegal etc. there will also be music, clowns, jugglers and dance performances. join us! or see more on releasecarnival.wordpress.com

  • Northernwoman Northernwoman

    26 May 2010, 10:07AM

    It makes me ashamed of the Labour government. They improved a few things (even Cameron acknowledged as much on the steps of no.10) but got other things, such as this, so desperately wrong.

    I am ashamed that it took a Tory government to put it right. Labour, what happened to your heart whilst in government?

  • Dawson7 Dawson7

    26 May 2010, 10:14AM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • Dawson7 Dawson7

    26 May 2010, 10:33AM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • Dawson7 Dawson7

    26 May 2010, 11:00AM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • LeSatirist LeSatirist

    26 May 2010, 11:06AM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • aerogirl aerogirl

    26 May 2010, 11:09AM

    He says 'I felt like a criminal' numerous times in this article. He is an illegal immigrant therefore he is a criminal. The same as if I was in India or Australia etc

  • Dawson7 Dawson7

    26 May 2010, 11:22AM

    Sorry I expect this to be my last post, I am an expert on how your system works in favour of the criminals who traffice people, Britain has re produced the slave trade with its laws applied to human rights, at the heart of it is your legal aid system and the benefits open to anyone and its very easy to defraud. One of the most favourite training video's is the UK Border Force as recently shown on TV where a man quite clearly in his late 20s claims to be only 15, they quite simply cannot make a decision and send him into child care for the risk of being wrong under human rights, he remains in the system for quite sometime before melting away, the UK border force series has been very educational on how not to be deported, finally the last card to be played if all else has not worked is to commit a serious crime against your society where you will be locked up but leave with an excellent education and time to plan your appeal which normally works because the crime commited back home would result in serious harm or maybe death if it was rape, again you have just made children an ace card to play thanks to the people earning money from your system including your lawyers they are nothing more then plantation owners from the slave trade days earning plenty of money on the backs of slave children, please wake up and stop this madness.

  • Haldane86 Haldane86

    26 May 2010, 11:24AM

    @Dawson

    "because your legal system is making a bundle of money above you since I am a cash cow in respect of legal aid," you lost me at this nonesense. Currently working as a legal aid lawyer and suriving on £14k in London, you clearly don't have a clue! Law firms are disappearing every day cause of cuts to legal aid. But hey i'm sure that you'd decline to take it if you ever faced legal proceedings!

    @aerogirl

    you conveniently ignore the fact that he has an outstanding appeal against refusal of his asylum claim. Whilst he is here with an outstanding right of appeal he is not commiting any criminal offence. He will have been granted Temporary Admission, which allows him to stay until his appeal rights are exhausted. His claim is based on being recognised as an a refugee under international law. He may have been an illegal entrant but after claiming asylum he is not a criminal, despite the misconception you and the Daily Mail/Express nutters hold.

    I for one am proud to live in a country which respects our obligations under one of the most important international agreements there is(albeit imperfectly...see the UNHCRs report on the Home Office's dealing with Asylum cases) better than most of our continental neighbours.

    @ Redtom - It's a disgrace that children are detained and I welcome the end of the barbaric practice, like you say, it's a stain on Gordon Brown and Labour.

  • Haldane86 Haldane86

    26 May 2010, 11:29AM

    @dawson - no you're right, seen as though you clearly disagree with human rights let's lose some. I vote for starting with you're freedom of expression. It wouldn't be missed!

  • IKNOWNOTHING IKNOWNOTHING

    26 May 2010, 11:33AM

    @aerogirl
    His family claimed asylum. That means that they are not "illegal immigrants." Illegal immigrants would be those who entered the country without claiming asylum. Those who have had their applications rejected are also not "illegal immigrants," but "failed asylum seekers" and unless they abscond will have committed no criminal offence.Their appeal may well succeed.
    So he is not a criminal, but you are very ignorant.

