close
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20100203084211/http://www.dailykos.com:80/

Daily Kos

SUBSCRIBE! (or exclude from AdBlock)

If you use ad blocking software while viewing Daily Kos, you're getting all the benefits of our site but we're not getting any of the advertisement revenue associated with your visits. This site relies on ad revenue for daily operations: a decrease in the number of ads seen means a decrease in the funding available to run the site, to pay those that work on it, and to create improved site features.

We won't stop you from using ad blocking software, but if you do use it we ask you to support Daily Kos another way: by purchasing a site subscription. A subscription is an inexpensive way to support the site that eliminates the advertisements without using ad blocking software.

Revenue generated from the subscriptions goes to the Daily Kos fellowship program, providing a steady income for bloggers and allowing them to concentrate full time on expanding the reach and influence of the netroots through a variety of projects.

By using ad blocking software, you may be hiding the site ads but you're also reducing the site's primary source of revenue. So if you must use one, please do your part to support the site and the people that bring it to you by purchasing a site subscription today.

To exclude Daily Kos from Adblock Plus, in Firefox click Tools > Adblock Plus > click on Add Filter, and copy/paste @@http://*dailykos.com/* to the field, then click Add Filter at the bottom of the window, then OK.

55
43
Research 2000. 01/25-01/28
MoE 2%.
More poll results here.
NY-Gov 01/26
NY-Sen 01/26
NV-Sen 01/25
CT-Sen 01/18
MA-Sen 01/18
CO-Gov 01/18
CO-Sen 01/18
(More...)

Open Thread for Night Owls, Early Birds & Expats

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 09:41:35 PM PST

David Streitfield writes:

The number of Americans who owed more than their homes were worth was virtually nil when the real estate collapse began in mid-2006, but by the third quarter of 2009, an estimated 4.5 million homeowners had reached the critical threshold, with their home’s value dropping below 75 percent of the mortgage balance.

They are stretched, aggrieved and restless. With figures released last week showing that the real estate market was stalling again, their numbers are now projected to climb to a peak of 5.1 million by June — about 10 percent of all Americans with mortgages.

"We’re now at the point of maximum vulnerability," said Sam Khater, a senior economist with First American CoreLogic, the firm that conducted the recent research. "People’s emotional attachment to their property is melting into the air."

Suggestions that people would be wise to renege on their home loans are at least a couple of years old, but they are turning into a full-throated barrage. Bloggers were quick to note recently that landlords of an 11,000-unit residential complex in Manhattan showed no hesitation, or shame, in walking away from their deeply underwater investment. ...

"Since the beginning of December, I’ve advised 60 people to walk away," said Steve Walsh, a mortgage broker in Scottsdale, Ariz. "Everyone has lost hope. They don’t qualify for modifications, and being on the hamster wheel of paying for a property that is not worth it gets so old."

As noted at Calculated Risk, the Negative Equity Report for 3rd Quarter 2009 showed a stunning situation:

Data Highlights

• Nearly 10.7 million, or 23 percent, of all residential properties with mortgages were in negative equity as of September, 2009. An additional 2.3 million mortgages were approaching negative equity, meaning they had less than five percent equity. Together negative equity and near negative equity mortgages account for nearly 28 percent of all residential properties with a mortgage nationwide.

• The distribution of negative equity is heavily concentrated in five states: Nevada (65 percent), which had the highest percentage negative equity, followed by Arizona (48 percent), Florida (45 percent), Michigan (37 percent) and California (35 percent). Among the top five states, the average negative equity share was 40 percent, compared to 14 percent for the remaining states. In numerical terms, California (2.4 million) and Florida (2.0 million) had the largest number of negative equity mortgages accounting for 4.4 million or 42 percent of all negative equity loans

• • • • •

At 1 p.m. (Pacific Time) Wednesday, Markos will be running an "ask me about Daily Kos" liveblog here on the Front Page of the site. If you have questions about the site, this will be your chance to ask them.


Open Thread and Diary Rescue

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 08:46:05 PM PST

Tonight's Rescue brought to you by ItsJessMe, YatPundit, mem from somerville, jennyjem, grog, and pico.

Diary Rescue is all about promoting good writers, so remember to subscribe to diarists whose work you enjoy reading.

jotter has High Impact Diaries: February 1, 2010.

brillig has Top Comments - Haircut Edition.

Please suggest your own favorites from the last 24 hours, and use as an open thread.

Illinois primary results: the land of Lincoln weighs in

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 08:23:31 PM PST

It's official: Alexi Giannoulias will face off against Mark Kirk this November to fill Barack Obama's former senate seat. It only took four plus hours after the polls closed to call it, but Giannoulias held off a challenge from David Hoffman, 39% - 34%.

The Republican side was never in doubt, with Kirk crushing his teabagger opponent 57% - 19%.

And with 93% of the vote in, we still don't know who the Democratic candidate for Governor will be. As of this writing, incumbent Pat Quinn is in a statistical dead-heat with challenger Daniel Hynes -- expect the counting in this one to go on through the night, as it will to decide the Republican challenger, where three candidates are still within striking distance.

In another notable race, it looks like Dan Seals (IL-10) held off a strong challenge from Julie Hamos -- with 99% of the vote in, Seals leads by barely 600 votes.

And I'm sorry to report that we will not, I repeat, will not have another Hastert to kick around. In the 14th District, Randy Hultgren handily defeated former congressman Dennis Hastert's son, Ethan Hastert, 55% - 45%.

