close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100515062615/http://www.guardian.co.uk:80/commentisfree/2010/may/13/labour-leadership-iraq-workers

Labour's next leader must not be tainted by past mistakes

We must cease to be part of the establishment and place ourselves on the side of the governed

It is only 72 hours since I left Downing Street for the last time – and fewer still since the emotional but supremely dignified departure by Gordon and his family. But with the Lib Dems now camped out with the Conservatives in a coalition dominated by the right, and a cabinet stuffed with millionaires apparently preparing to cut public services, a new political vacuum has opened up for Labour if it has the courage to occupy the centre left of British politics.

Without being seen to look backward to old Labour formulae, we can and should put an end to the years of triangulation against the Tories. We must cease to be the party of the establishment, and become the party of an insurgency against those powerful vested interests which have so damaged the country.

The collapse of the financial markets has increased both a sense of insecurity about the future and a feeling that the growing inequalities in our country – exemplified by the bankers' bonuses – are unfair. The times we live in demand an active government; an end to the idea that markets are always right; enhanced social protections for the millions who feel vulnerable at a time of economic change; a rebalanced and reflationary economic strategy; and a socially just tax system.

These requirements cannot be fulfilled by a government of the right. They require a Labour party which quickly regains its confidence in our historic values.

There is a political crisis, too. An enormous gulf has opened up between the governed and the Westminster elite. Every week I attended Labour's cabinet and worked as Brown's parliamentary private secretary, for whom I have the greatest admiration. But every week too I attended my surgeries and spoke to friends and family in Yorkshire. The disjunction between the two experiences was evident and during the election, in hundreds of encounters with voters, I could sense their growing disillusionment. Of course, this was crystallised by the horrific expenses fiasco. But the roots of this crisis lay deeper.

The country was shocked to see a war approved by the Commons fought on a false prospectus offered by a Labour prime minister. And millions of people were profoundly uneasy at the way in which the European Union's free market culture, based on the free movement of capital and labour, was intensified and steamrollered through the Commons in the form of the Lisbon treaty. It had real effects on real people. It enabled multinational companies to move production and distribution units around the globe without a by-your-leave. It was accompanied by falling living standards, especially for manual workers. At a time of profound economic insecurity, this in turn fed the fear of mass migration, which was being used by the employers to drive down hard-won deals for better wages and conditions.

Britons continue to feel that the criminal justice system still needs recalibrating in favour of the victim. Nonetheless, aspects of Labour's excellent anti-crime drive – which has yielded falling crime levels – had authoritarian tinges and gave the impression of an over-mighty state.

Labour needs to rebuild its relationship with its core demographic alliance of progressive and working-class voters. Our social base in both these groups has atrophied. Between 1997 and 2005, and under Tony Blair, Labour lost four million votes. In last week's election we lost a further 900,000, almost exclusively manual workers.

We can therefore only rebuild ourselves if we move beyond New Labour in three areas. First, our next Leader must offer a new economic paradigm – the creation of a more heterogeneous base built around green industries rather than our over-dependence on the City. We should espouse a clearly redistributive tax and welfare system. Serious steps need to be taken to offer social protections to people at work.

Second, we need to reassert the importance of public spending to achieve growth. The former chancellor's suggestion that Labour's cuts would go deeper than those carried out by Margaret Thatcher rocked the confidence of millions of people. The public sector is what makes our country a civilised community. We should have sought to reinforce the public sector ethos of care and service, rather than introduce the ethos of competition and managerialism. In these matters, the voluntary and charitable sector and many campaigning NGOs will be natural allies and we should foster relationships with them. Above all, the trade unions – which are the biggest democratic civil society organisations – will be at the core of this work.

Finally, in order to resolve the political crisis, we should place ourselves decisively on the side of the governed and not be part of the elite. We need to return to our tradition of being for civil liberties and opposed to the authoritarian state. We need to embrace political and institutional reform. It will also mean that our new leader must say that the war in Iraq was wrong and that the mistake will never again be repeated by Labour.

The new government is not as stable as it claims. Labour therefore has no time to lose. We must have a debate which will be suffused with a deep pride at our achievements in office. But with the benefit of my recent experience, I give a strong warning to the Labour movement.