  • ScepticMike ScepticMike

    26 May 2010, 11:37AM

    It would be interesting to have some more information as to why he and his mother are in this country in the first place.
    Having said that surely we can organise treatment of people including children in a civilised way which includes either accepting that we have to give asylum in accordance with the law or they are not entitled and are sent straight back.
    However I am cynical enough to think that if people with children were not detained there would be a sudden increase in "families" claiming asylum.

  • Dawson7 Dawson7

    26 May 2010, 11:45AM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • CarlMB CarlMB

    26 May 2010, 12:02PM

    Whilst I am for 'detainees' not being 'torutred' in these camps, I'd be intersted to know whether the UK was really this family's nearest safe country...?

  • Haldane86 Haldane86

    26 May 2010, 12:09PM

    @ sceptic mike

    If you take a look at the UNHCRs report on how well the UK deals with asylum claims you get a flavour of the problems in the system...namely poorly trained, poorly paid decision makers at the Home Office who's decisions must then be overturned on appeal.

    Just occasionally the UKBA shows it can still amuse and entertain with it's
    crass stupidity. This came from a west african casecase:

    "You claim that you could not relocate to the area where your parents are
    living as you fear attacks from guerrillas. However, information from the
    World Wide Fund for nature confirms that guerrillas (sic) are not native to
    that part of the country and in any event there are few recorded incidents
    of primates attacking humans unless their natural habitat is disturbed or
    their young threatened".

  • ianua ianua

    26 May 2010, 12:29PM

    I think people are being a bit harsh on aerogirl - she made a linguistic based mistake based on a layman's knowledge that implies if you do something illegal (e.g. entering or remaining in this country without permission) you are a criminal. In this case her knowledge was not sufficient but calling her "very ignorant" and tarring her with the same brush a "daily mail nutters" is a bit mean.

  • nonuffingsayless nonuffingsayless

    26 May 2010, 12:38PM

    michael portillo -his family could have gone from spain to france
    michael howard - family came from romania (i think) crossing how many countries?
    anc activists in London /Dublin etc flew the length of africa
    european jews in the 30s and 40s going to US, Australia south africa
    the greek (and many other) royal family have found sanctuary here over the years
    russian millionaire disadents (well business rivals to putins mates)
    and so on and so on
    there is a long history of not going to the first safe country
    and many times this country has benefited for our generousity in letting these people in
    plus many of these "safe countries" are housing millions of refugees and suffering social problems that make our issues seem trivial
    a bit of humanity is all i think most of us are asking for
    a few fair points on child trafficing - unfortunately the powers that be seem to give very little thought to this or indeed sexual trafficing as well

  • SafeAndSound SafeAndSound

    26 May 2010, 12:43PM

    I thought Malawi was a democratic country with a mufti-ethnic population, generally free (admittedly it has some ethic/religious issues tensions but no more than the UK) of inter community strife . Seriously what is wrong with the whole system is that claiming asylum is too simple and open to abuse. In Belgium or Holland they can assess a case at point of entry and remove those who attempt to abuse the system. The problem is in the UK it takes too long to short out - because by the time the process has ended, it will against the seekers' human rights to be removed when they have integrated into one section or another UK society. We can't blame people for trying it on - when it is so easy to cheat the system - those who suffer are the real asylum seekers, who are tarred with same brush as the fake ones. If the government really cared about human rights then they should really sort this the whole process out.

  • mac64 mac64

    26 May 2010, 12:48PM

    If it's wrong for the children to endure unhuman and cruel treatment- AND IT IS-then it's wrong for the parents to endure inhuman and degrading treatment.

    The point is the deportations are wrong, as are the racist immigration/asylum policies of Labour, Tories and now Lib Dems.