Race tracker wiki: IL-Sen IL-10 IL-14 IL-Gov

Illinois primary results: the land of Lincoln weighs in

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 07:12:06 PM PST

The Associated Press has called Mark Kirk the winner in the Republican Senate primary. Kirk said in a victory speech:

"The people of Illinois now see the arrogance of a one-party state," Kirk said. "And this election will show we will not surrender to their dangerous cynicism of low expectations. Because we are Americans and we can do anything."

7:45 p.m.: Giannoulias is maintaining his lead.  Results at Chicago Sun-Times.

Senate - GOP: Illinois - 9282 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 83% ( 567,167 total votes )

Kirk , Mark - 56% ( 319,820 )
Hughes , Patrick - 19% ( 108,917 )
Lowery , Don - 9% ( 52,135 )
Thomas , Kathleen - 7% ( 40,932 )
Martin , Andy - 5% ( 29,167 )
Arrington , John - 3% ( 16,196 )

Senate - Dems: Illinois - 9554 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 85% ( 757,356 total votes )

Giannoulias , Alexi - 39% ( 293,785 )
Hoffman , David - 34% ( 258,963 )
Jackson , Cheryle - 20% ( 149,039 )
Marshall , Robert - 6% ( 42,444 )
Meister , Jacob - 2% ( 13,125 )

Governor - Dems: Illinois - 9269 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 83% ( 752,917 total votes )

Quinn , Pat (i) - 51% ( 380,866 )
Hynes , Daniel - 49% ( 372,051 )

Governor - GOP: Illinois - 9269 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 83% ( 584,701 total votes )

Brady , Bill - 21% ( 119,905 )
Dillard , Kirk - 20% ( 116,036 )
McKenna , Andy - 20% ( 115,377 )
Ryan , Jim - 16% ( 96,046 )
Andrzejewski , Adam - 15% ( 85,529 )
Proft , Dan - 8% ( 46,457 )
Schillerstrom , Bob - 1% ( 5,351 )

The remaining questions are: how light was today's light turnout and what, if anything, does it portend for November?

Race tracker wiki: IL-Sen IL-Gov

Illinois primary results: the land of Lincoln weighs in

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 06:41:55 PM PST

6:51PM -- Hoffman has narrowed the gap with Giannoulias in the Democratic Senate primary [edit: the gap hasn't really narrowed in terms of votes -- but in terms of percentage, Hoffman trails by slightly less now than he did in the last update] (results at Chicago Sun-Times):


Senate - GOP: Illinois - 6250 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 56% ( 328,251 total votes )

Kirk , Mark - 59% ( 193,889 )
Hughes , Patrick - 18% ( 59,917 )
Lowery , Don - 9% ( 28,110 )
Thomas , Kathleen - 6% ( 21,305 )
Martin , Andy - 5% ( 15,959 )
Arrington , John - 3% ( 9,071 )

Senate - Dems: Illinois - 6332 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 56% ( 585,049 total votes )

Giannoulias , Alexi - 38% ( 221,568 )
Hoffman , David - 35% ( 201,892 )
Jackson , Cheryle - 21% ( 122,367 )
Marshall , Robert - 5% ( 30,107 )
Meister , Jacob - 2% ( 9,115 )

Governor - Dems: Illinois - 6235 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 56% ( 584,562 total votes )

Quinn , Pat (i) - 52% ( 302,559 )
Hynes , Daniel - 48% ( 282,003 )

Governor - GOP: Illinois - 6186 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 55% ( 332,769 total votes )

McKenna , Andy - 23% ( 75,431 )
Dillard , Kirk - 19% ( 63,184 )
Ryan , Jim - 17% ( 57,929 )
Brady , Bill - 16% ( 54,199 )
Andrzejewski , Adam - 15% ( 50,280 )
Proft , Dan - 9% ( 28,572 )
Schillerstrom , Bob - 1% ( 3,174 )

Here's the latest numbers from the Chicago Sun-Times:

Senate - GOP: Illinois - 5089 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 45% ( 241,660 total votes )

Kirk , Mark - 59% ( 142,378 )
Hughes , Patrick - 18% ( 43,970 )
Lowery , Don - 8% ( 20,376 )
Thomas , Kathleen - 7% ( 16,027 )
Martin , Andy - 5% ( 12,030 )
Arrington , John - 3% ( 6,879 )

Senate - Dems: Illinois - 5194 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 46% ( 473,541 total votes )

Giannoulias , Alexi - 38% ( 178,750 )
Hoffman , David - 33% ( 158,202 )
Jackson , Cheryle - 22% ( 104,349 )
Marshall , Robert - 5% ( 24,728 )
Meister , Jacob - 2% ( 7,512 )

Governor - Dems: Illinois - 4997 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 45% ( 467,368 total votes )

Quinn , Pat (i) - 52% ( 244,262 )
Hynes , Daniel - 48% ( 223,106 )

Governor - GOP: Illinois - 4833 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 43% ( 235,582 total votes )

McKenna , Andy - 23% ( 53,185 )
Dillard , Kirk - 19% ( 45,503 )
Ryan , Jim - 18% ( 41,547 )
Brady , Bill - 16% ( 38,770 )
Andrzejewski , Adam - 15% ( 34,410 )
Proft , Dan - 8% ( 19,949 )
Schillerstrom , Bob - 1% ( 2,218 )

Note that there are a bit more than 50% as many votes being cast in the GOP primary as in the Democratic primary. In 2004, there was a bit mopre than 54% as many GOP ballots cast. Because Cook has reported more quickly than the rest of the state, it would seem likely that the GOP ratio could climb above its 2004 level.