We must choose a leader who can learn from our mistakes and apply those lessons to the future. It would be best not to choose someone who was a minister at the time the decision was taken to go to war. The campaign for the deputy leadership gave a glimpse of the party's thirst for change. We cannot duck it any longer. We must reject any continuity candidate and grasp the change the country wants, but which will not be delivered by the present cabinet.

This task is urgent. On behalf of the people Labour exists first and foremost to represent, we can't afford to get it wrong.


Your IP address will be logged

Comments in chronological order

Post a comment
  • This symbol indicates that that person is The Guardian's staffStaff
  • This symbol indicates that that person is a contributorContributor

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

  • xenium1 xenium1

    13 May 2010, 5:01PM

    We must cease to be the party of the establishment, and become the party of an insurgency against those powerful vested interests which have so damaged the country.

    Well said. Now, tell it to all the damaged goods lining up to sink the party even further into the mire for the sake of their own c.v.. Better still, let's all - both on behalf of the people the party is supposed to represent & with their help - tell them to go f..k themselves.

  • LiberalSweden LiberalSweden

    13 May 2010, 5:01PM

    So what you are saying Jon is that Nu Lab was a mistake

    Without being seen to look backward to old Labour formulae, we can and should put an end to the years of triangulation against the Tories.

    Good that you could say this after you had been thrown out and not before.

  • Cairncross Cairncross

    13 May 2010, 5:09PM

    "Second, we need to reassert the importance of public spending to achieve growth."

    Public spending only "achieves" growth when it pays for things which help the public sector create wealth - e.g. a motorway, a health service, effective policing etc.

    The Labour party has run out of these kind of shovel-ready investments, and instead pisses taxpayers' money away on bonuses for civil servants, endless consultancy fees and massive white elephants like the Olympics.

    Hopefully the new government will afford a bit more priority to the private sector.

  • mikebach mikebach

    13 May 2010, 5:09PM

    Every time I see the smiling faces of the Milibands, Balls and all those senior ministers of the Blair-Brown dictatorship who are putting themselves forward as candidates of the new Labour leader, I keep seeing the smiling face of Hermann Goering at the start of the Nurnberg trials.

    Goering was confident he was just following orders, his political expertise would be needed after the war and he would be found innocent of any crime. He never understood that it was his duty as a human being to take action that was consistent with being a human being.

    These Labour candidates from the senior ranks stood by or blamed Sue and assisted in making war, making the poor poorer, making the rich richer, introduced the abuses associated with the Welfare Reform Act, destroyed pensions, destroyed sterling, the economy and jobs. Like the Cheshire Cat they smile and keep very very quiet on their record. They arrange visits around the country to be photoed with the rent a crowd. Lord Mandelson still pulling the strings from beyond the wrath and anger of voters. Perhaps he would be the best candidate for Labour leader.

  • sweatermonkey sweatermonkey

    13 May 2010, 5:17PM

    "We must have a debate which will be suffused with a deep pride at our achievements in office".

    Your only lasting achievement was to bankrupt the country. It's nothing to be proud of.

  • 1586 1586

    13 May 2010, 5:17PM

    @trickett

    Labour needs to rebuild its relationship with its core demographic alliance of progressive and working-class voters. Our social base in both these groups has atrophied. Between 1997 and 2005, and under Tony Blair, Labour lost four million votes. In last week's election we lost a further 900,000, almost exclusively manual workers.

    We can therefore only rebuild ourselves if we move beyond New Labour in three areas. First, our next Leader must offer a new economic paradigm ? the creation of a more heterogeneous base built around green industries rather than our over-dependence on the City.

    So, no change from New Labour then...........hi-falutin' gobbeldy-gook

    No wonder I've never heard of you........no wonder your boss got shellacked.

  • Dungal Dungal

    13 May 2010, 5:23PM

    We should accept that the ConDems are are just a continuation of the old politics which in fact is true. There for any attempt to retake the centre is pointless and offers no reason to exist. Labour should rediscover its socialist principles of freedom and fairness.

  • grebmorf grebmorf

    13 May 2010, 5:23PM

    I found it hard to read the words of those who participated in the betratal of the natural Labour consistuency over the past 13 years suddenly reaching the blinding revelation that the party needs to be progressive and redistributive.