  • BigChegs BigChegs

    26 May 2010, 12:51PM

    If I was genuinely afraid for my life in Malawi, surely it would be much easier for me to escape persecution by running away to say Tanzania, Mozambique or Zambia, each of which borders Malawi and has huge areas of unprotected, unmanned borders.
    Sorry to sound like such an unsympathetic bastard, but the money it must take to get 3 illegal immigrants into Britain in the first place should be enough to live on handsomely in any of those countries for quite some time.
    Begging the question, are we really so stupid and are our heads so far up our arseholes that we cannot distinguish between a genuine case and an obvious welfare refugee any more?
    The rest of Europe must be pissing their pants laughing at us. Yes, allow genuine cases, but don't let any illegals slip out of sight until they have been processed. Obvious scammers, sorry - next cargo ship home for you, Sir or Madam and we will bill your government for the inconvenience you have caused us to boot. If that's not nice, think how much worse it would be living in real danger, personal or political in Malawi, Nigeria etc etc.
    Disclaimer - I have never and will never vote for a Right Wing party, but enough is enough!

  • mac64 mac64

    26 May 2010, 12:55PM

    It makes me sick when people blab on about bogus/failed asylum seekers and greedy immigrants.

    What has been particularly stomach-churning is having to witness Britain turn back the likes of Iraqi and Afghani immigrants/asylum seekers after we helped destroy their countries.

  • Mungobel Mungobel

    26 May 2010, 1:08PM

    Sceptic Mike: " It would be interesting to have some more information as to why he and his mother are in this country in the first place"

    Malawi is a very impoverished country. It also has a history of political oppression. For those reasons alone, it should not come as a surprise to anyone to come across Malawians who appear to be seeking a better life in countries which are seen as offering prospects of a better life.

  • domprague domprague

    26 May 2010, 2:51PM

    @SamuelSmiles
    'This could have been avoided if her family entered legally. I don?t have any sympathy for her, sorry.'

    It says they are asylum seekers. That's legal so check your facts before you turn off your sympathy.

  • Mungobel Mungobel

    26 May 2010, 3:05PM

    BigChegs: "If I was genuinely afraid for my life in Malawi, surely it would be much easier for me to escape persecution by running away to say Tanzania, Mozambique or Zambia, each of which borders Malawi and has huge areas of unprotected, unmanned borders.."

    If you were a woman with two children with reason to flee Malawi you might know that the three countries you mention have not often been known to refuse asylum to the obviously needy. However you would usefully set against that knowledge such things as the very high incidence of violence and abuse suffered by vulnerable women including school-age children in Tanzania. You would also usefully know that, if you fled to Zambia, you would very likely be placed in an overcrowded refugee camp alongside thousands of other refugees from war-torn Angola or the Congo. There your health and safety and that of your children would continue to be at risk for reasons well-documented in reports from UN and other agencies. Moreover, you would probably be aware that, provided you managed the journey safely and weathered all else, your chances of escaping a life of poverty in Tanzania, Zambia, or Mozambique were unlikely to be appreciably better than in the country you were fleeing..

  • Novelist Novelist

    26 May 2010, 3:21PM

    If you don't have permission to come, then don't come. If you come anyway, then you have no cause to complain about what happens to you. The UK is not the provider of social security for the whole world. Why should UK citizens support people who have never contributed to UK society and arrive illegally?

  • bigplanetlittlemoon bigplanetlittlemoon

    26 May 2010, 3:37PM

    Each time I question whether us LibDems should have got into bed with the tories in the coalition I remember the kids locked up in detention who would have stayed there but for the change in policy resulting from the MPs work in the negotiations.

  • CapitanBea CapitanBea

    26 May 2010, 3:41PM

    Spot on @cxk271! @Marina888 almost managed to clean up the rambling, incoherent syntax, but not quite.

    @Samuelsmiles - did you even read the article? It was written by a boy.

    @Meskelund, thank you for the information - I'll be joining you on the march.