In any case, there's about twice as many Democrats voting today as Republicans.

Race tracker wiki: IL-Sen IL-Gov

Illinois primary results: the land of Lincoln weighs in

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 06:17:23 PM PST

Update: Still no races called. Turnout looks to be low, a combination of the weather and a lack of voter intensity perhaps.


Candidate - % (votes)

Senate - GOP: Illinois - 3406 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 30% ( 121,343 total votes)


Kirk , Mark - 63% ( 76,314 )
Hughes , Patrick - 17% ( 21,165 )
Lowery , Don - 7% ( 8,377 )
Thomas , Kathleen - 6% ( 6,929 )
Martin , Andy - 4% ( 5,392 )
Arrington , John - 3% ( 3,166 )

Senate - Dems: Illinois - 3437 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 31% ( 360,283 total votes)


Giannoulias , Alexi - 37% ( 132,099 )
Hoffman , David - 33% ( 120,050 )
Jackson , Cheryle - 24% ( 85,265 )
Marshall , Robert - 5% ( 17,672 )
Meister , Jacob - 1% ( 5,197 )

Governor - Dems: Illinois - 3401 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 30% ( 360,732 total votes)


Quinn , Pat (i) - 53% ( 191,867 )
Hynes , Daniel - 47% ( 168,865 )

Governor - GOP: Illinois - 3391 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 30% ( 121,245 total votes)


McKenna , Andy - 26% ( 31,576 )
Ryan , Jim - 20% ( 24,080 )
Dillard , Kirk - 19% ( 23,361 )
Andrzejewski , Adam - 15% ( 18,176 )
Brady , Bill - 10% ( 12,001 )
Proft , Dan - 9% ( 10,773 )
Schillerstrom , Bob - 1% ( 1,278 )

Here's the latest numbers from the Sun-Times:

Illinois - 2717 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 24%
Candidate - % (votes)

Senate - GOP:


Kirk , Mark - 65% ( 48,425 )
Hughes , Patrick - 18% ( 13,207 )
Lowery , Don - 5% ( 4,036 )
Thomas , Kathleen - 5% ( 3,896 )
Martin , Andy - 4% ( 3,322 )
Arrington , John - 3% ( 1,985 )

Senate - Dems:

Giannoulias , Alexi - 37% ( 111,826 )
Hoffman , David - 32% ( 98,433 )
Jackson , Cheryle - 25% ( 76,192 )
Marshall , Robert - 5% ( 14,818 )
Meister , Jacob - 1% ( 4,272 )

Governor - Dems:

Quinn , Pat (i) - 53% ( 163,854 )
Hynes , Daniel - 47% ( 142,485 )

Governor -GOP:

McKenna , Andy - 28% ( 21,151 )
Ryan , Jim - 21% ( 15,475 )
Dillard , Kirk - 18% ( 13,724 )
Andrzejewski , Adam - 16% ( 11,838 )
Proft , Dan - 10% ( 7,113 )
Brady , Bill - 6% ( 4,742 )
Schillerstrom , Bob - 1% ( 584 )

Note that teabagger candidate Pat Hughes is having his ass handed to him.

Race tracker wiki: IL-Sen IL-Gov

Illinois primary results: The land of Lincoln logs in

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 05:02:45 PM PST

5:42PM -- Here's The latest numbers from the Sun-Times:

Illinois - 1247 of 11215 Precincts Reporting - 11%

Senate - GOP:

Kirk , Mark 60% ( 9810 )
Hughes , Patrick 19% ( 3069 )
Thomas , Kathleen 7% ( 1106 )
Martin , Andy 6% ( 906 )
Lowery , Don 5% ( 900 )
Arrington , John 4% ( 580 )

Senate - Dems:

Giannoulias , Alexi 37% ( 56342 )
Hoffman , David 30% ( 46322 )
Jackson , Cheryle 26% ( 40384 )
Marshall , Robert 5% ( 7774 )
Meister , Jacob 1% ( 2212 )

Governor - Dems:

Quinn , Pat (i) 54% ( 82820 )
Hynes , Daniel 46% ( 70871 )

Governor -GOP:

McKenna , Andy 27% ( 4505 )
Andrzejewski , Adam 20% ( 3383 )
Ryan , Jim 20% ( 3380 )
Dillard , Kirk 16% ( 2750 )
Proft , Dan 9% ( 1556 )
Brady , Bill 6% ( 1069 )
Schillerstrom , Bob 1% ( 194 )

5:30PM: Chicago Sun-Times has results with vote totals here.

5:26PM: Politico has some early numbers (with 0.0% reporting) in the Democratic primary:

Senate - Dems:
Giannoulias 41.9%
Hoffman 33.0%
Jackson 11.8%
Marhsall 8.5%
Meisler 4.7%

Senate - GOP:
Kirk 57.0%
Hughes 17.4%
Martin 6.3%
Arrington 2.9%

Governor - Dems:
Hynes 52.6%
Quinn 47.4%

Governor - GOP:
McKenna 24.2%
Dillard 23.2%
Ryan 18.5%
Brady 18.1%
Andzrejewski 6.3%

Original post:

Fox News managed to turn today's primary election in Illinois into a story about Bill Ayers. Check out the foxnews.com story in the lower left hand corner of this FNC screenshot:

Fox News

Yes, Fox is the most trusted name in news. Among conservative wingnuts. And if you've looked at our poll of Republican voters, you know just how crazy they are.