    It needed the Labour Party to be proudly expousing such values whilst people like the author had access to power and the rest of us watched them wasting it. Not suddenly finding, like a revelation when they have finally been kicked out for running a globalised, free market approach incompetently.

    And please, please don't try an blame the EU for New Labour's love of the market:
    "And millions of people were profoundly uneasy at the way in which the European Union's free market culture, based on the free movement of capital and labour, was intensified and steamrollered through the Commons in the form of the Lisbon treaty."
    Unequivocal Labour support for a left of centre agenda in Europe would have helped Social Democratic parties across the continent.

  • tark tark

    13 May 2010, 5:25PM

    Spot on, if a tad late. The next leader should ideally be someone who did not vote for the Iraq war, and who was not a visible front-bencher. I've said that Kerry McCarthy would be a good candidate. Elected in 2005, not party to the major mistakes. I admire plenty about the Milibands etc, and I think that they're good people, but it will be a mistake to put up someone who can be pulled down easily by reference to their slavish votes, poor policy or past pronouncements. One of the reasons Call Me Dave was a (relative) success (remember - did no better than Blair's 3rd election) is that his voting record didn't stretch back to the antediluvian Tory 80s and being just an adivser to Lamont didn't have the same traction as a voting record or frontbench career in the Tory fag-end in the 90s (although his voting record is pretty awful - but that's a different story).

  • KettsOak KettsOak

    13 May 2010, 5:35PM

    and become the party of an insurgency against those powerful vested interests which have so damaged the country.

    Sorry old boy, but if the party is to become radical, it's folks like you who will be booted out.

    Otherwise you'll be a party of dinosaurs - out of touch, out of office and out of England.

  • PabloObscura PabloObscura

    13 May 2010, 5:36PM

    The Iraq war was a mistake but at the time there was support for it from all parties and about 75% of the people.. in hind site we know we were lied to but I still feel that something had to be done about Sadam as well as many other leaders who kill their own people...

    do not forget Iraq and the 100,000s killed but learn from it and move on

  • petrifiedprozac petrifiedprozac

    13 May 2010, 5:38PM

    Dungal

    Labour should simply adopt the Greens agenda, its time will come and so will the end of the neocon consensus.

    True. Just as Thatcher smashed the post war consensus, it is time to smash the neocon consensus. There is enouygh disillusionment around and enough anger, it just needs someone to articulate it.

  • sarahsmith232 sarahsmith232

    13 May 2010, 5:44PM

    the European Union's free market culture of free movement of labour? i'm so sick of hearing Labour try to wriggle out of responsibility for this horrendous immigration mess by blaming our membership of the EU.
    they could have blocked access to our labour markets for the first 7 years after the Eastern European nation joined. they didn't chose to do that.
    stop blaming the EU, Labour is to blame for our immigration mess.

  • silverlink silverlink

    13 May 2010, 5:46PM

    A way forward for the Labour Party would be to go out there and listen to the people.

    You know, the smelly, uneducated plebs you are theoretically supposed to represent. The ones who do shit jobs for not much, or sign on because they can't even get a job. The long-term sick. The old. The untrendy. The bigots. People who live outside the M25. People who maybe haven't gone to university and don't have rich daddies.

    I know it will be a massive culture change, but if you did that, and found out what they wanted, and somehow translated it into policies. And if you somehow managed to persuade them that you are sincere, and ask them to vote for you...

    You see, those plebs are actually the majority in this country.

  • DixiesMayor DixiesMayor

    13 May 2010, 5:54PM

    I was appalled to see that hardly had your boss decided to quit immediately as Leader ( a bad mistake) that David Miliband was out of the blocks and getting the backing of various Blarites Because of his close association with Blair he is toxic and is the last person to lead the Labour Party. Harriet can manage quite nicely for the time being and there is no need for the Labour Party to be bounced into choosing a leader.

    The first thing Labour needs to do is to carry out a proper wide ranging inquiry into what went wrong. Certainly some of the issues mentioned by Jon Trickett played a part but there were many other mistakes including the fact that on the street the Tories were winning the arguments on immigration and the job tax.

    Too many people who would have voted Labour in any previous elections told me they did not like Brown without being able to really explain why. Too many people told me that Labour were too soft on the bankers. Above all, too many people told me that they felt the Labour Party no longer stood for the working man.