  • BoredSilly BoredSilly

    26 May 2010, 3:47PM

    This isn't a discussion on immigration law it's about children's rights. We are talking here about a little boy who wants nothing more than to get an education. A kid such as this will likely grow up to be a very hard working and disciplined member of society. Immigrants have no safety net in terms of family or friends so they generally tend to work bloody hard and pay their taxes on time. Immigration has always provided Britain with skilled and unskilled labour from around the world but in particular from those countries we once invaded and exploited. Britain ran Malawi from the late 19th Century through to the mid 1960's, we took plenty of the countries resources both in terms of oil, minerals AND people. This poor family is an English speaking one, these are not illiterate peasants that will be on the dole for the rest of their lives they are hard working god fearing people who (if given a chance) will enrich this country a great deal.
    As an Englishman who has traveled and worked all over the world I have to say I am ashamed to read many of the posts here. I think it's about time we forced BNP and English Defense League supporters to take history lessons in locals schools. That way they might be reminded of the way the British acted in other peoples countries from the 17th Century through to today.
    And anyway since when did the UK lock up kids...????? WTF..??
    Bloody disgusting article, it makes my skin crawl.

  • Haldane86 Haldane86

    26 May 2010, 4:04PM

    @Novelist - you're typical of the blinding ignorance of the UK's actual immigration policy.

    Read the final line of the article:

    "The Botomani family are appealing a Home Office rejection of their asylum claim."

    These people claimed asylum in the UK on the basis of the 1951 Geneva Convention...under your logic Jews would not have been allowed to flee Nazi Germany to come to the UK because they didn't have a valid visa!

    Also do you even know what benefits are available to asylum claimants or do you blindly accept the ridiculous assertion held up by the daily mail etc that you're handed the keys to a mansion on arrival whilst british families suffer in poor housing next door?

    If you come to the UK and you claim asylum, you become entitled to NASS (national asylum support service) support in the form of basic (often squalid) accommodation and food vouchers redeemable almost nowhere. AND you only get access to these benefits if you are deemed to be DESTITUTE, i.e. unable to feed or clothe yourself by any other means, and don't forget the total prohibition on Asylum claimaints working whilst their claim is determined!

  • Marina888 Marina888

    26 May 2010, 4:30PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • BigChegs BigChegs

    26 May 2010, 5:26PM

    f you were a woman with two children with reason to flee Malawi you might know that the three countries you mention have not often been known to refuse asylum to the obviously needy. However you would usefully set against that knowledge such things as the very high incidence of violence and abuse suffered by vulnerable women including school-age children in Tanzania. You would also usefully know that, if you fled to Zambia, you would very likely be placed in an overcrowded refugee camp alongside thousands of other refugees from war-torn Angola or the Congo. There your health and safety and that of your children would continue to be at risk for reasons well-documented in reports from UN and other agencies. Moreover, you would probably be aware that, provided you managed the journey safely and weathered all else, your chances of escaping a life of poverty in Tanzania, Zambia, or Mozambique were unlikely to be appreciably better than in the country you were fleeing..

    Were this the case, my first and overriding priority would be the safety of my children, not whether I would be able to sign on in the country I fled to.

  • BigChegs BigChegs

    26 May 2010, 5:30PM

    IKNOWNOTHING

    @aerogirl
    His family claimed asylum. That means that they are not "illegal immigrants." Illegal immigrants would be those who entered the country without claiming asylum. Those who have had their applications rejected are also not "illegal immigrants," but "failed asylum seekers" and unless they abscond will have committed no criminal offence.Their appeal may well succeed.
    So he is not a criminal, but you are very ignorant.

    So, in other words, I'm not a criminal as long as I say "I claim political asylum" - handy, I'll try it next time I get a speeding ticket or get my weed confiscated.

  • Novelist Novelist

    26 May 2010, 6:53PM

    @haldane86:

    If you come to the UK and you claim asylum

    - You need to study the asylum laws. Or do you think that Malawi is next door to the UK?
    These people are economic migrants in disguise.

  • martinusher martinusher

    26 May 2010, 6:53PM

    1) In most countries entering the country without permission or remaining in the country after you have been asked to leave is a criminal offense.

    2) Everyone knows that provided you ask for asylum at UK immigration before they determine that you have no legal right to entry the country then you will be admitted pending your status being determined. Once admitted then its quite difficult to remove you. It is best to claim religious persecution.