But don't let Fox get you down...join us here tonight as we liveblog the results from the Land of Lincoln, including the nomination battle for President Obama's old U.S. Senate seat, the gubernatorial primary, and several House races.

For an overview of what's at stake, see Steve Singiser's post covering the gamut of what to expect tonight.

Race tracker wiki: IL-Sen IL-Gov

HCR Holding Pattern, Virginia Senate Votes to Pre-empt

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 04:30:04 PM PST

While Dems are taking a public "breather" on healthcare reform, behind the scenes discussions are apparently moving forward.

Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Chairman Tom Harkin (D-Iowa) said a reconciliation package is under development by staff — apparently despite the opposition of moderate Senate Democrats....

Harkin said Democratic leaders have reassessed the prospects for a health care bill and are getting ready to resume the effort.

“It just rested for about a week. But it’s not dead,” Harkin said Thursday, adding that he hopes to see the outlines of a bill before the Senate adjourns for the Presidents Day recess on Feb. 12 and to approve a final package soon after the chamber reconvenes later this month....

[S]ome Democrats monitoring health care developments in the Senate argued that the majority remains on track to reach a deal with the House and clear a final health care package.

These Democrats say there is a difference between moving health care out of the public spotlight and killing it. The effort to move a jobs bill through the Senate has been positioned front and center — much as health care legislation was treated last year. But work on a health care bill is continuing behind the scenes.

“It’s off the radar,” Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) said. “It’s just we’re not doing it right now. It’s a different dynamic right now.”

Jon Cohn notes that taking some of the pressure off might be working in terms of public opinion, but with the caveat "The more time members of Congress spend away from health care, the less enthusiastic they will be about taking it up again." Members of Congress are notoriously risk-averse and as we've seen for the past year, would far rather put off difficult decisions than take them, as if showing themselves incapable of acting was going to make them any more popular than doing something people might not like.

That also just gives more time for state legislatures to act. Yesterday the Democratic-controlled Virginia Senate passed bills "that would make it illegal to require individuals to purchase health insurance." It's one state, Virginia, where Democratic politicians are freaking out about the loss of the governor's chair. Nonetheless, numerous states are considering the same kinds of action. (Though the federal law would trump the states, should it actually pass.) If this drags out too much longer, expect the usual suspects in Congress (Blue Dogs and ConservaDems) who've already dragged this process out to within an inch of its life to get even more scared.

Late afternoon/early evening open thread

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 03:46:04 PM PST

Did you know Harold Ford has never voted in New York...but he’s running to represent it in the U.S. Senate?

Race tracker wiki: NY-Sen

Obama: "I'm a Big Believer in Net Neutrality"

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 03:16:03 PM PST

During yesterday's YouTube question time with the president, the question voted number one by CitizenTube visitors in the "jobs and economy" category was this one, from James Earlywine of Indianapolis:

An open Internet is a powerful engine for economic growth and new jobs. Letting large companies block and filter online content and services would stifle needed growth. What is your commitment to keeping the Internet open and neutral in America?

Obama's answer was spot on:

I'm a big believer in Net Neutrality. I campaigned on this. I continue to be a strong supporter of it. My FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski has indicated that he shares the view that we've got to keep the Internet open, that we don't want to create a bunch of gateways that prevent somebody who doesn't have a lot of money but has a good idea from being able to start their next YouTube or their next Google on the Internet.

This is something we're committed to. We're getting pushback, obviously, from some of the bigger carriers who would like to be able to charge more fees and extract more money from wealthier customers. But we think that runs counter to the whole spirit of openness that has made the Internet such a powerful engine for not only economic growth, but also for the generation of ideas and creativity.

Save the Internet's Tim Karr responds:

As the FCC prepares to make new rules on Net Neutrality this spring, it's important to hear Obama take a stand. Obama's statement comes on the heels of other prominent public officials expressing their support of Net Neutrality and Internet freedom, including FCC Commissioner Mignon Clyburn and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

"I hope we can do this again," Obama said at the end of the interview. "This gives me great access to all of the people out there with your wonderful ideas. "

It also gives all of us great access to those in power. And isn't that what protecting the open Internet is all about?

The FCC rule making is critical, and given the strong support of Net Neutrality in the current FCC is likely to give us some breathing room. But regulations can be changed by the next FCC appointed by a hostile president. Congress needs to act, giving Net Neutrality the full weight of law. They have some time to do that, thanks to the FCC, but needs to act this session on Rep. Ed Markey's H.R. 3458, the Internet Freedom Preservation Act.

John McCain, now and then

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 02:30:04 PM PST

Here's video of the John McCain flip-flop caught by AMERICAblog on whether we should listen to military leaders on repealing ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’:

So in 2006, McCain said we should listen to military leaders in deciding whether to repeal DADT. Flash forward to today and Admiral Mike Mullen, the Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman, says we should repeal DADT. But now John McCain dismisses Mullen, saying we should not repeal DADT.

That's some seriously straight twisted talk, eh?

IL-Sen/IL-Gov: Primary Day In the Land of Lincoln

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 02:00:06 PM PST

Groundhog Day is also the official kickoff day for the 2010 midterm election cycle, with the first primary elections in the nation scheduled in the state of Illinois.

Competitive primaries are the order of the day at the top of the ticket, with some interesting downballot races to keep an eye on, as well.