    We need an inquiry not a race to find a leader but such an inquiry must have a majority of rank -and -file members on it and be prepared to dig deep into why we have ended up with a Tory-Lib Dem coalition having lost 5 million of our previous Labour voters.

    These are serious issues and deserve serious consideratioin.

  • EdictofNantes EdictofNantes

    13 May 2010, 5:56PM

    We must cease to be the party of the establishment, and become the party of an insurgency against those powerful vested interests which have so damaged the country.

    You just don't get it do you.

    It was your lot that 'so damaged' the country. Have you forgotten you were in power for 13 years.

  • FAFENG FAFENG

    13 May 2010, 6:03PM

    Any future Labour will be well advised to consider the following:
    1. Apologize for the Blair war in Iraq and making the BBC a scapegoat in that regard
    2. Renounce the Blunkett/Reid authoritarianism and pledge to respect the privacy of individual both in the physical and virtual worlds
    3. Stop toadying to the Murdoch press
    4. Revert to the reforming politics that they practiced between 1997 and 2000
    5. Don't let Mandelson, Straw, Blunkett, Reid, Ainsworth et al anywhere near their party's leadership

    PS: Get anyone but D Milliband

  • Pairubu Pairubu

    13 May 2010, 6:03PM

    We must cease to be the party of the establishment, and become the party of an insurgency against those powerful vested interests which have so damaged the country.

    Lumee ! How the scales have fallen from your eyes, now that you've been kicked out, of course.
    Too bad you weren't struck by this great insight when you were actually in position to do something about it.
    Enjoy your retirement.

  • dryrot dryrot

    13 May 2010, 6:18PM

    Time to face facts, Nu Labour was always all image and no substance.

    You can fool some of the people some of the time etc. When fortunes faded Blair was seen as the problem and had to go to be replaced by Brown the saviour. After the honeynmoon period the public realised it was going to be more of the same or worse but the party then saw Brown as the problem - except he wasnt. The problem was and is Nu Labour pure and simple - a bunch of jumped up middle class types playing at socialism.

    The thought of the likes of the Miillipedes and Balls being in control is really frightening. More spin - more lies - more sell out of the UK to the EU - unrestricted immigration. The Labour party have now come close to bankrupting the UK twice in 40 years and I hope they wont be given another chance.

    If PR is adopted we will see the main parties LibLabCon decline and the small parties such as UKIP BNP English Democrats and maybe the Greens taking a greater proportion of the vote. How many people have you heard saying the equivalent of ' I would have voted Monster Raving Loony Party if I thought they had a chance' - Under a PR they will have a chance.

  • petrifiedprozac petrifiedprozac

    13 May 2010, 6:19PM

    SarahSmith232

    the European Union's free market culture of free movement of labour? i'm so sick of hearing Labour try to wriggle out of responsibility for this horrendous immigration mess by blaming our membership of the EU. they could have blocked access to our labour markets for the first 7 years after the Eastern European nation joined. they didn't chose to do that. stop blaming the EU, Labour is to blame for our immigration mess.

    Britain has less immigration than other EU countries. Britain has a 9% none indigenous population, which is smaller than Germany, France, Spain, Itaty, Sweden, Belgium and Holland, which is 20%. That says Britain is far more hostile to immigrants thasn other west European countries. You are just your typical little Englander xenophobe. Over 2 million Brits live in the EU, similar to the amount of EU citizens that live in Britain. It all comes out in the wash. Britain's, ney, England's curtain twitching xenophobes are the pits.

  • Andygandhi Andygandhi

    13 May 2010, 6:20PM

    "Labour's next leader must not be tainted by past mistakes" - spot on.

    So that's John McDonnell then? Someone who has made many socialists and trade unionists stick with Labour because he has stayed true to the interests of ordinary people, rather than big business and the police state.

    There are already over 1100 members on Facebook calling on John to stand.

    A choice between ex-No.10 and No.11 apparatchiks would be no choice at all. Please can MPs not block us members from having a serious choice this time.

  • AuldCurmudgeon AuldCurmudgeon

    13 May 2010, 6:21PM

    We need to return to our tradition of being for civil liberties and opposed to the authoritarian state.