    3) The article appears to be carefully ghostwritten to bolster a case for religious persecution. The child angle just turns the screw a bit (pluck those heartstrings!). (That doesn't mean the individual case isn't real or important but its just one among many.)

    4) Doing the legal immigration route is time consuming and relatively expensive. Try it sometime.

  • FreeAfrica FreeAfrica

    26 May 2010, 7:39PM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • ALHAJ ALHAJ

    26 May 2010, 8:58PM

    THANKS FOR THIS NEWS, AND CONGRATULATION DOWSON YOU HAVE HIT THE NAIL TOP. IS SHAME FOR UK TO TALK ABOUT HUMAN RIGHT ABUSE BY ANY COUNTRY THEY SHOULD RATHER DO THEIR HOME WORK PROPER BEFORE CONDEMING OTHERS, WHY? I WAS INPRISON ON FALSE CHARGE , I SPEND NINE MONTHS BEFORE I WAS TRYED , BY THE GRACE OF ALLAH (GOD) I CAME OUT OF IT AS INOCENT, I WILL CONDEMED THE POLCE AT FIRST THEY DID NOT DO THEIR JOB AS POLICE OR THEY SAW THE CASE WAS BETWEEN MUSLIM AND CHRISTIAN. THEY HAVE DESTROYED MY LIFE WITH THAT FALSE CHARGE , I WAS ASAULTED BY UNTRAINED OFFICER WITH BACK INJURY UP TILL NOW I HAVEN'T RECOVER. WITH ALL THIS TRAUMA AND ANGUSH I WENT THROUGH, I HAVEN'T RECEIVE COMPASATION YET. SHAME TO UK GOVERNMENT I WILL TALK AND TALK SO THE WHOLE WORLD WILL KNOW WHAT IS GOING ON IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. AS DOWON HAVE STATED, SOME SOLICITORS DON'T DESERVE TO BE ON LEGAL AID SYSTEM , BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT DOING WHAT TO BE PAID FOR OR THE GOVERMENT SHOULD CUT MONEY ALLOCATED TO THEM AND IF THEY FAILD TO WIN ABOUT FIVE CASE , THE SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THAT AID LIST. SOME WILL JUST ASK YOU TO SIGN PAPERS AND THAT WILL BE THE OF YOUR CASE AS SOON AS THEY LEAVE.
    FROM THERE TO DETENTION CENTER ANOTHER PRISON, I SPEND ONE AND HALF MONTH BEFORE I WAS INTERVIED, AND THOSE INTERVIEWERS KNEW NOTHINTHING ABOUT THE THE COUNTRY I CAME FROM, YOU CAN SEE THAT THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT AFRICA BUT WHAT THEY READ FROM THE INTERNET, BUT WHAT U HAVE BEEN READING FROM THE THE NET IS JUST AN ICEBERG. I'M PLEADING WITH THIS NEW GOVERMENT TO LOOK AT THINGS AGAIN AND MAKE CHANGES WITH UK BORDER EGENCY TO SAVE MONEY FOR THE FRAGILE ECONOMY. IS A SHAME TO PREACH WHAT YOU DONT PRATICE. THANKS FOR THE SPACE PROVIDED.

  • BigChegs BigChegs

    27 May 2010, 1:26AM

    This comment has been removed by a moderator. Replies may also be deleted.
  • godelpus godelpus

    27 May 2010, 1:36AM

    What an emotive piece of writing! There must be a similar story for every single family held in detention but how does it help?
    We are given no details of how or why the family arrived in this country or under what circumstances they fled Milawi. And, if we did know these details, it still wouldn?t help!
    Being very practical about this issue, we have laws and processes to deal with those people who enter this country without the right to do so and we must follow those regulations until there is a democratic decision to change them. If ?tugging at the heart strings? becomes the right of entry, then so be it but at the moment it is not and the existing regulations must be applied.
    If every migrant is granted leave to remain, which part of our welfare system should be suspended to finance them? Should your child?s education be compromised? Should your mum?s free prescriptions be withdrawn? Should we cut the old age pension? I am curious to know where the additional finance can be drawn from in the present climate.
    Let us not forget that the mother of this child brought him here, knowing that she did not have leave to remain and so must have accepted that there may be consequences.