GUBERNATORIAL PRIMARIES:

On the Democratic side, all eyes are on the contested, and quite ugly, primary between incumbent Governor Pat Quinn and state Comptroller Dan Hynes. Once comfortably ahead, Quinn had seen his lead dwindle in the face of a fiercely aggressive campaign by Hynes, who actually took a narrow lead in last-minute polls by both Rasmussen and PPP. Hynes' track record in primaries is only so-so: he was easily defeated by Barack Obama when both men ran for the U.S. Senate in 2004. This time around, he seems to be in a better position. This cycle, if nothing else has been made clear, is not a swell time to be an incumbent state executive.

The Republican primary, on the other hand, is a genuine pick 'em. Recent polling has been a wash--three different candidates have been in the lead, and five different GOP aspirants have been within single digits of the lead. The trio up front appears to be former state party chairman Andy McKenna, state senator Kirk Dillard, and former state Attorney General Jim Ryan. Nothing is for certain, though, as state senator Bill Brady and businessman Adam Andrezejewski linger just behind.

U.S. SENATE PRIMARIES:

The race here appears to be on the Democratic side, though thirty-something state Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias seems to be the bettor's favorite heading into Primary Day. Giannoulias was the lead fundraiser for the race on the Dem side, with just over three million dollars raised, and earned the endorsement of Jacob Meister, who was well behind in the field but dropped out over the weekend and endorsed Giannoulias. David Hoffman, the former Chicago Inspector General, has actually put a pretty decent campaign together, and was clearly in the second spot in last week's Rasmussen poll of this race. The candidacy of Chicago Urban League President Cheryle Robinson Jackson has plateaued a bit, hurt in part by money woes (she had raised just over $ 400K by the last filing deadline, which was less than both Giannoulias and Hoffman still had on-hand).

On the Republican side, what many thought would be a potentially intriguing primary has really fizzled out. Mark Kirk, after all, had cast enough apostate votes in the House that there was some real consternation about him being the Republican standard-bearer for the Senate. In fact, you might recall that Kirk briefly flirted with stepping away from a Senate bid, because Illinois Republicans were hedging on their support. In the end, he got into the race, and real estate developer Patrick Hughes got in as the "tea party" alternative. Hughes, however, failed to capitalize on the Doug Hoffman wave. Kirk outraised him 9-to-1, and the polls have never been all that close. As Tom Jensen of Public Policy Polling noted on his blog:

"The fact that Mark Kirk is going to steamroll Patrick Hughes shows that the Tea Party movement is only as effective as the money that's behind it. If the Club for Growth or some other big time funding mechanism doesn't get involved these candidates have no chance against more mainstream Republicans who can raise the money. At the end of the day this movement may be grassroots but it's only successful when it's well funded grassroots.

U.S. HOUSE PRIMARIES:

There are a few downballot primaries worth keeping an eye on. Probably the marquee race for the House is going to be in the northern Chicago suburbs of IL-10, where Mark Kirk has had to fight hard as an incumbent, and which is one of the few Democratic pickup opportunities this cycle. On the Democratic side, the man who held Kirk to single-digit wins in both 2006 and 2008, marketing executive Dan Seals, is back. This time around, he has a real primary fight on his hands in the person of state Representative Julie Hamos. Hamos has actually outraised Seals during this cycle (although, it must be said that Seals beat the well-funded Jay Footlik easily when the two went head-to-head in the 2008 Dem primary). Attorney Elliot Richardson rounds out the Democratic field, and has raised enough money to be a factor. Interestingly, there has been near-total silence on polling out of this primary, with the only poll out in the open being an Anzalone-Liszt (D) poll from August giving Seals a wide edge. On the Republican side, meanwhile, it looks to be a three-candidate race, with state legislator Elizabeth Coulson getting chased hard by businessman Bob Dold (who has claimed endorsements from Dick Lugar and Dan Quayle) and stock analyst Dick Green.

Down the road in IL-11, freshman Democrat Debbie Halvorson will learn who her GOP opponent is tonight. It is likely to be establishment choice Adam Kinzinger, who was anointed early on and faces two poorly-funded (fifteen grand between the two of 'em) teabagger-esque rivals tonight. Kinzinger has burned through quite a bit of his war chest in this nuisance primary, and as a result, Halvorson has nearly a 5-to-1 CoH edge as they head into the general election cycle.

In other races tonight, only state Senator Randy Hultgren stands in the way of the Hastert dynasty in IL-14, as Ethan Hastert tries to reclaim his dad's seat in Congress from Democratic Rep. Bill Foster. Meanwhile, a sextet of relatively lightly-funded Republicans (Maria Rodriguez leads the field with just $ 106K raised total) are vying for the right to take on Democrat Melissa Bean in IL-08. Lastly, it will be interesting to see if his public flirtation with the Cook County Presidency extracts any costs from longtime IL-07 Congressman Danny Davis. Four Democrats are challenging him for re-election.

Race tracker wiki: IL-Sen IL-Gov IL-07 IL-08 IL-10 IL-11 IL-14

DNC funds paid for anti-HCR Nelson ads

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 01:22:04 PM PST

Joe Sudbay:

Last month, Ben Nelson did a TV ad defending his vote on health care. He talks straight to the camera and disses those "who wanted a government takeover." That sounds like an attack on people who supported the public option, because that's as close as Congress got to a "government takeover." You'll recall that Nelson helped kill the public option in the Senate and the Medicare buy-in (after he'd already agreed to it), insisted on the inclusion of harsh anti-abortion language, and then threatened to join the Republicans in filibustering the conference report on the deal he already cut. That Ben Nelson.

Turns out, though, that it's not a Ben Nelson campaign ad. It's hard to read the disclaimer, but the ad was paid for by the Nebraska Democratic Party. It's one of a series of ad touting Nelson's "courageous" effort to bring down real health care reform. More of the ads can be seen here and here.

So, one wonders, where did the Nebraska Democratic Party get the money to pay for these TV ads

Who gave the cash to the Nebraska Democratic Party? Well, if you've donated to the Democratic National Committee this cycle, you did.

That's right, the Democratic Party paid for ads attacking health care reform, for an incumbent senator who isn't even up for reelection until 2012, and for a senator who has made it his life mission to stymie every significant item in the Obama/Democratic agenda. The same Ben Nelson that fought hard to include regressive anti-choice language in the Senate bill, backing off only when Democrats agreed to pay him off with $100 million for Nebraska's Medicaid expansion.

This is the same Ben Nelson that cut $60 billion in school reconstruction funds in last year's stimulus plan, and the same Ben Nelson that has signed on to the odious Murkowski amendment that would prevent the EPA from regulating greenhouse gasses. And of course, the same Ben Nelson that stripped the health care reform bill of any meaningful cost constraints.

The DNC has denied a deal to fund the ads in exchange for his vote (along with putting American taxpayers on the hook for his state's Medicaid expansion).

“We, the Democratic Party, were defending a Democratic senator from attacks from the health insurance industry and other special interests for his support of reform. Senator Nelson is not the first Democrat we have defended from these attacks and he will not be the last. We've spent money directly in support of House Democrats who have supported reform in the form of TV and radio ads and we've also worked with state parties to defend Democrats like Senators Nelson, Lincoln and Dorgan who have stood up to the insurance industry in support of reform,” said DNC spokesman Hari Sevugan.

What a laughable piece of shit response. The health insurance industry was attacking Nelson? He was their biggest champion!

Insurance giant Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Nebraska, for instance, would pay between $15 million and $20 million less in fees under the Senate bill than it would have without a change the Nebraska Democrat helped broker, according to Nelson's office. Another insurer, Mutual of Omaha, won't have to pay taxes on so-called Medigap insurance that buttresses Medicare insurance used by the elderly.

Unlike the Blue Cross/Blue Shield deal, that tax break will be extended to other companies. Mutual of Omaha spokesman Jim Nolan said he didn't "have a figure to share" about how much the company may save.

A Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Nebraska spokesman estimated that the cost-savings figure released by Nelson's office was probably close to accurate and added that the company didn't ask for the break.

Nelson was actually under attack from Republicans for cutting a sweetheart deal not available to other states, and for busting teabagger expectations that he'd help them outright scuttle any reform. Had he kept his mouth shut and done the right thing from the start, he'd be in much better shape. Instead, he has made a spectacle over himself, and now everyone is so unhappy that he even exists, that he's felt the need to go up on the air. Yet rather than manning up and covering the costs himself, just like his sweetheart Medicaid deal, he went begging elsewhere for the cash.  

Ben Nelson is sitting on over $1 million in campaign funds. He could've spent some of his cash. Or, he could've had his buddies in the insurance world to pick up the tab. They can do that now, according to the Supreme Court.

But for the Democratic National Committee to spend hard-earned money on the caucus' most disloyal member, while incumbents due for reelection in 20-freaking-10 go unhelped is political malpractice.

Not only is it bad electoral politics, denying those funds to needed campaigns this cycle, but it's bad politics -- ensuring that no elected Democrat feel any pressure to vote with the caucus for the good of the party and the country.

Why should Nelson and his friends give a shit what the Democratic leadership thinks, if his "fuck you" to the party is rewarded by a shiny check for half a million dollars?

Tim Kaine is worthless. And for the first time ever, I'm looking forward to a primary to Ben Nelson in 2012. He'll never survive a GOP challenge, so I want it to be the Democrats who have the satisfaction of ending his career.

(Discussion is also going on in slinkerwink's recommended diary. SusanG).

Update: To be clear, the DNC isn't denying funding the ad -- they've admitted it. They're denying that the money was part of a quid pro quo for his vote. I think it's clear they're lying.

Today's "don't ask, don't tell" hearing

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 12:40:04 PM PST

In what Carl Levin (D-MI) described as a "profile in leadership," today Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mike Mullen gave a stirring personal statement in support of repealing the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy:

But as expected, during the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing, Defense Secretary Gates and Mullen announced that the Pentagon would begin a yearlong study to determine how to end the military's discriminatory "don't ask, don't tell" policy.

And at the same time, several Republican opposition themes emerged: we can't do this while we're in the middle of two wars, they understand that the witnesses are just following orders from their Leftist-in-Chief, or that Gates and Mullen are biased and will exert undue influence on their subordinates to get the results they want. Take your pick.

So, why will it take a year of reviews, studies and surveys to decide that saying "none of your damned business" is the only policy they need? According to Gates:

Frankly, that's a load of garbage. You don't need a year to decide how or if you're going to stop discriminating against people, you just do it.

And then the Q & A ... or, more often than not, the speechifying by the senators began.

After Carl Levin (D-MI) opened with a strong statement of support, John McCain (R-AZ), sitting at his side and looking like he was sucking lemons, accused Gates of being biased and launched into "forced intimacy ... customs and traditions, including many restrictions on personal conduct" (never mind his own philandering ways while he was serving under those selfsame rules), and that "don't ask, don't tell" works because ... and I'm not making this up ... it helps to "balance a potentially disruptive tension between the desires of a minority and the broader interest of our all volunteer force." Oh, and we're fighting two wars.

Jeff Sessions (R-AL) had an unusual rationale for opposing the repeal. He began by saying that every American deserves justice ... so far, so good ... then disputed that 10,000 soldiers had been dismissed under the policy, but that, hey, even if it was 10,000, that was over a period of a decade -- now if it was in one year, then it might matter. So apparently over a decade, every American doesn't deserve justice. But his main concern was the "undue command influence" on any report that comes out of the Pentagon, a talking point that was echoed by Saxby Chambliss (R-GA) and Roger Wicker (R-MS). It seems like only yesterday that Republicans viewed the Pentagon as God's mouthpiece, doesn't it?  

The most relevant questions came from Susan Collins (R-ME) and Claire McCaskill (D-MO). Collins asked whether gay and lesbian soldiers, serving openly with our NATO allies, had ever impacted military effectiveness or unit cohesiveness. McCaskill asked, given that gays and lesbians are already serving in our military, are they causing morale or discipline problems. No, no, and no.

And the eye-rolling (and enjoyable) moment came courtesy of Joe Lieberman, who, after expressing his support for the repeal, felt compelled to point out that doing so would require 60 votes. Carl Levin disagreed:

Snap.

All in all, it was a disappointing hearing. The idea that there needs to be a study, let alone one that takes a year, to say, hey, your private life is private, is ridiculous. And it means that repealing "don't ask, don't tell" is being pushed down the road. Again.

Roland Burris (D-IL) nailed it when he said we shouldn't be wasting time or money to decide that everyone deserves something so "basic in human rights," and that what this needs is the "audacity of Truman."

Midday open thread

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 12:00:04 PM PST

  • Tomorrow, at 1 p.m. PT, I will be doing a "ask me about Daily Kos" liveblog here on the front page of the site. If you have questions about the site, that'll be your chance to ask them.
  • The highest ranking military officer supports repeal of Don't Ask, Don't Tell:

    Adm. Mike Mullen's statement was the strongest yet from the uniformed military on this volatile issue, although he stressed that he was "speaking for myself and myself only." He told the Senate Armed Services Committee Tuesday he is deeply troubled by a policy that forces people to "lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens."

    Mullen said he knows many will disagree about abandoning the "don't ask, don't tell" policy and said there are practical obstacles to lifting the 1993 ban. But he said he thinks the military can handle it. Mullen is chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and chief military adviser to President Barack Obama.

  • Punxsutawney Phil sees his shadow, so lots more winter for those of you unfortunate enough to live in places where winter exists.
  • Richard Cohen desperately wants fascism. It's just uncomfortable for him, what with his always piddling his pants.
  • One writer at NY Times Magazine tries to rank the top 10 most alarming revelations from our Republican-only poll released this morning.
  • A couple of days ago I plugged the fundraiser for my preferred non-political charity, Whole Child International, featuring the Dalai Lama, in Los Angeles on February 20-21.

    Well, the event has gotten even better -- it'll feature a performance by Sheryl Crow. Unfortunately, I have a friend getting married that weekend, in Chicago, so I won't be able to go.

    And seriously, my friend better appreciate it -- I'm giving up an event with Sheryl Crow and the Dalai Lama for her wedding. In February. In Chicago.

  • There is nothing too crazy for the wingnuts to embrace.
  • Unlike 1994, Dems don't plan to be caught flat-footed in a tough environment. They're preparing early.
  • Hey procrastinators, time's running out to submit panel ideas for Netroots Nation.
  • Colbert crushes Harold Ford.
  • Just got this note from Del Ali, president of polling firm Research 2000:

    We have received two threatening phone calls in the past hour. Interestingly enough, both calls conclude that both you and I are terrorists promoting a gay and of course ant-American agenda.

    Got it? Polling Republicans and asking them what they think, then jotting down their answers, promotes terrorism, gays, and an anti-American agenda. It's fun being a wingnut!

Specter on Reconciliation: The Value of Primary Challenges

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 11:20:03 AM PST

The newest Dem in the Senate, Arlen Specter, is sounding a lot more like a Democrat than some of his colleagues.

Speaking at a Pennsylvania Progressive forum on Saturday, Specter suggested that the only way to get health care reform passed would be to placate House Democrats who were concerned about passing the Senate bill pro forma. The only way to placate House Democrats, he added, would be to pass amendments to the Senate's legislation "simultaneously" through the use of a process known as reconciliation.

"I believe we ought to pass comprehensive health care reform and we ought to do it now and there is a way to do it," Specter said. "I provided the 60th vote. We passed it in the Senate. Let the House accept it, simultaneously with a bill to make certain changes through reconciliation and 50 votes. There will be no disagreement about taking away the giveaway to Nebraska and Louisiana and the other inappropriate measures but let's move ahead and let's move ahead now."

The move wouldn't just "placate" the House, but would allow for critical improvements to the bill--removing the disastrous Nelson deal for Nebraska, which even he has abandoned, and increasing subsidy levels to make mandated insurance more affordable for more people.

Specter's insistence could be coming from his long experience in the Republican caucus, knowing that there's no way in hell anything substantive gets passed with Republican help. But it's undoubtedly also coming from the challenge of running in a primary against Rep. Joe Sestak, who has been consistently and publicly progressive on the issue of healthcare reform.

It's also a reflection of a seasoned politician, Specter, understanding how important the Democratic base is going to be November, something the House intrinsically gets, since they have to run every two years, but the Senate all too often forgets.

More discussion going on in slinkerwink's diary.

Race tracker wiki: PA-Sen

Markos solves political gridlock in less than 30 seconds

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 10:40:03 AM PST

KEITH OLBERMANN: In 30 seconds, what do we do to fix it [our political system]?

MARKOS MOULITSAS: Well, our system is broken. Mostly the Senate. In 30 seconds I can do it quicker: kill the filibuster. And that's something I hope Democrats start looking into.

The argument for the filibuster (as it is presently being abused) is that there are some issues that are so important that only a supermajority should be allowed to determine whether or not we embrace a new policy.

This argument, however, ignores the fact that when you vote "no" on health care reform, you're also voting "yes" for the current health care system. It's not "health care reform" vs. nothing. It's "health care reform" vs. "the current health care system."

Let's take another hypothetical scenario. Imagine the Senate bill (with some fixes) becomes law, but without a public option.

At that point, if the public option requires 60 votes, it's easy to imagine that 55 Senators might vote in favor of the public option, but that it fails to pass because 45 oppose it.

Those 45 senators would be voting to require people to get their health care insurance from private insurers. Whether or not you agree with that position, it's clear that they aren't just against the public option -- they are for requiring everybody to get insurance privately.

So if you have 55 senators who are for making a public option available, and 45 Senators who are for requiring everybody to get insurance privately, why on earth should the 45 Senators prevail?

It's clear: they shouldn't. And the way to make that happen is to kill the filibuster, not just by using reconciliation, but by actually getting rid of the rule altogether at the start of the next session of Congress.

If we don't do it, we're just going to see more gridlock, and more headlines like this.

'Volcker Rule' Seems Headed for Senate Fizzle

Tue Feb 02, 2010 at 10:00:03 AM PST

Regular followers of Senate doings will no doubt be astonished to learn that the "Volcker Rule" rolled out with much ceremony and applause just 12 days ago has run into stumbling blocks on both sides of the aisle in that august body, according to dealReporter, a news service whose article was published in the Financial Times:

Senate Banking Committee ranking member Richard Shelby (R-AL) said he opposes the so-called Volcker rule and the Obama administration’s call to levy a USD 90bn tax on banks. His comments come as House Financial Services Committee Chairman Barney Frank (D-MA) predicted the proposals outlined by President Obama could be law within six months.

Speaking to this news service on Thursday, Shelby said if Democrats push forward with the proposals they risk unravelling much of the bipartisan support already reached regarding the passage of financial regulatory reform in the Senate. Shelby said that the Obama administration risks losing Republican support for the bill if they begin to “politicise” the issue.

However, Shelby said he expects to hold a meeting with Banking Committee Chairman Chris Dodd (D-CT) regarding the way forward on regulatory reform in two weeks time. A Democratic banking committee staffer confirmed that the meeting between Dodd and Shelby will be critical as Dodd needs to determine the level of bipartisan agreement and the timing of bringing the bill through committee and on the Senate floor.

Here's how bipartisan "agreement" works: Keep diluting whatever legislation is being considered to meet the demands of Republicans so that some of them will support the final product. Bring the diluted measure to a vote. Watch as the Party of No Way, No How votes like the Borg against the diluted measure.

So, imagine if you will, that the Volcker Rule went one step further. Not some DFH plan concocted by me and my democratic socialist pals, but the proposal of a banker:

The third, and greatest, problem with Wall Street - which the Volcker plan doesn't address - is its dominance by trading. Trading is necessary to provide liquidity, but through the explosion of derivatives and the rise of computerized "fast trading," Wall Street's operations have become "rent seeking." Trading operations scoop wealth out of the economy without giving any useful service in return. That's how Wall Street bonuses got so huge; in times of cheap money like the present, the profitability of a trading business with a substantial market share goes through the roof.

Most of those profits depend on insider information - not insider information about company activities (the use of which would be illegal) -- but insider information about trading flows (where the money's coming from and where it's going). Traders have always used this; you can't make it illegal. However, in a world where trading volume has zoomed skyward, insider information about money flows has become exceedingly valuable. What's more, unlike in most businesses, greater market share provides you with exponentially higher profits - it's more than twice as valuable to control 20% of the trading as to control 10%.

The Volcker plan does nothing about this. The best solution would be an ad valorem transactions tax, a "Tobin tax" of, say, 0.05% on every trade. This wouldn't add much cost to legitimate investing, but it would make the "fast trading," scooping a few cents per share on millions of trades a day, completely unprofitable. That in turn would return Wall Street to banking and corporate finance (arranging deals and raising capital) the businesses that actually have a value for the economy.

You know exactly how long that idea would survive in the Senate Banking Committee. But not to worry. It won't even be suggested.


:: Next 18

Hate ads? Subscribe.

BERJAYA







Support Bloggers' Rights!
Support Bloggers' Rights!


BERJAYA

On Mothertalkers:

Luxury Items You Would Give Your Kids?

Tuesday Open Thread

Making the Case for Vegan Children

Monday Morning Open Thread

Preview Review: A Family Is a Family Is a Family

On Street Prophets:

Twosday Teatime: The Banned Book Edition

Air Force Academy Worship Area Desecrated

The Mother of Civil Rights

Abortion and parental notification laws

Coffee Hour: Small is Beautiful

On Congress Matters:

Capitol Hill News Open Thread

Today in Congress

Capitol Hill News Open Thread

Is this "roadblock" for reconciliation really a roadblock?

This Week in Congress

Click Here