    You need a Clause 5 moment. You need to embed, fully, publicly and unequivocably that you, your party and everybody in it forever renounces and condemns the fundamental corruption of the fabric of this nation that you and your fellow travellers have embarked upon for the last thirteen years.

    Walking naked through the streets around St Pauls flaggelating yourselves with spiky chains might make this appear more credible.

  • GCday GCday

    13 May 2010, 6:22PM

    How do you plan to do this trick of not being part of the establishment when you only seem to recruit PPCs who are part of the establishment?

  • liberalcynic liberalcynic

    13 May 2010, 6:23PM

    An odd mix of the good, the bad and the downright daft here. Three cheers if Labour jettisons the authoritarianism of the blair years, but are you really suggesting pulling us out of the EU, Jon?

  • peitha peitha

    13 May 2010, 6:28PM

    And millions of people were profoundly uneasy at the way in which the European Union's free market culture, based on the free movement of capital and labour, was intensified and steamrollered through the Commons in the form of the Lisbon treaty.

    Remind us, which government did that?

    I'd check the photograph of the leaders who were present at the signing of the Treaty but there seems to be one missing. I guess he must have snuck in later on the QT to avoid being photographed with the rest ...

    Oh hang on, here's the name of the government concerned, in the court report where the same government went to court to establish that its own manifesto promises that we'd get a referendum on the EU constitution aka Lisbon treaty weren't subject to 'legitimate expectation' and could be reneged on at will ...

    Gosh, seems to have your previous boss's fingerprints all over the place ....

  • StevieND StevieND

    13 May 2010, 6:31PM

    A likely outcome would be that Labour now splits into smaller specific-interest parties.

    Many will say that there is little point in maintaining an umbrella organisation on the left when it can never govern from that position.

  • McCauley McCauley

    13 May 2010, 6:34PM

    Labour's next leader must not be tainted by past mistakes

    We have a Parliamentary system. You're all tainted.

    Second, we need to reassert the importance of public spending to achieve growth.

    *Bangs head against desk*

  • EvilTory EvilTory

    13 May 2010, 6:34PM

    "steamrollered through the Commons in the form of the Lisbon treaty."

    that's the same Lisbon treaty that you reneged on your manifesto promise to offer a referendum on?

  • exw8ea exw8ea

    13 May 2010, 6:38PM

    globalgypsy

    It is easy to blame labour for all the ills in the world.

    I disagreed with the Iraq invasion and the way Blair sold us to the Yanks but take a good look at the government which is in now because had those parties voted against the invasion alongside the Labour MPs who were against it we wouldn't have gone in!!

    Try not looking through blue and yellow shaded glasses for a while and you may see that all the parties are to blame and those that voted for the invasion are also complicit in war crimes.

  • rabbitin rabbitin

    13 May 2010, 6:45PM

    Between 1997 and 2005, and under Tony Blair, Labour lost four million votes......We must choose a leader who can learn from our mistakes and apply those lessons to the future. It would be best not to choose someone who was a minister at the time the decision was taken to go to war.

    We cannot duck it any longer. We must reject any continuity candidate and grasp the change the country wants, but which will not be delivered by the present cabinet.

    well said tom.

    ...with good grace and sentiment all round

  • princesschipchops princesschipchops

    13 May 2010, 6:49PM

    Iain Duncan Smith is about to bring pure unadulterated workfare to our fair isles and you lot are to blame! You opened the door. You abused the out of work and the sick in the most disgraceful attack on the welfare state ever seen.

    You talk of no return to Old Labour - why not? That is what you need to win. You seriously need to start listening to the thousands of people joining - they all want you to turn left. Sharp left not leftish.

    If a Labour party does not represent the working class, the low paid and the unemployed then it has no purpose. You need to realise that your core vote could be very powerful and that you were never going to keep the floating middle class - middle englanders - the Tories do Tory so much better you see.

    If you move to the left I will not only vote for you I will join the party - but you have to fully renounce 'New' Labour - it is a toxic brand.

    And I tell you what mate - after this crisis has unwound fully and after five years of Con Demnation we will be crying out for a real left wing party.

    But first you have to actually admit - as Purnell has - that your welfare to work programme and despicable ESA programme was WRONG. YOu have to admit that you became too far removed from the interests of your voters - otherwise how the hell can you stand up in parliament and argue against anything this lot will do?

  • Dungal Dungal

    13 May 2010, 6:58PM

    We now know that this government is going to be Blair with tweaks, I really think this country will get tired of this after eighteen years and at last it may be time for the true left to stand up proudly as a true alternative. As should have happened in 1997.

  • GarryS GarryS

    13 May 2010, 6:59PM

    ...the emotional but supremely dignified departure by Gordon...

    Really?

    As the election results became clear, my stomach started to hurt. The Tories had won a larger share of the vote than Labour had won in 2005 - they had won a larger mandate than Labour had governed with for the last five years. Labour had lost 91 seats and the LDs did not have their breakthrough. The dream of a left cente coalition dedicated to implementing a fair voting system was dead and a coalition to keep the Tories out was essentially impossible to justify. And even if it had been justifiable, the numbers didn't add up. Buying off the nationalists? A non-starter. Labour being able to deliver every single one of their MPs in a vote on a fair voting system? A pipe dream.

    The Tories may not have won an overall majority but they had by far the biggest mandate to form a government. It was a hugely dispiriting realisation but denial wouldn't make it go away. This is a democracy, however flawed.

    And then, bizarrely, there was talk of a Lib-Lab pact. Even of a rainbow coalition. What on earth was going on? Had these people not seen the election results? Didn't Labour know that it would be electoral suicide?

    It has now become clear that they never were sincere. For Labour it was simply an attempt attract left-centre LD voters by creating a narrative in which the LDs could have kept the Tories out but chose not too. Brown's resignation statement may have been dignified but the timing of his announcement was just another part of the attempt to build this narrative - "we tried, we even got rid of our leader but the LDs were not interested".

    It is almost amusing that they have continued to sell this line even after many of their own MPs very publicly demonstrated that a Lib-Lab coalition was unworkable. But it isn't amusing because as a left-centre voter, I desperately want Labour to rebuilt, to address their failures and to put aside the politics of spin which made them so very difficult to support in recent years. Instead, their first act of opposition is an exercise in spin straight out of the "The Think of it". It is not an inspiring start.

  • lung lung

    13 May 2010, 7:02PM

    "Labour's next leader must not be tainted by past mistakes"

    looks like labour need a whole new team then!

    because most of them are all tainted!

    go for MR MARXIST Miliband, i guess he's your best bet :' )

  • TomHarrison TomHarrison

    13 May 2010, 7:03PM

    And millions of people were profoundly uneasy at the way in which the European Union's free market culture, based on the free movement of capital and labour, was intensified and steamrollered through the Commons in the form of the Lisbon treaty. It had real effects on real people. It enabled multinational companies to move production and distribution units around the globe without a by-your-leave.

    If you stopped lying it might at least be a start. The dominant free market culture is that of the City of London and its political stooges. The wretched Broon used to lecture the Germans about the supposed superiority of Anglo-Saxon capitalism; the Europeans are deeply suspicious of what the Germans contemptuously call "Manchester capitalism". British asets - and the lives of British people - are simply gambling chips in one big casino - and it makes no odds where the gamblers come from; as long as they are loaded

    At a time of profound economic insecurity, this in turn fed the fear of mass migration, which was being used by the employers to drive down hard-won deals for better wages and conditions.

    A well justified fear by "bigots" then. But it was your decision not to impose transition arrangements to protect our labour market in 2004; like the French and Germans did; don't pretend otherwise.

    First, our next Leader must offer a new economic paradigm ? the creation of a more heterogeneous base built around green industries rather than our over-dependence on the City

    There's death bed conversions - but in this one the corpse is green, putrid and stinking

    The former chancellor's suggestion that Labour's cuts would go deeper than those carried out by Margaret Thatcher rocked the confidence of millions of people.

    He was just more honest than the rest of you

    Finally, in order to resolve the political crisis, we should place ourselves decisively on the side of the governed and not be part of the elite.

    Cant

Showing first 50 comments | Go to all comments | Go to latest comment

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and signed in.

|

Comments

Sorry, commenting is not available at this time. Please try again later.

Latest posts

Free P&P at the Guardian bookshop

Guardian Jobs

UK

Browse all jobs

USA

Browse all jobs

  • Loading jobs...

jobs by Indeed job search