  • BriscoRant BriscoRant

    27 May 2010, 2:22AM

    @Dawson7

    One of the most favourite training video's is the UK Border Force as recently shown on TV where a man quite clearly in his late 20s claims to be only 15, they quite simply cannot make a decision and ....

    Please share how you know, your estimate of this guys age - from TV - is what his age actually was . Cause what matters, is what his age actually is. That is what the rules will turn on.

    Even with experts, it's difficult to estimate age for young adults and adults.

    A friend - yes, a migrant - had his age estimated on his papers. He felt the stimate was not correct, and wanted that amended. So we set out to find someone, who could examine him and provide an independent and sound professional opinion.

    We scoured the best local medicos. Mr K was quite happy to take dental examinatinon, have , X rays, other tests medical exaiminations etc. However none of the medicos would even estimate a range. They might attempt it for kids, but not for adults. There is little growth going on, to gauge age. And at any rate, even if it is going on, human growth rates are just too variable.

    Dawson7, by all means express your opinions on CiF. You are entitled to hold them and express them. However others have opinions too, and there are also facts. So if you get challenged a bit - dont be offended at that - and i trust your challengers will be civil...

  • BriscoRant BriscoRant

    27 May 2010, 3:58AM

    @ Meskelund,

    Just to support your point

    while their pledge to end detention of children is certainly welcomed, there is no need for their promised 'review,' extensive research has already been done by various organisations,

    Indeed - see this article from 2002 on Australia, whose last government pioneered and experimented with detaining children indefinitely.

    With child detention, the official denial of damage to health, is the same sort of Denialism one encounters, from tobacco companies, or whether humans are causing climate change. In short it is a PR technique and nothing more than that. Same as used eg to deny tobacco causes cancer; or that humans cause global warming; or in S Africa, that HIV causes symptoms of AIDS.

    People might like to learn how to spot a Denialism campaign amongst official spin and reaction. If you spot it, there are known, effective ways to respond.

    My photocopy of Diethelm & McKee's article "Denialism: how should scientists respond?" has been used so much, it has now fallen to bits. However, you can read it free here. I hope.

  • ShiresofEngland ShiresofEngland

    27 May 2010, 11:38AM

    What an emotive poor piece writing. My heart sinks when I read these sorts of stories without and form of balance to put the case in context.

    Of course no one in their right mind wants to lock up children, and there should be ways found to stop that from happening. Most of that should be done by stopping the abuse of the asylum system, and preventing illegal immigration.

    What should have accompanied this piece is a brief outline of what had led to them being taken to Yarls Wood in the first place to give some form of balance.

    1. How did they arrive? My guess is that it would have been a huge journey for a mother and young children without the proper paperwork to get through so many countries and end up in the UK. Predominately this tends to be men either fleeing or/and looking for work. More likely is that they came to the UK on a plane and probably overstayed. Which would mean that not only could they afford passports, air fare, and show means to get a visa that in Malawian terms they are well off.

    2. Did the mother set out with the intension of settling in the UK, by either using the asylum system, or illegal immigration to overstay.

    3. At what point did the immigration service detect them, and inform them that they are going to be deported, or their asylum claim fail. from what I understand there is a time lag between then and being locked up.

    So who is at fault, the government or the mother? Both as far as I am concerned. The government should change the immigration and asylum system to stop abuses and deport quickly those who fail. The mother is to blame for not getting on a plane when either her visa expired or her asylum claim failed.

    Of course I have sympathy for the children as they are innocents, I have none for the mother. Each country should always have the right to choose which foreign nationals all allowed to stay, and those that are no longer required in the country, the tail should not wag the dog. The rest of it is just emotive guff.

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

Comments are now closed for this entry.

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

close

Browse all jobs

jobs by Indeed

Latest news on guardian.co.uk

Last updated less than one minute ago

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop